 |
|
|
|
PlaceMatch™ lets you find places similar to any city or town you select, either using the default criteria or using criteria you specify.The criteria being used are show as column headings in the results table further below.
However, if you want to specify which factors to use in determining which places are similar to each other, you can select among dozens of other criteria. These include criteria related to crime and income, population demographics, education levels, and others; there are dozens of criteria you can select.
Please click on the [+/-] Advanced Controls link just below and try PlaceMatch using a variety of filtering criteria.
All Places > Maryland > Wheaton Glenmont
Click this [+/-] link to see or edit the similarity criteria used.
Cities and Towns Similar to Wheaton-Glenmont, Maryland:
Sorted from most similar to least (using the default selection criteria).
Your specified criteria have resulted in 100 locations (a maximum of 100 are shown in the table below). Note that you can dictate for each each criterion (e.g., the percentage of people in poverty) whether it should match Wheaton-Glenmont 'loosely' or 'strictly', using the Advanced Controls. This matching level, loose versus strict, is shown near the top of each column in the results table.
Click on a city or town name below to find places similar to it.
Or, to see details about a place, click its [details] link in the table below.
| City, State | Similarity | Go To City | 1 Person Houses | 65+ | College Grads | Commute Minutes | Family Income | Kids 0-4 | Non White | Pop. | Poverty | Seasonal Housing | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | ||||
| WHEATON-GLENMONT, MARYLAND | [details] | 22% | 11.8% | 34.2% | 36 | $62,295 | 7.2% | 50.1% | 57,694 | 8.5% | 0.2% | ||
| 1. Duarte, California | 92.3 | [details] | 21.7% | 11.9% | 23.6% | 31 | $56,556 | 7.5% | 48% | 21,486 | 11.3% | 0.2% | |
| 2. Annandale, Virginia | 92.1 | [details] | 21.8% | 11.8% | 49.2% | 31 | $80,459 | 6.5% | 35.5% | 54,994 | 7% | 0.2% | |
| 3. Rockville, Maryland | 91.9 | [details] | 23.9% | 13.1% | 52.9% | 32 | $79,051 | 6.3% | 32.2% | 47,388 | 7.8% | 0.2% | |
| 4. Concord, California | 91.6 | [details] | 23% | 10.7% | 25.9% | 33 | $62,093 | 7.1% | 29.3% | 121,780 | 7.6% | 0.3% | |
| 5. Huntington Station, New York | 91.4 | [details] | 19.1% | 10.6% | 27.9% | 30 | $67,115 | 7.8% | 28.4% | 29,910 | 11.2% | 0.2% | |
| 6. Vallejo, California | 91.2 | [details] | 22.8% | 11.2% | 21.1% | 37 | $56,805 | 7.2% | 64% | 116,760 | 10.1% | 0.3% | |
| 7. Glendora, California | 91.2 | [details] | 19.1% | 12.5% | 25.7% | 31 | $66,674 | 6.3% | 19.7% | 49,415 | 5.9% | 0.2% | |
| 8. Bergenfield, New Jersey | 91.1 | [details] | 20.8% | 13.5% | 32.3% | 32 | $71,187 | 6.8% | 37.1% | 26,247 | 3.5% | 0.2% | |
| 9. Edison, New Jersey | 91.1 | [details] | 21.2% | 11.9% | 42.3% | 34 | $77,976 | 6.4% | 40.5% | 97,687 | 4.8% | 0.2% | |
