 |
|
|
|
PlaceMatch™ lets you find places similar to any city or town you select, either using the default criteria or using criteria you specify.The criteria being used are show as column headings in the results table further below.
However, if you want to specify which factors to use in determining which places are similar to each other, you can select among dozens of other criteria. These include criteria related to crime and income, population demographics, education levels, and others; there are dozens of criteria you can select.
Please click on the [+/-] Advanced Controls link just below and try PlaceMatch using a variety of filtering criteria.
All Places > Michigan > Grosse Pointe Park
Click this [+/-] link to see or edit the similarity criteria used.
Cities and Towns Similar to Grosse Pointe Park, Michigan:
Sorted from most similar to least (using the default selection criteria).
Your specified criteria have resulted in 100 locations (a maximum of 100 are shown in the table below). Note that you can dictate for each each criterion (e.g., the percentage of people in poverty) whether it should match Grosse Pointe Park 'loosely' or 'strictly', using the Advanced Controls. This matching level, loose versus strict, is shown near the top of each column in the results table.
Click on a city or town name below to find places similar to it.
Or, to see details about a place, click its [details] link in the table below.
| City, State | Similarity | Go To City | 1 Person Houses | 65+ | College Grads | Commute Minutes | Family Income | Kids 0-4 | Non White | Pop. | Poverty | Prop. Crime | Seasonal Housing | Viol. Crime | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | ||||
| GROSSE POINTE PARK, MICHIGAN | [details] | 26.2% | 10.8% | 59.5% | 27 | $104,267 | 6.4% | 7.5% | 12,443 | 4% | 26.5 | 0.3% | 1.3 | ||
| 1. Chelmsford, Massachusetts | 89 | [details] | 23.1% | 13% | 44% | 29 | $82,676 | 6.7% | 6.9% | 33,858 | 2.8% | 16 | 0.3% | 1.2 | |
| 2. Chesterton, Indiana | 88.1 | [details] | 23.6% | 10.7% | 29.5% | 25 | $66,239 | 6.8% | 3.7% | 10,488 | 4.3% | 34.7 | 0.4% | 1.5 | |
| 3. Westerville, Ohio | 88 | [details] | 21.2% | 10.4% | 44.6% | 23 | $82,163 | 6.1% | 6.5% | 35,318 | 3.5% | 31.8 | 0.3% | 1.3 | |
| 4. Hudson, Massachusetts | 87.1 | [details] | 25.3% | 12.2% | 28.4% | 26 | $70,145 | 6.6% | 5.9% | 18,113 | 4.5% | 13.6 | 0.3% | 0.5 | |
| 5. West Linn, Oregon | 86.7 | [details] | 17.9% | 7.8% | 49.2% | 25 | $83,252 | 6.6% | 6.7% | 22,261 | 3.9% | 19.2 | 0.3% | 1.1 | |
| 6. Natick, Massachusetts | 86.5 | [details] | 28.2% | 14.3% | 52.5% | 31 | $85,715 | 7.4% | 8% | 32,170 | 2.8% | 22.4 | 0.2% | 1.2 | |
| 7. Bellaire, Texas | 86.5 | [details] | 23.6% | 11.9% | 66.6% | 22 | $104,200 | 7.3% | 10.9% | 15,642 | 2.6% | 29.4 | 0.2% | 2.8 | |
| 8. Metuchen, New Jersey | 86.4 | [details] | 23.1% | 14.9% | 49.2% | 34 | $85,022 | 6.6% | 15.6% | 12,840 | 3.9% | 16 | 0.2% | 1.1 | |
