 |
|
|
|
PlaceMatch™ lets you find places similar to any city or town you select, either using the default criteria or using criteria you specify.The criteria being used are show as column headings in the results table further below.
However, if you want to specify which factors to use in determining which places are similar to each other, you can select among dozens of other criteria. These include criteria related to crime and income, population demographics, education levels, and others; there are dozens of criteria you can select.
Please click on the [+/-] Advanced Controls link just below and try PlaceMatch using a variety of filtering criteria.
All Places > Hawaii > Waihee Waiehu
Click this [+/-] link to see or edit the similarity criteria used.
Cities and Towns Similar to Waihee-Waiehu, Hawaii:
Sorted from most similar to least (using the default selection criteria).
Your specified criteria have resulted in 97 locations (a maximum of 100 are shown in the table below). Note that you can dictate for each each criterion (e.g., the percentage of people in poverty) whether it should match Waihee-Waiehu 'loosely' or 'strictly', using the Advanced Controls. This matching level, loose versus strict, is shown near the top of each column in the results table.
Click on a city or town name below to find places similar to it.
Or, to see details about a place, click its [details] link in the table below.
| City, State | Similarity | Go To City | 1 Person Houses | 65+ | College Grads | Commute Minutes | Family Income | Kids 0-4 | Non White | Pop. | Poverty | Seasonal Housing | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | ||||
| WAIHEE-WAIEHU, HAWAII | [details] | 10.4% | 8% | 19.2% | 26 | $64,195 | 7.3% | 86.6% | 7,310 | 6.8% | 0.2% | ||
| 1. Glenpool, Oklahoma | 90 | [details] | 16% | 5.7% | 17.9% | 24 | $47,093 | 9% | 23.1% | 8,123 | 6.4% | 0.1% | |
| 2. Dixon, California | 89.1 | [details] | 12.9% | 7.2% | 18.7% | 27 | $58,849 | 8.7% | 29.5% | 16,103 | 8.1% | 0.1% | |
| 3. Schertz, Texas | 88.6 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.8% | 27.5% | 25 | $59,745 | 7.5% | 18% | 18,694 | 5.2% | 0.2% | |
| 4. Winters, California | 88.6 | [details] | 15% | 7.8% | 18.1% | 26 | $55,183 | 7.8% | 30.2% | 6,125 | 5% | 0.2% | |
| 5. Simpsonville, South Carolina | 88.3 | [details] | 20.6% | 7.5% | 25.6% | 22 | $52,043 | 7.7% | 17.3% | 14,352 | 6.1% | 0.2% | |
| 6. Forney, Texas | 88.2 | [details] | 18% | 8% | 14.6% | 34 | $58,295 | 8.3% | 16.3% | 5,588 | 5.3% | 0.1% | |
| 7. Converse, Texas | 88.2 | [details] | 16.2% | 6.4% | 19% | 25 | $49,396 | 7.8% | 30.6% | 11,508 | 6.5% | 0.1% | |
| 8. Zachary, Louisiana | 88.2 | [details] | 16.9% | 10.8% | 20.8% | 28 | $57,389 | 6.9% | 30.2% | 11,275 | 9.1% | 0.1% | |
