 |
Please see the results table below.
PlaceMatch lets you find places similar to any city or town you select, either using the default criteria or using criteria you specify.The criteria being used are show as column headings in the results table further below.
However, if you want to specify which factors to use in determining which places are similar to each other, you can select among dozens of other criteria. These include criteria related to crime and income, population demographics, education levels, and others; there are dozens of criteria you can select.
Please click on the [+/-] Advanced Controls link just below and try PlaceMatch using a variety of filtering criteria.
All Places > California > Santa Rosa
Click this [+/-] link to see or edit the similarity criteria used.
Cities and Towns Similar to Santa Rosa, California:
Sorted from most similar to least (using the default selection criteria).
Your specified criteria have resulted in 72 locations (a maximum of 100 are shown in the table below). Note that you can dictate for each each criterion (e.g., the percentage of people in poverty) whether it should match Santa Rosa 'loosely' or 'strictly', using the Advanced Controls. This matching level, loose versus strict, is shown near the top of each column in the results table.
Click on a city or town name below to find places similar to it.
Or, to see details about a place, click its [details] link in the table below.
| City, State | Similarity | Go To City | 1 Person Houses | 65+ | College Grads | Commute Minutes | Family Income | Kids 0-4 | Non White | Pop. | Poverty | Prop. Crime | Seasonal Housing | Viol. Crime | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | ||||
| SANTA ROSA, CALIFORNIA | [details] | 27.8% | 13.9% | 27.6% | 24 | $59,659 | 6.5% | 22.4% | 147,595 | 8.5% | 36.8 | 0.5% | 6.8 | ||
| 1. Napa, California | 94.6 | [details] | 26.6% | 13.8% | 23.3% | 25 | $58,788 | 6.8% | 19.7% | 72,585 | 8.9% | 33.7 | 0.6% | 4.5 | |
| 2. Redlands, California | 92.2 | [details] | 26.1% | 12.6% | 35.2% | 24 | $56,254 | 6.2% | 26.3% | 63,591 | 10.5% | 36.5 | 0.4% | 4.6 | |
| 3. San Diego, California | 90.1 | [details] | 28% | 10.5% | 35% | 24 | $53,060 | 6.7% | 39.8% | 1,223,400 | 14.6% | 37.1 | 1.1% | 5.5 | |
| 4. Lacey, Washington | 89.9 | [details] | 29% | 13.3% | 26.9% | 25 | $50,923 | 7.7% | 21.8% | 31,226 | 9.2% | 49.5 | 0.3% | 3.6 | |
| 5. Colorado Springs, Colorado | 89.3 | [details] | 27.1% | 9.6% | 33.6% | 22 | $53,478 | 7.5% | 19.3% | 360,890 | 8.7% | 56.4 | 0.5% | 4.5 | |
| 6. Salem, Oregon | 89 | [details] | 28.4% | 12.4% | 24.1% | 23 | $46,409 | 7.4% | 16.9% | 136,924 | 15% | 72.6 | 0.3% | 5.4 | |
| 7. Des Moines, Washington | 88.9 | [details] | 28% | 14.9% | 22.9% | 28 | $57,003 | 6.6% | 25.8% | 29,267 | 7.6% | 43.7 | 0.5% | 3.9 | |
| 8. Lakewood, Colorado | 88.3 | [details] | 30.7% | 12.1% | 32.8% | 27 | $57,171 | 6.1% | 12.8% | 144,126 | 7.1% | 53.6 | 0.3% | 4.6 | |
