 |
|
|
|
PlaceMatch™ lets you find places similar to any city or town you select, either using the default criteria or using criteria you specify.The criteria being used are show as column headings in the results table further below.
However, if you want to specify which factors to use in determining which places are similar to each other, you can select among dozens of other criteria. These include criteria related to crime and income, population demographics, education levels, and others; there are dozens of criteria you can select.
Please click on the [+/-] Advanced Controls link just below and try PlaceMatch using a variety of filtering criteria.
All Places > California > Placentia
Click this [+/-] link to see or edit the similarity criteria used.
Cities and Towns Similar to Placentia, California:
Sorted from most similar to least (using the default selection criteria).
Your specified criteria have resulted in 78 locations (a maximum of 100 are shown in the table below). Note that you can dictate for each each criterion (e.g., the percentage of people in poverty) whether it should match Placentia 'loosely' or 'strictly', using the Advanced Controls. This matching level, loose versus strict, is shown near the top of each column in the results table.
Click on a city or town name below to find places similar to it.
Or, to see details about a place, click its [details] link in the table below.
| City, State | Similarity | Go To City | 1 Person Houses | 65+ | College Grads | Commute Minutes | Family Income | Kids 0-4 | Non White | Pop. | Poverty | Prop. Crime | Seasonal Housing | Viol. Crime | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | ||||
| PLACENTIA, CALIFORNIA | [details] | 16.1% | 9.1% | 31.3% | 28 | $68,976 | 7.4% | 32.2% | 46,488 | 8.7% | 19.2 | 0.2% | 2.8 | ||
| 1. Lake Forest, California | 93.2 | [details] | 19.7% | 8.6% | 33.9% | 27 | $75,121 | 7.1% | 24% | 58,707 | 5.3% | 19.3 | 0.1% | 2 | |
| 2. Orange, California | 92.1 | [details] | 19.4% | 9.6% | 28% | 26 | $64,573 | 7.4% | 29.5% | 128,821 | 10% | 27.4 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 3. San Jose, California | 91.6 | [details] | 18.3% | 8.3% | 31.6% | 29 | $74,813 | 7.6% | 52.5% | 894,943 | 8.8% | 24.9 | 0.3% | 3.8 | |
| 4. Livermore, California | 91.1 | [details] | 18.6% | 7.5% | 31.6% | 33 | $82,421 | 7.7% | 18.1% | 73,345 | 5.3% | 25.6 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 5. Santa Clarita, California | 90.8 | [details] | 19.1% | 7.1% | 29.1% | 35 | $73,588 | 7.8% | 20.5% | 151,088 | 6.4% | 20.9 | 0.2% | 2.4 | |
