 |
|
|
|
PlaceMatch™ lets you find places similar to any city or town you select, either using the default criteria or using criteria you specify.The criteria being used are show as column headings in the results table further below.
However, if you want to specify which factors to use in determining which places are similar to each other, you can select among dozens of other criteria. These include criteria related to crime and income, population demographics, education levels, and others; there are dozens of criteria you can select.
Please click on the [+/-] Advanced Controls link just below and try PlaceMatch using a variety of filtering criteria.
All Places > California > Lake Forest
Click this [+/-] link to see or edit the similarity criteria used.
Cities and Towns Similar to Lake Forest, California:
Sorted from most similar to least (using the default selection criteria).
Your specified criteria have resulted in 100 locations (a maximum of 100 are shown in the table below). Note that you can dictate for each each criterion (e.g., the percentage of people in poverty) whether it should match Lake Forest 'loosely' or 'strictly', using the Advanced Controls. This matching level, loose versus strict, is shown near the top of each column in the results table.
Click on a city or town name below to find places similar to it.
Or, to see details about a place, click its [details] link in the table below.
| City, State | Similarity | Go To City | 1 Person Houses | 65+ | College Grads | Commute Minutes | Family Income | Kids 0-4 | Non White | Pop. | Poverty | Prop. Crime | Seasonal Housing | Viol. Crime | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | ||||
| LAKE FOREST, CALIFORNIA | [details] | 19.7% | 8.6% | 33.9% | 27 | $75,121 | 7.1% | 24% | 58,707 | 5.3% | 19.3 | 0.1% | 2 | ||
| 1. Placentia, California | 93.2 | [details] | 16.1% | 9.1% | 31.3% | 28 | $68,976 | 7.4% | 32.2% | 46,488 | 8.7% | 19.2 | 0.2% | 2.8 | |
| 2. Santa Clarita, California | 93 | [details] | 19.1% | 7.1% | 29.1% | 35 | $73,588 | 7.8% | 20.5% | 151,088 | 6.4% | 20.9 | 0.2% | 2.4 | |
| 3. Simi Valley, California | 92.7 | [details] | 14.7% | 7.6% | 24.9% | 30 | $75,140 | 7.3% | 18.7% | 111,351 | 5.8% | 19.7 | 0.1% | 1.6 | |
| 4. Livermore, California | 91.7 | [details] | 18.6% | 7.5% | 31.6% | 33 | $82,421 | 7.7% | 18.1% | 73,345 | 5.3% | 25.6 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 5. Milpitas, California | 91.5 | [details] | 11.5% | 7% | 36.5% | 25 | $84,827 | 7.2% | 69.1% | 62,698 | 5% | 35.8 | 0.1% | 3.1 | |
| 6. Poway, California | 91.5 | [details] | 12.8% | 8.6% | 39.3% | 27 | $77,875 | 6% | 17.1% | 48,044 | 4.3% | 17.7 | 0.2% | 1.6 | |
