 |
|
|
|
PlaceMatch™ lets you find places similar to any city or town you select, either using the default criteria or using criteria you specify.The criteria being used are show as column headings in the results table further below.
However, if you want to specify which factors to use in determining which places are similar to each other, you can select among dozens of other criteria. These include criteria related to crime and income, population demographics, education levels, and others; there are dozens of criteria you can select.
Please click on the [+/-] Advanced Controls link just below and try PlaceMatch using a variety of filtering criteria.
All Places > California > Orange
Click this [+/-] link to see or edit the similarity criteria used.
Cities and Towns Similar to Orange, California:
Sorted from most similar to least (using the default selection criteria).
Your specified criteria have resulted in 100 locations (a maximum of 100 are shown in the table below). Note that you can dictate for each each criterion (e.g., the percentage of people in poverty) whether it should match Orange 'loosely' or 'strictly', using the Advanced Controls. This matching level, loose versus strict, is shown near the top of each column in the results table.
Click on a city or town name below to find places similar to it.
Or, to see details about a place, click its [details] link in the table below.
| City, State | Similarity | Go To City | 1 Person Houses | 65+ | College Grads | Commute Minutes | Family Income | Kids 0-4 | Non White | Pop. | Poverty | Prop. Crime | Seasonal Housing | Viol. Crime | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | ||||
| ORANGE, CALIFORNIA | [details] | 19.4% | 9.6% | 28% | 26 | $64,573 | 7.4% | 29.5% | 128,821 | 10% | 27.4 | 0.2% | 1.9 | ||
| 1. Placentia, California | 92.1 | [details] | 16.1% | 9.1% | 31.3% | 28 | $68,976 | 7.4% | 32.2% | 46,488 | 8.7% | 19.2 | 0.2% | 2.8 | |
| 2. San Jose, California | 92 | [details] | 18.3% | 8.3% | 31.6% | 29 | $74,813 | 7.6% | 52.5% | 894,943 | 8.8% | 24.9 | 0.3% | 3.8 | |
| 3. Fullerton, California | 92 | [details] | 23.4% | 11.3% | 31.3% | 29 | $57,345 | 7% | 38.1% | 126,003 | 11.4% | 36.3 | 0.2% | 3.1 | |
| 4. Buena Park, California | 90 | [details] | 15% | 9.3% | 19.7% | 30 | $52,327 | 8.1% | 47% | 78,282 | 11.3% | 27.4 | 0.1% | 4.1 | |
| 5. Fremont, California | 89.9 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.3% | 43.2% | 34 | $82,199 | 7.4% | 52.3% | 203,413 | 5.4% | 28.1 | 0.3% | 2.2 | |
| 6. Upland, California | 89.9 | [details] | 21% | 10.8% | 26.7% | 31 | $57,471 | 7% | 32.8% | 68,393 | 12% | 44.4 | 0.2% | 3.8 | |
