 |
|
|
|
PlaceMatch™ lets you find places similar to any city or town you select, either using the default criteria or using criteria you specify.The criteria being used are show as column headings in the results table further below.
However, if you want to specify which factors to use in determining which places are similar to each other, you can select among dozens of other criteria. These include criteria related to crime and income, population demographics, education levels, and others; there are dozens of criteria you can select.
Please click on the [+/-] Advanced Controls link just below and try PlaceMatch using a variety of filtering criteria.
All Places > Illinois > Hoffman Estates
Click this [+/-] link to see or edit the similarity criteria used.
Cities and Towns Similar to Hoffman Estates, Illinois:
Sorted from most similar to least (using the default selection criteria).
Your specified criteria have resulted in 100 locations (a maximum of 100 are shown in the table below). Note that you can dictate for each each criterion (e.g., the percentage of people in poverty) whether it should match Hoffman Estates 'loosely' or 'strictly', using the Advanced Controls. This matching level, loose versus strict, is shown near the top of each column in the results table.
Click on a city or town name below to find places similar to it.
Or, to see details about a place, click its [details] link in the table below.
| City, State | Similarity | Go To City | 1 Person Houses | 65+ | College Grads | Commute Minutes | Family Income | Kids 0-4 | Non White | Pop. | Poverty | Seasonal Housing | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | ||||
| HOFFMAN ESTATES, ILLINOIS | [details] | 20.1% | 6.7% | 35.9% | 30 | $73,685 | 7.2% | 25.6% | 49,495 | 4.4% | 0.1% | ||
| 1. Lake Forest, California | 94.4 | [details] | 19.7% | 8.6% | 33.9% | 27 | $75,121 | 7.1% | 24% | 58,707 | 5.3% | 0.1% | |
| 2. Santa Clarita, California | 93.9 | [details] | 19.1% | 7.1% | 29.1% | 35 | $73,588 | 7.8% | 20.5% | 151,088 | 6.4% | 0.2% | |
| 3. Milpitas, California | 93.5 | [details] | 11.5% | 7% | 36.5% | 25 | $84,827 | 7.2% | 69.1% | 62,698 | 5% | 0.1% | |
| 4. Aberdeen, New Jersey | 93.4 | [details] | 20.8% | 10.4% | 34.4% | 37 | $76,648 | 6.9% | 21.2% | 17,454 | 4.7% | 0.1% | |
| 5. Mundelein, Illinois | 93.3 | [details] | 17.1% | 6.2% | 39.9% | 30 | $75,083 | 9.2% | 21.3% | 30,935 | 4.6% | 0.2% | |
| 6. Livermore, California | 93.2 | [details] | 18.6% | 7.5% | 31.6% | 33 | $82,421 | 7.7% | 18.1% | 73,345 | 5.3% | 0.2% | |
| 7. Simi Valley, California | 93.2 | [details] | 14.7% | 7.6% | 24.9% | 30 | $75,140 | 7.3% | 18.7% | 111,351 | 5.8% | 0.1% | |
| 8. Morgan Hill, California | 93.1 | [details] | 15.8% | 7.5% | 33.5% | 37 | $90,134 | 8.1% | 27.6% | 33,556 | 4.7% | 0.3% | |
