 |
|
|
|
PlaceMatch™ lets you find places similar to any city or town you select, either using the default criteria or using criteria you specify.The criteria being used are show as column headings in the results table further below.
However, if you want to specify which factors to use in determining which places are similar to each other, you can select among dozens of other criteria. These include criteria related to crime and income, population demographics, education levels, and others; there are dozens of criteria you can select.
Please click on the [+/-] Advanced Controls link just below and try PlaceMatch using a variety of filtering criteria.
All Places > California > San Jose
Click this [+/-] link to see or edit the similarity criteria used.
Cities and Towns Similar to San Jose, California:
Sorted from most similar to least (using the default selection criteria).
Your specified criteria have resulted in 81 locations (a maximum of 100 are shown in the table below). Note that you can dictate for each each criterion (e.g., the percentage of people in poverty) whether it should match San Jose 'loosely' or 'strictly', using the Advanced Controls. This matching level, loose versus strict, is shown near the top of each column in the results table.
Click on a city or town name below to find places similar to it.
Or, to see details about a place, click its [details] link in the table below.
| City, State | Similarity | Go To City | 1 Person Houses | 65+ | College Grads | Commute Minutes | Family Income | Kids 0-4 | Non White | Pop. | Poverty | Prop. Crime | Seasonal Housing | Viol. Crime | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | ||||
| SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA | [details] | 18.3% | 8.3% | 31.6% | 29 | $74,813 | 7.6% | 52.5% | 894,943 | 8.8% | 24.9 | 0.3% | 3.8 | ||
| 1. Fremont, California | 93.9 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.3% | 43.2% | 34 | $82,199 | 7.4% | 52.3% | 203,413 | 5.4% | 28.1 | 0.3% | 2.2 | |
| 2. Orange, California | 92 | [details] | 19.4% | 9.6% | 28% | 26 | $64,573 | 7.4% | 29.5% | 128,821 | 10% | 27.4 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 3. Tustin, California | 91.9 | [details] | 23.8% | 7.1% | 33.4% | 25 | $60,092 | 8.6% | 41.3% | 67,504 | 8.5% | 30.3 | 0.4% | 3.2 | |
| 4. Placentia, California | 91.6 | [details] | 16.1% | 9.1% | 31.3% | 28 | $68,976 | 7.4% | 32.2% | 46,488 | 8.7% | 19.2 | 0.2% | 2.8 | |
| 5. Union City, California | 90.3 | [details] | 11.2% | 8.1% | 29.5% | 34 | $74,910 | 7.3% | 69.8% | 66,869 | 6.5% | 40.2 | 0.1% | 5.2 | |