| 6. Simi Valley, California | 90.7 | [details] | 14.7% | 7.6% | 24.9% | 30 | $75,140 | 7.3% | 18.7% | 111,351 | 5.8% | 19.7 | 0.1% | 1.6 | |
| 7. Milpitas, California | 90.5 | [details] | 11.5% | 7% | 36.5% | 25 | $84,827 | 7.2% | 69.1% | 62,698 | 5% | 35.8 | 0.1% | 3.1 | |
| 8. Rancho Cucamonga, California | 90.2 | [details] | 16.8% | 6.1% | 23.3% | 33 | $66,446 | 7% | 33.5% | 127,743 | 7.1% | 33.9 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 9. Vacaville, California | 89.9 | [details] | 19.3% | 8.3% | 19.4% | 30 | $63,950 | 6.6% | 27.9% | 88,625 | 6.1% | 26.8 | 0.2% | 3.7 | |
| 10. Petaluma, California | 89.9 | [details] | 22.8% | 11% | 30.1% | 34 | $71,158 | 6.6% | 15.8% | 54,548 | 6% | 24.3 | 0.3% | 2.6 | |
| 11. Fremont, California | 89.8 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.3% | 43.2% | 34 | $82,199 | 7.4% | 52.3% | 203,413 | 5.4% | 28.1 | 0.3% | 2.2 | |
| 12. Windsor, California | 89.6 | [details] | 18.1% | 11.1% | 24.7% | 27 | $67,992 | 8% | 21% | 22,744 | 5.1% | 19.8 | 0.3% | 2.9 | |
| 13. Folsom, California | 88.6 | [details] | 21.7% | 8.8% | 37.6% | 28 | $82,448 | 6.9% | 22.1% | 51,884 | 7.3% | 30.9 | 0.4% | 1.6 | |
| 14. Duarte, California | 88.4 | [details] | 21.7% | 11.9% | 23.6% | 31 | $56,556 | 7.5% | 48% | 21,486 | 11.3% | 27.7 | 0.2% | 4.3 | |
| 15. San Marcos, California | 88.4 | [details] | 20.2% | 11.9% | 20% | 28 | $51,292 | 8.8% | 32.6% | 54,977 | 12% | 27.2 | 0.3% | 4.6 | |
| 16. McKinney, Texas | 88.3 | [details] | 18.9% | 6.8% | 39.1% | 29 | $72,133 | 10.1% | 21.6% | 54,369 | 8.5% | 34.1 | 0.2% | 3.4 | |
| 17. Rocklin, California | 88.2 | [details] | 18.6% | 8.6% | 36.1% | 28 | $72,245 | 7.9% | 11.7% | 36,330 | 4.5% | 34.4 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 18. Morgan Hill, California | 88.2 | [details] | 15.8% | 7.5% | 33.5% | 37 | $90,134 | 8.1% | 27.6% | 33,556 | 4.7% | 28.3 | 0.3% | 1.5 | |
| 19. Carrollton, Texas | 88 | [details] | 20% | 5.2% | 37% | 28 | $68,672 | 7.9% | 28.1% | 109,576 | 5.6% | 34.8 | 0.4% | 2.3 | |
| 20. Dickinson, Texas | 87.9 | [details] | 21.5% | 9.6% | 21% | 30 | $46,585 | 8% | 27.6% | 17,093 | 13.1% | 28.8 | 0.3% | 3.7 | |
| 21. Tustin, California | 87.6 | [details] | 23.8% | 7.1% | 33.4% | 25 | $60,092 | 8.6% | 41.3% | 67,504 | 8.5% | 30.3 | 0.4% | 3.2 | |
| 22. Antioch, California | 87.6 | [details] | 15.8% | 7.4% | 18.2% | 43 | $64,723 | 8.6% | 34.7% | 90,532 | 8.5% | 34.3 | 0.1% | 5.8 | |
| 23. Moorpark, California | 87.3 | [details] | 10% | 4.5% | 34.2% | 30 | $78,909 | 8.1% | 25.6% | 31,415 | 7% | 11.7 | 0.1% | 1.3 | |
