 |
|
|
|
PlaceMatch™ lets you find places similar to any city or town you select, either using the default criteria or using criteria you specify.The criteria being used are show as column headings in the results table further below.
However, if you want to specify which factors to use in determining which places are similar to each other, you can select among dozens of other criteria. These include criteria related to crime and income, population demographics, education levels, and others; there are dozens of criteria you can select.
Please click on the [+/-] Advanced Controls link just below and try PlaceMatch using a variety of filtering criteria.
All Places > Colorado > Arvada
Click this [+/-] link to see or edit the similarity criteria used.
Cities and Towns Similar to Arvada, Colorado:
Sorted from most similar to least (using the default selection criteria).
Your specified criteria have resulted in 90 locations (a maximum of 100 are shown in the table below). Note that you can dictate for each each criterion (e.g., the percentage of people in poverty) whether it should match Arvada 'loosely' or 'strictly', using the Advanced Controls. This matching level, loose versus strict, is shown near the top of each column in the results table.
Click on a city or town name below to find places similar to it.
Or, to see details about a place, click its [details] link in the table below.
| City, State | Similarity | Go To City | 1 Person Houses | 65+ | College Grads | Commute Minutes | Family Income | Kids 0-4 | Non White | Pop. | Poverty | Prop. Crime | Seasonal Housing | Viol. Crime | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | ||||
| ARVADA, COLORADO | [details] | 22.9% | 10.7% | 29% | 27 | $63,273 | 6.4% | 9% | 102,153 | 5.2% | 35.8 | 0.1% | 1.8 | ||
| 1. Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota | 92.1 | [details] | 21.6% | 7.8% | 29.6% | 23 | $68,629 | 7.2% | 8.2% | 29,751 | 4.2% | 35.4 | 0.2% | 1.7 | |
| 2. Westminster, Colorado | 90.4 | [details] | 23.9% | 6.5% | 31.3% | 28 | $63,776 | 7.3% | 15.8% | 100,940 | 4.7% | 52 | 0.3% | 2.5 | |
| 3. Coon Rapids, Minnesota | 90.1 | [details] | 20.1% | 7.3% | 21.4% | 28 | $62,260 | 7.5% | 6.8% | 61,607 | 4.8% | 48.3 | 0.2% | 1.8 | |
| 4. Blue Springs, Missouri | 89.6 | [details] | 18% | 7.1% | 27.4% | 27 | $61,008 | 7.4% | 6.8% | 48,080 | 4.8% | 42.1 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 5. Reynoldsburg, Ohio | 89.5 | [details] | 25.2% | 10.1% | 27.1% | 24 | $60,183 | 7.1% | 15% | 32,069 | 5.5% | 41.8 | 0.3% | 2.8 | |
| 6. Brandon, Mississippi | 89.5 | [details] | 24% | 11.5% | 34.4% | 25 | $63,098 | 6.7% | 13.4% | 16,436 | 6% | 19.3 | 0.1% | 0.7 | |
| 7. Gloucester, New Jersey | 89.4 | [details] | 21.3% | 9.4% | 22% | 32 | $62,992 | 6.8% | 16.9% | 64,350 | 6.2% | 25.2 | 0.1% | 3.2 | |