| 10. West Covina, California | 91.1 | [details] | 14.7% | 10.4% | 21.9% | 35 | $57,614 | 7.6% | 56.1% | 105,080 | 9% | 0.1% | |
| 11. Newark, California | 91 | [details] | 14.1% | 7.8% | 24.2% | 32 | $71,351 | 7.2% | 47.8% | 42,471 | 5.5% | 0.2% | |
| 12. Fremont, California | 91 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.3% | 43.2% | 34 | $82,199 | 7.4% | 52.3% | 203,413 | 5.4% | 0.3% | |
| 13. Aberdeen, New Jersey | 90.7 | [details] | 20.8% | 10.4% | 34.4% | 37 | $76,648 | 6.9% | 21.2% | 17,454 | 4.7% | 0.1% | |
| 14. Union City, California | 90.6 | [details] | 11.2% | 8.1% | 29.5% | 34 | $74,910 | 7.3% | 69.8% | 66,869 | 6.5% | 0.1% | |
| 15. Placentia, California | 90.4 | [details] | 16.1% | 9.1% | 31.3% | 28 | $68,976 | 7.4% | 32.2% | 46,488 | 8.7% | 0.2% | |
| 16. Old Bridge, New Jersey | 90.4 | [details] | 21% | 10.5% | 29.5% | 41 | $74,045 | 7% | 20.5% | 60,456 | 4.2% | 0.2% | |
| 17. Baldwin, New York | 90.4 | [details] | 18.4% | 12% | 35.2% | 39 | $78,400 | 6.8% | 34.2% | 23,455 | 5.4% | 0.2% | |
| 18. Teaneck, New Jersey | 90.3 | [details] | 21.2% | 14.2% | 47.9% | 34 | $84,791 | 6.4% | 43.8% | 39,260 | 4.2% | 0.3% | |
| 19. Piscataway, New Jersey | 90.3 | [details] | 19.5% | 8.7% | 40.5% | 30 | $75,218 | 6.2% | 51.2% | 50,482 | 3.8% | 0.2% | |
| 20. Woodbridge, New Jersey | 90.2 | [details] | 21.7% | 13.4% | 26.8% | 31 | $68,492 | 6.3% | 29.2% | 97,203 | 4.8% | 0.2% | |
| 21. South San Francisco, California | 90.1 | [details] | 19.8% | 12.6% | 25.2% | 28 | $66,598 | 6.5% | 56% | 60,552 | 5.2% | 0.3% | |
| 22. San Jose, California | 90.1 | [details] | 18.3% | 8.3% | 31.6% | 29 | $74,813 | 7.6% | 52.5% | 894,943 | 8.8% | 0.3% | |
| 23. Whittier, California | 90 | [details] | 22.2% | 12.5% | 21.9% | 31 | $55,726 | 7.8% | 36.8% | 83,680 | 10.5% | 0.2% | |
| 24. Lakewood, California | 90 | [details] | 18.3% | 11.9% | 20.7% | 29 | $63,342 | 7.1% | 37.3% | 79,345 | 7.4% | 0.1% | |
| 25. Aurora, Illinois | 89.9 | [details] | 20.8% | 6.3% | 29.9% | 30 | $61,113 | 10.6% | 31.9% | 142,990 | 8.5% | 0.2% | |
| 26. Upland, California | 89.8 | [details] | 21% | 10.8% | 26.7% | 31 | $57,471 | 7% | 32.8% | 68,393 | 12% | 0.2% | |
| 27. Palisades Park, New Jersey | 89.7 | [details] | 22.9% | 12.1% | 30.6% | 32 | $54,503 | 6.7% | 51.7% | 17,073 | 9.7% | 0.1% | |
| 28. Sayreville, New Jersey | 89.5 | [details] | 22.3% | 12.4% | 25% | 36 | $66,266 | 6.7% | 23.5% | 40,377 | 4.7% | 0.1% | |
| 29. Covina, California | 89.4 | [details] | 20.4% | 10.9% | 18.8% | 32 | $55,111 | 7.4% | 37.9% | 46,837 | 11.6% | 0.1% | |
| 30. Petaluma, California | 89.4 | [details] | 22.8% | 11% | 30.1% | 34 | $71,158 | 6.6% | 15.8% | 54,548 | 6% | 0.3% | |
| 31. North Plainfield, New Jersey | 89.3 | [details] | 23.1% | 9.5% | 26.5% | 31 | $62,875 | 7.8% | 36.9% | 21,103 | 6.4% | 0.1% | |