| 6. Chula Vista, California | 90.2 | [details] | 19.2% | 11% | 22.2% | 27 | $50,136 | 7.8% | 44.9% | 173,556 | 10.6% | 41.6 | 0.4% | 4.8 | |
| 7. South San Francisco, California | 90.1 | [details] | 19.8% | 12.6% | 25.2% | 28 | $66,598 | 6.5% | 56% | 60,552 | 5.2% | 23.7 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 8. Duarte, California | 90 | [details] | 21.7% | 11.9% | 23.6% | 31 | $56,556 | 7.5% | 48% | 21,486 | 11.3% | 27.7 | 0.2% | 4.3 | |
| 9. Hayward, California | 89.9 | [details] | 21% | 10.2% | 19.9% | 33 | $54,712 | 7.9% | 57% | 140,030 | 10% | 36 | 0.2% | 4.2 | |
| 10. Livermore, California | 89.7 | [details] | 18.6% | 7.5% | 31.6% | 33 | $82,421 | 7.7% | 18.1% | 73,345 | 5.3% | 25.6 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 11. Westminster, California | 89.6 | [details] | 16.9% | 11.2% | 18.1% | 29 | $52,677 | 7.3% | 54.2% | 88,207 | 13.5% | 32.8 | 0.1% | 3.8 | |
| 12. Gilroy, California | 89.6 | [details] | 14.4% | 6.8% | 19.1% | 32 | $65,330 | 9.4% | 41.1% | 41,464 | 10.4% | 37.7 | 0.1% | 4.4 | |
| 13. North Plainfield, New Jersey | 89.5 | [details] | 23.1% | 9.5% | 26.5% | 31 | $62,875 | 7.8% | 36.9% | 21,103 | 6.4% | 22.9 | 0.1% | 2.9 | |
| 14. Fullerton, California | 89.5 | [details] | 23.4% | 11.3% | 31.3% | 29 | $57,345 | 7% | 38.1% | 126,003 | 11.4% | 36.3 | 0.2% | 3.1 | |
| 15. Buena Park, California | 89.5 | [details] | 15% | 9.3% | 19.7% | 30 | $52,327 | 8.1% | 47% | 78,282 | 11.3% | 27.4 | 0.1% | 4.1 | |
| 16. Anaheim, California | 89.4 | [details] | 18% | 8.2% | 19.6% | 29 | $49,969 | 9.2% | 45.2% | 328,014 | 14.1% | 31.3 | 0.2% | 4.7 | |
| 17. Milpitas, California | 89.2 | [details] | 11.5% | 7% | 36.5% | 25 | $84,827 | 7.2% | 69.1% | 62,698 | 5% | 35.8 | 0.1% | 3.1 | |
| 18. West Covina, California | 89.1 | [details] | 14.7% | 10.4% | 21.9% | 35 | $57,614 | 7.6% | 56.1% | 105,080 | 9% | 40 | 0.1% | 3.6 | |
| 19. Edison, New Jersey | 89 | [details] | 21.2% | 11.9% | 42.3% | 34 | $77,976 | 6.4% | 40.5% | 97,687 | 4.8% | 25.1 | 0.2% | 2.2 | |
| 20. Santa Clarita, California | 88.8 | [details] | 19.1% | 7.1% | 29.1% | 35 | $73,588 | 7.8% | 20.5% | 151,088 | 6.4% | 20.9 | 0.2% | 2.4 | |
| 21. Whittier, California | 88.8 | [details] | 22.2% | 12.5% | 21.9% | 31 | $55,726 | 7.8% | 36.8% | 83,680 | 10.5% | 34.5 | 0.2% | 3.7 | |
| 22. Lake Forest, California | 88.7 | [details] | 19.7% | 8.6% | 33.9% | 27 | $75,121 | 7.1% | 24% | 58,707 | 5.3% | 19.3 | 0.1% | 2 | |
| 23. Freeport, New York | 88.6 | [details] | 21.2% | 10.5% | 20.5% | 33 | $61,673 | 6.9% | 57.1% | 43,783 | 10.6% | 20 | 0.3% | 4.1 | |
| 24. San Marcos, California | 88.5 | [details] | 20.2% | 11.9% | 20% | 28 | $51,292 | 8.8% | 32.6% | 54,977 | 12% | 27.2 | 0.3% | 4.6 | |