| 9. San Carlos, California | 86.3 | [details] | 25.4% | 14.3% | 49.8% | 27 | $103,971 | 7% | 15.5% | 27,718 | 2.7% | 21.4 | 0.3% | 0.9 | |
| 10. Saline, Michigan | 86.2 | [details] | 27.8% | 11.3% | 40.4% | 23 | $73,162 | 7.4% | 4.3% | 8,034 | 4% | 23 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 11. Schererville, Indiana | 86 | [details] | 24.2% | 10.4% | 29.5% | 31 | $70,474 | 6.4% | 8.6% | 24,851 | 3.1% | 25.4 | 0.5% | 0.9 | |
| 12. Hooksett, New Hampshire | 86 | [details] | 19.7% | 9.1% | 29.4% | 26 | $68,673 | 6.5% | 3.5% | 11,721 | 4% | 25.3 | 0.4% | 0.9 | |
| 13. Lafayette, California | 85.9 | [details] | 19.3% | 14.4% | 68% | 32 | $120,364 | 5.5% | 13.2% | 23,908 | 2.9% | 35.2 | 0.3% | 1.4 | |
| 14. San Anselmo, California | 85.9 | [details] | 28.2% | 11.3% | 59% | 33 | $86,528 | 5.9% | 8.4% | 12,378 | 5.1% | 21.1 | 0.6% | 1.4 | |
| 15. Pompton Lakes, New Jersey | 85.8 | [details] | 24.1% | 13.4% | 28.4% | 27 | $74,701 | 6.9% | 7% | 10,640 | 3.2% | 13 | 0.2% | 1.1 | |
| 16. Stow, Ohio | 85.8 | [details] | 23.8% | 12% | 36.2% | 25 | $67,822 | 6.6% | 4.8% | 32,139 | 4% | 21.8 | 0.4% | 0.4 | |
| 17. Pequannock, New Jersey | 85.7 | [details] | 20.8% | 14.1% | 37.5% | 28 | $84,487 | 6.8% | 3.4% | 13,888 | 3% | 13.6 | 0.3% | 0.4 | |
| 18. Pitman, New Jersey | 85.6 | [details] | 26% | 15% | 31.7% | 26 | $59,419 | 5.8% | 2.8% | 9,331 | 5.6% | 11.8 | 0.2% | 0.1 | |
| 19. Shoreview, Minnesota | 85.6 | [details] | 24.1% | 9.7% | 46.9% | 23 | $82,500 | 5.5% | 6.7% | 25,924 | 2.1% | 13.5 | 0.4% | 0.6 | |
| 20. Vadnais Heights, Minnesota | 85.4 | [details] | 24.7% | 7.8% | 37% | 24 | $74,178 | 6.9% | 8.3% | 13,069 | 3.2% | 20.6 | 0.4% | 0.4 | |
| 21. Hanover, New Jersey | 85.3 | [details] | 19.5% | 14.9% | 41.5% | 24 | $93,937 | 6.4% | 11.2% | 12,898 | 1.2% | 13.5 | 0.2% | 1.2 | |
| 22. Vienna, Virginia | 85.2 | [details] | 19.2% | 13.6% | 56.4% | 30 | $93,043 | 6.5% | 18.9% | 14,453 | 2.5% | 16.3 | 0.4% | 1.2 | |
| 23. Boylston, Massachusetts | 85.2 | [details] | 22.3% | 12.3% | 37.7% | 26 | $77,604 | 5.9% | 3.3% | 4,008 | 2.8% | 22.7 | 0.2% | 0.5 | |
| 24. University Heights, Ohio | 85 | [details] | 29.9% | 13.4% | 55.3% | 23 | $75,424 | 7.3% | 24.6% | 14,146 | 5.8% | 17.7 | 0.4% | 2.3 | |
| 25. Louisville, Colorado | 85 | [details] | 22.7% | 6.1% | 59.9% | 23 | $81,512 | 6.3% | 8.8% | 18,937 | 3% | 22.3 | 0.4% | 1.2 | |
| 26. North Olmsted, Ohio | 85 | [details] | 26.4% | 15% | 27.1% | 25 | $62,422 | 5.5% | 6% | 34,113 | 4.1% | 14.7 | 0.4% | 0.9 | |
| 27. Sylvania, Ohio | 84.9 | [details] | 26.2% | 13.3% | 43.3% | 23 | $73,947 | 6.2% | 4.8% | 18,670 | 4.2% | 19.8 | 0.4% | 0.1 | |
| 28. Butler, New Jersey | 84.9 | [details] | 24.2% | 13.2% | 24.1% | 27 | $66,199 | 6.3% | 5.1% | 7,420 | 5% | 16.7 | 0.1% | 1.6 | |
| 29. Kenmore, Washington | 84.8 | [details] | 24.2% | 10.3% | 41.5% | 30 | $72,139 | 5.7% | 13.3% | 18,678 | 5.7% | 29.1 | 0.5% | 1.7 | |
