 |
|
|
|
PlaceMatch™ lets you find places similar to any city or town you select, either using the default criteria or using criteria you specify.The criteria being used are show as column headings in the results table further below.
However, if you want to specify which factors to use in determining which places are similar to each other, you can select among dozens of other criteria. These include criteria related to crime and income, population demographics, education levels, and others; there are dozens of criteria you can select.
Please click on the [+/-] Advanced Controls link just below and try PlaceMatch using a variety of filtering criteria.
All Places > Illinois > Rolling Meadows
Click this [+/-] link to see or edit the similarity criteria used.
Cities and Towns Similar to Rolling Meadows, Illinois:
Sorted from most similar to least (using the default selection criteria).
Your specified criteria have resulted in 100 locations (a maximum of 100 are shown in the table below). Note that you can dictate for each each criterion (e.g., the percentage of people in poverty) whether it should match Rolling Meadows 'loosely' or 'strictly', using the Advanced Controls. This matching level, loose versus strict, is shown near the top of each column in the results table.
Click on a city or town name below to find places similar to it.
Or, to see details about a place, click its [details] link in the table below.
| City, State | Similarity | Go To City | 1 Person Houses | 65+ | College Grads | Commute Minutes | Family Income | Kids 0-4 | Non White | Pop. | Poverty | Seasonal Housing | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | ||||
| ROLLING MEADOWS, ILLINOIS | [details] | 23.6% | 10.6% | 31% | 26 | $68,571 | 7.1% | 17.7% | 24,604 | 5.1% | 0.4% | ||
| 1. Petaluma, California | 92.7 | [details] | 22.8% | 11% | 30.1% | 34 | $71,158 | 6.6% | 15.8% | 54,548 | 6% | 0.3% | |
| 2. Livermore, California | 91.9 | [details] | 18.6% | 7.5% | 31.6% | 33 | $82,421 | 7.7% | 18.1% | 73,345 | 5.3% | 0.2% | |
| 3. Prospect Heights, Illinois | 91.6 | [details] | 23.8% | 11.4% | 28.5% | 28 | $63,382 | 7.4% | 22.6% | 17,081 | 4.3% | 0.4% | |
| 4. Folsom, California | 91.4 | [details] | 21.7% | 8.8% | 37.6% | 28 | $82,448 | 6.9% | 22.1% | 51,884 | 7.3% | 0.4% | |
| 5. Thousand Oaks, California | 91 | [details] | 19.6% | 11.1% | 42.2% | 27 | $86,041 | 6.7% | 14.9% | 117,005 | 5% | 0.5% | |
| 6. Burlington, Massachusetts | 90.8 | [details] | 19% | 13.9% | 42.6% | 26 | $82,072 | 6.9% | 13.3% | 22,876 | 1.9% | 0.6% | |
| 7. Woodinville, Washington | 90.7 | [details] | 24% | 8.7% | 42.8% | 27 | $81,251 | 6.5% | 16% | 9,194 | 4.4% | 0.3% | |
| 8. San Juan Capistrano, California | 90.6 | [details] | 20.3% | 13.1% | 30.7% | 26 | $69,481 | 7.2% | 21.5% | 33,826 | 10.7% | 0.6% | |
| 9. Windsor, California | 90.5 | [details] | 18.1% | 11.1% | 24.7% | 27 | $67,992 | 8% | 21% | 22,744 | 5.1% | 0.3% | |