| 9. Galt, California | 88.1 | [details] | 14.3% | 8.5% | 14% | 31 | $47,845 | 8.9% | 29.5% | 19,472 | 10.6% | 0.2% | |
| 10. La Porte, Texas | 88.1 | [details] | 17.3% | 6.9% | 13.2% | 25 | $60,034 | 7.9% | 18.6% | 31,880 | 7.5% | 0.4% | |
| 11. Windsor, California | 87.9 | [details] | 18.1% | 11.1% | 24.7% | 27 | $67,992 | 8% | 21% | 22,744 | 5.1% | 0.3% | |
| 12. Katy, Texas | 87.5 | [details] | 17.8% | 8.1% | 23.5% | 34 | $57,741 | 7.5% | 16% | 11,775 | 8.4% | 0.4% | |
| 13. Millbrook, Alabama | 87.2 | [details] | 16.6% | 7% | 22% | 26 | $47,004 | 8.6% | 20.1% | 10,386 | 8.9% | 0.2% | |
| 14. Hanover Park, Illinois | 87.2 | [details] | 14% | 4.1% | 20.2% | 31 | $63,990 | 8.8% | 31.9% | 38,278 | 6.1% | 0% | |
| 15. Arlington, Tennessee | 87.1 | [details] | 11% | 8% | 16.9% | 28 | $55,602 | 7.7% | 25.8% | 2,569 | 11.3% | 0.2% | |
| 16. Marion, Arkansas | 86.6 | [details] | 19.5% | 5.2% | 24.2% | 23 | $50,853 | 8.1% | 16% | 8,901 | 8.1% | 0.2% | |
| 17. Pearland, Texas | 86.5 | [details] | 15.4% | 8.4% | 29.1% | 32 | $70,748 | 8% | 17.4% | 37,640 | 4.7% | 0.1% | |
| 18. Garner, North Carolina | 86.5 | [details] | 23.3% | 10.9% | 28.2% | 26 | $58,302 | 6.7% | 33% | 17,757 | 6.8% | 0.2% | |
| 19. Irmo, South Carolina | 86.2 | [details] | 14.3% | 4.8% | 39.2% | 26 | $62,005 | 7.4% | 23.2% | 11,039 | 4.3% | 0% | |
| 20. Cibolo, Texas | 86.2 | [details] | 19.3% | 6.2% | 28.1% | 26 | $65,545 | 7.6% | 18.9% | 3,035 | 6.1% | 0.1% | |
| 21. Fort Mill, South Carolina | 86 | [details] | 22% | 10.4% | 28.3% | 26 | $56,538 | 7.6% | 18.3% | 7,587 | 10.1% | 0.2% | |
| 22. Cedar Hill, Texas | 86 | [details] | 14.7% | 4.6% | 28.3% | 34 | $63,416 | 8.5% | 43.3% | 32,093 | 5.5% | 0.1% | |
| 23. Moorpark, California | 85.8 | [details] | 10% | 4.5% | 34.2% | 30 | $78,909 | 8.1% | 25.6% | 31,415 | 7% | 0.1% | |
| 24. Live Oak, Texas | 85.8 | [details] | 19.5% | 9.1% | 22.4% | 23 | $52,885 | 6.7% | 21.8% | 9,156 | 7.1% | 0.1% | |
| 25. Lancaster, Texas | 85.6 | [details] | 21.3% | 9% | 18.9% | 32 | $48,498 | 8.2% | 62.4% | 25,894 | 8.1% | 0.2% | |
| 26. Rio Rancho, New Mexico | 85.6 | [details] | 20.8% | 11.7% | 24.8% | 29 | $52,233 | 7.5% | 21.6% | 51,765 | 5.1% | 0.5% | |
| 27. Stockbridge, Georgia | 85.5 | [details] | 20.7% | 6.7% | 23.7% | 31 | $51,341 | 9.7% | 28.4% | 9,853 | 6.8% | 0.3% | |
| 28. Logan, New Jersey | 85.4 | [details] | 15.6% | 6.2% | 25% | 30 | $70,771 | 8.5% | 18% | 6,032 | 4.3% | 0.3% | |
| 29. Westampton, New Jersey | 85.3 | [details] | 17.2% | 9.1% | 26.2% | 29 | $69,656 | 7.3% | 29.2% | 7,217 | 2.5% | 0.2% | |
| 30. Goose Creek, South Carolina | 85.3 | [details] | 13.1% | 4.3% | 20.6% | 23 | $47,937 | 8.6% | 21.5% | 29,208 | 6.8% | 0.1% | |
| 31. Richmond Hill, Georgia | 85.2 | [details] | 19% | 6.8% | 21.7% | 28 | $54,457 | 9.4% | 18.7% | 6,959 | 10.3% | 0.1% | |
