 |
|
|
|
PlaceMatch™ lets you find places similar to any city or town you select, either using the default criteria or using criteria you specify.The criteria being used are show as column headings in the results table further below.
However, if you want to specify which factors to use in determining which places are similar to each other, you can select among dozens of other criteria. These include criteria related to crime and income, population demographics, education levels, and others; there are dozens of criteria you can select.
Please click on the [+/-] Advanced Controls link just below and try PlaceMatch using a variety of filtering criteria.
All Places > California > Simi Valley
Click this [+/-] link to see or edit the similarity criteria used.
Cities and Towns Similar to Simi Valley, California:
Sorted from most similar to least (using the default selection criteria).
Your specified criteria have resulted in 100 locations (a maximum of 100 are shown in the table below). Note that you can dictate for each each criterion (e.g., the percentage of people in poverty) whether it should match Simi Valley 'loosely' or 'strictly', using the Advanced Controls. This matching level, loose versus strict, is shown near the top of each column in the results table.
Click on a city or town name below to find places similar to it.
Or, to see details about a place, click its [details] link in the table below.
| City, State | Similarity | Go To City | 1 Person Houses | 65+ | College Grads | Commute Minutes | Family Income | Kids 0-4 | Non White | Pop. | Poverty | Prop. Crime | Seasonal Housing | Viol. Crime | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | ||||
| SIMI VALLEY, CALIFORNIA | [details] | 14.7% | 7.6% | 24.9% | 30 | $75,140 | 7.3% | 18.7% | 111,351 | 5.8% | 19.7 | 0.1% | 1.6 | ||
| 1. Santa Clarita, California | 93.8 | [details] | 19.1% | 7.1% | 29.1% | 35 | $73,588 | 7.8% | 20.5% | 151,088 | 6.4% | 20.9 | 0.2% | 2.4 | |
| 2. Lake Forest, California | 92.7 | [details] | 19.7% | 8.6% | 33.9% | 27 | $75,121 | 7.1% | 24% | 58,707 | 5.3% | 19.3 | 0.1% | 2 | |
| 3. Moorpark, California | 91.7 | [details] | 10% | 4.5% | 34.2% | 30 | $78,909 | 8.1% | 25.6% | 31,415 | 7% | 11.7 | 0.1% | 1.3 | |
| 4. Rancho Cucamonga, California | 91.3 | [details] | 16.8% | 6.1% | 23.3% | 33 | $66,446 | 7% | 33.5% | 127,743 | 7.1% | 33.9 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 5. Livermore, California | 91.2 | [details] | 18.6% | 7.5% | 31.6% | 33 | $82,421 | 7.7% | 18.1% | 73,345 | 5.3% | 25.6 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 6. Morgan Hill, California | 91 | [details] | 15.8% | 7.5% | 33.5% | 37 | $90,134 | 8.1% | 27.6% | 33,556 | 4.7% | 28.3 | 0.3% | 1.5 | |