| 24. Buena Park, California | 87 | [details] | 15% | 9.3% | 19.7% | 30 | $52,327 | 8.1% | 47% | 78,282 | 11.3% | 27.4 | 0.1% | 4.1 | |
| 25. Schertz, Texas | 86.6 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.8% | 27.5% | 25 | $59,745 | 7.5% | 18% | 18,694 | 5.2% | 24 | 0.2% | 2.3 | |
| 26. Grand Terrace, California | 86.5 | [details] | 21.5% | 10.7% | 24.3% | 26 | $61,068 | 6.6% | 26.2% | 11,626 | 7.4% | 25.3 | 0.4% | 1.4 | |
| 27. Westminster, California | 86.5 | [details] | 16.9% | 11.2% | 18.1% | 29 | $52,677 | 7.3% | 54.2% | 88,207 | 13.5% | 32.8 | 0.1% | 3.8 | |
| 28. South San Francisco, California | 86.5 | [details] | 19.8% | 12.6% | 25.2% | 28 | $66,598 | 6.5% | 56% | 60,552 | 5.2% | 23.7 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 29. Santee, California | 86.4 | [details] | 18% | 8.9% | 17% | 28 | $57,874 | 6.7% | 13.3% | 52,975 | 5.4% | 23.3 | 0.2% | 3.1 | |
| 30. North Plainfield, New Jersey | 86.4 | [details] | 23.1% | 9.5% | 26.5% | 31 | $62,875 | 7.8% | 36.9% | 21,103 | 6.4% | 22.9 | 0.1% | 2.9 | |
| 31. Round Rock, Texas | 86.1 | [details] | 18.5% | 4.5% | 32.9% | 28 | $65,471 | 9.7% | 23.2% | 61,136 | 4% | 27.4 | 0.3% | 1.5 | |
| 32. Roswell, Georgia | 86.1 | [details] | 22.8% | 7.5% | 52.6% | 32 | $85,946 | 6.9% | 18.5% | 79,334 | 5% | 27.5 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 33. Pearland, Texas | 86 | [details] | 15.4% | 8.4% | 29.1% | 32 | $70,748 | 8% | 17.4% | 37,640 | 4.7% | 32 | 0.1% | 2.7 | |
| 34. Aberdeen, New Jersey | 85.9 | [details] | 20.8% | 10.4% | 34.4% | 37 | $76,648 | 6.9% | 21.2% | 17,454 | 4.7% | 14.3 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 35. Lafayette, Colorado | 85.8 | [details] | 22.7% | 5.8% | 45.6% | 26 | $64,088 | 8% | 14.5% | 23,197 | 7% | 22.8 | 0.2% | 2.6 | |
| 36. La Habra, California | 85.7 | [details] | 20.8% | 10.8% | 18.2% | 30 | $51,971 | 8.4% | 37% | 58,974 | 12.9% | 32 | 0.2% | 3.6 | |
| 37. North Brunswick, New Jersey | 85.7 | [details] | 24.4% | 10% | 37% | 32 | $70,812 | 6.7% | 37.3% | 36,287 | 4.7% | 25.2 | 0.1% | 2.2 | |
| 38. Mission Viejo, California | 85.7 | [details] | 17% | 10.9% | 41.2% | 29 | $86,902 | 6.9% | 16.8% | 93,102 | 3.8% | 14.1 | 0.3% | 1.3 | |
| 39. Forest Park, Ohio | 85.6 | [details] | 24.8% | 9.1% | 26.2% | 25 | $55,618 | 6.6% | 63.3% | 19,463 | 6% | 28.5 | 0.1% | 2.5 | |
| 40. Suisun City, California | 85.6 | [details] | 14.2% | 5.7% | 17.3% | 37 | $63,616 | 7.7% | 55.6% | 26,118 | 6.5% | 24 | 0.1% | 3.9 | |
| 41. Gloucester, New Jersey | 85.6 | [details] | 21.3% | 9.4% | 22% | 32 | $62,992 | 6.8% | 16.9% | 64,350 | 6.2% | 25.2 | 0.1% | 3.2 | |