| 7. South San Francisco, California | 89.7 | [details] | 19.8% | 12.6% | 25.2% | 28 | $66,598 | 6.5% | 56% | 60,552 | 5.2% | 23.7 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 8. Livermore, California | 89.4 | [details] | 18.6% | 7.5% | 31.6% | 33 | $82,421 | 7.7% | 18.1% | 73,345 | 5.3% | 25.6 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 9. Lake Forest, California | 89.3 | [details] | 19.7% | 8.6% | 33.9% | 27 | $75,121 | 7.1% | 24% | 58,707 | 5.3% | 19.3 | 0.1% | 2 | |
| 10. La Habra, California | 89 | [details] | 20.8% | 10.8% | 18.2% | 30 | $51,971 | 8.4% | 37% | 58,974 | 12.9% | 32 | 0.2% | 3.6 | |
| 11. Monrovia, California | 89 | [details] | 26% | 10.4% | 25.1% | 29 | $49,703 | 8% | 37.1% | 36,929 | 13.1% | 30.7 | 0.2% | 3.9 | |
| 12. Tustin, California | 88.8 | [details] | 23.8% | 7.1% | 33.4% | 25 | $60,092 | 8.6% | 41.3% | 67,504 | 8.5% | 30.3 | 0.4% | 3.2 | |
| 13. Westminster, California | 88.8 | [details] | 16.9% | 11.2% | 18.1% | 29 | $52,677 | 7.3% | 54.2% | 88,207 | 13.5% | 32.8 | 0.1% | 3.8 | |
| 14. Whittier, California | 88.7 | [details] | 22.2% | 12.5% | 21.9% | 31 | $55,726 | 7.8% | 36.8% | 83,680 | 10.5% | 34.5 | 0.2% | 3.7 | |
| 15. Corona, California | 88.3 | [details] | 14.4% | 5.8% | 22% | 37 | $63,505 | 9.8% | 38% | 124,966 | 8.3% | 36.2 | 0.2% | 2.2 | |
| 16. Petaluma, California | 88.2 | [details] | 22.8% | 11% | 30.1% | 34 | $71,158 | 6.6% | 15.8% | 54,548 | 6% | 24.3 | 0.3% | 2.6 | |
| 17. Richardson, Texas | 87.9 | [details] | 22.9% | 10% | 47.7% | 25 | $72,876 | 6.7% | 24.6% | 91,802 | 6.3% | 38.3 | 0.2% | 2.8 | |
| 18. Garland, Texas | 87.8 | [details] | 19.7% | 7.1% | 21.8% | 29 | $53,545 | 8.2% | 34.7% | 215,768 | 8.9% | 43 | 0.1% | 2.6 | |
| 19. Carrollton, Texas | 87.7 | [details] | 20% | 5.2% | 37% | 28 | $68,672 | 7.9% | 28.1% | 109,576 | 5.6% | 34.8 | 0.4% | 2.3 | |
| 20. Rancho Cucamonga, California | 87.7 | [details] | 16.8% | 6.1% | 23.3% | 33 | $66,446 | 7% | 33.5% | 127,743 | 7.1% | 33.9 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 21. Freeport, New York | 87.7 | [details] | 21.2% | 10.5% | 20.5% | 33 | $61,673 | 6.9% | 57.1% | 43,783 | 10.6% | 20 | 0.3% | 4.1 | |
| 22. Newark, California | 87.5 | [details] | 14.1% | 7.8% | 24.2% | 32 | $71,351 | 7.2% | 47.8% | 42,471 | 5.5% | 48.2 | 0.2% | 3.3 | |
| 23. Santa Clarita, California | 87.5 | [details] | 19.1% | 7.1% | 29.1% | 35 | $73,588 | 7.8% | 20.5% | 151,088 | 6.4% | 20.9 | 0.2% | 2.4 | |
| 24. North Plainfield, New Jersey | 87.5 | [details] | 23.1% | 9.5% | 26.5% | 31 | $62,875 | 7.8% | 36.9% | 21,103 | 6.4% | 22.9 | 0.1% | 2.9 | |
| 25. West Covina, California | 87.4 | [details] | 14.7% | 10.4% | 21.9% | 35 | $57,614 | 7.6% | 56.1% | 105,080 | 9% | 40 | 0.1% | 3.6 | |