| 7. Pearland, Texas | 90.8 | [details] | 15.4% | 8.4% | 29.1% | 32 | $70,748 | 8% | 17.4% | 37,640 | 4.7% | 32 | 0.1% | 2.7 | |
| 8. Mission Viejo, California | 90.8 | [details] | 17% | 10.9% | 41.2% | 29 | $86,902 | 6.9% | 16.8% | 93,102 | 3.8% | 14.1 | 0.3% | 1.3 | |
| 9. Friendswood, Texas | 90.7 | [details] | 17.2% | 8.6% | 38.6% | 30 | $77,293 | 6.6% | 9.9% | 29,037 | 3.3% | 15.6 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 10. Placentia, California | 90.7 | [details] | 16.1% | 9.1% | 31.3% | 28 | $68,976 | 7.4% | 32.2% | 46,488 | 8.7% | 19.2 | 0.2% | 2.8 | |
| 11. Schertz, Texas | 90.4 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.8% | 27.5% | 25 | $59,745 | 7.5% | 18% | 18,694 | 5.2% | 24 | 0.2% | 2.3 | |
| 12. Windsor, California | 90.3 | [details] | 18.1% | 11.1% | 24.7% | 27 | $67,992 | 8% | 21% | 22,744 | 5.1% | 19.8 | 0.3% | 2.9 | |
| 13. Glendora, California | 90.1 | [details] | 19.1% | 12.5% | 25.7% | 31 | $66,674 | 6.3% | 19.7% | 49,415 | 5.9% | 26.4 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 14. Rowlett, Texas | 89.7 | [details] | 10.6% | 5.2% | 32.5% | 34 | $73,417 | 8.7% | 18.2% | 44,503 | 3% | 26.1 | 0.1% | 1.6 | |
| 15. Chino Hills, California | 89.6 | [details] | 10.8% | 4.2% | 37.6% | 41 | $81,794 | 8.7% | 43.6% | 66,787 | 5.1% | 16.3 | 0.1% | 1.1 | |
| 16. Missouri City, Texas | 89.4 | [details] | 12% | 5.4% | 44.5% | 34 | $77,762 | 7.3% | 55.7% | 52,913 | 3.3% | 23.9 | 0.1% | 2.5 | |
| 17. Santee, California | 89.2 | [details] | 18% | 8.9% | 17% | 28 | $57,874 | 6.7% | 13.3% | 52,975 | 5.4% | 23.3 | 0.2% | 3.1 | |
| 18. Rocklin, California | 89 | [details] | 18.6% | 8.6% | 36.1% | 28 | $72,245 | 7.9% | 11.7% | 36,330 | 4.5% | 34.4 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 19. Allen, Texas | 89 | [details] | 11.9% | 2.8% | 47.5% | 31 | $82,747 | 10.7% | 12.9% | 43,554 | 3% | 33.9 | 0.1% | 1.4 | |
| 20. Billerica, Massachusetts | 88.7 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.4% | 23.4% | 28 | $72,102 | 6.9% | 5.3% | 38,981 | 3.8% | 12 | 0.1% | 0.8 | |
| 21. Sachse, Texas | 88.4 | [details] | 10.3% | 4% | 30.6% | 31 | $71,918 | 9.2% | 12.7% | 9,751 | 4.6% | 19.9 | 0.3% | 1.5 | |
| 22. Cedar Park, Texas | 88.4 | [details] | 13.1% | 4.3% | 36.6% | 32 | $70,587 | 11% | 13.6% | 26,049 | 4.1% | 22.5 | 0.1% | 2 | |
| 23. Milpitas, California | 88.4 | [details] | 11.5% | 7% | 36.5% | 25 | $84,827 | 7.2% | 69.1% | 62,698 | 5% | 35.8 | 0.1% | 3.1 | |
| 24. Fremont, California | 87.9 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.3% | 43.2% | 34 | $82,199 | 7.4% | 52.3% | 203,413 | 5.4% | 28.1 | 0.3% | 2.2 | |
| 25. Converse, Texas | 87.9 | [details] | 16.2% | 6.4% | 19% | 25 | $49,396 | 7.8% | 30.6% | 11,508 | 6.5% | 21.3 | 0.1% | 1 | |