| 32. DeSoto, Texas | 85 | [details] | 21% | 9.3% | 30.2% | 32 | $66,986 | 7% | 51.2% | 37,646 | 5.5% | 0.2% | |
| 33. Duncanville, Texas | 85 | [details] | 17.4% | 9.6% | 27.5% | 29 | $57,064 | 6.5% | 36.1% | 36,081 | 6.1% | 0.1% | |
| 34. Brighton, Colorado | 85 | [details] | 20% | 9.7% | 14.6% | 28 | $53,286 | 8.5% | 23.1% | 20,905 | 9.4% | 0.2% | |
| 35. Knightdale, North Carolina | 84.7 | [details] | 19.9% | 5.1% | 33.7% | 31 | $62,073 | 9.4% | 32.1% | 5,958 | 4.7% | 0.1% | |
| 36. Placentia, California | 84.7 | [details] | 16.1% | 9.1% | 31.3% | 28 | $68,976 | 7.4% | 32.2% | 46,488 | 8.7% | 0.2% | |
| 37. Lawrenceville, Georgia | 84.7 | [details] | 22.9% | 9.1% | 19.1% | 31 | $48,557 | 7.6% | 24% | 22,397 | 11.5% | 0.2% | |
| 38. Newark, California | 84.6 | [details] | 14.1% | 7.8% | 24.2% | 32 | $71,351 | 7.2% | 47.8% | 42,471 | 5.5% | 0.2% | |
| 39. Gibsonville, North Carolina | 84.4 | [details] | 23.5% | 9.9% | 23.8% | 23 | $51,164 | 7.1% | 19.8% | 4,372 | 8.9% | 0.1% | |
| 40. Concord, North Carolina | 84.2 | [details] | 23.1% | 11.1% | 22.8% | 27 | $53,571 | 7.9% | 21.2% | 55,977 | 8.2% | 0.3% | |
| 41. Angleton, Texas | 84.1 | [details] | 21.4% | 10.8% | 17.2% | 25 | $50,019 | 7.7% | 24.8% | 18,130 | 11.1% | 0.3% | |
| 42. Grand Terrace, California | 84.1 | [details] | 21.5% | 10.7% | 24.3% | 26 | $61,068 | 6.6% | 26.2% | 11,626 | 7.4% | 0.4% | |
| 43. Folsom, California | 83.8 | [details] | 21.7% | 8.8% | 37.6% | 28 | $82,448 | 6.9% | 22.1% | 51,884 | 7.3% | 0.4% | |
| 44. Shiloh, Illinois | 83.7 | [details] | 19.9% | 6.7% | 32.7% | 26 | $67,054 | 8% | 17.9% | 7,643 | 7.7% | 0.2% | |
| 45. Middletown, Delaware | 83.5 | [details] | 22.7% | 7.9% | 13.4% | 33 | $47,270 | 9.3% | 25.6% | 6,161 | 10.9% | 0.1% | |
| 46. North Hanover, New Jersey | 83.4 | [details] | 16.2% | 6.2% | 13.3% | 25 | $45,553 | 11.1% | 19.4% | 7,347 | 5.3% | 0.2% | |
| 47. Summerville, South Carolina | 83.4 | [details] | 23.3% | 10.6% | 26.7% | 29 | $51,469 | 7% | 22.8% | 27,752 | 9.2% | 0.4% | |
| 48. Prattville, Alabama | 83.3 | [details] | 20.3% | 10.6% | 22.2% | 23 | $51,774 | 6.8% | 16.9% | 24,303 | 8.3% | 0.2% | |
| 49. Rowlett, Texas | 83.2 | [details] | 10.6% | 5.2% | 32.5% | 34 | $73,417 | 8.7% | 18.2% | 44,503 | 3% | 0.1% | |
| 50. Oviedo, Florida | 83 | [details] | 9.7% | 5.8% | 41.3% | 31 | $66,288 | 8.4% | 16.5% | 26,316 | 4.6% | 0.3% | |
| 51. Douglasville, Georgia | 83 | [details] | 22.9% | 6.6% | 26.3% | 34 | $52,340 | 8.2% | 36.2% | 20,065 | 12.2% | 0.4% | |
| 52. Addison, Illinois | 82.9 | [details] | 17% | 8.4% | 19.5% | 26 | $59,007 | 7.6% | 24.6% | 35,914 | 9.6% | 0.2% | |
| 53. West Chicago, Illinois | 82.9 | [details] | 12.3% | 4.7% | 21.9% | 26 | $65,744 | 10.3% | 22.1% | 23,469 | 9.3% | 0.1% | |