| 32. Germantown, Maryland | 89.3 | [details] | 23.4% | 3.1% | 43.2% | 35 | $67,204 | 9.2% | 37.8% | 55,419 | 4.6% | 0.1% | |
| 33. Uniondale, New York | 89.2 | [details] | 15.9% | 12.6% | 19.4% | 36 | $67,264 | 6.7% | 73% | 23,011 | 8.8% | 0.1% | |
| 34. Englewood, New Jersey | 89.2 | [details] | 24.7% | 13.3% | 36.7% | 34 | $67,194 | 6.9% | 57.5% | 26,203 | 8.9% | 0.4% | |
| 35. Hayward, California | 89.2 | [details] | 21% | 10.2% | 19.9% | 33 | $54,712 | 7.9% | 57% | 140,030 | 10% | 0.2% | |
| 36. Orange, California | 89.1 | [details] | 19.4% | 9.6% | 28% | 26 | $64,573 | 7.4% | 29.5% | 128,821 | 10% | 0.2% | |
| 37. Rancho Cucamonga, California | 89.1 | [details] | 16.8% | 6.1% | 23.3% | 33 | $66,446 | 7% | 33.5% | 127,743 | 7.1% | 0.1% | |
| 38. Freeport, New York | 89.1 | [details] | 21.2% | 10.5% | 20.5% | 33 | $61,673 | 6.9% | 57.1% | 43,783 | 10.6% | 0.3% | |
| 39. Santa Clarita, California | 89 | [details] | 19.1% | 7.1% | 29.1% | 35 | $73,588 | 7.8% | 20.5% | 151,088 | 6.4% | 0.2% | |
| 40. Hazel Crest, Illinois | 89 | [details] | 21.4% | 10.6% | 22.1% | 37 | $54,049 | 7% | 80.5% | 14,816 | 8.4% | 0.3% | |
| 41. Fullerton, California | 89 | [details] | 23.4% | 11.3% | 31.3% | 29 | $57,345 | 7% | 38.1% | 126,003 | 11.4% | 0.2% | |
| 42. North Brunswick, New Jersey | 88.8 | [details] | 24.4% | 10% | 37% | 32 | $70,812 | 6.7% | 37.3% | 36,287 | 4.7% | 0.1% | |
| 43. Hoffman Estates, Illinois | 88.8 | [details] | 20.1% | 6.7% | 35.9% | 30 | $73,685 | 7.2% | 25.6% | 49,495 | 4.4% | 0.1% | |
| 44. Maplewood, New Jersey | 88.7 | [details] | 20.4% | 12.1% | 50.8% | 37 | $92,724 | 7.9% | 41.2% | 23,868 | 4.4% | 0.1% | |
| 45. Port Jefferson Station, New York | 88.7 | [details] | 20.9% | 11.1% | 24.8% | 31 | $63,185 | 6.8% | 11.6% | 7,527 | 7.6% | 0.3% | |
| 46. East Windsor, New Jersey | 88.5 | [details] | 24.4% | 8.3% | 42% | 35 | $73,461 | 7.7% | 25.6% | 24,919 | 5.3% | 0.2% | |
| 47. Lake Forest, California | 88.5 | [details] | 19.7% | 8.6% | 33.9% | 27 | $75,121 | 7.1% | 24% | 58,707 | 5.3% | 0.1% | |
| 48. Manassas, Virginia | 88.5 | [details] | 21% | 5.4% | 28.1% | 35 | $70,141 | 8.6% | 27.9% | 35,135 | 6.3% | 0.2% | |
| 49. Greenlawn, New York | 88.5 | [details] | 22.2% | 15.6% | 32.7% | 33 | $76,917 | 6.8% | 22.7% | 13,286 | 4.5% | 0.3% | |
| 50. Elmont, New York | 88.5 | [details] | 17.3% | 12.5% | 21.3% | 40 | $68,646 | 6.3% | 54.4% | 32,657 | 7.5% | 0.1% | |
| 51. New Carrollton, Maryland | 88.4 | [details] | 26.5% | 7.6% | 25.1% | 39 | $56,696 | 7.6% | 78.2% | 12,589 | 7.1% | 0% | |
| 52. Islip, New York | 88.4 | [details] | 18.1% | 11.1% | 23.6% | 32 | $72,361 | 7.7% | 12.3% | 20,575 | 4.1% | 0.2% | |
| 53. Livermore, California | 88.1 | [details] | 18.6% | 7.5% | 31.6% | 33 | $82,421 | 7.7% | 18.1% | 73,345 | 5.3% | 0.2% | |
| 54. Sleepy Hollow, New York | 88.1 | [details] | 23.1% | 10.5% | 33.5% | 30 | $63,889 | 7.8% | 32.4% | 9,212 | 7.4% | 0.3% | |