| 26. Rancho Santa Margarita, California | 87.9 | [details] | 17.4% | 3.4% | 43.8% | 33 | $88,216 | 10.2% | 18.4% | 47,214 | 2.9% | 10.4 | 0.2% | 0.9 | |
| 27. Gloucester, New Jersey | 87.8 | [details] | 21.3% | 9.4% | 22% | 32 | $62,992 | 6.8% | 16.9% | 64,350 | 6.2% | 25.2 | 0.1% | 3.2 | |
| 28. Wanaque, New Jersey | 87.8 | [details] | 16.7% | 12% | 22.3% | 30 | $71,127 | 6.7% | 9.3% | 10,266 | 3.3% | 13.2 | 0.1% | 1.3 | |
| 29. Hillsborough, New Jersey | 87.8 | [details] | 17.2% | 6.8% | 46.6% | 33 | $93,933 | 7.9% | 14% | 36,634 | 3.1% | 9.7 | 0.2% | 0.5 | |
| 30. Deer Park, Texas | 87.7 | [details] | 14% | 7.4% | 16.5% | 24 | $66,516 | 6.3% | 10% | 28,520 | 5.6% | 22.6 | 0.2% | 2.1 | |
| 31. Petaluma, California | 87.6 | [details] | 22.8% | 11% | 30.1% | 34 | $71,158 | 6.6% | 15.8% | 54,548 | 6% | 24.3 | 0.3% | 2.6 | |
| 32. Corona, California | 87.5 | [details] | 14.4% | 5.8% | 22% | 37 | $63,505 | 9.8% | 38% | 124,966 | 8.3% | 36.2 | 0.2% | 2.2 | |
| 33. Powder Springs, Georgia | 87.5 | [details] | 13.7% | 6.3% | 28.7% | 39 | $59,392 | 8% | 42.1% | 12,481 | 8.5% | 24 | 0.1% | 1.4 | |
| 34. Aberdeen, New Jersey | 87.4 | [details] | 20.8% | 10.4% | 34.4% | 37 | $76,648 | 6.9% | 21.2% | 17,454 | 4.7% | 14.3 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 35. Cottage Grove, Minnesota | 87.4 | [details] | 11.1% | 4.9% | 23.9% | 27 | $68,935 | 8.5% | 6.5% | 30,582 | 2.2% | 25.5 | 0.1% | 1.4 | |
| 36. Lafayette, Colorado | 87.3 | [details] | 22.7% | 5.8% | 45.6% | 26 | $64,088 | 8% | 14.5% | 23,197 | 7% | 22.8 | 0.2% | 2.6 | |
| 37. Howell, New Jersey | 87.2 | [details] | 15.3% | 8.8% | 29% | 39 | $74,623 | 8% | 10% | 48,903 | 4.2% | 12.7 | 0.3% | 1 | |
| 38. Parker, Colorado | 87.2 | [details] | 13.1% | 2.7% | 45.3% | 30 | $77,384 | 11.7% | 7.4% | 23,558 | 2.3% | 33.2 | 0.1% | 1.3 | |
| 39. Layton, Utah | 87.1 | [details] | 14.9% | 5.7% | 27.1% | 25 | $57,193 | 10.3% | 10.1% | 58,474 | 5.6% | 31 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 40. Arvada, Colorado | 87 | [details] | 22.9% | 10.7% | 29% | 27 | $63,273 | 6.4% | 9% | 102,153 | 5.2% | 35.8 | 0.1% | 1.8 | |
| 41. Bartlett, Tennessee | 87 | [details] | 12% | 8.6% | 28.2% | 25 | $69,962 | 6.6% | 7.6% | 40,543 | 2.7% | 28.4 | 0.1% | 1 | |
| 42. West Linn, Oregon | 86.7 | [details] | 17.9% | 7.8% | 49.2% | 25 | $83,252 | 6.6% | 6.7% | 22,261 | 3.9% | 19.2 | 0.3% | 1.1 | |
| 43. South Brunswick, New Jersey | 86.7 | [details] | 19.5% | 7.3% | 49% | 36 | $86,891 | 8.1% | 29.5% | 37,734 | 3.1% | 13.3 | 0.2% | 0.9 | |
| 44. Lino Lakes, Minnesota | 86.7 | [details] | 10% | 3.3% | 33.5% | 28 | $79,183 | 8.5% | 6.3% | 16,791 | 3% | 17.8 | 0% | 1 | |