| 7. Rocklin, California | 91.4 | [details] | 18.6% | 8.6% | 36.1% | 28 | $72,245 | 7.9% | 11.7% | 36,330 | 4.5% | 34.4 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 8. Fountain Valley, California | 91.3 | [details] | 16.2% | 11.3% | 34.4% | 28 | $74,502 | 6% | 36% | 54,978 | 4.3% | 26 | 0.3% | 1.3 | |
| 9. Rancho Cucamonga, California | 91.3 | [details] | 16.8% | 6.1% | 23.3% | 33 | $66,446 | 7% | 33.5% | 127,743 | 7.1% | 33.9 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 10. Vacaville, California | 90.7 | [details] | 19.3% | 8.3% | 19.4% | 30 | $63,950 | 6.6% | 27.9% | 88,625 | 6.1% | 26.8 | 0.2% | 3.7 | |
| 11. Morgan Hill, California | 90.4 | [details] | 15.8% | 7.5% | 33.5% | 37 | $90,134 | 8.1% | 27.6% | 33,556 | 4.7% | 28.3 | 0.3% | 1.5 | |
| 12. Fremont, California | 90.4 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.3% | 43.2% | 34 | $82,199 | 7.4% | 52.3% | 203,413 | 5.4% | 28.1 | 0.3% | 2.2 | |
| 13. Aberdeen, New Jersey | 89.8 | [details] | 20.8% | 10.4% | 34.4% | 37 | $76,648 | 6.9% | 21.2% | 17,454 | 4.7% | 14.3 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 14. Roswell, Georgia | 89.8 | [details] | 22.8% | 7.5% | 52.6% | 32 | $85,946 | 6.9% | 18.5% | 79,334 | 5% | 27.5 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 15. Mission Viejo, California | 89.7 | [details] | 17% | 10.9% | 41.2% | 29 | $86,902 | 6.9% | 16.8% | 93,102 | 3.8% | 14.1 | 0.3% | 1.3 | |
| 16. Friendswood, Texas | 89.6 | [details] | 17.2% | 8.6% | 38.6% | 30 | $77,293 | 6.6% | 9.9% | 29,037 | 3.3% | 15.6 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 17. Petaluma, California | 89.5 | [details] | 22.8% | 11% | 30.1% | 34 | $71,158 | 6.6% | 15.8% | 54,548 | 6% | 24.3 | 0.3% | 2.6 | |
| 18. Glendora, California | 89.4 | [details] | 19.1% | 12.5% | 25.7% | 31 | $66,674 | 6.3% | 19.7% | 49,415 | 5.9% | 26.4 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 19. Orange, California | 89.3 | [details] | 19.4% | 9.6% | 28% | 26 | $64,573 | 7.4% | 29.5% | 128,821 | 10% | 27.4 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 20. Windsor, California | 89.2 | [details] | 18.1% | 11.1% | 24.7% | 27 | $67,992 | 8% | 21% | 22,744 | 5.1% | 19.8 | 0.3% | 2.9 | |
| 21. Schertz, Texas | 89.1 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.8% | 27.5% | 25 | $59,745 | 7.5% | 18% | 18,694 | 5.2% | 24 | 0.2% | 2.3 | |
| 22. Moorpark, California | 89.1 | [details] | 10% | 4.5% | 34.2% | 30 | $78,909 | 8.1% | 25.6% | 31,415 | 7% | 11.7 | 0.1% | 1.3 | |
| 23. San Jose, California | 88.7 | [details] | 18.3% | 8.3% | 31.6% | 29 | $74,813 | 7.6% | 52.5% | 894,943 | 8.8% | 24.9 | 0.3% | 3.8 | |
| 24. Gloucester, New Jersey | 88.5 | [details] | 21.3% | 9.4% | 22% | 32 | $62,992 | 6.8% | 16.9% | 64,350 | 6.2% | 25.2 | 0.1% | 3.2 | |