| 55. DeSoto, Texas | 88 | [details] | 21% | 9.3% | 30.2% | 32 | $66,986 | 7% | 51.2% | 37,646 | 5.5% | 0.2% | |
| 56. Morgan Hill, California | 88 | [details] | 15.8% | 7.5% | 33.5% | 37 | $90,134 | 8.1% | 27.6% | 33,556 | 4.7% | 0.3% | |
| 57. Joliet, Illinois | 88 | [details] | 24.4% | 11% | 18.6% | 30 | $55,870 | 9.3% | 30.7% | 106,221 | 10.8% | 0.1% | |
| 58. Bay Shore, New York | 88 | [details] | 25.7% | 11.4% | 20.4% | 29 | $60,046 | 6.9% | 31.2% | 23,852 | 12.2% | 0.4% | |
| 59. Hillside, New Jersey | 87.9 | [details] | 17.9% | 11.1% | 18.5% | 29 | $64,635 | 6.4% | 60% | 21,747 | 5.3% | 0.1% | |
| 60. Woodridge, Illinois | 87.9 | [details] | 23.2% | 5.3% | 39% | 32 | $71,546 | 7.6% | 24.7% | 30,934 | 3.8% | 0.2% | |
| 61. Northglenn, Colorado | 87.8 | [details] | 23.1% | 10.2% | 19.4% | 30 | $52,888 | 7.3% | 17% | 31,575 | 5.4% | 0.2% | |
| 62. Roswell, Georgia | 87.7 | [details] | 22.8% | 7.5% | 52.6% | 32 | $85,946 | 6.9% | 18.5% | 79,334 | 5% | 0.3% | |
| 63. Park Forest, Illinois | 87.7 | [details] | 28.8% | 11.5% | 26.9% | 34 | $55,801 | 7.1% | 44.6% | 23,462 | 6.7% | 0.1% | |
| 64. Fairfield, California | 87.6 | [details] | 17.2% | 9% | 20.4% | 30 | $55,503 | 8.5% | 43.8% | 96,178 | 9.3% | 0.2% | |
| 65. Antioch, California | 87.5 | [details] | 15.8% | 7.4% | 18.2% | 43 | $64,723 | 8.6% | 34.7% | 90,532 | 8.5% | 0.1% | |
| 66. Chula Vista, California | 87.5 | [details] | 19.2% | 11% | 22.2% | 27 | $50,136 | 7.8% | 44.9% | 173,556 | 10.6% | 0.4% | |
| 67. Elgin, Illinois | 87.4 | [details] | 23.4% | 8.6% | 20.5% | 27 | $58,404 | 9.2% | 29.5% | 94,487 | 8.1% | 0.2% | |
| 68. Glendale Heights, Illinois | 87.3 | [details] | 22.4% | 5% | 26.7% | 29 | $64,115 | 8% | 36.2% | 31,765 | 6.1% | 0.1% | |
| 69. Garland, Texas | 87.2 | [details] | 19.7% | 7.1% | 21.8% | 29 | $53,545 | 8.2% | 34.7% | 215,768 | 8.9% | 0.1% | |
| 70. San Leandro, California | 87.1 | [details] | 28.5% | 16% | 23.3% | 32 | $60,266 | 6.3% | 48.7% | 79,452 | 6.4% | 0.3% | |
| 71. Bogota, New Jersey | 87.1 | [details] | 21.7% | 11.1% | 28.4% | 32 | $69,841 | 6.5% | 24.3% | 8,249 | 4% | 0.1% | |
| 72. Matawan, New Jersey | 87.1 | [details] | 24.6% | 10.5% | 30.4% | 37 | $72,183 | 6.3% | 17.7% | 8,910 | 5.4% | 0.1% | |
| 73. Westminster, Colorado | 87 | [details] | 23.9% | 6.5% | 31.3% | 28 | $63,776 | 7.3% | 15.8% | 100,940 | 4.7% | 0.3% | |
| 74. Federal Way, Washington | 87 | [details] | 24.6% | 7.6% | 26.2% | 32 | $55,833 | 7.8% | 31.2% | 83,259 | 9.3% | 0.2% | |
| 75. Duncanville, Texas | 87 | [details] | 17.4% | 9.6% | 27.5% | 29 | $57,064 | 6.5% | 36.1% | 36,081 | 6.1% | 0.1% | |
| 76. Deer Park, New York | 86.9 | [details] | 18% | 14.2% | 19.6% | 33 | $67,128 | 7% | 16.6% | 28,316 | 4.7% | 0.2% | |
| 77. Richton Park, Illinois | 86.8 | [details] | 26.3% | 7.6% | 25.4% | 41 | $58,661 | 7.6% | 64.3% | 12,533 | 7% | 0.1% | |