| 10. Farmers Branch, Texas | 90.1 | [details] | 23% | 12.1% | 27.2% | 23 | $57,531 | 7.3% | 21.6% | 27,508 | 6.3% | 0.3% | |
| 11. Roxbury, New Jersey | 90.1 | [details] | 18.1% | 9.9% | 33.9% | 35 | $83,409 | 7.1% | 7.4% | 23,883 | 2.7% | 0.4% | |
| 12. Chelmsford, Massachusetts | 89.8 | [details] | 23.1% | 13% | 44% | 29 | $82,676 | 6.7% | 6.9% | 33,858 | 2.8% | 0.3% | |
| 13. Montville, New Jersey | 89.8 | [details] | 16.6% | 10.8% | 51.2% | 30 | $105,394 | 6.9% | 15% | 20,839 | 3.8% | 0.4% | |
| 14. Concord, California | 89.7 | [details] | 23% | 10.7% | 25.9% | 33 | $62,093 | 7.1% | 29.3% | 121,780 | 7.6% | 0.3% | |
| 15. Broomfield, Colorado | 89.5 | [details] | 19.2% | 6.6% | 37.9% | 29 | $70,551 | 7.8% | 11.4% | 38,272 | 4.2% | 0.4% | |
| 16. Morgan Hill, California | 89.4 | [details] | 15.8% | 7.5% | 33.5% | 37 | $90,134 | 8.1% | 27.6% | 33,556 | 4.7% | 0.3% | |
| 17. Setauket-East Setauket, New York | 89.4 | [details] | 17% | 9.4% | 55.6% | 29 | $102,472 | 6.6% | 12.2% | 15,931 | 4.1% | 0.5% | |
| 18. Bridgewater, Massachusetts | 89.3 | [details] | 19.6% | 8.6% | 29.6% | 32 | $73,953 | 6.2% | 12.7% | 25,185 | 3.5% | 0.2% | |
| 19. Orange, California | 89.3 | [details] | 19.4% | 9.6% | 28% | 26 | $64,573 | 7.4% | 29.5% | 128,821 | 10% | 0.2% | |
| 20. Lake Grove, New York | 89.3 | [details] | 14% | 9% | 28.3% | 34 | $73,065 | 7.5% | 8.7% | 10,250 | 5.1% | 0.4% | |
| 21. New Windsor, New York | 89.2 | [details] | 24.4% | 14.5% | 21.4% | 30 | $62,439 | 6.5% | 14.2% | 9,077 | 5.3% | 0.4% | |
| 22. Pompton Lakes, New Jersey | 89 | [details] | 24.1% | 13.4% | 28.4% | 27 | $74,701 | 6.9% | 7% | 10,640 | 3.2% | 0.2% | |
| 23. Wheaton, Illinois | 89 | [details] | 24.6% | 11.2% | 57.3% | 29 | $90,475 | 6.3% | 10.2% | 55,416 | 3.6% | 0.2% | |
| 24. Santa Clarita, California | 88.9 | [details] | 19.1% | 7.1% | 29.1% | 35 | $73,588 | 7.8% | 20.5% | 151,088 | 6.4% | 0.2% | |
| 25. Rocklin, California | 88.9 | [details] | 18.6% | 8.6% | 36.1% | 28 | $72,245 | 7.9% | 11.7% | 36,330 | 4.5% | 0.3% | |
| 26. Port Jefferson Station, New York | 88.9 | [details] | 20.9% | 11.1% | 24.8% | 31 | $63,185 | 6.8% | 11.6% | 7,527 | 7.6% | 0.3% | |
| 27. Laguna Hills, California | 88.8 | [details] | 21.7% | 12.2% | 39.3% | 29 | $81,334 | 6.1% | 23.2% | 31,178 | 5% | 0.4% | |
| 28. Glendora, California | 88.8 | [details] | 19.1% | 12.5% | 25.7% | 31 | $66,674 | 6.3% | 19.7% | 49,415 | 5.9% | 0.2% | |
| 29. Glen Ellyn, Illinois | 88.7 | [details] | 25.2% | 11.4% | 58.8% | 32 | $95,332 | 7.8% | 10.5% | 26,999 | 2.8% | 0.4% | |
| 30. Westminster, Colorado | 88.6 | [details] | 23.9% | 6.5% | 31.3% | 28 | $63,776 | 7.3% | 15.8% | 100,940 | 4.7% | 0.3% | |
| 31. Placentia, California | 88.6 | [details] | 16.1% | 9.1% | 31.3% | 28 | $68,976 | 7.4% | 32.2% | 46,488 | 8.7% | 0.2% | |