| 25. North Brunswick, New Jersey | 88.5 | [details] | 24.4% | 10% | 37% | 32 | $70,812 | 6.7% | 37.3% | 36,287 | 4.7% | 25.2 | 0.1% | 2.2 | |
| 26. Piscataway, New Jersey | 88.4 | [details] | 19.5% | 8.7% | 40.5% | 30 | $75,218 | 6.2% | 51.2% | 50,482 | 3.8% | 12 | 0.2% | 1.2 | |
| 27. Old Bridge, New Jersey | 88.3 | [details] | 21% | 10.5% | 29.5% | 41 | $74,045 | 7% | 20.5% | 60,456 | 4.2% | 17.4 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 28. Bridgewater, Massachusetts | 88.2 | [details] | 19.6% | 8.6% | 29.6% | 32 | $73,953 | 6.2% | 12.7% | 25,185 | 3.5% | 10.9 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 29. Missouri City, Texas | 87.9 | [details] | 12% | 5.4% | 44.5% | 34 | $77,762 | 7.3% | 55.7% | 52,913 | 3.3% | 23.9 | 0.1% | 2.5 | |
| 30. South Brunswick, New Jersey | 87.9 | [details] | 19.5% | 7.3% | 49% | 36 | $86,891 | 8.1% | 29.5% | 37,734 | 3.1% | 13.3 | 0.2% | 0.9 | |
| 31. Delran, New Jersey | 87.8 | [details] | 21% | 10.8% | 27.3% | 28 | $67,895 | 6.2% | 17.1% | 15,536 | 4.1% | 17.1 | 0.1% | 1.4 | |
| 32. Bothell, Washington | 87.8 | [details] | 25.8% | 9.5% | 38.6% | 29 | $68,580 | 6% | 12.7% | 30,150 | 5.1% | 31.4 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 33. Pearland, Texas | 87.8 | [details] | 15.4% | 8.4% | 29.1% | 32 | $70,748 | 8% | 17.4% | 37,640 | 4.7% | 32 | 0.1% | 2.7 | |
| 34. Grand Terrace, California | 87.5 | [details] | 21.5% | 10.7% | 24.3% | 26 | $61,068 | 6.6% | 26.2% | 11,626 | 7.4% | 25.3 | 0.4% | 1.4 | |
| 35. Agoura Hills, California | 87.5 | [details] | 13.9% | 6.2% | 48.4% | 32 | $95,765 | 6% | 13% | 20,537 | 3.5% | 16.8 | 0.2% | 2.1 | |
| 36. Duluth, Georgia | 87.5 | [details] | 26.2% | 4.9% | 45.7% | 32 | $69,437 | 7.6% | 31.4% | 22,122 | 4.4% | 18.2 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 37. Lafayette, Colorado | 87.5 | [details] | 22.7% | 5.8% | 45.6% | 26 | $64,088 | 8% | 14.5% | 23,197 | 7% | 22.8 | 0.2% | 2.6 | |
| 38. Sayreville, New Jersey | 87.5 | [details] | 22.3% | 12.4% | 25% | 36 | $66,266 | 6.7% | 23.5% | 40,377 | 4.7% | 18 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 39. Burnsville, Minnesota | 87.3 | [details] | 24.8% | 7.2% | 36.8% | 24 | $67,979 | 7.1% | 12.5% | 60,220 | 5.1% | 31.1 | 0.4% | 1.3 | |
| 40. East Windsor, New Jersey | 87.2 | [details] | 24.4% | 8.3% | 42% | 35 | $73,461 | 7.7% | 25.6% | 24,919 | 5.3% | 16.3 | 0.2% | 0.9 | |
| 41. Chino Hills, California | 87.1 | [details] | 10.8% | 4.2% | 37.6% | 41 | $81,794 | 8.7% | 43.6% | 66,787 | 5.1% | 16.3 | 0.1% | 1.1 | |
| 42. Edison, New Jersey | 87 | [details] | 21.2% | 11.9% | 42.3% | 34 | $77,976 | 6.4% | 40.5% | 97,687 | 4.8% | 25.1 | 0.2% | 2.2 | |
| 43. Forest Park, Ohio | 86.9 | [details] | 24.8% | 9.1% | 26.2% | 25 | $55,618 | 6.6% | 63.3% | 19,463 | 6% | 28.5 | 0.1% | 2.5 | |