| 9. Temple Terrace, Florida | 87.7 | [details] | 29.4% | 11.9% | 43.5% | 24 | $56,809 | 5.5% | 19.5% | 20,918 | 7.2% | 38.6 | 0.5% | 3.5 | |
| 10. Albuquerque, New Mexico | 87.6 | [details] | 30.5% | 12% | 31.8% | 21 | $46,979 | 6.9% | 28.4% | 448,607 | 13.5% | 65.9 | 0.4% | 10.5 | |
| 11. Sparks, Nevada | 87.4 | [details] | 24% | 10.2% | 17.8% | 19 | $52,029 | 7.4% | 21.6% | 66,346 | 8% | 55.2 | 0.2% | 5.6 | |
| 12. Haverhill, Massachusetts | 87.3 | [details] | 28.7% | 12.8% | 23.4% | 28 | $59,772 | 7.4% | 10.3% | 58,969 | 9.1% | 25.4 | 0.3% | 5 | |
| 13. Fullerton, California | 87.2 | [details] | 23.4% | 11.3% | 31.3% | 29 | $57,345 | 7% | 38.1% | 126,003 | 11.4% | 36.3 | 0.2% | 3.1 | |
| 14. West Haven, Connecticut | 87 | [details] | 31.1% | 14.2% | 19.1% | 23 | $51,631 | 6.2% | 25.9% | 52,360 | 8.8% | 34.5 | 0.3% | 5.1 | |
| 15. San Mateo, California | 87 | [details] | 31.6% | 15.1% | 38.6% | 27 | $76,223 | 6.1% | 33.8% | 92,482 | 6.1% | 36.2 | 0.6% | 4.5 | |
| 16. Miami Springs, Florida | 86.7 | [details] | 25.8% | 15.5% | 26.7% | 23 | $56,892 | 5.4% | 9.2% | 13,712 | 9.7% | 37.1 | 0.5% | 5.3 | |
| 17. Havre de Grace, Maryland | 86.7 | [details] | 30.5% | 13% | 21.9% | 28 | $53,838 | 7.4% | 20.8% | 11,331 | 10.1% | 41 | 1.2% | 7.2 | |
| 18. Greensboro, North Carolina | 86.6 | [details] | 32.8% | 11.9% | 33.9% | 21 | $50,192 | 6.3% | 44.5% | 223,891 | 12.3% | 61.4 | 0.4% | 7.6 | |
| 19. Dover, Delaware | 86.6 | [details] | 32.3% | 13.3% | 28.8% | 20 | $48,338 | 6.7% | 45.1% | 32,135 | 13.8% | 56.2 | 0.4% | 7.6 | |
| 20. Roseville, California | 86.6 | [details] | 23.1% | 14.5% | 31.4% | 27 | $65,929 | 7.3% | 14% | 79,921 | 4.9% | 54.4 | 0.4% | 3.6 | |
| 21. Hazelwood, Missouri | 86.6 | [details] | 31.8% | 11.6% | 22.5% | 23 | $52,656 | 6.1% | 19.8% | 26,206 | 6.3% | 37.3 | 0.4% | 4.5 | |
| 22. Jacksonville, Florida | 86.5 | [details] | 26.2% | 10.3% | 21.1% | 26 | $47,243 | 7.3% | 35.5% | 735,617 | 12.2% | 58.8 | 0.3% | 8.9 | |
| 23. Redwood City, California | 86.5 | [details] | 27.1% | 10.2% | 35.7% | 26 | $73,798 | 7.5% | 31% | 75,402 | 6% | 32.8 | 0.8% | 4.2 | |
| 24. Lexington, Kentucky | 86.1 | [details] | 31.7% | 10% | 35.6% | 20 | $53,264 | 6.2% | 19% | 260,512 | 12.9% | 39.2 | 0.8% | 5 | |
| 25. Indianapolis, Indiana | 86 | [details] | 32% | 11.1% | 25.4% | 23 | $48,755 | 7.3% | 30.7% | 791,926 | 11.9% | 59.4 | 0.3% | 8.9 | |
| 26. Paso Robles, California | 85.8 | [details] | 23.4% | 13.4% | 17.4% | 21 | $44,322 | 7.2% | 24.3% | 24,297 | 13.6% | 27.5 | 0.3% | 4.9 | |
| 27. Marlborough, Massachusetts | 85.8 | [details] | 28.4% | 11.6% | 35.6% | 28 | $70,385 | 7% | 12.3% | 36,255 | 6.8% | 22.9 | 0.4% | 3.6 | |
| 28. Annapolis, Maryland | 85.6 | [details] | 32.5% | 11.9% | 38.7% | 27 | $56,984 | 6.7% | 37.3% | 35,838 | 12.7% | 51.8 | 1.2% | 12.2 | |
| 29. Burien, Washington | 85.5 | [details] | 32.5% | 13.8% | 21.2% | 26 | $53,814 | 6.1% | 24.3% | 31,881 | 9.4% | 62.9 | 0.3% | 5.4 | |
| 30. San Bruno, California | 85.5 | [details] | 25.3% | 11.2% | 26.2% | 27 | $70,251 | 6.1% | 42.3% | 40,165 | 4.4% | 24.7 | 0.5% | 2.9 | |