| 45. Roswell, Georgia | 86.7 | [details] | 22.8% | 7.5% | 52.6% | 32 | $85,946 | 6.9% | 18.5% | 79,334 | 5% | 27.5 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 46. Evesham, New Jersey | 86.7 | [details] | 22.9% | 8.9% | 39.7% | 31 | $77,245 | 7.3% | 8.7% | 42,275 | 2.8% | 16.7 | 0.2% | 1.2 | |
| 47. Corinth, Texas | 86.4 | [details] | 10.3% | 3.3% | 38.9% | 36 | $80,792 | 10.9% | 11.4% | 11,325 | 1.6% | 16.5 | 0.1% | 0.6 | |
| 48. St. Peters, Missouri | 86.4 | [details] | 20.5% | 7.8% | 27.2% | 27 | $65,123 | 7.4% | 5.7% | 51,381 | 2.7% | 27.4 | 0.2% | 2 | |
| 49. Pickerington, Ohio | 86.3 | [details] | 18.9% | 5.4% | 31.6% | 30 | $71,161 | 8.4% | 6.8% | 9,792 | 3.2% | 30.7 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 50. Old Bridge, New Jersey | 86.3 | [details] | 21% | 10.5% | 29.5% | 41 | $74,045 | 7% | 20.5% | 60,456 | 4.2% | 17.4 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 51. Norton, Massachusetts | 86.1 | [details] | 19.3% | 7.8% | 30.8% | 32 | $71,848 | 8% | 7.8% | 18,036 | 4% | 10 | 0.3% | 0.4 | |
| 52. Keller, Texas | 86.1 | [details] | 9.1% | 4.3% | 44.6% | 32 | $90,129 | 8.6% | 6.3% | 27,345 | 1.4% | 21.7 | 0.1% | 0.7 | |
| 53. Danville, California | 86.1 | [details] | 15.9% | 10.3% | 59.4% | 33 | $125,867 | 7.1% | 13.7% | 41,715 | 2.2% | 18.1 | 0.3% | 1.2 | |
| 54. Bridgewater, New Jersey | 86.1 | [details] | 19.3% | 12.7% | 49.9% | 31 | $99,832 | 7.7% | 14.9% | 42,940 | 2.1% | 14.8 | 0.3% | 0.4 | |
| 55. Orange, California | 86.1 | [details] | 19.4% | 9.6% | 28% | 26 | $64,573 | 7.4% | 29.5% | 128,821 | 10% | 27.4 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 56. Windsor, Colorado | 86 | [details] | 18.7% | 7.8% | 30.5% | 24 | $60,305 | 8.6% | 8.2% | 9,896 | 5.6% | 13.3 | 0.1% | 1.7 | |
| 57. Lakeville, Minnesota | 86 | [details] | 10.7% | 2.8% | 35.7% | 26 | $76,542 | 10.1% | 5.7% | 43,128 | 2% | 19.1 | 0.2% | 0.7 | |
| 58. Sherwood, Oregon | 86 | [details] | 15.7% | 5.3% | 35.6% | 28 | $67,277 | 11.5% | 7.6% | 11,791 | 2.7% | 21.9 | 0.1% | 0.5 | |
| 59. Savage, Minnesota | 86 | [details] | 10.6% | 2.6% | 41.4% | 26 | $79,244 | 12.2% | 9.4% | 21,115 | 2.3% | 29.7 | 0.1% | 1.3 | |
| 60. Sandy, Utah | 86 | [details] | 11.3% | 5.2% | 34.7% | 25 | $70,801 | 7.9% | 6.5% | 88,418 | 3.8% | 35.5 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 61. Apple Valley, Minnesota | 85.9 | [details] | 19.2% | 5.5% | 41% | 25 | $79,335 | 7.2% | 8.2% | 45,527 | 2.1% | 32.8 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 62. Delran, New Jersey | 85.8 | [details] | 21% | 10.8% | 27.3% | 28 | $67,895 | 6.2% | 17.1% | 15,536 | 4.1% | 17.1 | 0.1% | 1.4 | |