| 54. Jamesburg, New Jersey | 82.8 | [details] | 22.5% | 10.7% | 20.2% | 30 | $67,887 | 7.6% | 17.2% | 6,025 | 3.5% | 0% | |
| 55. Gilroy, California | 82.8 | [details] | 14.4% | 6.8% | 19.1% | 32 | $65,330 | 9.4% | 41.1% | 41,464 | 10.4% | 0.1% | |
| 56. San Marcos, California | 82.8 | [details] | 20.2% | 11.9% | 20% | 28 | $51,292 | 8.8% | 32.6% | 54,977 | 12% | 0.3% | |
| 57. Northglenn, Colorado | 82.8 | [details] | 23.1% | 10.2% | 19.4% | 30 | $52,888 | 7.3% | 17% | 31,575 | 5.4% | 0.2% | |
| 58. Cotati, California | 82.7 | [details] | 23.2% | 7.1% | 23.4% | 31 | $62,419 | 6.4% | 16.4% | 6,471 | 8.3% | 0.2% | |
| 59. Dickinson, Texas | 82.6 | [details] | 21.5% | 9.6% | 21% | 30 | $46,585 | 8% | 27.6% | 17,093 | 13.1% | 0.3% | |
| 60. Lilburn, Georgia | 82.6 | [details] | 22.5% | 8.3% | 31.8% | 32 | $62,563 | 6.6% | 30.9% | 11,307 | 6.1% | 0.2% | |
| 61. Farmers Branch, Texas | 82.6 | [details] | 23% | 12.1% | 27.2% | 23 | $57,531 | 7.3% | 21.6% | 27,508 | 6.3% | 0.3% | |
| 62. West Grove, Pennsylvania | 82.6 | [details] | 16.4% | 8.1% | 27.7% | 28 | $60,274 | 7.7% | 21.3% | 2,652 | 8.3% | 0.1% | |
| 63. McKinney, Texas | 82.5 | [details] | 18.9% | 6.8% | 39.1% | 29 | $72,133 | 10.1% | 21.6% | 54,369 | 8.5% | 0.2% | |
| 64. Duarte, California | 82.1 | [details] | 21.7% | 11.9% | 23.6% | 31 | $56,556 | 7.5% | 48% | 21,486 | 11.3% | 0.2% | |
| 65. Waipio Acres, Hawaii | 82 | [details] | 21.3% | 9% | 22.2% | 32 | $56,737 | 8.2% | 81.1% | 5,298 | 10.6% | 0.2% | |
| 66. Artesia, California | 82 | [details] | 14.9% | 12.4% | 18.8% | 27 | $47,017 | 7.3% | 55.8% | 16,380 | 11.5% | 0.2% | |
| 67. Mundelein, Illinois | 82 | [details] | 17.1% | 6.2% | 39.9% | 30 | $75,083 | 9.2% | 21.3% | 30,935 | 4.6% | 0.2% | |
| 68. Glendora, California | 81.9 | [details] | 19.1% | 12.5% | 25.7% | 31 | $66,674 | 6.3% | 19.7% | 49,415 | 5.9% | 0.2% | |
| 69. Harker Heights, Texas | 81.3 | [details] | 18.6% | 6.2% | 29.8% | 24 | $49,607 | 9.4% | 29.1% | 17,308 | 10% | 0.2% | |
| 70. Central Islip, New York | 81.2 | [details] | 17% | 7.4% | 14.9% | 31 | $57,252 | 7.8% | 52.2% | 31,950 | 11.4% | 0.3% | |
| 71. Glendale Heights, Illinois | 81.1 | [details] | 22.4% | 5% | 26.7% | 29 | $64,115 | 8% | 36.2% | 31,765 | 6.1% | 0.1% | |
| 72. Hillside, New Jersey | 80.7 | [details] | 17.9% | 11.1% | 18.5% | 29 | $64,635 | 6.4% | 60% | 21,747 | 5.3% | 0.1% | |
| 73. Justice, Illinois | 80.5 | [details] | 21.2% | 7.3% | 12.9% | 33 | $55,323 | 8.2% | 29.1% | 12,193 | 7.3% | 0.2% | |
| 74. Crown Heights, New York | 80.4 | [details] | 16.7% | 12.3% | 20.6% | 28 | $67,019 | 6.3% | 17.1% | 2,992 | 2% | 0.1% | |
| 75. Streamwood, Illinois | 80.4 | [details] | 18.4% | 6.1% | 26.5% | 33 | $68,771 | 8.7% | 22.5% | 36,407 | 3% | 0.1% | |
