Please see the results table below.
PlaceMatch lets you find places similar to any city or town you select, either using the default criteria or using criteria you specify.The criteria being used are show as column headings in the results table further below.
However, if you want to specify which factors to use in determining which places are similar to each other, you can select among dozens of other criteria. These include criteria related to crime and income, population demographics, education levels, and others; there are dozens of criteria you can select.
Please click on the [+/-] Advanced Controls link just below and try PlaceMatch using a variety of filtering criteria.
All Places > Maryland > Bowie
Click this [+/-] link to see or edit the similarity criteria used.
Cities and Towns Similar to Bowie, Maryland:
Sorted from most similar to least (using the default selection criteria).
Your specified criteria have resulted in 100 locations (a maximum of 100 are shown in the table below). Note that you can dictate for each each criterion (e.g., the percentage of people in poverty) whether it should match Bowie 'loosely' or 'strictly', using the Advanced Controls. This matching level, loose versus strict, is shown near the top of each column in the results table.
Click on a city or town name below to find places similar to it.
Or, to see details about a place, click its [details] link in the table below.
| City, State | Similarity | Go To City | 1 Person Houses | 65+ | College Grads | Commute Minutes | Family Income | Kids 0-4 | Non White | Pop. | Poverty | Seasonal Housing | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | ||||
| BOWIE, MARYLAND | [details] | 19.7% | 9.4% | 43% | 37 | $82,403 | 7.5% | 37.4% | 50,269 | 1.6% | 0.2% | ||
| 1. Bridgewater, New Jersey | 94.4 | [details] | 19.3% | 12.7% | 49.9% | 31 | $99,832 | 7.7% | 14.9% | 42,940 | 2.1% | 0.3% | |
| 2. Danville, California | 93.8 | [details] | 15.9% | 10.3% | 59.4% | 33 | $125,867 | 7.1% | 13.7% | 41,715 | 2.2% | 0.3% | |
| 3. South Brunswick, New Jersey | 93.5 | [details] | 19.5% | 7.3% | 49% | 36 | $86,891 | 8.1% | 29.5% | 37,734 | 3.1% | 0.2% | |
| 4. Hillsborough, New Jersey | 92.8 | [details] | 17.2% | 6.8% | 46.6% | 33 | $93,933 | 7.9% | 14% | 36,634 | 3.1% | 0.2% | |
| 5. Clayton, California | 92.8 | [details] | 14.7% | 9% | 51.8% | 39 | $107,448 | 7% | 12.1% | 10,762 | 2.6% | 0.1% | |
| 6. Missouri City, Texas | 92.7 | [details] | 12% | 5.4% | 44.5% | 34 | $77,762 | 7.3% | 55.7% | 52,913 | 3.3% | 0.1% | |
| 7. Chino Hills, California | 92.5 | [details] | 10.8% | 4.2% | 37.6% | 41 | $81,794 | 8.7% | 43.6% | 66,787 | 5.1% | 0.1% | |
| 8. Roselle, Illinois | 92.2 | [details] | 20.5% | 8.2% | 34% | 32 | $73,444 | 6.9% | 12.1% | 23,115 | 2% | 0.1% | |
| 9. Vernon Hills, Illinois | 92.1 | [details] | 25.1% | 6.1% | 54.3% | 31 | $83,806 | 8.1% | 18.1% | 20,120 | 2.9% | 0.2% | |