| 30. Plymouth, Minnesota | 84.8 | [details] | 21.7% | 7.6% | 51% | 24 | $90,134 | 7% | 8.6% | 65,894 | 2.6% | 24.4 | 0.5% | 0.9 | |
| 31. Delran, New Jersey | 84.3 | [details] | 21% | 10.8% | 27.3% | 28 | $67,895 | 6.2% | 17.1% | 15,536 | 4.1% | 17.1 | 0.1% | 1.4 | |
| 32. Burlington, Massachusetts | 84.3 | [details] | 19% | 13.9% | 42.6% | 26 | $82,072 | 6.9% | 13.3% | 22,876 | 1.9% | 28.1 | 0.6% | 1.1 | |
| 33. Gahanna, Ohio | 84.2 | [details] | 20.7% | 8.7% | 40.4% | 22 | $74,260 | 6.8% | 13.5% | 32,636 | 3.7% | 27.9 | 0.5% | 0.9 | |
| 34. Manchester, Missouri | 84.2 | [details] | 20.5% | 9% | 52.9% | 25 | $71,329 | 7% | 8.4% | 19,161 | 3% | 13.1 | 0.1% | 0.6 | |
| 35. Bothell, Washington | 83.9 | [details] | 25.8% | 9.5% | 38.6% | 29 | $68,580 | 6% | 12.7% | 30,150 | 5.1% | 31.4 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 36. Arvada, Colorado | 83.8 | [details] | 22.9% | 10.7% | 29% | 27 | $63,273 | 6.4% | 9% | 102,153 | 5.2% | 35.8 | 0.1% | 1.8 | |
| 37. Parsippany, New Jersey | 83.7 | [details] | 27% | 11.2% | 43% | 27 | $81,041 | 6.1% | 25.7% | 50,649 | 3.9% | 16.4 | 0.3% | 0.7 | |
| 38. Roxbury, New Jersey | 83.7 | [details] | 18.1% | 9.9% | 33.9% | 35 | $83,409 | 7.1% | 7.4% | 23,883 | 2.7% | 14.2 | 0.4% | 1.1 | |
| 39. Olmsted Falls, Ohio | 83.7 | [details] | 25.4% | 9.9% | 36% | 28 | $66,196 | 6.9% | 3.3% | 7,962 | 2.1% | 16.1 | 0.1% | 1 | |
| 40. Evesham, New Jersey | 83.6 | [details] | 22.9% | 8.9% | 39.7% | 31 | $77,245 | 7.3% | 8.7% | 42,275 | 2.8% | 16.7 | 0.2% | 1.2 | |
| 41. Mount Laurel, New Jersey | 83.6 | [details] | 28% | 14.7% | 42.1% | 30 | $76,288 | 6.1% | 12.9% | 40,221 | 3.1% | 19.5 | 0.4% | 1.1 | |
| 42. Novi, Michigan | 83.5 | [details] | 28% | 8.1% | 49.1% | 28 | $91,369 | 7.4% | 12.7% | 47,386 | 2.2% | 30.1 | 0.5% | 1.2 | |
| 43. Sterling Heights, Michigan | 83.5 | [details] | 24.1% | 11.8% | 23% | 27 | $70,140 | 6.2% | 9.3% | 124,471 | 5.2% | 23 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 44. Acton, Massachusetts | 83.5 | [details] | 21.5% | 8.4% | 69.3% | 33 | $108,189 | 7.4% | 11.6% | 20,331 | 2.9% | 12.6 | 0.5% | 0.2 | |
| 45. Mentor, Ohio | 83.3 | [details] | 20.6% | 12.3% | 27.4% | 24 | $65,322 | 6% | 2.7% | 50,278 | 2.7% | 26 | 0.4% | 1 | |
| 46. Roswell, Georgia | 83.3 | [details] | 22.8% | 7.5% | 52.6% | 32 | $85,946 | 6.9% | 18.5% | 79,334 | 5% | 27.5 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 47. Thousand Oaks, California | 83.2 | [details] | 19.6% | 11.1% | 42.2% | 27 | $86,041 | 6.7% | 14.9% | 117,005 | 5% | 15.6 | 0.5% | 1.4 | |
| 48. Apple Valley, Minnesota | 83.1 | [details] | 19.2% | 5.5% | 41% | 25 | $79,335 | 7.2% | 8.2% | 45,527 | 2.1% | 32.8 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 49. Roselle Park, New Jersey | 83.1 | [details] | 28.1% | 12.7% | 25.6% | 27 | $63,403 | 5.9% | 19.1% | 13,281 | 4.3% | 16.3 | 0.3% | 1.8 | |