| 25. Carrollton, Texas | 88.4 | [details] | 20% | 5.2% | 37% | 28 | $68,672 | 7.9% | 28.1% | 109,576 | 5.6% | 34.8 | 0.4% | 2.3 | |
| 26. La Habra, California | 88.3 | [details] | 20.8% | 10.8% | 18.2% | 30 | $51,971 | 8.4% | 37% | 58,974 | 12.9% | 32 | 0.2% | 3.6 | |
| 27. North Brunswick, New Jersey | 88 | [details] | 24.4% | 10% | 37% | 32 | $70,812 | 6.7% | 37.3% | 36,287 | 4.7% | 25.2 | 0.1% | 2.2 | |
| 28. Corona, California | 87.8 | [details] | 14.4% | 5.8% | 22% | 37 | $63,505 | 9.8% | 38% | 124,966 | 8.3% | 36.2 | 0.2% | 2.2 | |
| 29. Downey, California | 87.6 | [details] | 19.1% | 11% | 17.3% | 29 | $50,017 | 8% | 46.5% | 107,323 | 11.1% | 35.1 | 0.2% | 4.2 | |
| 30. Garland, Texas | 87.4 | [details] | 19.7% | 7.1% | 21.8% | 29 | $53,545 | 8.2% | 34.7% | 215,768 | 8.9% | 43 | 0.1% | 2.6 | |
| 31. Richardson, Texas | 87.4 | [details] | 22.9% | 10% | 47.7% | 25 | $72,876 | 6.7% | 24.6% | 91,802 | 6.3% | 38.3 | 0.2% | 2.8 | |
| 32. Vacaville, California | 87.1 | [details] | 19.3% | 8.3% | 19.4% | 30 | $63,950 | 6.6% | 27.9% | 88,625 | 6.1% | 26.8 | 0.2% | 3.7 | |
| 33. Petaluma, California | 87 | [details] | 22.8% | 11% | 30.1% | 34 | $71,158 | 6.6% | 15.8% | 54,548 | 6% | 24.3 | 0.3% | 2.6 | |
| 34. Escondido, California | 87 | [details] | 22.4% | 11% | 20.1% | 28 | $48,456 | 8.8% | 32.2% | 133,559 | 13.4% | 42.3 | 0.2% | 5.1 | |
| 35. Monrovia, California | 86.8 | [details] | 26% | 10.4% | 25.1% | 29 | $49,703 | 8% | 37.1% | 36,929 | 13.1% | 30.7 | 0.2% | 3.9 | |
| 36. Rancho Cucamonga, California | 86.8 | [details] | 16.8% | 6.1% | 23.3% | 33 | $66,446 | 7% | 33.5% | 127,743 | 7.1% | 33.9 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 37. Antioch, California | 86.3 | [details] | 15.8% | 7.4% | 18.2% | 43 | $64,723 | 8.6% | 34.7% | 90,532 | 8.5% | 34.3 | 0.1% | 5.8 | |
| 38. Plano, Texas | 86.1 | [details] | 20.2% | 4.9% | 53.3% | 29 | $91,162 | 8.3% | 21.7% | 222,030 | 4.3% | 38.8 | 0.3% | 2.9 | |
| 39. Lumberton, New Jersey | 86 | [details] | 24.8% | 11.1% | 30.9% | 29 | $70,329 | 8.3% | 21.7% | 10,461 | 3.8% | 36.5 | 0.2% | 3.2 | |
| 40. McKinney, Texas | 86 | [details] | 18.9% | 6.8% | 39.1% | 29 | $72,133 | 10.1% | 21.6% | 54,369 | 8.5% | 34.1 | 0.2% | 3.4 | |
| 41. Englewood, New Jersey | 86 | [details] | 24.7% | 13.3% | 36.7% | 34 | $67,194 | 6.9% | 57.5% | 26,203 | 8.9% | 20 | 0.4% | 2.1 | |
| 42. Roswell, Georgia | 85.5 | [details] | 22.8% | 7.5% | 52.6% | 32 | $85,946 | 6.9% | 18.5% | 79,334 | 5% | 27.5 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 43. Forest Park, Ohio | 85.2 | [details] | 24.8% | 9.1% | 26.2% | 25 | $55,618 | 6.6% | 63.3% | 19,463 | 6% | 28.5 | 0.1% | 2.5 | |