| 26. Glassboro, New Jersey | 87.3 | [details] | 23.5% | 9.8% | 24% | 29 | $55,246 | 6.4% | 25.5% | 19,068 | 15.2% | 42.6 | 0.2% | 4.1 | |
| 27. Forest Park, Ohio | 87.2 | [details] | 24.8% | 9.1% | 26.2% | 25 | $55,618 | 6.6% | 63.3% | 19,463 | 6% | 28.5 | 0.1% | 2.5 | |
| 28. Glendora, California | 87.2 | [details] | 19.1% | 12.5% | 25.7% | 31 | $66,674 | 6.3% | 19.7% | 49,415 | 5.9% | 26.4 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 29. Vacaville, California | 87 | [details] | 19.3% | 8.3% | 19.4% | 30 | $63,950 | 6.6% | 27.9% | 88,625 | 6.1% | 26.8 | 0.2% | 3.7 | |
| 30. Bound Brook, New Jersey | 86.9 | [details] | 23.6% | 12.5% | 23.9% | 26 | $51,346 | 6.9% | 17.4% | 10,155 | 10.9% | 21.3 | 0.2% | 1.3 | |
| 31. Edison, New Jersey | 86.5 | [details] | 21.2% | 11.9% | 42.3% | 34 | $77,976 | 6.4% | 40.5% | 97,687 | 4.8% | 25.1 | 0.2% | 2.2 | |
| 32. Monroe, Washington | 86.5 | [details] | 20.9% | 8% | 19.1% | 33 | $55,793 | 9.7% | 13.9% | 13,795 | 8.9% | 33.8 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 33. Milpitas, California | 86.5 | [details] | 11.5% | 7% | 36.5% | 25 | $84,827 | 7.2% | 69.1% | 62,698 | 5% | 35.8 | 0.1% | 3.1 | |
| 34. Grand Terrace, California | 86.4 | [details] | 21.5% | 10.7% | 24.3% | 26 | $61,068 | 6.6% | 26.2% | 11,626 | 7.4% | 25.3 | 0.4% | 1.4 | |
| 35. Dickinson, Texas | 86.3 | [details] | 21.5% | 9.6% | 21% | 30 | $46,585 | 8% | 27.6% | 17,093 | 13.1% | 28.8 | 0.3% | 3.7 | |
| 36. Mountlake Terrace, Washington | 86.1 | [details] | 26.2% | 9.2% | 24.4% | 30 | $52,117 | 6.5% | 22.3% | 20,362 | 8% | 34.7 | 0.1% | 1.7 | |
| 37. Simi Valley, California | 86.1 | [details] | 14.7% | 7.6% | 24.9% | 30 | $75,140 | 7.3% | 18.7% | 111,351 | 5.8% | 19.7 | 0.1% | 1.6 | |
| 38. Englewood, New Jersey | 85.9 | [details] | 24.7% | 13.3% | 36.7% | 34 | $67,194 | 6.9% | 57.5% | 26,203 | 8.9% | 20 | 0.4% | 2.1 | |
| 39. La Mirada, California | 85.8 | [details] | 17.4% | 13.8% | 25.2% | 30 | $66,598 | 6.3% | 35.5% | 46,783 | 5.6% | 26.1 | 0.2% | 3.2 | |
| 40. Folsom, California | 85.5 | [details] | 21.7% | 8.8% | 37.6% | 28 | $82,448 | 6.9% | 22.1% | 51,884 | 7.3% | 30.9 | 0.4% | 1.6 | |
| 41. Tualatin, Oregon | 85.5 | [details] | 24.8% | 5.8% | 37.5% | 23 | $68,165 | 7.6% | 13.1% | 22,791 | 5.5% | 46.9 | 0.5% | 2 | |
| 42. East Windsor, New Jersey | 85.4 | [details] | 24.4% | 8.3% | 42% | 35 | $73,461 | 7.7% | 25.6% | 24,919 | 5.3% | 16.3 | 0.2% | 0.9 | |
| 43. Woodbridge, New Jersey | 85.3 | [details] | 21.7% | 13.4% | 26.8% | 31 | $68,492 | 6.3% | 29.2% | 97,203 | 4.8% | 29.4 | 0.2% | 3.3 | |