| 8. Sterling Heights, Michigan | 89.4 | [details] | 24.1% | 11.8% | 23% | 27 | $70,140 | 6.2% | 9.3% | 124,471 | 5.2% | 23 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 9. Hendersonville, Tennessee | 89.2 | [details] | 22.5% | 10.2% | 26.4% | 29 | $57,625 | 6.6% | 7.1% | 40,620 | 6.2% | 22.9 | 0.3% | 3.1 | |
| 10. Matthews, North Carolina | 89.2 | [details] | 17.5% | 9.2% | 42.3% | 29 | $75,791 | 7% | 9.7% | 22,127 | 4% | 48.5 | 0.1% | 2.5 | |
| 11. Santee, California | 89 | [details] | 18% | 8.9% | 17% | 28 | $57,874 | 6.7% | 13.3% | 52,975 | 5.4% | 23.3 | 0.2% | 3.1 | |
| 12. Bothell, Washington | 89 | [details] | 25.8% | 9.5% | 38.6% | 29 | $68,580 | 6% | 12.7% | 30,150 | 5.1% | 31.4 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 13. Merrillville, Indiana | 89 | [details] | 26.2% | 15.1% | 20.2% | 30 | $56,355 | 6.6% | 30.3% | 30,560 | 4.3% | 35.4 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 14. Burnsville, Minnesota | 88.9 | [details] | 24.8% | 7.2% | 36.8% | 24 | $67,979 | 7.1% | 12.5% | 60,220 | 5.1% | 31.1 | 0.4% | 1.3 | |
| 15. Glendora, California | 88.9 | [details] | 19.1% | 12.5% | 25.7% | 31 | $66,674 | 6.3% | 19.7% | 49,415 | 5.9% | 26.4 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 16. Huber Heights, Ohio | 88.5 | [details] | 20.5% | 9.3% | 18.9% | 23 | $53,579 | 7.3% | 15.1% | 38,212 | 5.9% | 41 | 0.2% | 1.8 | |
| 17. Mounds View, Minnesota | 88.4 | [details] | 24.3% | 8.9% | 24% | 24 | $60,685 | 7.6% | 9.4% | 12,738 | 5.9% | 45.4 | 0.2% | 1.7 | |
| 18. Petaluma, California | 88.3 | [details] | 22.8% | 11% | 30.1% | 34 | $71,158 | 6.6% | 15.8% | 54,548 | 6% | 24.3 | 0.3% | 2.6 | |
| 19. Apple Valley, Minnesota | 88.3 | [details] | 19.2% | 5.5% | 41% | 25 | $79,335 | 7.2% | 8.2% | 45,527 | 2.1% | 32.8 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 20. Martinez, California | 88.2 | [details] | 27.6% | 10.1% | 32.1% | 29 | $77,411 | 5.6% | 19% | 35,866 | 5.2% | 43.5 | 0.1% | 2.7 | |
| 21. Bartlett, Tennessee | 88 | [details] | 12% | 8.6% | 28.2% | 25 | $69,962 | 6.6% | 7.6% | 40,543 | 2.7% | 28.4 | 0.1% | 1 | |
| 22. San Dimas, California | 87.9 | [details] | 21.2% | 11.9% | 28.4% | 32 | $72,124 | 5.9% | 25.3% | 34,980 | 6.3% | 24.9 | 0.4% | 2.6 | |
| 23. North Richland Hills, Texas | 87.8 | [details] | 20.6% | 8.8% | 26.1% | 28 | $64,718 | 7.1% | 11.5% | 55,635 | 4.8% | 47.8 | 0.2% | 2.6 | |
| 24. La Verne, California | 87.4 | [details] | 18.9% | 13.1% | 31.6% | 32 | $70,344 | 5.8% | 22.9% | 31,638 | 4.7% | 28 | 0.2% | 3 | |
| 25. Rancho Cucamonga, California | 87.3 | [details] | 16.8% | 6.1% | 23.3% | 33 | $66,446 | 7% | 33.5% | 127,743 | 7.1% | 33.9 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 26. Westerville, Ohio | 87.3 | [details] | 21.2% | 10.4% | 44.6% | 23 | $82,163 | 6.1% | 6.5% | 35,318 | 3.5% | 31.8 | 0.3% | 1.3 | |
| 27. Ripon, California | 87.2 | [details] | 16.2% | 10.1% | 20.6% | 29 | $62,592 | 7% | 15.5% | 10,146 | 6.2% | 37.1 | 0.1% | 2.8 | |
| 28. North St. Paul, Minnesota | 87.2 | [details] | 27% | 11.7% | 20% | 23 | $59,652 | 6.5% | 7.1% | 11,929 | 4.2% | 40.1 | 0.1% | 3.5 | |