| 44. Evesham, New Jersey | 86.9 | [details] | 22.9% | 8.9% | 39.7% | 31 | $77,245 | 7.3% | 8.7% | 42,275 | 2.8% | 16.7 | 0.2% | 1.2 | |
| 45. Arvada, Colorado | 86.7 | [details] | 22.9% | 10.7% | 29% | 27 | $63,273 | 6.4% | 9% | 102,153 | 5.2% | 35.8 | 0.1% | 1.8 | |
| 46. West Linn, Oregon | 86.6 | [details] | 17.9% | 7.8% | 49.2% | 25 | $83,252 | 6.6% | 6.7% | 22,261 | 3.9% | 19.2 | 0.3% | 1.1 | |
| 47. South San Francisco, California | 86.6 | [details] | 19.8% | 12.6% | 25.2% | 28 | $66,598 | 6.5% | 56% | 60,552 | 5.2% | 23.7 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 48. Tustin, California | 86.5 | [details] | 23.8% | 7.1% | 33.4% | 25 | $60,092 | 8.6% | 41.3% | 67,504 | 8.5% | 30.3 | 0.4% | 3.2 | |
| 49. Eagan, Minnesota | 86.5 | [details] | 22.9% | 4.2% | 47.7% | 23 | $80,062 | 8.1% | 12% | 63,557 | 2.9% | 26.8 | 0.3% | 1.1 | |
| 50. Woodbridge, New Jersey | 86.4 | [details] | 21.7% | 13.4% | 26.8% | 31 | $68,492 | 6.3% | 29.2% | 97,203 | 4.8% | 29.4 | 0.2% | 3.3 | |
| 51. Sugar Land, Texas | 86.2 | [details] | 12.3% | 6.7% | 53.7% | 31 | $88,639 | 6.1% | 34% | 63,328 | 3.8% | 27 | 0.3% | 2.4 | |
| 52. Bergenfield, New Jersey | 86.1 | [details] | 20.8% | 13.5% | 32.3% | 32 | $71,187 | 6.8% | 37.1% | 26,247 | 3.5% | 9.9 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 53. Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota | 86 | [details] | 21.6% | 7.8% | 29.6% | 23 | $68,629 | 7.2% | 8.2% | 29,751 | 4.2% | 35.4 | 0.2% | 1.7 | |
| 54. Rowlett, Texas | 86 | [details] | 10.6% | 5.2% | 32.5% | 34 | $73,417 | 8.7% | 18.2% | 44,503 | 3% | 26.1 | 0.1% | 1.6 | |
| 55. Converse, Texas | 86 | [details] | 16.2% | 6.4% | 19% | 25 | $49,396 | 7.8% | 30.6% | 11,508 | 6.5% | 21.3 | 0.1% | 1 | |
| 56. Yorba Linda, California | 85.7 | [details] | 12.6% | 7.7% | 41.5% | 32 | $96,132 | 6% | 18.5% | 58,918 | 3% | 13.6 | 0.2% | 0.9 | |
| 57. La Mirada, California | 85.7 | [details] | 17.4% | 13.8% | 25.2% | 30 | $66,598 | 6.3% | 35.5% | 46,783 | 5.6% | 26.1 | 0.2% | 3.2 | |
| 58. Voorhees, New Jersey | 85.7 | [details] | 26.8% | 10.9% | 46.2% | 32 | $86,873 | 6.3% | 21.7% | 28,126 | 5.7% | 29.1 | 0.3% | 2.5 | |
| 59. North Plainfield, New Jersey | 85.6 | [details] | 23.1% | 9.5% | 26.5% | 31 | $62,875 | 7.8% | 36.9% | 21,103 | 6.4% | 22.9 | 0.1% | 2.9 | |
| 60. Edmond, Oklahoma | 85.5 | [details] | 20.6% | 8.8% | 47.8% | 23 | $65,230 | 7% | 13.4% | 68,315 | 7.2% | 24.4 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 61. Bartlett, Tennessee | 85.4 | [details] | 12% | 8.6% | 28.2% | 25 | $69,962 | 6.6% | 7.6% | 40,543 | 2.7% | 28.4 | 0.1% | 1 | |