| 44. Newberg, Oregon | 85.1 | [details] | 22.7% | 10.6% | 20.8% | 25 | $51,084 | 8% | 9.5% | 18,064 | 6.6% | 46.6 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 45. Brooklyn Park, Minnesota | 85.1 | [details] | 22% | 5.6% | 27.3% | 25 | $64,297 | 8.1% | 28.6% | 67,388 | 5.1% | 42.5 | 0.2% | 4.1 | |
| 46. Sayreville, New Jersey | 84.9 | [details] | 22.3% | 12.4% | 25% | 36 | $66,266 | 6.7% | 23.5% | 40,377 | 4.7% | 18 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 47. Windsor, California | 84.7 | [details] | 18.1% | 11.1% | 24.7% | 27 | $67,992 | 8% | 21% | 22,744 | 5.1% | 19.8 | 0.3% | 2.9 | |
| 48. Lilburn, Georgia | 84.4 | [details] | 22.5% | 8.3% | 31.8% | 32 | $62,563 | 6.6% | 30.9% | 11,307 | 6.1% | 39.2 | 0.2% | 3.8 | |
| 49. Port Chester, New York | 84.4 | [details] | 26.7% | 12.9% | 20.6% | 22 | $51,025 | 7% | 39.3% | 27,867 | 13% | 22.5 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 50. Roswell, Georgia | 84.2 | [details] | 22.8% | 7.5% | 52.6% | 32 | $85,946 | 6.9% | 18.5% | 79,334 | 5% | 27.5 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 51. Burnsville, Minnesota | 84.2 | [details] | 24.8% | 7.2% | 36.8% | 24 | $67,979 | 7.1% | 12.5% | 60,220 | 5.1% | 31.1 | 0.4% | 1.3 | |
| 52. University Place, Washington | 84.2 | [details] | 25.6% | 11.2% | 33.9% | 27 | $60,401 | 6.3% | 24.1% | 29,933 | 7.3% | 35.2 | 0.2% | 3.9 | |
| 53. McKinney, Texas | 84.1 | [details] | 18.9% | 6.8% | 39.1% | 29 | $72,133 | 10.1% | 21.6% | 54,369 | 8.5% | 34.1 | 0.2% | 3.4 | |
| 54. Keizer, Oregon | 84 | [details] | 21.6% | 12.2% | 20.4% | 24 | $49,977 | 8.1% | 14.5% | 32,203 | 9.3% | 36.1 | 0.2% | 2.5 | |
| 55. Voorhees, New Jersey | 84 | [details] | 26.8% | 10.9% | 46.2% | 32 | $86,873 | 6.3% | 21.7% | 28,126 | 5.7% | 29.1 | 0.3% | 2.5 | |
| 56. Schertz, Texas | 83.6 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.8% | 27.5% | 25 | $59,745 | 7.5% | 18% | 18,694 | 5.2% | 24 | 0.2% | 2.3 | |
| 57. Roselle, New Jersey | 83.5 | [details] | 25.4% | 12% | 17.3% | 31 | $58,841 | 6.6% | 64.4% | 21,274 | 7.5% | 24.1 | 0.1% | 3.2 | |
| 58. DeSoto, Texas | 83.5 | [details] | 21% | 9.3% | 30.2% | 32 | $66,986 | 7% | 51.2% | 37,646 | 5.5% | 46.1 | 0.2% | 4.1 | |
| 59. Gloucester, New Jersey | 83.4 | [details] | 21.3% | 9.4% | 22% | 32 | $62,992 | 6.8% | 16.9% | 64,350 | 6.2% | 25.2 | 0.1% | 3.2 | |
| 60. Universal City, Texas | 83.3 | [details] | 24.7% | 12% | 29.6% | 22 | $59,109 | 6.4% | 19.5% | 14,849 | 7.7% | 26.1 | 0.2% | 2.4 | |
| 61. Harrison, New Jersey | 83.3 | [details] | 22.7% | 10.3% | 20.9% | 31 | $48,489 | 6.5% | 33.9% | 14,424 | 12.4% | 13 | 0.1% | 0.6 | |
| 62. Attleboro, Massachusetts | 83.3 | [details] | 25.7% | 12.9% | 23.5% | 28 | $59,112 | 7% | 8.7% | 42,068 | 6.2% | 22.6 | 0.2% | 3.5 | |