| 9. South Brunswick, New Jersey | 93 | [details] | 19.5% | 7.3% | 49% | 36 | $86,891 | 8.1% | 29.5% | 37,734 | 3.1% | 0.2% | |
| 10. Union City, California | 92.9 | [details] | 11.2% | 8.1% | 29.5% | 34 | $74,910 | 7.3% | 69.8% | 66,869 | 6.5% | 0.1% | |
| 11. Roselle, Illinois | 92.8 | [details] | 20.5% | 8.2% | 34% | 32 | $73,444 | 6.9% | 12.1% | 23,115 | 2% | 0.1% | |
| 12. Woodridge, Illinois | 92.7 | [details] | 23.2% | 5.3% | 39% | 32 | $71,546 | 7.6% | 24.7% | 30,934 | 3.8% | 0.2% | |
| 13. Newark, California | 92.5 | [details] | 14.1% | 7.8% | 24.2% | 32 | $71,351 | 7.2% | 47.8% | 42,471 | 5.5% | 0.2% | |
| 14. Carol Stream, Illinois | 92.2 | [details] | 21.4% | 5.7% | 32% | 31 | $74,984 | 8.2% | 21.5% | 40,438 | 3.4% | 0.1% | |
| 15. Aurora, Illinois | 91.9 | [details] | 20.8% | 6.3% | 29.9% | 30 | $61,113 | 10.6% | 31.9% | 142,990 | 8.5% | 0.2% | |
| 16. Newcastle, Washington | 91.8 | [details] | 20.2% | 6.6% | 54.4% | 27 | $91,381 | 7.8% | 24.9% | 7,737 | 2% | 0.2% | |
| 17. Piscataway, New Jersey | 91.7 | [details] | 19.5% | 8.7% | 40.5% | 30 | $75,218 | 6.2% | 51.2% | 50,482 | 3.8% | 0.2% | |
| 18. Rancho Cucamonga, California | 91.7 | [details] | 16.8% | 6.1% | 23.3% | 33 | $66,446 | 7% | 33.5% | 127,743 | 7.1% | 0.1% | |
| 19. Rancho Santa Margarita, California | 91.6 | [details] | 17.4% | 3.4% | 43.8% | 33 | $88,216 | 10.2% | 18.4% | 47,214 | 2.9% | 0.2% | |
| 20. Hillsborough, New Jersey | 91.5 | [details] | 17.2% | 6.8% | 46.6% | 33 | $93,933 | 7.9% | 14% | 36,634 | 3.1% | 0.2% | |
| 21. Bridgewater, Massachusetts | 91.5 | [details] | 19.6% | 8.6% | 29.6% | 32 | $73,953 | 6.2% | 12.7% | 25,185 | 3.5% | 0.2% | |
| 22. Placentia, California | 91.5 | [details] | 16.1% | 9.1% | 31.3% | 28 | $68,976 | 7.4% | 32.2% | 46,488 | 8.7% | 0.2% | |
| 23. Missouri City, Texas | 91.4 | [details] | 12% | 5.4% | 44.5% | 34 | $77,762 | 7.3% | 55.7% | 52,913 | 3.3% | 0.1% | |
| 24. Glendale Heights, Illinois | 91.4 | [details] | 22.4% | 5% | 26.7% | 29 | $64,115 | 8% | 36.2% | 31,765 | 6.1% | 0.1% | |
| 25. Evesham, New Jersey | 91.4 | [details] | 22.9% | 8.9% | 39.7% | 31 | $77,245 | 7.3% | 8.7% | 42,275 | 2.8% | 0.2% | |
| 26. Randolph, New Jersey | 91.3 | [details] | 18% | 7.3% | 59.4% | 32 | $115,722 | 7.6% | 14.3% | 24,847 | 1.4% | 0.2% | |
| 27. Fremont, California | 91.3 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.3% | 43.2% | 34 | $82,199 | 7.4% | 52.3% | 203,413 | 5.4% | 0.3% | |
| 28. Ellicott City, Maryland | 91.2 | [details] | 19.6% | 9.6% | 56.4% | 30 | $91,968 | 6.6% | 21.7% | 56,397 | 3.3% | 0.3% | |
| 29. DeSoto, Texas | 91 | [details] | 21% | 9.3% | 30.2% | 32 | $66,986 | 7% | 51.2% | 37,646 | 5.5% | 0.2% | |
| 30. Friendswood, Texas | 91 | [details] | 17.2% | 8.6% | 38.6% | 30 | $77,293 | 6.6% | 9.9% | 29,037 | 3.3% | 0.2% | |
| 31. Old Bridge, New Jersey | 90.9 | [details] | 21% | 10.5% | 29.5% | 41 | $74,045 | 7% | 20.5% | 60,456 | 4.2% | 0.2% | |