| 63. Maple Valley, Washington | 85.8 | [details] | 12.8% | 4.5% | 31.7% | 38 | $70,008 | 9.2% | 9.4% | 14,209 | 2.6% | 32 | 0.3% | 1.8 | |
| 64. Rosemount, Minnesota | 85.8 | [details] | 13.1% | 5.4% | 29.3% | 26 | $68,929 | 9.4% | 7.2% | 14,619 | 3.3% | 33.7 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 65. Sayreville, New Jersey | 85.6 | [details] | 22.3% | 12.4% | 25% | 36 | $66,266 | 6.7% | 23.5% | 40,377 | 4.7% | 18 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 66. Holly Springs, North Carolina | 85.5 | [details] | 16.4% | 2.8% | 50.7% | 34 | $74,010 | 11.5% | 22.9% | 9,192 | 4.8% | 20.1 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 67. Pflugerville, Texas | 85.4 | [details] | 11.5% | 3.7% | 38.3% | 27 | $73,629 | 9.3% | 22.8% | 16,335 | 1.7% | 31 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 68. Coppell, Texas | 85.4 | [details] | 15.8% | 2.6% | 62.6% | 27 | $106,630 | 9.5% | 16.8% | 35,958 | 1.9% | 24.8 | 0.3% | 0.6 | |
| 69. Kennesaw, Georgia | 85.3 | [details] | 22% | 5.8% | 34.5% | 38 | $67,778 | 9.9% | 18% | 21,675 | 4.5% | 25.5 | 0.2% | 1.1 | |
| 70. Round Rock, Texas | 85 | [details] | 18.5% | 4.5% | 32.9% | 28 | $65,471 | 9.7% | 23.2% | 61,136 | 4% | 27.4 | 0.3% | 1.5 | |
| 71. Randolph, New Jersey | 85 | [details] | 18% | 7.3% | 59.4% | 32 | $115,722 | 7.6% | 14.3% | 24,847 | 1.4% | 10.2 | 0.2% | 0.5 | |
| 72. McKinney, Texas | 84.8 | [details] | 18.9% | 6.8% | 39.1% | 29 | $72,133 | 10.1% | 21.6% | 54,369 | 8.5% | 34.1 | 0.2% | 3.4 | |
| 73. Wylie, Texas | 84.7 | [details] | 15.4% | 5.9% | 21.4% | 34 | $62,903 | 9.4% | 9.5% | 15,132 | 3.4% | 32.7 | 0.2% | 2.5 | |
| 74. West Richland, Washington | 84.7 | [details] | 17.5% | 6.1% | 29.1% | 25 | $61,813 | 9.2% | 6.8% | 8,385 | 4.5% | 19.2 | 0.1% | 1.2 | |
| 75. Alabaster, Alabama | 84.6 | [details] | 17.7% | 7.7% | 34.7% | 32 | $63,685 | 9.3% | 12.3% | 22,619 | 5.9% | 8.9 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 76. Flower Mound, Texas | 84.6 | [details] | 8.9% | 2.7% | 53.1% | 33 | $98,055 | 10.7% | 9.8% | 50,702 | 2.5% | 13.9 | 0.1% | 0.9 | |
| 77. East Windsor, New Jersey | 84.6 | [details] | 24.4% | 8.3% | 42% | 35 | $73,461 | 7.7% | 25.6% | 24,919 | 5.3% | 16.3 | 0.2% | 0.9 | |
| 78. Sterling Heights, Michigan | 84.5 | [details] | 24.1% | 11.8% | 23% | 27 | $70,140 | 6.2% | 9.3% | 124,471 | 5.2% | 23 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 79. Ashland, Massachusetts | 84.4 | [details] | 22.6% | 9.8% | 45.6% | 34 | $77,611 | 7.9% | 8.1% | 14,674 | 2% | 3.9 | 0.2% | 1.6 | |
| 80. Norfolk, Massachusetts | 84.4 | [details] | 10.8% | 5.5% | 37.9% | 36 | $92,001 | 7.3% | 11% | 10,460 | 1.1% | 4.2 | 0.4% | 0.5 | |
| 81. Castle Rock, Colorado | 84.4 | [details] | 17.8% | 4.7% | 38.6% | 30 | $72,563 | 9.8% | 6.2% | 20,224 | 3.6% | 35.1 | 0.3% | 1.2 | |