| 32. Maplewood, Minnesota | 88.5 | [details] | 26.8% | 15% | 25.6% | 23 | $63,049 | 6.5% | 11.3% | 34,947 | 4.8% | 0.4% | |
| 33. Pleasanton, California | 88.5 | [details] | 19.3% | 7.6% | 47.3% | 35 | $102,796 | 6.8% | 19.6% | 63,654 | 2.6% | 0.7% | |
| 34. Ashland, Massachusetts | 88.5 | [details] | 22.6% | 9.8% | 45.6% | 34 | $77,611 | 7.9% | 8.1% | 14,674 | 2% | 0.2% | |
| 35. Eastampton, New Jersey | 88.5 | [details] | 21.4% | 7.2% | 29.6% | 30 | $71,765 | 7.1% | 21.8% | 6,202 | 2.9% | 0.5% | |
| 36. East Farmingdale, New York | 88.5 | [details] | 19.7% | 10.6% | 21.8% | 30 | $71,726 | 7.4% | 26.7% | 5,400 | 7% | 0.2% | |
| 37. Fairfax, Virginia | 88.4 | [details] | 23.5% | 12.8% | 45.7% | 32 | $78,921 | 6% | 27.1% | 21,498 | 5.7% | 0.4% | |
| 38. Tualatin, Oregon | 88.4 | [details] | 24.8% | 5.8% | 37.5% | 23 | $68,165 | 7.6% | 13.1% | 22,791 | 5.5% | 0.5% | |
| 39. Roseville, California | 88.4 | [details] | 23.1% | 14.5% | 31.4% | 27 | $65,929 | 7.3% | 14% | 79,921 | 4.9% | 0.4% | |
| 40. Palatine, Illinois | 88.4 | [details] | 27.8% | 8.8% | 41.4% | 29 | $76,270 | 7.3% | 16.9% | 65,479 | 4.8% | 0.3% | |
| 41. Corte Madera, California | 88.4 | [details] | 25.1% | 13.3% | 63.3% | 29 | $95,471 | 7% | 12.3% | 9,100 | 4.5% | 0.4% | |
| 42. Brea, California | 88.3 | [details] | 23.2% | 11.4% | 33.5% | 30 | $68,423 | 6.1% | 22.7% | 35,410 | 5.3% | 0.3% | |
| 43. Northborough, Massachusetts | 88.3 | [details] | 17% | 9.8% | 51% | 27 | $90,480 | 7.3% | 7% | 14,013 | 2.8% | 0.4% | |
| 44. Randolph, Massachusetts | 88.3 | [details] | 23.7% | 14.3% | 26.6% | 34 | $61,942 | 6% | 37.2% | 30,963 | 4.1% | 0.3% | |
| 45. San Carlos, California | 88.3 | [details] | 25.4% | 14.3% | 49.8% | 27 | $103,971 | 7% | 15.5% | 27,718 | 2.7% | 0.3% | |
| 46. West Dundee, Illinois | 88.3 | [details] | 25.6% | 8.5% | 36.8% | 29 | $78,007 | 8.3% | 6.1% | 5,428 | 3.7% | 0.4% | |
| 47. Pinecrest, Florida | 88.2 | [details] | 14.9% | 10.2% | 61.6% | 31 | $122,526 | 6.2% | 9.7% | 19,055 | 4.1% | 0.4% | |
| 48. Newark, California | 88.2 | [details] | 14.1% | 7.8% | 24.2% | 32 | $71,351 | 7.2% | 47.8% | 42,471 | 5.5% | 0.2% | |
| 49. Redwood City, California | 88.2 | [details] | 27.1% | 10.2% | 35.7% | 26 | $73,798 | 7.5% | 31% | 75,402 | 6% | 0.8% | |
| 50. Easton, Massachusetts | 88.2 | [details] | 20.7% | 9.4% | 39.6% | 30 | $82,190 | 6.5% | 8.1% | 22,299 | 2% | 0.5% | |
| 51. North Patchogue, New York | 88.2 | [details] | 20.3% | 8.7% | 18.3% | 31 | $65,117 | 6.9% | 6.7% | 7,825 | 3.7% | 0.7% | |
| 52. Wharton, New Jersey | 88.1 | [details] | 26.4% | 11.3% | 22.7% | 30 | $64,957 | 7.4% | 17.9% | 6,298 | 8.3% | 0.2% | |
| 53. Lumberton, New Jersey | 88.1 | [details] | 24.8% | 11.1% | 30.9% | 29 | $70,329 | 8.3% | 21.7% | 10,461 | 3.8% | 0.2% | |
| 54. Lafayette, Colorado | 88.1 | [details] | 22.7% | 5.8% | 45.6% | 26 | $64,088 | 8% | 14.5% | 23,197 | 7% | 0.2% | |