| 32. North Brunswick, New Jersey | 90.9 | [details] | 24.4% | 10% | 37% | 32 | $70,812 | 6.7% | 37.3% | 36,287 | 4.7% | 0.1% | |
| 33. Gloucester, New Jersey | 90.9 | [details] | 21.3% | 9.4% | 22% | 32 | $62,992 | 6.8% | 16.9% | 64,350 | 6.2% | 0.1% | |
| 34. Moorpark, California | 90.8 | [details] | 10% | 4.5% | 34.2% | 30 | $78,909 | 8.1% | 25.6% | 31,415 | 7% | 0.1% | |
| 35. Roswell, Georgia | 90.8 | [details] | 22.8% | 7.5% | 52.6% | 32 | $85,946 | 6.9% | 18.5% | 79,334 | 5% | 0.3% | |
| 36. Manassas, Virginia | 90.8 | [details] | 21% | 5.4% | 28.1% | 35 | $70,141 | 8.6% | 27.9% | 35,135 | 6.3% | 0.2% | |
| 37. Batavia, Illinois | 90.7 | [details] | 21.4% | 9.9% | 42.6% | 28 | $81,689 | 7.7% | 6.8% | 23,866 | 3.6% | 0.2% | |
| 38. Mission Viejo, California | 90.5 | [details] | 17% | 10.9% | 41.2% | 29 | $86,902 | 6.9% | 16.8% | 93,102 | 3.8% | 0.3% | |
| 39. Glendora, California | 90.5 | [details] | 19.1% | 12.5% | 25.7% | 31 | $66,674 | 6.3% | 19.7% | 49,415 | 5.9% | 0.2% | |
| 40. Streamwood, Illinois | 90.5 | [details] | 18.4% | 6.1% | 26.5% | 33 | $68,771 | 8.7% | 22.5% | 36,407 | 3% | 0.1% | |
| 41. Plano, Texas | 90.4 | [details] | 20.2% | 4.9% | 53.3% | 29 | $91,162 | 8.3% | 21.7% | 222,030 | 4.3% | 0.3% | |
| 42. Bolingbrook, Illinois | 90.4 | [details] | 14.2% | 4.3% | 29.2% | 34 | $71,527 | 9.5% | 35.5% | 56,321 | 4.1% | 0.1% | |
| 43. Westminster, Colorado | 90.4 | [details] | 23.9% | 6.5% | 31.3% | 28 | $63,776 | 7.3% | 15.8% | 100,940 | 4.7% | 0.3% | |
| 44. Rocklin, California | 90.4 | [details] | 18.6% | 8.6% | 36.1% | 28 | $72,245 | 7.9% | 11.7% | 36,330 | 4.5% | 0.3% | |
| 45. Bowie, Maryland | 90.3 | [details] | 19.7% | 9.4% | 43% | 37 | $82,403 | 7.5% | 37.4% | 50,269 | 1.6% | 0.2% | |
| 46. East Windsor, New Jersey | 90.2 | [details] | 24.4% | 8.3% | 42% | 35 | $73,461 | 7.7% | 25.6% | 24,919 | 5.3% | 0.2% | |
| 47. Duncanville, Texas | 90.2 | [details] | 17.4% | 9.6% | 27.5% | 29 | $57,064 | 6.5% | 36.1% | 36,081 | 6.1% | 0.1% | |
| 48. Brooklyn Park, Minnesota | 90 | [details] | 22% | 5.6% | 27.3% | 25 | $64,297 | 8.1% | 28.6% | 67,388 | 5.1% | 0.2% | |
| 49. Pearland, Texas | 90 | [details] | 15.4% | 8.4% | 29.1% | 32 | $70,748 | 8% | 17.4% | 37,640 | 4.7% | 0.1% | |
| 50. Chino Hills, California | 89.8 | [details] | 10.8% | 4.2% | 37.6% | 41 | $81,794 | 8.7% | 43.6% | 66,787 | 5.1% | 0.1% | |
| 51. Richardson, Texas | 89.8 | [details] | 22.9% | 10% | 47.7% | 25 | $72,876 | 6.7% | 24.6% | 91,802 | 6.3% | 0.2% | |
| 52. Petaluma, California | 89.7 | [details] | 22.8% | 11% | 30.1% | 34 | $71,158 | 6.6% | 15.8% | 54,548 | 6% | 0.3% | |
| 53. Monroe, New York | 89.7 | [details] | 15.3% | 9.4% | 32.2% | 42 | $76,894 | 7.2% | 9% | 7,780 | 4.8% | 0.3% | |
| 54. McKinney, Texas | 89.6 | [details] | 18.9% | 6.8% | 39.1% | 29 | $72,133 | 10.1% | 21.6% | 54,369 | 8.5% | 0.2% | |