| 29. Schertz, Texas | 87.1 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.8% | 27.5% | 25 | $59,745 | 7.5% | 18% | 18,694 | 5.2% | 24 | 0.2% | 2.3 | |
| 30. Fayetteville, Georgia | 87.1 | [details] | 26.6% | 13.2% | 31.3% | 30 | $62,133 | 6.7% | 19.6% | 11,148 | 3% | 55.9 | 0.1% | 1.4 | |
| 31. Roswell, Georgia | 87.1 | [details] | 22.8% | 7.5% | 52.6% | 32 | $85,946 | 6.9% | 18.5% | 79,334 | 5% | 27.5 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 32. Roseville, California | 87.1 | [details] | 23.1% | 14.5% | 31.4% | 27 | $65,929 | 7.3% | 14% | 79,921 | 4.9% | 54.4 | 0.4% | 3.6 | |
| 33. Simi Valley, California | 87 | [details] | 14.7% | 7.6% | 24.9% | 30 | $75,140 | 7.3% | 18.7% | 111,351 | 5.8% | 19.7 | 0.1% | 1.6 | |
| 34. Loveland, Colorado | 87 | [details] | 23.5% | 12.5% | 27.5% | 24 | $54,337 | 7% | 7.1% | 50,608 | 5.7% | 38.8 | 0.3% | 1.8 | |
| 35. Richardson, Texas | 87 | [details] | 22.9% | 10% | 47.7% | 25 | $72,876 | 6.7% | 24.6% | 91,802 | 6.3% | 38.3 | 0.2% | 2.8 | |
| 36. West Linn, Oregon | 86.9 | [details] | 17.9% | 7.8% | 49.2% | 25 | $83,252 | 6.6% | 6.7% | 22,261 | 3.9% | 19.2 | 0.3% | 1.1 | |
| 37. Crystal, Minnesota | 86.7 | [details] | 27.6% | 14.1% | 22.4% | 23 | $54,738 | 6.6% | 11.7% | 22,698 | 4.4% | 31.6 | 0.1% | 2.4 | |
| 38. Lake Forest, California | 86.7 | [details] | 19.7% | 8.6% | 33.9% | 27 | $75,121 | 7.1% | 24% | 58,707 | 5.3% | 19.3 | 0.1% | 2 | |
| 39. University Place, Washington | 86.6 | [details] | 25.6% | 11.2% | 33.9% | 27 | $60,401 | 6.3% | 24.1% | 29,933 | 7.3% | 35.2 | 0.2% | 3.9 | |
| 40. Attleboro, Massachusetts | 86.6 | [details] | 25.7% | 12.9% | 23.5% | 28 | $59,112 | 7% | 8.7% | 42,068 | 6.2% | 22.6 | 0.2% | 3.5 | |
| 41. Grand Terrace, California | 86.6 | [details] | 21.5% | 10.7% | 24.3% | 26 | $61,068 | 6.6% | 26.2% | 11,626 | 7.4% | 25.3 | 0.4% | 1.4 | |
| 42. St. Peters, Missouri | 86.5 | [details] | 20.5% | 7.8% | 27.2% | 27 | $65,123 | 7.4% | 5.7% | 51,381 | 2.7% | 27.4 | 0.2% | 2 | |
| 43. Novato, California | 86.5 | [details] | 25.3% | 13% | 37% | 37 | $74,434 | 5.9% | 17.3% | 47,630 | 5.6% | 27.6 | 0.3% | 1.4 | |
| 44. Oak Creek, Wisconsin | 86.4 | [details] | 25.2% | 8.9% | 24.4% | 24 | $63,381 | 6.7% | 8% | 28,456 | 3.1% | 32.3 | 0.1% | 1 | |
| 45. Farmers Branch, Texas | 86.4 | [details] | 23% | 12.1% | 27.2% | 23 | $57,531 | 7.3% | 21.6% | 27,508 | 6.3% | 50.5 | 0.3% | 2.7 | |
| 46. West Deptford, New Jersey | 86.4 | [details] | 27.3% | 12.2% | 21.7% | 25 | $64,477 | 5.9% | 7.7% | 19,368 | 5.3% | 22.7 | 0.2% | 1.6 | |
| 47. Woodbridge, New Jersey | 86.3 | [details] | 21.7% | 13.4% | 26.8% | 31 | $68,492 | 6.3% | 29.2% | 97,203 | 4.8% | 29.4 | 0.2% | 3.3 | |
| 48. Northglenn, Colorado | 86.3 | [details] | 23.1% | 10.2% | 19.4% | 30 | $52,888 | 7.3% | 17% | 31,575 | 5.4% | 63.1 | 0.2% | 3.6 | |