| 31. Durham, North Carolina | 85.4 | [details] | 31.8% | 9.3% | 41.8% | 22 | $51,162 | 7.2% | 54.5% | 187,035 | 15% | 65.4 | 0.6% | 8.4 | |
| 32. Somerville, New Jersey | 85.2 | [details] | 32.8% | 14% | 31.5% | 24 | $60,422 | 7% | 28.8% | 12,423 | 7.7% | 20.2 | 0.3% | 3.2 | |
| 33. Clifton, New Jersey | 84.9 | [details] | 27.9% | 17.6% | 23.6% | 26 | $60,688 | 6% | 23.8% | 78,672 | 6.3% | 26.7 | 0.2% | 2.9 | |
| 34. Casselberry, Florida | 84.7 | [details] | 31.1% | 14.5% | 18.5% | 28 | $45,354 | 5.5% | 14.4% | 22,629 | 8.8% | 40.6 | 1.1% | 6.7 | |
| 35. Fridley, Minnesota | 84.6 | [details] | 26.9% | 12% | 24.4% | 23 | $55,381 | 6.7% | 11.3% | 27,449 | 7.3% | 46.3 | 0.2% | 3 | |
| 36. Kentwood, Michigan | 84.6 | [details] | 31% | 9.8% | 31.5% | 20 | $55,615 | 7.7% | 19.1% | 45,255 | 6.3% | 33.2 | 0.5% | 3 | |
| 37. High Point, North Carolina | 84.5 | [details] | 27.2% | 11.9% | 25.5% | 21 | $48,057 | 7.5% | 39.4% | 85,839 | 13.2% | 67.7 | 0.5% | 7.8 | |
| 38. Rock Hill, South Carolina | 84.5 | [details] | 27.3% | 11.3% | 24.3% | 24 | $45,697 | 7% | 41.3% | 49,765 | 14% | 59.5 | 0.3% | 14.3 | |
| 39. Maitland, Florida | 84.4 | [details] | 27.7% | 16.2% | 51.8% | 25 | $69,504 | 5.9% | 14.8% | 12,019 | 6.4% | 36 | 0.9% | 3.3 | |
| 40. Manchester, New Hampshire | 84.3 | [details] | 31.7% | 12.9% | 22.3% | 22 | $50,039 | 6.7% | 8.3% | 107,006 | 10.6% | 35 | 0.5% | 3.4 | |
| 41. Placerville, California | 84.2 | [details] | 33.2% | 17.4% | 19.6% | 24 | $46,875 | 6.5% | 11.4% | 9,610 | 12.1% | 45.6 | 0.9% | 4.6 | |
| 42. Meriden, Connecticut | 84.1 | [details] | 28.8% | 14.1% | 16.4% | 20 | $52,788 | 7.1% | 19.8% | 58,244 | 11% | 37.9 | 0.2% | 3.5 | |
| 43. Atascadero, California | 83.9 | [details] | 22.2% | 11.5% | 20.3% | 22 | $55,009 | 5.4% | 11.2% | 26,411 | 9% | 26.4 | 0.7% | 4.2 | |
| 44. Summerville, South Carolina | 83.5 | [details] | 23.3% | 10.6% | 26.7% | 29 | $51,469 | 7% | 22.8% | 27,752 | 9.2% | 45.4 | 0.4% | 4.1 | |
| 45. Kenner, Louisiana | 83.5 | [details] | 23.1% | 8.9% | 21.3% | 28 | $45,866 | 7% | 31.9% | 70,517 | 13.6% | 42.4 | 0.3% | 4.4 | |
| 46. Winston-Salem, North Carolina | 83.5 | [details] | 33.4% | 13.7% | 30.3% | 20 | $46,595 | 6.7% | 44.4% | 185,776 | 15.2% | 66.5 | 0.3% | 8.1 | |
| 47. Garden City, Idaho | 83.4 | [details] | 27% | 12.5% | 24.2% | 20 | $46,463 | 7.5% | 10.7% | 10,624 | 12.7% | 54.4 | 0.5% | 8.6 | |
| 48. White Plains, New York | 83.3 | [details] | 33.4% | 15.2% | 41.1% | 29 | $71,891 | 6.2% | 35.1% | 53,077 | 9.8% | 27.1 | 0.8% | 4 | |
| 49. Woodbury, New Jersey | 83.2 | [details] | 31.7% | 16.5% | 21.9% | 26 | $53,630 | 6.5% | 27.6% | 10,307 | 13.5% | 47.2 | 0.3% | 5.1 | |
| 50. Mauldin, South Carolina | 82.9 | [details] | 26% | 9.3% | 34.5% | 20 | $61,817 | 7.2% | 25.7% | 15,224 | 4.4% | 38.6 | 0.6% | 6.1 | |
| 51. Waxahachie, Texas | 82.6 | [details] | 21.5% | 12.3% | 18.4% | 25 | $50,048 | 7.5% | 29.6% | 21,426 | 12.8% | 49.4 | 0.6% | 4.4 | |