| 44. Brooklyn Park, Minnesota | 85.2 | [details] | 22% | 5.6% | 27.3% | 25 | $64,297 | 8.1% | 28.6% | 67,388 | 5.1% | 42.5 | 0.2% | 4.1 | |
| 45. Roselle, New Jersey | 84.8 | [details] | 25.4% | 12% | 17.3% | 31 | $58,841 | 6.6% | 64.4% | 21,274 | 7.5% | 24.1 | 0.1% | 3.2 | |
| 46. Sayreville, New Jersey | 84.7 | [details] | 22.3% | 12.4% | 25% | 36 | $66,266 | 6.7% | 23.5% | 40,377 | 4.7% | 18 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 47. Gloucester, New Jersey | 84.5 | [details] | 21.3% | 9.4% | 22% | 32 | $62,992 | 6.8% | 16.9% | 64,350 | 6.2% | 25.2 | 0.1% | 3.2 | |
| 48. Temecula, California | 84.3 | [details] | 12.8% | 7.1% | 25% | 35 | $62,270 | 8.9% | 21.1% | 57,716 | 6.7% | 42 | 0.4% | 3.6 | |
| 49. Carson, California | 84.3 | [details] | 14.3% | 10.7% | 18.1% | 28 | $54,886 | 6.9% | 74.3% | 89,730 | 9.3% | 29.6 | 0.2% | 6.9 | |
| 50. Duncanville, Texas | 84.2 | [details] | 17.4% | 9.6% | 27.5% | 29 | $57,064 | 6.5% | 36.1% | 36,081 | 6.1% | 42.2 | 0.1% | 4.6 | |
| 51. Suisun City, California | 84.2 | [details] | 14.2% | 5.7% | 17.3% | 37 | $63,616 | 7.7% | 55.6% | 26,118 | 6.5% | 24 | 0.1% | 3.9 | |
| 52. Lakewood, California | 84.2 | [details] | 18.3% | 11.9% | 20.7% | 29 | $63,342 | 7.1% | 37.3% | 79,345 | 7.4% | 38.2 | 0.1% | 4.8 | |
| 53. Windsor, California | 84.1 | [details] | 18.1% | 11.1% | 24.7% | 27 | $67,992 | 8% | 21% | 22,744 | 5.1% | 19.8 | 0.3% | 2.9 | |
| 54. Aberdeen, New Jersey | 84 | [details] | 20.8% | 10.4% | 34.4% | 37 | $76,648 | 6.9% | 21.2% | 17,454 | 4.7% | 14.3 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 55. Plainfield, New Jersey | 84 | [details] | 21% | 9.2% | 18.5% | 31 | $50,774 | 7.9% | 78.6% | 47,829 | 15.9% | 33.3 | 0.1% | 11.5 | |
| 56. Lilburn, Georgia | 83.9 | [details] | 22.5% | 8.3% | 31.8% | 32 | $62,563 | 6.6% | 30.9% | 11,307 | 6.1% | 39.2 | 0.2% | 3.8 | |
| 57. Miramar, Florida | 83.2 | [details] | 14.1% | 6.3% | 20.7% | 34 | $52,952 | 8.7% | 56.4% | 72,739 | 8.2% | 41 | 0.4% | 6.2 | |
| 58. Lafayette, Colorado | 83.1 | [details] | 22.7% | 5.8% | 45.6% | 26 | $64,088 | 8% | 14.5% | 23,197 | 7% | 22.8 | 0.2% | 2.6 | |
| 59. Monroe, Washington | 83.1 | [details] | 20.9% | 8% | 19.1% | 33 | $55,793 | 9.7% | 13.9% | 13,795 | 8.9% | 33.8 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 60. Schertz, Texas | 82.4 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.8% | 27.5% | 25 | $59,745 | 7.5% | 18% | 18,694 | 5.2% | 24 | 0.2% | 2.3 | |
| 61. Cedar Hill, Texas | 82 | [details] | 14.7% | 4.6% | 28.3% | 34 | $63,416 | 8.5% | 43.3% | 32,093 | 5.5% | 43 | 0.1% | 2.8 | |
| 62. Santee, California | 82 | [details] | 18% | 8.9% | 17% | 28 | $57,874 | 6.7% | 13.3% | 52,975 | 5.4% | 23.3 | 0.2% | 3.1 | |