| 76. Hoffman Estates, Illinois | 80.3 | [details] | 20.1% | 6.7% | 35.9% | 30 | $73,685 | 7.2% | 25.6% | 49,495 | 4.4% | 0.1% | |
| 77. Leesburg, Virginia | 80.2 | [details] | 23% | 6.1% | 41.3% | 30 | $78,111 | 9.8% | 16.7% | 28,311 | 3.6% | 0.5% | |
| 78. Delran, New Jersey | 79.9 | [details] | 21% | 10.8% | 27.3% | 28 | $67,895 | 6.2% | 17.1% | 15,536 | 4.1% | 0.1% | |
| 79. Palmer, Alaska | 79.7 | [details] | 22.2% | 9.1% | 14.5% | 34 | $53,164 | 8.5% | 19.1% | 4,533 | 12.7% | 0.3% | |
| 80. East Farmingdale, New York | 79.6 | [details] | 19.7% | 10.6% | 21.8% | 30 | $71,726 | 7.4% | 26.7% | 5,400 | 7% | 0.2% | |
| 81. Rolling Meadows, Illinois | 79.6 | [details] | 23.6% | 10.6% | 31% | 26 | $68,571 | 7.1% | 17.7% | 24,604 | 5.1% | 0.4% | |
| 82. Covina, California | 79.5 | [details] | 20.4% | 10.9% | 18.8% | 32 | $55,111 | 7.4% | 37.9% | 46,837 | 11.6% | 0.1% | |
| 83. Carol Stream, Illinois | 78.7 | [details] | 21.4% | 5.7% | 32% | 31 | $74,984 | 8.2% | 21.5% | 40,438 | 3.4% | 0.1% | |
| 84. Berwyn Heights, Maryland | 78.5 | [details] | 18.4% | 12.9% | 37.5% | 30 | $69,013 | 6.3% | 28.2% | 2,942 | 5.5% | 0.2% | |
| 85. West Babylon, New York | 78.5 | [details] | 18.4% | 13.2% | 17.2% | 31 | $67,013 | 7% | 16.2% | 43,452 | 6.2% | 0.3% | |
| 86. Prospect Park, New Jersey | 78.3 | [details] | 17% | 8.8% | 12.4% | 24 | $49,405 | 7.7% | 38.8% | 5,779 | 10% | 0.2% | |
| 87. Zion, Illinois | 77.6 | [details] | 21.4% | 8.4% | 15.7% | 32 | $50,378 | 9% | 41.2% | 22,866 | 11.9% | 0.2% | |
| 88. Huntington Station, New York | 77.3 | [details] | 19.1% | 10.6% | 27.9% | 30 | $67,115 | 7.8% | 28.4% | 29,910 | 11.2% | 0.2% | |
| 89. Schiller Park, Illinois | 76.5 | [details] | 21.9% | 10.4% | 14.4% | 27 | $48,525 | 6.6% | 19% | 11,850 | 9.2% | 0.1% | |
| 90. Freeport, New York | 76.3 | [details] | 21.2% | 10.5% | 20.5% | 33 | $61,673 | 6.9% | 57.1% | 43,783 | 10.6% | 0.3% | |
| 91. Woodridge, Illinois | 76.3 | [details] | 23.2% | 5.3% | 39% | 32 | $71,546 | 7.6% | 24.7% | 30,934 | 3.8% | 0.2% | |
| 92. North Plainfield, New Jersey | 76.2 | [details] | 23.1% | 9.5% | 26.5% | 31 | $62,875 | 7.8% | 36.9% | 21,103 | 6.4% | 0.1% | |
| 93. Bound Brook, New Jersey | 75.3 | [details] | 23.6% | 12.5% | 23.9% | 26 | $51,346 | 6.9% | 17.4% | 10,155 | 10.9% | 0.2% | |
| 94. Bogota, New Jersey | 75.3 | [details] | 21.7% | 11.1% | 28.4% | 32 | $69,841 | 6.5% | 24.3% | 8,249 | 4% | 0.1% | |
| 95. Harrison, New Jersey | 72.8 | [details] | 22.7% | 10.3% | 20.9% | 31 | $48,489 | 6.5% | 33.9% | 14,424 | 12.4% | 0.1% | |
| 96. Palisades Park, New Jersey | 71.9 | [details] | 22.9% | 12.1% | 30.6% | 32 | $54,503 | 6.7% | 51.7% | 17,073 | 9.7% | 0.1% | |
| 97. Sleepy Hollow, New York | 69.6 | [details] | 23.1% | 10.5% | 33.5% | 30 | $63,889 | 7.8% | 32.4% | 9,212 | 7.4% | 0.3% |