| 10. Montville, New Jersey | 92 | [details] | 16.6% | 10.8% | 51.2% | 30 | $105,394 | 6.9% | 15% | 20,839 | 3.8% | 0.4% | |
| 11. Livermore, California | 92 | [details] | 18.6% | 7.5% | 31.6% | 33 | $82,421 | 7.7% | 18.1% | 73,345 | 5.3% | 0.2% | |
| 12. Norfolk, Massachusetts | 91.9 | [details] | 10.8% | 5.5% | 37.9% | 36 | $92,001 | 7.3% | 11% | 10,460 | 1.1% | 0.4% | |
| 13. Warrenville, Illinois | 91.9 | [details] | 24.4% | 6% | 39.8% | 29 | $72,233 | 7.5% | 10.9% | 13,363 | 1.6% | 0.3% | |
| 14. Mission Viejo, California | 91.9 | [details] | 17% | 10.9% | 41.2% | 29 | $86,902 | 6.9% | 16.8% | 93,102 | 3.8% | 0.3% | |
| 15. Morgan Hill, California | 91.9 | [details] | 15.8% | 7.5% | 33.5% | 37 | $90,134 | 8.1% | 27.6% | 33,556 | 4.7% | 0.3% | |
| 16. Congers, New York | 91.4 | [details] | 13.8% | 10.7% | 36.1% | 34 | $85,821 | 7.1% | 14.8% | 8,303 | 2.9% | 0.1% | |
| 17. Bolingbrook, Illinois | 91.4 | [details] | 14.2% | 4.3% | 29.2% | 34 | $71,527 | 9.5% | 35.5% | 56,321 | 4.1% | 0.1% | |
| 18. Howell, New Jersey | 91.3 | [details] | 15.3% | 8.8% | 29% | 39 | $74,623 | 8% | 10% | 48,903 | 4.2% | 0.3% | |
| 19. Streamwood, Illinois | 91.3 | [details] | 18.4% | 6.1% | 26.5% | 33 | $68,771 | 8.7% | 22.5% | 36,407 | 3% | 0.1% | |
| 20. Germantown, Maryland | 91.1 | [details] | 23.4% | 3.1% | 43.2% | 35 | $67,204 | 9.2% | 37.8% | 55,419 | 4.6% | 0.1% | |
| 21. Santa Clarita, California | 91.1 | [details] | 19.1% | 7.1% | 29.1% | 35 | $73,588 | 7.8% | 20.5% | 151,088 | 6.4% | 0.2% | |
| 22. Allen, Texas | 91.1 | [details] | 11.9% | 2.8% | 47.5% | 31 | $82,747 | 10.7% | 12.9% | 43,554 | 3% | 0.1% | |
| 23. Matteson, Illinois | 91.1 | [details] | 20.5% | 10.8% | 25.4% | 37 | $65,666 | 6.4% | 67.3% | 12,928 | 4.4% | 0.2% | |
| 24. Bartlett, Illinois | 91 | [details] | 14% | 5.6% | 38.3% | 35 | $86,503 | 10.7% | 12.8% | 36,706 | 1.9% | 0.1% | |
| 25. Hoffman Estates, Illinois | 90.8 | [details] | 20.1% | 6.7% | 35.9% | 30 | $73,685 | 7.2% | 25.6% | 49,495 | 4.4% | 0.1% | |
| 26. Mundelein, Illinois | 90.8 | [details] | 17.1% | 6.2% | 39.9% | 30 | $75,083 | 9.2% | 21.3% | 30,935 | 4.6% | 0.2% | |
| 27. Rowlett, Texas | 90.7 | [details] | 10.6% | 5.2% | 32.5% | 34 | $73,417 | 8.7% | 18.2% | 44,503 | 3% | 0.1% | |
| 28. Warren, New Jersey | 90.7 | [details] | 12.1% | 11.2% | 58.2% | 33 | $121,264 | 7.1% | 13.7% | 14,259 | 2.1% | 0.3% | |
| 29. Vienna, Virginia | 90.6 | [details] | 19.2% | 13.6% | 56.4% | 30 | $93,043 | 6.5% | 18.9% | 14,453 | 2.5% | 0.4% | |
| 30. Glen Ridge, New Jersey | 90.5 | [details] | 16.6% | 10.4% | 65.8% | 40 | $120,650 | 9.3% | 10.8% | 7,271 | 3% | 0.1% | |
| 31. Dale City, Virginia | 90.4 | [details] | 13.6% | 3.8% | 22.7% | 42 | $69,278 | 8% | 43.2% | 55,971 | 4.4% | 0.1% | |
| 32. Aberdeen, New Jersey | 90.3 | [details] | 20.8% | 10.4% | 34.4% | 37 | $76,648 | 6.9% | 21.2% | 17,454 | 4.7% | 0.1% | |