| 55. Bridgewater, New Jersey | 89.6 | [details] | 19.3% | 12.7% | 49.9% | 31 | $99,832 | 7.7% | 14.9% | 42,940 | 2.1% | 0.3% | |
| 56. Thornton, Colorado | 89.6 | [details] | 18.5% | 5.6% | 19.9% | 30 | $58,742 | 8.8% | 17.3% | 82,384 | 5.2% | 0.1% | |
| 57. Vernon Hills, Illinois | 89.6 | [details] | 25.1% | 6.1% | 54.3% | 31 | $83,806 | 8.1% | 18.1% | 20,120 | 2.9% | 0.2% | |
| 58. San Jose, California | 89.5 | [details] | 18.3% | 8.3% | 31.6% | 29 | $74,813 | 7.6% | 52.5% | 894,943 | 8.8% | 0.3% | |
| 59. Matthews, North Carolina | 89.5 | [details] | 17.5% | 9.2% | 42.3% | 29 | $75,791 | 7% | 9.7% | 22,127 | 4% | 0.1% | |
| 60. Islip, New York | 89.4 | [details] | 18.1% | 11.1% | 23.6% | 32 | $72,361 | 7.7% | 12.3% | 20,575 | 4.1% | 0.2% | |
| 61. Vacaville, California | 89.4 | [details] | 19.3% | 8.3% | 19.4% | 30 | $63,950 | 6.6% | 27.9% | 88,625 | 6.1% | 0.2% | |
| 62. Germantown, Maryland | 89.4 | [details] | 23.4% | 3.1% | 43.2% | 35 | $67,204 | 9.2% | 37.8% | 55,419 | 4.6% | 0.1% | |
| 63. Delran, New Jersey | 89.3 | [details] | 21% | 10.8% | 27.3% | 28 | $67,895 | 6.2% | 17.1% | 15,536 | 4.1% | 0.1% | |
| 64. Edison, New Jersey | 89.3 | [details] | 21.2% | 11.9% | 42.3% | 34 | $77,976 | 6.4% | 40.5% | 97,687 | 4.8% | 0.2% | |
| 65. Dale City, Virginia | 89.3 | [details] | 13.6% | 3.8% | 22.7% | 42 | $69,278 | 8% | 43.2% | 55,971 | 4.4% | 0.1% | |
| 66. Woodinville, Washington | 89.2 | [details] | 24% | 8.7% | 42.8% | 27 | $81,251 | 6.5% | 16% | 9,194 | 4.4% | 0.3% | |
| 67. Sayreville, New Jersey | 89.1 | [details] | 22.3% | 12.4% | 25% | 36 | $66,266 | 6.7% | 23.5% | 40,377 | 4.7% | 0.1% | |
| 68. Hanover Park, Illinois | 89.1 | [details] | 14% | 4.1% | 20.2% | 31 | $63,990 | 8.8% | 31.9% | 38,278 | 6.1% | 0% | |
| 69. West Linn, Oregon | 89.1 | [details] | 17.9% | 7.8% | 49.2% | 25 | $83,252 | 6.6% | 6.7% | 22,261 | 3.9% | 0.3% | |
| 70. Antioch, California | 89.1 | [details] | 15.8% | 7.4% | 18.2% | 43 | $64,723 | 8.6% | 34.7% | 90,532 | 8.5% | 0.1% | |
| 71. Itasca, Illinois | 89 | [details] | 23.6% | 11.4% | 32.8% | 27 | $78,700 | 6.4% | 12% | 8,302 | 4.7% | 0.1% | |
| 72. Matteson, Illinois | 88.8 | [details] | 20.5% | 10.8% | 25.4% | 37 | $65,666 | 6.4% | 67.3% | 12,928 | 4.4% | 0.2% | |
| 73. Congers, New York | 88.8 | [details] | 13.8% | 10.7% | 36.1% | 34 | $85,821 | 7.1% | 14.8% | 8,303 | 2.9% | 0.1% | |
| 74. Lafayette, Colorado | 88.8 | [details] | 22.7% | 5.8% | 45.6% | 26 | $64,088 | 8% | 14.5% | 23,197 | 7% | 0.2% | |
| 75. Schertz, Texas | 88.8 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.8% | 27.5% | 25 | $59,745 | 7.5% | 18% | 18,694 | 5.2% | 0.2% | |
| 76. Arvada, Colorado | 88.8 | [details] | 22.9% | 10.7% | 29% | 27 | $63,273 | 6.4% | 9% | 102,153 | 5.2% | 0.1% | |
| 77. Sugar Land, Texas | 88.8 | [details] | 12.3% | 6.7% | 53.7% | 31 | $88,639 | 6.1% | 34% | 63,328 | 3.8% | 0.3% | |