| 63. Marysville, Washington | 83.3 | [details] | 23.9% | 11.3% | 19% | 28 | $55,796 | 8.2% | 11.8% | 25,315 | 5.6% | 41.5 | 0.4% | 2.4 | |
| 64. Lafayette, Colorado | 83.2 | [details] | 22.7% | 5.8% | 45.6% | 26 | $64,088 | 8% | 14.5% | 23,197 | 7% | 22.8 | 0.2% | 2.6 | |
| 65. Arvada, Colorado | 83 | [details] | 22.9% | 10.7% | 29% | 27 | $63,273 | 6.4% | 9% | 102,153 | 5.2% | 35.8 | 0.1% | 1.8 | |
| 66. Grapevine, Texas | 82.8 | [details] | 22% | 4.8% | 43.2% | 26 | $84,940 | 7.4% | 11.8% | 42,059 | 4.8% | 37.6 | 0.3% | 2.1 | |
| 67. Naugatuck, Connecticut | 82.8 | [details] | 24.9% | 11.7% | 19% | 27 | $59,216 | 6.9% | 8.2% | 30,989 | 6.4% | 17.7 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 68. Canby, Oregon | 82.7 | [details] | 20.3% | 11.6% | 17.9% | 27 | $49,690 | 8.4% | 11.6% | 12,790 | 7.4% | 48.2 | 0.2% | 0.6 | |
| 69. Santee, California | 82.5 | [details] | 18% | 8.9% | 17% | 28 | $57,874 | 6.7% | 13.3% | 52,975 | 5.4% | 23.3 | 0.2% | 3.1 | |
| 70. Converse, Texas | 82.4 | [details] | 16.2% | 6.4% | 19% | 25 | $49,396 | 7.8% | 30.6% | 11,508 | 6.5% | 21.3 | 0.1% | 1 | |
| 71. Reynoldsburg, Ohio | 82.4 | [details] | 25.2% | 10.1% | 27.1% | 24 | $60,183 | 7.1% | 15% | 32,069 | 5.5% | 41.8 | 0.3% | 2.8 | |
| 72. Mounds View, Minnesota | 82.3 | [details] | 24.3% | 8.9% | 24% | 24 | $60,685 | 7.6% | 9.4% | 12,738 | 5.9% | 45.4 | 0.2% | 1.7 | |
| 73. Cedar Hill, Texas | 82.3 | [details] | 14.7% | 4.6% | 28.3% | 34 | $63,416 | 8.5% | 43.3% | 32,093 | 5.5% | 43 | 0.1% | 2.8 | |
| 74. Lawrenceville, Georgia | 82.2 | [details] | 22.9% | 9.1% | 19.1% | 31 | $48,557 | 7.6% | 24% | 22,397 | 11.5% | 47 | 0.2% | 3.6 | |
| 75. Ripon, California | 82 | [details] | 16.2% | 10.1% | 20.6% | 29 | $62,592 | 7% | 15.5% | 10,146 | 6.2% | 37.1 | 0.1% | 2.8 | |
| 76. Layton, Utah | 82 | [details] | 14.9% | 5.7% | 27.1% | 25 | $57,193 | 10.3% | 10.1% | 58,474 | 5.6% | 31 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 77. Harker Heights, Texas | 82 | [details] | 18.6% | 6.2% | 29.8% | 24 | $49,607 | 9.4% | 29.1% | 17,308 | 10% | 39.5 | 0.2% | 2.4 | |
| 78. North Richland Hills, Texas | 81.9 | [details] | 20.6% | 8.8% | 26.1% | 28 | $64,718 | 7.1% | 11.5% | 55,635 | 4.8% | 47.8 | 0.2% | 2.6 | |
| 79. Temecula, California | 81.7 | [details] | 12.8% | 7.1% | 25% | 35 | $62,270 | 8.9% | 21.1% | 57,716 | 6.7% | 42 | 0.4% | 3.6 | |
| 80. Suisun City, California | 81.7 | [details] | 14.2% | 5.7% | 17.3% | 37 | $63,616 | 7.7% | 55.6% | 26,118 | 6.5% | 24 | 0.1% | 3.9 | |
| 81. Franklin, Tennessee | 81.4 | [details] | 25.5% | 7.4% | 42.3% | 24 | $69,431 | 8.5% | 15.5% | 41,842 | 6.7% | 22.2 | 0.3% | 2.2 | |