| 49. Fridley, Minnesota | 86 | [details] | 26.9% | 12% | 24.4% | 23 | $55,381 | 6.7% | 11.3% | 27,449 | 7.3% | 46.3 | 0.2% | 3 | |
| 50. Edmond, Oklahoma | 85.9 | [details] | 20.6% | 8.8% | 47.8% | 23 | $65,230 | 7% | 13.4% | 68,315 | 7.2% | 24.4 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 51. Woodinville, Washington | 85.7 | [details] | 24% | 8.7% | 42.8% | 27 | $81,251 | 6.5% | 16% | 9,194 | 4.4% | 63.3 | 0.3% | 1.6 | |
| 52. Mountlake Terrace, Washington | 85.6 | [details] | 26.2% | 9.2% | 24.4% | 30 | $52,117 | 6.5% | 22.3% | 20,362 | 8% | 34.7 | 0.1% | 1.7 | |
| 53. Brea, California | 85.4 | [details] | 23.2% | 11.4% | 33.5% | 30 | $68,423 | 6.1% | 22.7% | 35,410 | 5.3% | 46.1 | 0.3% | 2.5 | |
| 54. Snellville, Georgia | 85.3 | [details] | 15.2% | 12.3% | 29.1% | 36 | $74,077 | 6.4% | 10.4% | 15,351 | 3% | 49.3 | 0.1% | 1.5 | |
| 55. Yukon, Oklahoma | 85.3 | [details] | 20.1% | 10.7% | 23.2% | 22 | $52,646 | 6.5% | 9.1% | 21,043 | 6.6% | 29.1 | 0.3% | 2.1 | |
| 56. Lafayette, California | 85.2 | [details] | 19.3% | 14.4% | 68% | 32 | $120,364 | 5.5% | 13.2% | 23,908 | 2.9% | 35.2 | 0.3% | 1.4 | |
| 57. Deer Park, Texas | 85.2 | [details] | 14% | 7.4% | 16.5% | 24 | $66,516 | 6.3% | 10% | 28,520 | 5.6% | 22.6 | 0.2% | 2.1 | |
| 58. Vacaville, California | 84.9 | [details] | 19.3% | 8.3% | 19.4% | 30 | $63,950 | 6.6% | 27.9% | 88,625 | 6.1% | 26.8 | 0.2% | 3.7 | |
| 59. St. Charles, Missouri | 84.9 | [details] | 29.4% | 12.2% | 26.6% | 23 | $60,175 | 6.2% | 6.7% | 60,321 | 6.3% | 28.5 | 0.4% | 2.4 | |
| 60. Lilburn, Georgia | 84.6 | [details] | 22.5% | 8.3% | 31.8% | 32 | $62,563 | 6.6% | 30.9% | 11,307 | 6.1% | 39.2 | 0.2% | 3.8 | |
| 61. Grapevine, Texas | 84.3 | [details] | 22% | 4.8% | 43.2% | 26 | $84,940 | 7.4% | 11.8% | 42,059 | 4.8% | 37.6 | 0.3% | 2.1 | |
| 62. Dublin, California | 84.3 | [details] | 21.1% | 4.6% | 32.9% | 32 | $83,123 | 5.9% | 30.6% | 29,973 | 2.9% | 26.9 | 0.4% | 2.8 | |
| 63. Voorhees, New Jersey | 84.1 | [details] | 26.8% | 10.9% | 46.2% | 32 | $86,873 | 6.3% | 21.7% | 28,126 | 5.7% | 29.1 | 0.3% | 2.5 | |
| 64. Gladstone, Oregon | 83.9 | [details] | 19.6% | 11.5% | 16.3% | 24 | $52,500 | 6.7% | 9.6% | 11,438 | 9% | 60.8 | 0.2% | 0.9 | |
| 65. Saline, Michigan | 83.9 | [details] | 27.8% | 11.3% | 40.4% | 23 | $73,162 | 7.4% | 4.3% | 8,034 | 4% | 23 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 66. Leominster, Massachusetts | 83.8 | [details] | 27.8% | 13.6% | 21.9% | 26 | $54,660 | 7.1% | 12.9% | 41,303 | 9.5% | 26.7 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 67. Choctaw, Oklahoma | 83.8 | [details] | 16.1% | 10.6% | 19% | 27 | $55,437 | 5.8% | 11.2% | 9,377 | 5.9% | 23.4 | 0.3% | 1.7 | |
| 68. Zachary, Louisiana | 83.6 | [details] | 16.9% | 10.8% | 20.8% | 28 | $57,389 | 6.9% | 30.2% | 11,275 | 9.1% | 27.4 | 0.1% | 1.6 | |
| 69. Benbrook, Texas | 83.4 | [details] | 28.4% | 14.7% | 32.6% | 25 | $63,529 | 5.9% | 11.7% | 20,208 | 4.4% | 27.3 | 0.1% | 1.7 | |