| 33. Newcastle, Washington | 90.3 | [details] | 20.2% | 6.6% | 54.4% | 27 | $91,381 | 7.8% | 24.9% | 7,737 | 2% | 0.2% | |
| 34. Friendswood, Texas | 90.2 | [details] | 17.2% | 8.6% | 38.6% | 30 | $77,293 | 6.6% | 9.9% | 29,037 | 3.3% | 0.2% | |
| 35. Randolph, New Jersey | 90.2 | [details] | 18% | 7.3% | 59.4% | 32 | $115,722 | 7.6% | 14.3% | 24,847 | 1.4% | 0.2% | |
| 36. Rancho Santa Margarita, California | 90.2 | [details] | 17.4% | 3.4% | 43.8% | 33 | $88,216 | 10.2% | 18.4% | 47,214 | 2.9% | 0.2% | |
| 37. Westampton, New Jersey | 90.1 | [details] | 17.2% | 9.1% | 26.2% | 29 | $69,656 | 7.3% | 29.2% | 7,217 | 2.5% | 0.2% | |
| 38. Simi Valley, California | 90 | [details] | 14.7% | 7.6% | 24.9% | 30 | $75,140 | 7.3% | 18.7% | 111,351 | 5.8% | 0.1% | |
| 39. Fremont, California | 90 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.3% | 43.2% | 34 | $82,199 | 7.4% | 52.3% | 203,413 | 5.4% | 0.3% | |
| 40. Broomfield, Colorado | 90 | [details] | 19.2% | 6.6% | 37.9% | 29 | $70,551 | 7.8% | 11.4% | 38,272 | 4.2% | 0.4% | |
| 41. Maplewood, New Jersey | 89.9 | [details] | 20.4% | 12.1% | 50.8% | 37 | $92,724 | 7.9% | 41.2% | 23,868 | 4.4% | 0.1% | |
| 42. Union City, California | 89.9 | [details] | 11.2% | 8.1% | 29.5% | 34 | $74,910 | 7.3% | 69.8% | 66,869 | 6.5% | 0.1% | |
| 43. Sharon, Massachusetts | 89.8 | [details] | 14.6% | 10.9% | 63.1% | 37 | $99,015 | 7% | 10% | 17,408 | 3% | 0.3% | |
| 44. Dix Hills, New York | 89.8 | [details] | 7.1% | 10.1% | 52.9% | 36 | $108,081 | 7.3% | 13.3% | 26,024 | 2.9% | 0.3% | |
| 45. Scotch Plains, New Jersey | 89.6 | [details] | 20.9% | 14.1% | 49.7% | 35 | $96,238 | 7.8% | 21.1% | 22,732 | 3% | 0.2% | |
| 46. Frisco, Texas | 89.6 | [details] | 16% | 3.6% | 49.8% | 33 | $84,150 | 12.8% | 12.7% | 33,714 | 3.4% | 0.2% | |
| 47. Lynwood, Illinois | 89.5 | [details] | 20.7% | 7.5% | 22.2% | 37 | $64,848 | 7.7% | 49.9% | 7,377 | 5.8% | 0.1% | |
| 48. Petaluma, California | 89.5 | [details] | 22.8% | 11% | 30.1% | 34 | $71,158 | 6.6% | 15.8% | 54,548 | 6% | 0.3% | |
| 49. Ellicott City, Maryland | 89.5 | [details] | 19.6% | 9.6% | 56.4% | 30 | $91,968 | 6.6% | 21.7% | 56,397 | 3.3% | 0.3% | |
| 50. Closter, New Jersey | 89.4 | [details] | 14% | 13.1% | 49.9% | 36 | $94,543 | 6.5% | 24.7% | 8,383 | 2.7% | 0.3% | |
| 51. Gurnee, Illinois | 89.4 | [details] | 23.3% | 7.2% | 47.8% | 32 | $88,932 | 9.6% | 17.9% | 28,834 | 3% | 0.4% | |
| 52. Ahuimanu, Hawaii | 89.3 | [details] | 9.2% | 7% | 37.2% | 37 | $74,788 | 7.1% | 77.7% | 8,506 | 3.9% | 0.2% | |
| 53. Lake Forest, California | 89.2 | [details] | 19.7% | 8.6% | 33.9% | 27 | $75,121 | 7.1% | 24% | 58,707 | 5.3% | 0.1% | |
| 54. Elwood, New York | 89.2 | [details] | 9.6% | 13% | 39.8% | 38 | $94,404 | 7.5% | 14% | 10,916 | 2.1% | 0.3% | |