| 82. Fridley, Minnesota | 81 | [details] | 26.9% | 12% | 24.4% | 23 | $55,381 | 6.7% | 11.3% | 27,449 | 7.3% | 46.3 | 0.2% | 3 | |
| 83. Huber Heights, Ohio | 80.5 | [details] | 20.5% | 9.3% | 18.9% | 23 | $53,579 | 7.3% | 15.1% | 38,212 | 5.9% | 41 | 0.2% | 1.8 | |
| 84. Summerville, South Carolina | 80.1 | [details] | 23.3% | 10.6% | 26.7% | 29 | $51,469 | 7% | 22.8% | 27,752 | 9.2% | 45.4 | 0.4% | 4.1 | |
| 85. Camas, Washington | 80 | [details] | 18.4% | 8.7% | 31.1% | 23 | $64,885 | 8.8% | 8% | 12,534 | 5.4% | 46.5 | 0.3% | 0.7 | |
| 86. Deer Park, Texas | 79.9 | [details] | 14% | 7.4% | 16.5% | 24 | $66,516 | 6.3% | 10% | 28,520 | 5.6% | 22.6 | 0.2% | 2.1 | |
| 87. Edmond, Oklahoma | 79.9 | [details] | 20.6% | 8.8% | 47.8% | 23 | $65,230 | 7% | 13.4% | 68,315 | 7.2% | 24.4 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 88. Lebanon, Ohio | 79.5 | [details] | 23.8% | 8.9% | 25% | 24 | $52,578 | 8.5% | 9% | 16,962 | 6.4% | 34.5 | 0.2% | 1.3 | |
| 89. Troutdale, Oregon | 79.5 | [details] | 13.3% | 4.4% | 20.4% | 27 | $62,203 | 8.6% | 12.5% | 13,777 | 4.8% | 44.4 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 90. Mooresville, North Carolina | 79.5 | [details] | 23.8% | 11.2% | 22.8% | 28 | $51,011 | 8.1% | 18.5% | 18,823 | 7.2% | 33.6 | 0.4% | 2.3 | |
| 91. Goose Creek, South Carolina | 79 | [details] | 13.1% | 4.3% | 20.6% | 23 | $47,937 | 8.6% | 21.5% | 29,208 | 6.8% | 24.1 | 0.1% | 2.4 | |
| 92. Brandon, Mississippi | 79 | [details] | 24% | 11.5% | 34.4% | 25 | $63,098 | 6.7% | 13.4% | 16,436 | 6% | 19.3 | 0.1% | 0.7 | |
| 93. Bixby, Oklahoma | 78.8 | [details] | 18.1% | 9.8% | 26.6% | 23 | $58,104 | 7.7% | 13.1% | 13,336 | 5.4% | 22.3 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 94. West Jordan, Utah | 78.5 | [details] | 10.5% | 3.2% | 20.2% | 26 | $57,818 | 11.3% | 11.2% | 68,336 | 5.2% | 47.6 | 0.1% | 2.4 | |
| 95. Windsor, Colorado | 78.3 | [details] | 18.7% | 7.8% | 30.5% | 24 | $60,305 | 8.6% | 8.2% | 9,896 | 5.6% | 13.3 | 0.1% | 1.7 | |
| 96. Rio Rancho, New Mexico | 77.8 | [details] | 20.8% | 11.7% | 24.8% | 29 | $52,233 | 7.5% | 21.6% | 51,765 | 5.1% | 25.6 | 0.5% | 3.2 | |
| 97. Zachary, Louisiana | 77.3 | [details] | 16.9% | 10.8% | 20.8% | 28 | $57,389 | 6.9% | 30.2% | 11,275 | 9.1% | 27.4 | 0.1% | 1.6 | |
| 98. Holly Springs, North Carolina | 75.8 | [details] | 16.4% | 2.8% | 50.7% | 34 | $74,010 | 11.5% | 22.9% | 9,192 | 4.8% | 20.1 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 99. Yukon, Oklahoma | 73.9 | [details] | 20.1% | 10.7% | 23.2% | 22 | $52,646 | 6.5% | 9.1% | 21,043 | 6.6% | 29.1 | 0.3% | 2.1 | |
| 100. Roy, Utah | 73.4 | [details] | 15.8% | 8.3% | 16.3% | 23 | $53,763 | 10.1% | 9.3% | 32,885 | 5.5% | 27.7 | 0.2% | 2.1 |