| 63. Chesapeake, Virginia | 82 | [details] | 18% | 9% | 24.7% | 26 | $56,302 | 7.2% | 33.1% | 199,184 | 7.3% | 38.5 | 0.3% | 5.5 | |
| 64. Pearland, Texas | 81.6 | [details] | 15.4% | 8.4% | 29.1% | 32 | $70,748 | 8% | 17.4% | 37,640 | 4.7% | 32 | 0.1% | 2.7 | |
| 65. Winslow, New Jersey | 81.6 | [details] | 18.7% | 8.5% | 18.6% | 35 | $62,045 | 8.2% | 34.5% | 34,611 | 6% | 19.8 | 0.1% | 4.4 | |
| 66. Maplewood, New Jersey | 81.4 | [details] | 20.4% | 12.1% | 50.8% | 37 | $92,724 | 7.9% | 41.2% | 23,868 | 4.4% | 27.2 | 0.1% | 3.4 | |
| 67. Franklin, Tennessee | 81.4 | [details] | 25.5% | 7.4% | 42.3% | 24 | $69,431 | 8.5% | 15.5% | 41,842 | 6.7% | 22.2 | 0.3% | 2.2 | |
| 68. Harker Heights, Texas | 80.7 | [details] | 18.6% | 6.2% | 29.8% | 24 | $49,607 | 9.4% | 29.1% | 17,308 | 10% | 39.5 | 0.2% | 2.4 | |
| 69. Lawrence, Indiana | 80.5 | [details] | 24.6% | 8.2% | 26.8% | 26 | $56,609 | 9.1% | 21.4% | 38,915 | 6.7% | 28.8 | 0.3% | 4.4 | |
| 70. Reynoldsburg, Ohio | 80.5 | [details] | 25.2% | 10.1% | 27.1% | 24 | $60,183 | 7.1% | 15% | 32,069 | 5.5% | 41.8 | 0.3% | 2.8 | |
| 71. Wake Forest, North Carolina | 79.8 | [details] | 20.8% | 7.9% | 43% | 32 | $60,408 | 9.8% | 20.4% | 12,588 | 8.8% | 36.9 | 0.6% | 2.7 | |
| 72. Angleton, Texas | 79.6 | [details] | 21.4% | 10.8% | 17.2% | 25 | $50,019 | 7.7% | 24.8% | 18,130 | 11.1% | 28.9 | 0.3% | 6.2 | |
| 73. Oviedo, Florida | 79.5 | [details] | 9.7% | 5.8% | 41.3% | 31 | $66,288 | 8.4% | 16.5% | 26,316 | 4.6% | 18.9 | 0.3% | 4 | |
| 74. Acworth, Georgia | 79.4 | [details] | 23.3% | 7.2% | 29.2% | 39 | $55,163 | 10% | 20.3% | 13,422 | 8.3% | 38.2 | 0.2% | 3.8 | |
| 75. Ripon, California | 79 | [details] | 16.2% | 10.1% | 20.6% | 29 | $62,592 | 7% | 15.5% | 10,146 | 6.2% | 37.1 | 0.1% | 2.8 | |
| 76. Cedar Park, Texas | 78.1 | [details] | 13.1% | 4.3% | 36.6% | 32 | $70,587 | 11% | 13.6% | 26,049 | 4.1% | 22.5 | 0.1% | 2 | |
| 77. Mooresville, North Carolina | 78 | [details] | 23.8% | 11.2% | 22.8% | 28 | $51,011 | 8.1% | 18.5% | 18,823 | 7.2% | 33.6 | 0.4% | 2.3 | |
| 78. Rio Rancho, New Mexico | 77.9 | [details] | 20.8% | 11.7% | 24.8% | 29 | $52,233 | 7.5% | 21.6% | 51,765 | 5.1% | 25.6 | 0.5% | 3.2 | |
| 79. Mansfield, Texas | 77 | [details] | 10.8% | 5.7% | 32.8% | 28 | $71,700 | 8.4% | 13.6% | 28,031 | 4% | 36.8 | 0.2% | 2.3 | |
| 80. Irmo, South Carolina | 76.5 | [details] | 14.3% | 4.8% | 39.2% | 26 | $62,005 | 7.4% | 23.2% | 11,039 | 4.3% | 29.9 | 0% | 4.9 | |
| 81. Holly Springs, North Carolina | 76 | [details] | 16.4% | 2.8% | 50.7% | 34 | $74,010 | 11.5% | 22.9% | 9,192 | 4.8% | 20.1 | 0.1% | 2.1 |