| 62. Apple Valley, Minnesota | 85.3 | [details] | 19.2% | 5.5% | 41% | 25 | $79,335 | 7.2% | 8.2% | 45,527 | 2.1% | 32.8 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 63. Bogota, New Jersey | 84.9 | [details] | 21.7% | 11.1% | 28.4% | 32 | $69,841 | 6.5% | 24.3% | 8,249 | 4% | 13.3 | 0.1% | 1.9 | |
| 64. Windsor, Colorado | 84.9 | [details] | 18.7% | 7.8% | 30.5% | 24 | $60,305 | 8.6% | 8.2% | 9,896 | 5.6% | 13.3 | 0.1% | 1.7 | |
| 65. Franklin, Tennessee | 84.6 | [details] | 25.5% | 7.4% | 42.3% | 24 | $69,431 | 8.5% | 15.5% | 41,842 | 6.7% | 22.2 | 0.3% | 2.2 | |
| 66. Pompton Lakes, New Jersey | 84.6 | [details] | 24.1% | 13.4% | 28.4% | 27 | $74,701 | 6.9% | 7% | 10,640 | 3.2% | 13 | 0.2% | 1.1 | |
| 67. Sterling Heights, Michigan | 84.6 | [details] | 24.1% | 11.8% | 23% | 27 | $70,140 | 6.2% | 9.3% | 124,471 | 5.2% | 23 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 68. Lawrence, Indiana | 84.4 | [details] | 24.6% | 8.2% | 26.8% | 26 | $56,609 | 9.1% | 21.4% | 38,915 | 6.7% | 28.8 | 0.3% | 4.4 | |
| 69. Danville, California | 84.4 | [details] | 15.9% | 10.3% | 59.4% | 33 | $125,867 | 7.1% | 13.7% | 41,715 | 2.2% | 18.1 | 0.3% | 1.2 | |
| 70. Lee's Summit, Missouri | 84.4 | [details] | 22.3% | 10.2% | 37.3% | 26 | $70,702 | 8% | 6.8% | 70,700 | 3.8% | 34.1 | 0.2% | 2.4 | |
| 71. Winslow, New Jersey | 84.4 | [details] | 18.7% | 8.5% | 18.6% | 35 | $62,045 | 8.2% | 34.5% | 34,611 | 6% | 19.8 | 0.1% | 4.4 | |
| 72. Sandy, Utah | 84.2 | [details] | 11.3% | 5.2% | 34.7% | 25 | $70,801 | 7.9% | 6.5% | 88,418 | 3.8% | 35.5 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 73. University Place, Washington | 84.2 | [details] | 25.6% | 11.2% | 33.9% | 27 | $60,401 | 6.3% | 24.1% | 29,933 | 7.3% | 35.2 | 0.2% | 3.9 | |
| 74. Hendersonville, Tennessee | 83.9 | [details] | 22.5% | 10.2% | 26.4% | 29 | $57,625 | 6.6% | 7.1% | 40,620 | 6.2% | 22.9 | 0.3% | 3.1 | |
| 75. Naugatuck, Connecticut | 83.8 | [details] | 24.9% | 11.7% | 19% | 27 | $59,216 | 6.9% | 8.2% | 30,989 | 6.4% | 17.7 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 76. Broken Arrow, Oklahoma | 83.8 | [details] | 15.6% | 7.5% | 30.9% | 23 | $58,891 | 8% | 14.7% | 74,859 | 4.5% | 29.2 | 0.1% | 2.7 | |
| 77. Pickerington, Ohio | 83.7 | [details] | 18.9% | 5.4% | 31.6% | 30 | $71,161 | 8.4% | 6.8% | 9,792 | 3.2% | 30.7 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 78. Mountlake Terrace, Washington | 83.7 | [details] | 26.2% | 9.2% | 24.4% | 30 | $52,117 | 6.5% | 22.3% | 20,362 | 8% | 34.7 | 0.1% | 1.7 | |
| 79. Bixby, Oklahoma | 83.7 | [details] | 18.1% | 9.8% | 26.6% | 23 | $58,104 | 7.7% | 13.1% | 13,336 | 5.4% | 22.3 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 80. Wanaque, New Jersey | 83.6 | [details] | 16.7% | 12% | 22.3% | 30 | $71,127 | 6.7% | 9.3% | 10,266 | 3.3% | 13.2 | 0.1% | 1.3 | |