| 52. Lebanon, Tennessee | 82.3 | [details] | 28.2% | 14.2% | 18.2% | 24 | $45,094 | 7% | 17.1% | 20,235 | 13% | 47.4 | 0.4% | 6 | |
| 53. Northport, Alabama | 82.2 | [details] | 28.8% | 14.1% | 30% | 20 | $48,673 | 7.1% | 28.9% | 19,435 | 13.9% | 43.3 | 0.4% | 7.4 | |
| 54. Fort Walton Beach, Florida | 82 | [details] | 27.6% | 16.3% | 21.3% | 20 | $45,791 | 5.5% | 21.2% | 19,973 | 9.9% | 37.2 | 0.9% | 4.5 | |
| 55. Belmont, North Carolina | 81.7 | [details] | 27.8% | 13.4% | 22% | 22 | $46,765 | 6.1% | 15.6% | 8,705 | 9.5% | 48.3 | 0.2% | 3.8 | |
| 56. Kernersville, North Carolina | 81.5 | [details] | 31.2% | 10.3% | 25.9% | 22 | $52,266 | 7% | 15.9% | 17,126 | 8.4% | 68.6 | 0.3% | 5.3 | |
| 57. Florence, Kentucky | 81.4 | [details] | 30.2% | 11.8% | 17.9% | 23 | $52,160 | 7.5% | 7.6% | 23,551 | 9.5% | 65 | 0.7% | 3.9 | |
| 58. Westland, Michigan | 81.4 | [details] | 32.5% | 13.2% | 16.1% | 25 | $55,323 | 6.9% | 12.8% | 86,602 | 6.8% | 29.2 | 0.3% | 4.1 | |
| 59. Bethany, Oklahoma | 80.6 | [details] | 30.3% | 16.7% | 23.1% | 21 | $43,905 | 6.2% | 14.2% | 20,307 | 9% | 42.6 | 0.3% | 3.5 | |
| 60. Burlington, North Carolina | 80.5 | [details] | 30.2% | 17% | 21.7% | 19 | $45,441 | 6.5% | 33.7% | 44,917 | 13.7% | 56.7 | 0.3% | 6.6 | |
| 61. Easley, South Carolina | 80.5 | [details] | 25.7% | 14.7% | 20.8% | 24 | $47,867 | 6.8% | 14.7% | 17,754 | 10.9% | 56.7 | 0.4% | 3.6 | |
| 62. Aiken, South Carolina | 80.4 | [details] | 29.7% | 17.8% | 38.1% | 23 | $56,033 | 5.8% | 33.4% | 25,337 | 14.4% | 52.5 | 1% | 3.9 | |
| 63. Claremore, Oklahoma | 80 | [details] | 30.6% | 16.9% | 16.6% | 22 | $45,810 | 7.3% | 24.3% | 15,873 | 11.9% | 43.3 | 0.3% | 3.3 | |
| 64. Miami Shores, Florida | 79.4 | [details] | 23.3% | 12.6% | 43% | 26 | $64,963 | 5.6% | 34.9% | 10,380 | 8.8% | 61.5 | 0.7% | 5.4 | |
| 65. Angleton, Texas | 79.2 | [details] | 21.4% | 10.8% | 17.2% | 25 | $50,019 | 7.7% | 24.8% | 18,130 | 11.1% | 28.9 | 0.3% | 6.2 | |
| 66. Hendersonville, Tennessee | 79 | [details] | 22.5% | 10.2% | 26.4% | 29 | $57,625 | 6.6% | 7.1% | 40,620 | 6.2% | 22.9 | 0.3% | 3.1 | |
| 67. Decatur, Alabama | 78.2 | [details] | 28.8% | 13.1% | 23.7% | 20 | $47,574 | 6.8% | 24.5% | 53,929 | 14.9% | 72.7 | 0.3% | 5 | |
| 68. Rock Springs, Wyoming | 78.1 | [details] | 27% | 9.9% | 18.1% | 20 | $51,539 | 6.8% | 8.3% | 18,708 | 9.4% | 51.2 | 0.8% | 9 | |
| 69. Rio Rancho, New Mexico | 77.5 | [details] | 20.8% | 11.7% | 24.8% | 29 | $52,233 | 7.5% | 21.6% | 51,765 | 5.1% | 25.6 | 0.5% | 3.2 | |
| 70. Bartow, Florida | 77.3 | [details] | 27.8% | 16.9% | 17% | 21 | $44,093 | 6.3% | 34.1% | 15,340 | 13.1% | 61.8 | 0.8% | 8.9 | |
| 71. Mount Pleasant, South Carolina | 76 | [details] | 23.6% | 10.3% | 52.6% | 23 | $71,165 | 7.5% | 9.8% | 47,609 | 5% | 27.9 | 0.8% | 3.2 | |
| 72. Kirkwood, Missouri | 74.8 | [details] | 33.4% | 18.2% | 51.5% | 22 | $72,830 | 6% | 9.2% | 27,324 | 4.6% | 28.3 | 0.4% | 3 |
Copyright © 2004-2008 Moving Traffic, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
|