| 55. Woodridge, Illinois | 89.1 | [details] | 23.2% | 5.3% | 39% | 32 | $71,546 | 7.6% | 24.7% | 30,934 | 3.8% | 0.2% | |
| 56. Corinth, Texas | 89 | [details] | 10.3% | 3.3% | 38.9% | 36 | $80,792 | 10.9% | 11.4% | 11,325 | 1.6% | 0.1% | |
| 57. Flower Mound, Texas | 89 | [details] | 8.9% | 2.7% | 53.1% | 33 | $98,055 | 10.7% | 9.8% | 50,702 | 2.5% | 0.1% | |
| 58. DeSoto, Texas | 88.9 | [details] | 21% | 9.3% | 30.2% | 32 | $66,986 | 7% | 51.2% | 37,646 | 5.5% | 0.2% | |
| 59. Roswell, Georgia | 88.8 | [details] | 22.8% | 7.5% | 52.6% | 32 | $85,946 | 6.9% | 18.5% | 79,334 | 5% | 0.3% | |
| 60. Holly Springs, North Carolina | 88.8 | [details] | 16.4% | 2.8% | 50.7% | 34 | $74,010 | 11.5% | 22.9% | 9,192 | 4.8% | 0.1% | |
| 61. Rocklin, California | 88.8 | [details] | 18.6% | 8.6% | 36.1% | 28 | $72,245 | 7.9% | 11.7% | 36,330 | 4.5% | 0.3% | |
| 62. Pearland, Texas | 88.7 | [details] | 15.4% | 8.4% | 29.1% | 32 | $70,748 | 8% | 17.4% | 37,640 | 4.7% | 0.1% | |
| 63. Country Club Hills, Illinois | 88.6 | [details] | 19.2% | 7.1% | 22.8% | 40 | $61,577 | 6.8% | 85.5% | 16,169 | 5.5% | 0.1% | |
| 64. Baldwin Harbor, New York | 88.6 | [details] | 13.6% | 13% | 40.8% | 40 | $95,240 | 6.7% | 17.4% | 8,147 | 2.8% | 0.1% | |
| 65. Matthews, North Carolina | 88.6 | [details] | 17.5% | 9.2% | 42.3% | 29 | $75,791 | 7% | 9.7% | 22,127 | 4% | 0.1% | |
| 66. Cedar Hill, Texas | 88.5 | [details] | 14.7% | 4.6% | 28.3% | 34 | $63,416 | 8.5% | 43.3% | 32,093 | 5.5% | 0.1% | |
| 67. Newark, California | 88.5 | [details] | 14.1% | 7.8% | 24.2% | 32 | $71,351 | 7.2% | 47.8% | 42,471 | 5.5% | 0.2% | |
| 68. South Elgin, Illinois | 88.5 | [details] | 17.5% | 5.7% | 25.3% | 33 | $71,190 | 11.7% | 14% | 16,100 | 3% | 0.1% | |
| 69. Duncanville, Texas | 88.4 | [details] | 17.4% | 9.6% | 27.5% | 29 | $57,064 | 6.5% | 36.1% | 36,081 | 6.1% | 0.1% | |
| 70. Old Bridge, New Jersey | 88.4 | [details] | 21% | 10.5% | 29.5% | 41 | $74,045 | 7% | 20.5% | 60,456 | 4.2% | 0.2% | |
| 71. Covington, Washington | 88.3 | [details] | 11.8% | 3.7% | 24.8% | 36 | $65,173 | 7.9% | 12.1% | 13,783 | 3.6% | 0.2% | |
| 72. Gloucester, New Jersey | 88.3 | [details] | 21.3% | 9.4% | 22% | 32 | $62,992 | 6.8% | 16.9% | 64,350 | 6.2% | 0.1% | |
| 73. East Windsor, New Jersey | 88.3 | [details] | 24.4% | 8.3% | 42% | 35 | $73,461 | 7.7% | 25.6% | 24,919 | 5.3% | 0.2% | |
| 74. Coppell, Texas | 88.2 | [details] | 15.8% | 2.6% | 62.6% | 27 | $106,630 | 9.5% | 16.8% | 35,958 | 1.9% | 0.3% | |
| 75. Ridgewood, New Jersey | 88.1 | [details] | 18.5% | 12.2% | 66.7% | 36 | $121,848 | 7.8% | 12.2% | 24,936 | 3% | 0.4% | |
| 76. Sachse, Texas | 88.1 | [details] | 10.3% | 4% | 30.6% | 31 | $71,918 | 9.2% | 12.7% | 9,751 | 4.6% | 0.3% | |
| 77. Baldwin, New York | 88 | [details] | 18.4% | 12% | 35.2% | 39 | $78,400 | 6.8% | 34.2% | 23,455 | 5.4% | 0.2% | |