| 78. Wheaton-Glenmont, Maryland | 88.8 | [details] | 22% | 11.8% | 34.2% | 36 | $62,295 | 7.2% | 50.1% | 57,694 | 8.5% | 0.2% | |
| 79. Annandale, Virginia | 88.7 | [details] | 21.8% | 11.8% | 49.2% | 31 | $80,459 | 6.5% | 35.5% | 54,994 | 7% | 0.2% | |
| 80. Tracy, California | 88.6 | [details] | 14.4% | 6.4% | 18% | 42 | $67,464 | 9.4% | 34.8% | 56,929 | 7% | 0.2% | |
| 81. Ahuimanu, Hawaii | 88.6 | [details] | 9.2% | 7% | 37.2% | 37 | $74,788 | 7.1% | 77.7% | 8,506 | 3.9% | 0.2% | |
| 82. Ashland, Massachusetts | 88.6 | [details] | 22.6% | 9.8% | 45.6% | 34 | $77,611 | 7.9% | 8.1% | 14,674 | 2% | 0.2% | |
| 83. Cedar Hill, Texas | 88.6 | [details] | 14.7% | 4.6% | 28.3% | 34 | $63,416 | 8.5% | 43.3% | 32,093 | 5.5% | 0.1% | |
| 84. Rowlett, Texas | 88.5 | [details] | 10.6% | 5.2% | 32.5% | 34 | $73,417 | 8.7% | 18.2% | 44,503 | 3% | 0.1% | |
| 85. Oak Forest, Illinois | 88.5 | [details] | 21% | 9.2% | 22.5% | 34 | $68,862 | 6.7% | 9.6% | 28,051 | 3.6% | 0.1% | |
| 86. Norton, Massachusetts | 88.5 | [details] | 19.3% | 7.8% | 30.8% | 32 | $71,848 | 8% | 7.8% | 18,036 | 4% | 0.3% | |
| 87. Apple Valley, Minnesota | 88.5 | [details] | 19.2% | 5.5% | 41% | 25 | $79,335 | 7.2% | 8.2% | 45,527 | 2.1% | 0.2% | |
| 88. Westampton, New Jersey | 88.4 | [details] | 17.2% | 9.1% | 26.2% | 29 | $69,656 | 7.3% | 29.2% | 7,217 | 2.5% | 0.2% | |
| 89. Maplewood, New Jersey | 88.4 | [details] | 20.4% | 12.1% | 50.8% | 37 | $92,724 | 7.9% | 41.2% | 23,868 | 4.4% | 0.1% | |
| 90. Lumberton, New Jersey | 88.4 | [details] | 24.8% | 11.1% | 30.9% | 29 | $70,329 | 8.3% | 21.7% | 10,461 | 3.8% | 0.2% | |
| 91. Garland, Texas | 88.3 | [details] | 19.7% | 7.1% | 21.8% | 29 | $53,545 | 8.2% | 34.7% | 215,768 | 8.9% | 0.1% | |
| 92. Baldwin, New York | 88.2 | [details] | 18.4% | 12% | 35.2% | 39 | $78,400 | 6.8% | 34.2% | 23,455 | 5.4% | 0.2% | |
| 93. Winslow, New Jersey | 88.1 | [details] | 18.7% | 8.5% | 18.6% | 35 | $62,045 | 8.2% | 34.5% | 34,611 | 6% | 0.1% | |
| 94. North Aurora, Illinois | 88.1 | [details] | 25.7% | 9.9% | 30.7% | 28 | $70,780 | 9.7% | 12.3% | 10,585 | 3% | 0.1% | |
| 95. Round Rock, Texas | 88 | [details] | 18.5% | 4.5% | 32.9% | 28 | $65,471 | 9.7% | 23.2% | 61,136 | 4% | 0.3% | |
| 96. Villa Park, Illinois | 88 | [details] | 20.9% | 11.7% | 23.7% | 27 | $62,805 | 7% | 10.9% | 22,075 | 4.8% | 0.1% | |
| 97. Coppell, Texas | 87.9 | [details] | 15.8% | 2.6% | 62.6% | 27 | $106,630 | 9.5% | 16.8% | 35,958 | 1.9% | 0.3% | |
| 98. Danville, California | 87.9 | [details] | 15.9% | 10.3% | 59.4% | 33 | $125,867 | 7.1% | 13.7% | 41,715 | 2.2% | 0.3% | |
| 99. North Plainfield, New Jersey | 87.9 | [details] | 23.1% | 9.5% | 26.5% | 31 | $62,875 | 7.8% | 36.9% | 21,103 | 6.4% | 0.1% | |
| 100. Elgin, Illinois | 87.9 | [details] | 23.4% | 8.6% | 20.5% | 27 | $58,404 | 9.2% | 29.5% | 94,487 | 8.1% | 0.2% |