| 78. Laguna Hills, California | 86.8 | [details] | 21.7% | 12.2% | 39.3% | 29 | $81,334 | 6.1% | 23.2% | 31,178 | 5% | 0.4% | |
| 79. Palatine, Illinois | 86.7 | [details] | 27.8% | 8.8% | 41.4% | 29 | $76,270 | 7.3% | 16.9% | 65,479 | 4.8% | 0.3% | |
| 80. Vacaville, California | 86.7 | [details] | 19.3% | 8.3% | 19.4% | 30 | $63,950 | 6.6% | 27.9% | 88,625 | 6.1% | 0.2% | |
| 81. Lancaster, Texas | 86.7 | [details] | 21.3% | 9% | 18.9% | 32 | $48,498 | 8.2% | 62.4% | 25,894 | 8.1% | 0.2% | |
| 82. La Mirada, California | 86.6 | [details] | 17.4% | 13.8% | 25.2% | 30 | $66,598 | 6.3% | 35.5% | 46,783 | 5.6% | 0.2% | |
| 83. Westminster, California | 86.6 | [details] | 16.9% | 11.2% | 18.1% | 29 | $52,677 | 7.3% | 54.2% | 88,207 | 13.5% | 0.1% | |
| 84. Voorhees, New Jersey | 86.6 | [details] | 26.8% | 10.9% | 46.2% | 32 | $86,873 | 6.3% | 21.7% | 28,126 | 5.7% | 0.3% | |
| 85. Mount Prospect, Illinois | 86.6 | [details] | 24.9% | 14.8% | 35.4% | 29 | $67,262 | 6.6% | 19.4% | 56,265 | 4.6% | 0.1% | |
| 86. Westbury, New York | 86.6 | [details] | 19.8% | 13.6% | 31.2% | 34 | $77,988 | 6.2% | 38.4% | 14,263 | 5.3% | 0.4% | |
| 87. La Habra, California | 86.5 | [details] | 20.8% | 10.8% | 18.2% | 30 | $51,971 | 8.4% | 37% | 58,974 | 12.9% | 0.2% | |
| 88. Corona, California | 86.5 | [details] | 14.4% | 5.8% | 22% | 37 | $63,505 | 9.8% | 38% | 124,966 | 8.3% | 0.2% | |
| 89. Gaithersburg, Maryland | 86.5 | [details] | 27.4% | 8.2% | 46.5% | 34 | $66,669 | 8.2% | 41.8% | 52,613 | 7.1% | 0.5% | |
| 90. San Marcos, California | 86.5 | [details] | 20.2% | 11.9% | 20% | 28 | $51,292 | 8.8% | 32.6% | 54,977 | 12% | 0.3% | |
| 91. Carson, California | 86.4 | [details] | 14.3% | 10.7% | 18.1% | 28 | $54,886 | 6.9% | 74.3% | 89,730 | 9.3% | 0.2% | |
| 92. South River, New Jersey | 86.4 | [details] | 23.3% | 14.6% | 20.9% | 33 | $62,869 | 6.6% | 16.5% | 15,322 | 4.9% | 0.1% | |
| 93. Gloucester, New Jersey | 86.4 | [details] | 21.3% | 9.4% | 22% | 32 | $62,992 | 6.8% | 16.9% | 64,350 | 6.2% | 0.1% | |
| 94. Simi Valley, California | 86.2 | [details] | 14.7% | 7.6% | 24.9% | 30 | $75,140 | 7.3% | 18.7% | 111,351 | 5.8% | 0.1% | |
| 95. Roseville, California | 86.2 | [details] | 23.1% | 14.5% | 31.4% | 27 | $65,929 | 7.3% | 14% | 79,921 | 4.9% | 0.4% | |
| 96. Hillside, Illinois | 86.2 | [details] | 26.2% | 15.6% | 20.4% | 31 | $59,375 | 6.5% | 50.7% | 8,155 | 6.3% | 0.2% | |
| 97. Mountlake Terrace, Washington | 86.1 | [details] | 26.2% | 9.2% | 24.4% | 30 | $52,117 | 6.5% | 22.3% | 20,362 | 8% | 0.1% | |
| 98. Tenafly, New Jersey | 86 | [details] | 16.8% | 15.2% | 62.2% | 37 | $111,029 | 6.5% | 23.2% | 13,806 | 5.2% | 0.4% | |
| 99. Metuchen, New Jersey | 85.9 | [details] | 23.1% | 14.9% | 49.2% | 34 | $85,022 | 6.6% | 15.6% | 12,840 | 3.9% | 0.2% | |
| 100. Carrollton, Texas | 85.9 | [details] | 20% | 5.2% | 37% | 28 | $68,672 | 7.9% | 28.1% | 109,576 | 5.6% | 0.4% |