| 78. Edison, New Jersey | 88 | [details] | 21.2% | 11.9% | 42.3% | 34 | $77,976 | 6.4% | 40.5% | 97,687 | 4.8% | 0.2% | |
| 79. Kennesaw, Georgia | 88 | [details] | 22% | 5.8% | 34.5% | 38 | $67,778 | 9.9% | 18% | 21,675 | 4.5% | 0.2% | |
| 80. North Brunswick, New Jersey | 87.9 | [details] | 24.4% | 10% | 37% | 32 | $70,812 | 6.7% | 37.3% | 36,287 | 4.7% | 0.1% | |
| 81. Plano, Texas | 87.8 | [details] | 20.2% | 4.9% | 53.3% | 29 | $91,162 | 8.3% | 21.7% | 222,030 | 4.3% | 0.3% | |
| 82. Windsor, California | 87.8 | [details] | 18.1% | 11.1% | 24.7% | 27 | $67,992 | 8% | 21% | 22,744 | 5.1% | 0.3% | |
| 83. Manassas, Virginia | 87.7 | [details] | 21% | 5.4% | 28.1% | 35 | $70,141 | 8.6% | 27.9% | 35,135 | 6.3% | 0.2% | |
| 84. Carol Stream, Illinois | 87.6 | [details] | 21.4% | 5.7% | 32% | 31 | $74,984 | 8.2% | 21.5% | 40,438 | 3.4% | 0.1% | |
| 85. Woodinville, Washington | 87.5 | [details] | 24% | 8.7% | 42.8% | 27 | $81,251 | 6.5% | 16% | 9,194 | 4.4% | 0.3% | |
| 86. The Colony, Texas | 87.4 | [details] | 11.3% | 2.9% | 24% | 34 | $66,203 | 8.4% | 15.5% | 26,531 | 2.8% | 0% | |
| 87. Glen Rock, New Jersey | 87.3 | [details] | 14.8% | 13.7% | 61.1% | 34 | $111,280 | 8.3% | 9.9% | 11,546 | 2.4% | 0.1% | |
| 88. Itasca, Illinois | 87.2 | [details] | 23.6% | 11.4% | 32.8% | 27 | $78,700 | 6.4% | 12% | 8,302 | 4.7% | 0.1% | |
| 89. Mansfield, Texas | 87.2 | [details] | 10.8% | 5.7% | 32.8% | 28 | $71,700 | 8.4% | 13.6% | 28,031 | 4% | 0.2% | |
| 90. Cedar Park, Texas | 87 | [details] | 13.1% | 4.3% | 36.6% | 32 | $70,587 | 11% | 13.6% | 26,049 | 4.1% | 0.1% | |
| 91. Hanover Park, Illinois | 87 | [details] | 14% | 4.1% | 20.2% | 31 | $63,990 | 8.8% | 31.9% | 38,278 | 6.1% | 0% | |
| 92. Westfield, New Jersey | 87 | [details] | 19.3% | 13.5% | 62.5% | 35 | $112,145 | 8% | 10% | 29,644 | 2.7% | 0.4% | |
| 93. Oviedo, Florida | 87 | [details] | 9.7% | 5.8% | 41.3% | 31 | $66,288 | 8.4% | 16.5% | 26,316 | 4.6% | 0.3% | |
| 94. Islip, New York | 87 | [details] | 18.1% | 11.1% | 23.6% | 32 | $72,361 | 7.7% | 12.3% | 20,575 | 4.1% | 0.2% | |
| 95. Elk Grove, California | 86.9 | [details] | 12.8% | 6.8% | 24.1% | 28 | $64,069 | 7.9% | 40.9% | 59,984 | 5.2% | 0.1% | |
| 96. Westminster, Colorado | 86.8 | [details] | 23.9% | 6.5% | 31.3% | 28 | $63,776 | 7.3% | 15.8% | 100,940 | 4.7% | 0.3% | |
| 97. Pflugerville, Texas | 86.7 | [details] | 11.5% | 3.7% | 38.3% | 27 | $73,629 | 9.3% | 22.8% | 16,335 | 1.7% | 0.1% | |
| 98. Sugar Hill, Georgia | 86.7 | [details] | 17% | 5.4% | 28.1% | 36 | $63,003 | 9.8% | 12.3% | 11,399 | 3.2% | 0.2% | |
| 99. Thornton, Colorado | 86.5 | [details] | 18.5% | 5.6% | 19.9% | 30 | $58,742 | 8.8% | 17.3% | 82,384 | 5.2% | 0.1% | |
| 100. Columbia, Maryland | 86.4 | [details] | 25.4% | 7.5% | 59% | 32 | $83,753 | 6.9% | 33.5% | 88,254 | 5.4% | 0.4% |
Copyright © 2004-2008 Moving Traffic, Inc. All Rights Reserved.