| 55. Voorhees, New Jersey | 88 | [details] | 26.8% | 10.9% | 46.2% | 32 | $86,873 | 6.3% | 21.7% | 28,126 | 5.7% | 0.3% | |
| 56. Ramsey, New Jersey | 88 | [details] | 22.6% | 11.2% | 54.5% | 30 | $104,036 | 7.6% | 8.4% | 14,351 | 1.9% | 0.3% | |
| 57. Rohnert Park, California | 88 | [details] | 24% | 8.1% | 24.7% | 29 | $61,420 | 6.3% | 19.7% | 42,236 | 8% | 0.4% | |
| 58. Westbury, New York | 87.9 | [details] | 19.8% | 13.6% | 31.2% | 34 | $77,988 | 6.2% | 38.4% | 14,263 | 5.3% | 0.4% | |
| 59. League City, Texas | 87.9 | [details] | 18.3% | 5.9% | 35.5% | 30 | $72,760 | 8.1% | 16% | 45,444 | 4.8% | 0.6% | |
| 60. Acton, Massachusetts | 87.9 | [details] | 21.5% | 8.4% | 69.3% | 33 | $108,189 | 7.4% | 11.6% | 20,331 | 2.9% | 0.5% | |
| 61. North Andover, Massachusetts | 87.8 | [details] | 24.9% | 13.4% | 50.3% | 30 | $91,105 | 7% | 6.3% | 27,202 | 2.9% | 0.5% | |
| 62. Newcastle, Washington | 87.8 | [details] | 20.2% | 6.6% | 54.4% | 27 | $91,381 | 7.8% | 24.9% | 7,737 | 2% | 0.2% | |
| 63. Louisville, Colorado | 87.8 | [details] | 22.7% | 6.1% | 59.9% | 23 | $81,512 | 6.3% | 8.8% | 18,937 | 3% | 0.4% | |
| 64. La Mirada, California | 87.8 | [details] | 17.4% | 13.8% | 25.2% | 30 | $66,598 | 6.3% | 35.5% | 46,783 | 5.6% | 0.2% | |
| 65. Centereach, New York | 87.8 | [details] | 9.7% | 9.3% | 21.8% | 32 | $71,336 | 6.9% | 8.1% | 27,285 | 5.6% | 0.2% | |
| 66. Friendswood, Texas | 87.7 | [details] | 17.2% | 8.6% | 38.6% | 30 | $77,293 | 6.6% | 9.9% | 29,037 | 3.3% | 0.2% | |
| 67. Florence, New Jersey | 87.6 | [details] | 24.8% | 11.9% | 19.9% | 28 | $67,412 | 6.1% | 14.5% | 10,746 | 6.1% | 0.3% | |
| 68. Evesham, New Jersey | 87.6 | [details] | 22.9% | 8.9% | 39.7% | 31 | $77,245 | 7.3% | 8.7% | 42,275 | 2.8% | 0.2% | |
| 69. Schertz, Texas | 87.5 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.8% | 27.5% | 25 | $59,745 | 7.5% | 18% | 18,694 | 5.2% | 0.2% | |
| 70. Ronkonkoma, New York | 87.5 | [details] | 16.1% | 7.5% | 20% | 32 | $73,003 | 7% | 6.1% | 20,029 | 3.7% | 0.2% | |
| 71. Batavia, Illinois | 87.4 | [details] | 21.4% | 9.9% | 42.6% | 28 | $81,689 | 7.7% | 6.8% | 23,866 | 3.6% | 0.2% | |
| 72. Long Hill, New Jersey | 87.4 | [details] | 18.2% | 12.6% | 49.3% | 31 | $103,037 | 7.7% | 7.2% | 8,777 | 3.3% | 0.4% | |
| 73. Woodbridge, New Jersey | 87.3 | [details] | 21.7% | 13.4% | 26.8% | 31 | $68,492 | 6.3% | 29.2% | 97,203 | 4.8% | 0.2% | |
| 74. Cypress, California | 87.3 | [details] | 17.3% | 10.6% | 31.2% | 31 | $70,060 | 6% | 34.4% | 46,229 | 6% | 0.6% | |
| 75. Richardson, Texas | 87.3 | [details] | 22.9% | 10% | 47.7% | 25 | $72,876 | 6.7% | 24.6% | 91,802 | 6.3% | 0.2% | |
| 76. Poway, California | 87.3 | [details] | 12.8% | 8.6% | 39.3% | 27 | $77,875 | 6% | 17.1% | 48,044 | 4.3% | 0.2% | |
| 77. Glen Carbon, Illinois | 87.3 | [details] | 22% | 11% | 42.5% | 27 | $72,182 | 6.5% | 10.9% | 10,425 | 5.8% | 0.3% | |