| 70. Shoreline, Washington | 83.4 | [details] | 26.6% | 14.5% | 37.3% | 28 | $61,450 | 5.2% | 23% | 53,025 | 6.9% | 42.2 | 0.3% | 2.9 | |
| 71. Live Oak, Texas | 83.3 | [details] | 19.5% | 9.1% | 22.4% | 23 | $52,885 | 6.7% | 21.8% | 9,156 | 7.1% | 50.8 | 0.1% | 2.7 | |
| 72. Concord, California | 83.3 | [details] | 23% | 10.7% | 25.9% | 33 | $62,093 | 7.1% | 29.3% | 121,780 | 7.6% | 49.1 | 0.3% | 3.2 | |
| 73. Placentia, California | 83.3 | [details] | 16.1% | 9.1% | 31.3% | 28 | $68,976 | 7.4% | 32.2% | 46,488 | 8.7% | 19.2 | 0.2% | 2.8 | |
| 74. Grosse Pointe Park, Michigan | 83 | [details] | 26.2% | 10.8% | 59.5% | 27 | $104,267 | 6.4% | 7.5% | 12,443 | 4% | 26.5 | 0.3% | 1.3 | |
| 75. Hastings, Minnesota | 83 | [details] | 22.5% | 11.7% | 20.2% | 23 | $61,093 | 6.7% | 2.8% | 18,204 | 4.9% | 20.8 | 0.2% | 0.6 | |
| 76. Orange, California | 83 | [details] | 19.4% | 9.6% | 28% | 26 | $64,573 | 7.4% | 29.5% | 128,821 | 10% | 27.4 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 77. South Plainfield, New Jersey | 82.5 | [details] | 15.3% | 14.1% | 24% | 27 | $72,745 | 6.2% | 22.3% | 21,810 | 3.4% | 19.4 | 0.2% | 2.2 | |
| 78. Sugar Land, Texas | 82 | [details] | 12.3% | 6.7% | 53.7% | 31 | $88,639 | 6.1% | 34% | 63,328 | 3.8% | 27 | 0.3% | 2.4 | |
| 79. San Carlos, California | 81.7 | [details] | 25.4% | 14.3% | 49.8% | 27 | $103,971 | 7% | 15.5% | 27,718 | 2.7% | 21.4 | 0.3% | 0.9 | |
| 80. Bryant, Arkansas | 81.4 | [details] | 19.9% | 10.4% | 24.9% | 25 | $56,038 | 7.2% | 4.1% | 9,764 | 4.8% | 42.4 | 0.2% | 1.6 | |
| 81. Kenosha, Wisconsin | 81.4 | [details] | 28.3% | 12.2% | 18.2% | 24 | $51,016 | 7.5% | 16.4% | 90,352 | 9.5% | 31.7 | 0.3% | 2.4 | |
| 82. Southlake, Texas | 80.9 | [details] | 5.2% | 3.1% | 59.2% | 31 | $136,023 | 7.6% | 5.5% | 21,519 | 1.8% | 26.1 | 0.2% | 0.7 | |
| 83. Natick, Massachusetts | 80.6 | [details] | 28.2% | 14.3% | 52.5% | 31 | $85,715 | 7.4% | 8% | 32,170 | 2.8% | 22.4 | 0.2% | 1.2 | |
| 84. Belmont, North Carolina | 80.3 | [details] | 27.8% | 13.4% | 22% | 22 | $46,765 | 6.1% | 15.6% | 8,705 | 9.5% | 48.3 | 0.2% | 3.8 | |
| 85. Trussville, Alabama | 79.6 | [details] | 17% | 11.7% | 31.2% | 26 | $71,111 | 6% | 3.2% | 12,924 | 3.5% | 59.4 | 0.2% | 2.6 | |
| 86. Belleville, New Jersey | 79.5 | [details] | 27.9% | 13.4% | 21.7% | 29 | $55,212 | 5.9% | 30.6% | 35,928 | 8.2% | 23.5 | 0.2% | 2.8 | |
| 87. Brentwood, Tennessee | 79.4 | [details] | 10.1% | 8.2% | 64.7% | 24 | $118,450 | 5.7% | 5.4% | 23,445 | 2% | 19.4 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 88. Belmont, California | 79.4 | [details] | 27.2% | 13.2% | 51.7% | 29 | $95,722 | 6% | 24.8% | 25,123 | 4% | 22.8 | 0.2% | 0.8 | |
| 89. Kearny, New Jersey | 79.2 | [details] | 21.8% | 10.9% | 17.4% | 32 | $54,596 | 5.7% | 24.3% | 40,513 | 8.6% | 27.3 | 0.2% | 2.7 | |
| 90. Enumclaw, Washington | 79 | [details] | 29.1% | 14.5% | 18.7% | 35 | $56,270 | 7.2% | 5.7% | 11,116 | 8.2% | 41.6 | 0.3% | 1.9 |