| 82. Grand Terrace, California | 84.2 | [details] | 21.5% | 10.7% | 24.3% | 26 | $61,068 | 6.6% | 26.2% | 11,626 | 7.4% | 25.3 | 0.4% | 1.4 | |
| 83. Warren, New Jersey | 84.1 | [details] | 12.1% | 11.2% | 58.2% | 33 | $121,264 | 7.1% | 13.7% | 14,259 | 2.1% | 10.9 | 0.3% | 0.5 | |
| 84. South San Francisco, California | 84.1 | [details] | 19.8% | 12.6% | 25.2% | 28 | $66,598 | 6.5% | 56% | 60,552 | 5.2% | 23.7 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 85. Forest Park, Ohio | 84.1 | [details] | 24.8% | 9.1% | 26.2% | 25 | $55,618 | 6.6% | 63.3% | 19,463 | 6% | 28.5 | 0.1% | 2.5 | |
| 86. North Brunswick, New Jersey | 84 | [details] | 24.4% | 10% | 37% | 32 | $70,812 | 6.7% | 37.3% | 36,287 | 4.7% | 25.2 | 0.1% | 2.2 | |
| 87. Apex, North Carolina | 83.9 | [details] | 19.3% | 4% | 58.8% | 26 | $78,689 | 10.4% | 14.9% | 20,212 | 1.9% | 21.7 | 0.2% | 3.5 | |
| 88. Ballwin, Missouri | 83.9 | [details] | 21.3% | 12.1% | 46.7% | 28 | $77,021 | 7.3% | 6.6% | 31,283 | 3.2% | 7.8 | 0.2% | 0.6 | |
| 89. Chelmsford, Massachusetts | 83.9 | [details] | 23.1% | 13% | 44% | 29 | $82,676 | 6.7% | 6.9% | 33,858 | 2.8% | 16 | 0.3% | 1.2 | |
| 90. Manchester, Missouri | 83.8 | [details] | 20.5% | 9% | 52.9% | 25 | $71,329 | 7% | 8.4% | 19,161 | 3% | 13.1 | 0.1% | 0.6 | |
| 91. Zachary, Louisiana | 83.8 | [details] | 16.9% | 10.8% | 20.8% | 28 | $57,389 | 6.9% | 30.2% | 11,275 | 9.1% | 27.4 | 0.1% | 1.6 | |
| 92. Ramsey, New Jersey | 83.6 | [details] | 22.6% | 11.2% | 54.5% | 30 | $104,036 | 7.6% | 8.4% | 14,351 | 1.9% | 13 | 0.3% | 1.1 | |
| 93. North Plainfield, New Jersey | 83.3 | [details] | 23.1% | 9.5% | 26.5% | 31 | $62,875 | 7.8% | 36.9% | 21,103 | 6.4% | 22.9 | 0.1% | 2.9 | |
| 94. Brandon, Mississippi | 83.2 | [details] | 24% | 11.5% | 34.4% | 25 | $63,098 | 6.7% | 13.4% | 16,436 | 6% | 19.3 | 0.1% | 0.7 | |
| 95. Edison, New Jersey | 83.1 | [details] | 21.2% | 11.9% | 42.3% | 34 | $77,976 | 6.4% | 40.5% | 97,687 | 4.8% | 25.1 | 0.2% | 2.2 | |
| 96. Maplewood, New Jersey | 82.9 | [details] | 20.4% | 12.1% | 50.8% | 37 | $92,724 | 7.9% | 41.2% | 23,868 | 4.4% | 27.2 | 0.1% | 3.4 | |
| 97. Hendersonville, Tennessee | 82.8 | [details] | 22.5% | 10.2% | 26.4% | 29 | $57,625 | 6.6% | 7.1% | 40,620 | 6.2% | 22.9 | 0.3% | 3.1 | |
| 98. Sharon, Massachusetts | 82.8 | [details] | 14.6% | 10.9% | 63.1% | 37 | $99,015 | 7% | 10% | 17,408 | 3% | 5.5 | 0.3% | 1 | |
| 99. Southlake, Texas | 82.7 | [details] | 5.2% | 3.1% | 59.2% | 31 | $136,023 | 7.6% | 5.5% | 21,519 | 1.8% | 26.1 | 0.2% | 0.7 | |
| 100. Highland Village, Texas | 82.7 | [details] | 7.1% | 4% | 54.9% | 33 | $105,109 | 6.4% | 5.8% | 12,173 | 0.4% | 11.3 | 0.1% | 1 |