| 78. Stony Point, New York | 87.3 | [details] | 17.6% | 12.3% | 24.5% | 34 | $82,124 | 6.8% | 5.7% | 11,744 | 3.6% | 0.3% | |
| 79. San Bruno, California | 87.3 | [details] | 25.3% | 11.2% | 26.2% | 27 | $70,251 | 6.1% | 42.3% | 40,165 | 4.4% | 0.5% | |
| 80. Mission Viejo, California | 87.3 | [details] | 17% | 10.9% | 41.2% | 29 | $86,902 | 6.9% | 16.8% | 93,102 | 3.8% | 0.3% | |
| 81. Huntington Beach, California | 87.2 | [details] | 24.5% | 10.4% | 36% | 30 | $74,378 | 6.2% | 20.8% | 189,594 | 6.6% | 0.7% | |
| 82. Strongsville, Ohio | 87.2 | [details] | 19.8% | 11.4% | 37% | 28 | $76,964 | 6.2% | 5.8% | 43,858 | 2.2% | 0.5% | |
| 83. Mahwah, New Jersey | 87.2 | [details] | 28% | 10.7% | 49.5% | 31 | $94,484 | 6.9% | 12.1% | 24,062 | 2% | 0.6% | |
| 84. West Linn, Oregon | 87.2 | [details] | 17.9% | 7.8% | 49.2% | 25 | $83,252 | 6.6% | 6.7% | 22,261 | 3.9% | 0.3% | |
| 85. Napa, California | 87.2 | [details] | 26.6% | 13.8% | 23.3% | 25 | $58,788 | 6.8% | 19.7% | 72,585 | 8.9% | 0.6% | |
| 86. Andover, Massachusetts | 87.2 | [details] | 21.5% | 12.3% | 62.5% | 31 | $104,820 | 6.6% | 8.4% | 31,247 | 3.9% | 0.7% | |
| 87. Roswell, Georgia | 87.2 | [details] | 22.8% | 7.5% | 52.6% | 32 | $85,946 | 6.9% | 18.5% | 79,334 | 5% | 0.3% | |
| 88. Northglenn, Colorado | 87.1 | [details] | 23.1% | 10.2% | 19.4% | 30 | $52,888 | 7.3% | 17% | 31,575 | 5.4% | 0.2% | |
| 89. Schererville, Indiana | 87 | [details] | 24.2% | 10.4% | 29.5% | 31 | $70,474 | 6.4% | 8.6% | 24,851 | 3.1% | 0.5% | |
| 90. Cupertino, California | 87 | [details] | 19.4% | 11% | 65.4% | 27 | $109,455 | 6.1% | 49.9% | 50,546 | 4.8% | 0.4% | |
| 91. Lombard, Illinois | 87 | [details] | 29.5% | 14.5% | 36% | 30 | $69,686 | 6.1% | 13% | 42,322 | 3.8% | 0.4% | |
| 92. Vienna, Virginia | 87 | [details] | 19.2% | 13.6% | 56.4% | 30 | $93,043 | 6.5% | 18.9% | 14,453 | 2.5% | 0.4% | |
| 93. Libertyville, Illinois | 87 | [details] | 21.2% | 11.6% | 56.1% | 28 | $103,573 | 6.7% | 7.8% | 20,742 | 3.5% | 0.3% | |
| 94. Laguna Niguel, California | 87 | [details] | 20.5% | 8.9% | 47.8% | 31 | $93,613 | 7% | 16.5% | 61,891 | 4.1% | 0.8% | |
| 95. Bridgewater, New Jersey | 86.9 | [details] | 19.3% | 12.7% | 49.9% | 31 | $99,832 | 7.7% | 14.9% | 42,940 | 2.1% | 0.3% | |
| 96. Twinsburg, Ohio | 86.9 | [details] | 25.3% | 11.2% | 38.5% | 27 | $72,634 | 8% | 13.1% | 17,006 | 2.1% | 0.3% | |
| 97. Longmont, Colorado | 86.9 | [details] | 23.8% | 9.2% | 31.3% | 24 | $58,037 | 7.8% | 15.2% | 71,093 | 7.8% | 0.3% | |
| 98. Bergenfield, New Jersey | 86.8 | [details] | 20.8% | 13.5% | 32.3% | 32 | $71,187 | 6.8% | 37.1% | 26,247 | 3.5% | 0.2% | |
| 99. Wellesley, Massachusetts | 86.8 | [details] | 20.6% | 13.9% | 75.9% | 26 | $134,769 | 7.3% | 10% | 26,613 | 3.8% | 0.8% | |
| 100. Burnsville, Minnesota | 86.8 | [details] | 24.8% | 7.2% | 36.8% | 24 | $67,979 | 7.1% | 12.5% | 60,220 | 5.1% | 0.4% |