| 42. Freeport, New York | 85.2 | [details] | 21.2% | 10.5% | 20.5% | 33 | $61,673 | 6.9% | 57.1% | 43,783 | 10.6% | 20 | 0.3% | 4.1 | |
| 43. Anaheim, California | 85.1 | [details] | 18% | 8.2% | 19.6% | 29 | $49,969 | 9.2% | 45.2% | 328,014 | 14.1% | 31.3 | 0.2% | 4.7 | |
| 44. Whittier, California | 85 | [details] | 22.2% | 12.5% | 21.9% | 31 | $55,726 | 7.8% | 36.8% | 83,680 | 10.5% | 34.5 | 0.2% | 3.7 | |
| 45. Edison, New Jersey | 84.9 | [details] | 21.2% | 11.9% | 42.3% | 34 | $77,976 | 6.4% | 40.5% | 97,687 | 4.8% | 25.1 | 0.2% | 2.2 | |
| 46. Woodbridge, New Jersey | 84.8 | [details] | 21.7% | 13.4% | 26.8% | 31 | $68,492 | 6.3% | 29.2% | 97,203 | 4.8% | 29.4 | 0.2% | 3.3 | |
| 47. Chino Hills, California | 84.8 | [details] | 10.8% | 4.2% | 37.6% | 41 | $81,794 | 8.7% | 43.6% | 66,787 | 5.1% | 16.3 | 0.1% | 1.1 | |
| 48. Sayreville, New Jersey | 84.8 | [details] | 22.3% | 12.4% | 25% | 36 | $66,266 | 6.7% | 23.5% | 40,377 | 4.7% | 18 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 49. Monroe, Washington | 84.6 | [details] | 20.9% | 8% | 19.1% | 33 | $55,793 | 9.7% | 13.9% | 13,795 | 8.9% | 33.8 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 50. Richmond Hill, Georgia | 84.4 | [details] | 19% | 6.8% | 21.7% | 28 | $54,457 | 9.4% | 18.7% | 6,959 | 10.3% | 22.8 | 0.1% | 3.3 | |
| 51. Powder Springs, Georgia | 84.2 | [details] | 13.7% | 6.3% | 28.7% | 39 | $59,392 | 8% | 42.1% | 12,481 | 8.5% | 24 | 0.1% | 1.4 | |
| 52. Bogota, New Jersey | 84 | [details] | 21.7% | 11.1% | 28.4% | 32 | $69,841 | 6.5% | 24.3% | 8,249 | 4% | 13.3 | 0.1% | 1.9 | |
| 53. Cedar Park, Texas | 83.7 | [details] | 13.1% | 4.3% | 36.6% | 32 | $70,587 | 11% | 13.6% | 26,049 | 4.1% | 22.5 | 0.1% | 2 | |
| 54. Arvada, Colorado | 83.3 | [details] | 22.9% | 10.7% | 29% | 27 | $63,273 | 6.4% | 9% | 102,153 | 5.2% | 35.8 | 0.1% | 1.8 | |
| 55. Downey, California | 83.2 | [details] | 19.1% | 11% | 17.3% | 29 | $50,017 | 8% | 46.5% | 107,323 | 11.1% | 35.1 | 0.2% | 4.2 | |
| 56. Layton, Utah | 83.2 | [details] | 14.9% | 5.7% | 27.1% | 25 | $57,193 | 10.3% | 10.1% | 58,474 | 5.6% | 31 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 57. Burnsville, Minnesota | 83.2 | [details] | 24.8% | 7.2% | 36.8% | 24 | $67,979 | 7.1% | 12.5% | 60,220 | 5.1% | 31.1 | 0.4% | 1.3 | |
| 58. Oviedo, Florida | 83.1 | [details] | 9.7% | 5.8% | 41.3% | 31 | $66,288 | 8.4% | 16.5% | 26,316 | 4.6% | 18.9 | 0.3% | 4 | |
| 59. Englewood, New Jersey | 83.1 | [details] | 24.7% | 13.3% | 36.7% | 34 | $67,194 | 6.9% | 57.5% | 26,203 | 8.9% | 20 | 0.4% | 2.1 | |