| 81. Twinsburg, Ohio | 83.5 | [details] | 25.3% | 11.2% | 38.5% | 27 | $72,634 | 8% | 13.1% | 17,006 | 2.1% | 11.2 | 0.3% | 1.1 | |
| 82. Sachse, Texas | 83.5 | [details] | 10.3% | 4% | 30.6% | 31 | $71,918 | 9.2% | 12.7% | 9,751 | 4.6% | 19.9 | 0.3% | 1.5 | |
| 83. Florence, New Jersey | 83.5 | [details] | 24.8% | 11.9% | 19.9% | 28 | $67,412 | 6.1% | 14.5% | 10,746 | 6.1% | 13.1 | 0.3% | 2.3 | |
| 84. Oviedo, Florida | 83.5 | [details] | 9.7% | 5.8% | 41.3% | 31 | $66,288 | 8.4% | 16.5% | 26,316 | 4.6% | 18.9 | 0.3% | 4 | |
| 85. Howell, New Jersey | 83.3 | [details] | 15.3% | 8.8% | 29% | 39 | $74,623 | 8% | 10% | 48,903 | 4.2% | 12.7 | 0.3% | 1 | |
| 86. Daly City, California | 83.3 | [details] | 18.2% | 12% | 29.1% | 32 | $68,365 | 6% | 74.1% | 103,621 | 7.1% | 22.5 | 0.3% | 3.1 | |
| 87. Ashland, Massachusetts | 83.1 | [details] | 22.6% | 9.8% | 45.6% | 34 | $77,611 | 7.9% | 8.1% | 14,674 | 2% | 3.9 | 0.2% | 1.6 | |
| 88. Whittier, California | 83.1 | [details] | 22.2% | 12.5% | 21.9% | 31 | $55,726 | 7.8% | 36.8% | 83,680 | 10.5% | 34.5 | 0.2% | 3.7 | |
| 89. Oak Creek, Wisconsin | 83.1 | [details] | 25.2% | 8.9% | 24.4% | 24 | $63,381 | 6.7% | 8% | 28,456 | 3.1% | 32.3 | 0.1% | 1 | |
| 90. Madison, Mississippi | 83 | [details] | 16.2% | 8.5% | 55.1% | 24 | $77,202 | 8.1% | 6.8% | 14,692 | 2.5% | 17.5 | 0.2% | 0.8 | |
| 91. Parsippany, New Jersey | 83 | [details] | 27% | 11.2% | 43% | 27 | $81,041 | 6.1% | 25.7% | 50,649 | 3.9% | 16.4 | 0.3% | 0.7 | |
| 92. Cottage Grove, Minnesota | 83 | [details] | 11.1% | 4.9% | 23.9% | 27 | $68,935 | 8.5% | 6.5% | 30,582 | 2.2% | 25.5 | 0.1% | 1.4 | |
| 93. Chelmsford, Massachusetts | 82.8 | [details] | 23.1% | 13% | 44% | 29 | $82,676 | 6.7% | 6.9% | 33,858 | 2.8% | 16 | 0.3% | 1.2 | |
| 94. West Richland, Washington | 82.8 | [details] | 17.5% | 6.1% | 29.1% | 25 | $61,813 | 9.2% | 6.8% | 8,385 | 4.5% | 19.2 | 0.1% | 1.2 | |
| 95. Westerville, Ohio | 82.7 | [details] | 21.2% | 10.4% | 44.6% | 23 | $82,163 | 6.1% | 6.5% | 35,318 | 3.5% | 31.8 | 0.3% | 1.3 | |
| 96. Powder Springs, Georgia | 82.7 | [details] | 13.7% | 6.3% | 28.7% | 39 | $59,392 | 8% | 42.1% | 12,481 | 8.5% | 24 | 0.1% | 1.4 | |
| 97. Attleboro, Massachusetts | 82.6 | [details] | 25.7% | 12.9% | 23.5% | 28 | $59,112 | 7% | 8.7% | 42,068 | 6.2% | 22.6 | 0.2% | 3.5 | |
| 98. Milford, Massachusetts | 82.6 | [details] | 25.7% | 12.9% | 26.7% | 28 | $61,029 | 7.2% | 7.1% | 26,799 | 7.2% | 9.3 | 0.3% | 2.4 | |
| 99. Maplewood, New Jersey | 82.4 | [details] | 20.4% | 12.1% | 50.8% | 37 | $92,724 | 7.9% | 41.2% | 23,868 | 4.4% | 27.2 | 0.1% | 3.4 | |
| 100. Maple Valley, Washington | 81.9 | [details] | 12.8% | 4.5% | 31.7% | 38 | $70,008 | 9.2% | 9.4% | 14,209 | 2.6% | 32 | 0.3% | 1.8 |