| 60. Winslow, New Jersey | 83 | [details] | 18.7% | 8.5% | 18.6% | 35 | $62,045 | 8.2% | 34.5% | 34,611 | 6% | 19.8 | 0.1% | 4.4 | |
| 61. Lawrence, Indiana | 83 | [details] | 24.6% | 8.2% | 26.8% | 26 | $56,609 | 9.1% | 21.4% | 38,915 | 6.7% | 28.8 | 0.3% | 4.4 | |
| 62. Angleton, Texas | 82.3 | [details] | 21.4% | 10.8% | 17.2% | 25 | $50,019 | 7.7% | 24.8% | 18,130 | 11.1% | 28.9 | 0.3% | 6.2 | |
| 63. Roselle, New Jersey | 82.1 | [details] | 25.4% | 12% | 17.3% | 31 | $58,841 | 6.6% | 64.4% | 21,274 | 7.5% | 24.1 | 0.1% | 3.2 | |
| 64. Spring Hill, Tennessee | 81.9 | [details] | 12.3% | 3.6% | 29.7% | 31 | $62,643 | 11% | 11.7% | 7,715 | 4% | 20.9 | 0.1% | 2.7 | |
| 65. Broken Arrow, Oklahoma | 81.6 | [details] | 15.6% | 7.5% | 30.9% | 23 | $58,891 | 8% | 14.7% | 74,859 | 4.5% | 29.2 | 0.1% | 2.7 | |
| 66. Holly Springs, North Carolina | 81.6 | [details] | 16.4% | 2.8% | 50.7% | 34 | $74,010 | 11.5% | 22.9% | 9,192 | 4.8% | 20.1 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 67. Sachse, Texas | 81.5 | [details] | 10.3% | 4% | 30.6% | 31 | $71,918 | 9.2% | 12.7% | 9,751 | 4.6% | 19.9 | 0.3% | 1.5 | |
| 68. Irmo, South Carolina | 81.2 | [details] | 14.3% | 4.8% | 39.2% | 26 | $62,005 | 7.4% | 23.2% | 11,039 | 4.3% | 29.9 | 0% | 4.9 | |
| 69. Maplewood, New Jersey | 81.1 | [details] | 20.4% | 12.1% | 50.8% | 37 | $92,724 | 7.9% | 41.2% | 23,868 | 4.4% | 27.2 | 0.1% | 3.4 | |
| 70. Bound Brook, New Jersey | 81 | [details] | 23.6% | 12.5% | 23.9% | 26 | $51,346 | 6.9% | 17.4% | 10,155 | 10.9% | 21.3 | 0.2% | 1.3 | |
| 71. Mooresville, North Carolina | 80.9 | [details] | 23.8% | 11.2% | 22.8% | 28 | $51,011 | 8.1% | 18.5% | 18,823 | 7.2% | 33.6 | 0.4% | 2.3 | |
| 72. Bixby, Oklahoma | 80.8 | [details] | 18.1% | 9.8% | 26.6% | 23 | $58,104 | 7.7% | 13.1% | 13,336 | 5.4% | 22.3 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 73. Goose Creek, South Carolina | 80 | [details] | 13.1% | 4.3% | 20.6% | 23 | $47,937 | 8.6% | 21.5% | 29,208 | 6.8% | 24.1 | 0.1% | 2.4 | |
| 74. Zachary, Louisiana | 80 | [details] | 16.9% | 10.8% | 20.8% | 28 | $57,389 | 6.9% | 30.2% | 11,275 | 9.1% | 27.4 | 0.1% | 1.6 | |
| 75. Lebanon, Ohio | 79.1 | [details] | 23.8% | 8.9% | 25% | 24 | $52,578 | 8.5% | 9% | 16,962 | 6.4% | 34.5 | 0.2% | 1.3 | |
| 76. Leander, Texas | 78.9 | [details] | 14.3% | 4.6% | 22.4% | 37 | $55,051 | 10.1% | 13.8% | 7,596 | 4.2% | 30 | 0% | 5.1 | |
| 77. Pelham, Alabama | 78.7 | [details] | 24.5% | 8.6% | 34.8% | 26 | $63,994 | 7.9% | 10% | 14,369 | 4.6% | 35.2 | 0.2% | 2.6 | |
| 78. Mustang, Oklahoma | 77.8 | [details] | 15.7% | 8.6% | 17.8% | 24 | $53,018 | 7.2% | 8.4% | 13,156 | 5.6% | 35.4 | 0.2% | 4.3 |