| 50. New Berlin, Wisconsin | 83.1 | [details] | 19.1% | 12.7% | 36.8% | 22 | $75,565 | 6% | 4.2% | 38,220 | 2% | 13.5 | 0.2% | 0.5 | |
| 51. Novato, California | 83.1 | [details] | 25.3% | 13% | 37% | 37 | $74,434 | 5.9% | 17.3% | 47,630 | 5.6% | 27.6 | 0.3% | 1.4 | |
| 52. Glendora, California | 83 | [details] | 19.1% | 12.5% | 25.7% | 31 | $66,674 | 6.3% | 19.7% | 49,415 | 5.9% | 26.4 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 53. Folsom, California | 83 | [details] | 21.7% | 8.8% | 37.6% | 28 | $82,448 | 6.9% | 22.1% | 51,884 | 7.3% | 30.9 | 0.4% | 1.6 | |
| 54. Laguna Hills, California | 82.9 | [details] | 21.7% | 12.2% | 39.3% | 29 | $81,334 | 6.1% | 23.2% | 31,178 | 5% | 24.4 | 0.4% | 1.9 | |
| 55. Rutherford, New Jersey | 82.9 | [details] | 28.5% | 14.6% | 40.3% | 32 | $78,120 | 5.2% | 18% | 18,110 | 3.7% | 18.2 | 0.2% | 0.6 | |
| 56. Pelham, New York | 82.8 | [details] | 21.2% | 12% | 54.9% | 37 | $95,929 | 7.3% | 16.8% | 6,400 | 3.3% | 20.9 | 0.2% | 2.2 | |
| 57. Burnsville, Minnesota | 82.6 | [details] | 24.8% | 7.2% | 36.8% | 24 | $67,979 | 7.1% | 12.5% | 60,220 | 5.1% | 31.1 | 0.4% | 1.3 | |
| 58. Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota | 82.6 | [details] | 21.6% | 7.8% | 29.6% | 23 | $68,629 | 7.2% | 8.2% | 29,751 | 4.2% | 35.4 | 0.2% | 1.7 | |
| 59. Tewksbury, Massachusetts | 82.6 | [details] | 18.6% | 11.5% | 25.2% | 31 | $76,443 | 7% | 3.6% | 28,851 | 3.8% | 14.1 | 0.3% | 1.2 | |
| 60. Belmont, California | 82.5 | [details] | 27.2% | 13.2% | 51.7% | 29 | $95,722 | 6% | 24.8% | 25,123 | 4% | 22.8 | 0.2% | 0.8 | |
| 61. Mukilteo, Washington | 82.3 | [details] | 19.4% | 6.6% | 42.7% | 30 | $79,487 | 5.9% | 17.9% | 18,019 | 3.4% | 31 | 0.6% | 1.1 | |
| 62. Benicia, California | 82 | [details] | 23.1% | 9.3% | 37.3% | 32 | $77,974 | 5.6% | 21.1% | 26,865 | 4.3% | 17.9 | 0.4% | 2.5 | |
| 63. Germantown, Wisconsin | 82 | [details] | 20.4% | 9.4% | 29.4% | 22 | $68,975 | 7.3% | 4.2% | 18,260 | 2.5% | 17.4 | 0.3% | 0.2 | |
| 64. Voorhees, New Jersey | 81.9 | [details] | 26.8% | 10.9% | 46.2% | 32 | $86,873 | 6.3% | 21.7% | 28,126 | 5.7% | 29.1 | 0.3% | 2.5 | |
| 65. Reynoldsburg, Ohio | 81.8 | [details] | 25.2% | 10.1% | 27.1% | 24 | $60,183 | 7.1% | 15% | 32,069 | 5.5% | 41.8 | 0.3% | 2.8 | |
| 66. Bogota, New Jersey | 81.8 | [details] | 21.7% | 11.1% | 28.4% | 32 | $69,841 | 6.5% | 24.3% | 8,249 | 4% | 13.3 | 0.1% | 1.9 | |
| 67. Oak Creek, Wisconsin | 81.8 | [details] | 25.2% | 8.9% | 24.4% | 24 | $63,381 | 6.7% | 8% | 28,456 | 3.1% | 32.3 | 0.1% | 1 | |
| 68. Petaluma, California | 81.7 | [details] | 22.8% | 11% | 30.1% | 34 | $71,158 | 6.6% | 15.8% | 54,548 | 6% | 24.3 | 0.3% | 2.6 | |
| 69. Milford, New Hampshire | 81.3 | [details] | 25% | 9.6% | 26.7% | 25 | $61,682 | 7.3% | 3.2% | 13,535 | 5.2% | 15.7 | 0.4% | 1.2 | |
| 70. Aberdeen, New Jersey | 81.3 | [details] | 20.8% | 10.4% | 34.4% | 37 | $76,648 | 6.9% | 21.2% | 17,454 | 4.7% | 14.3 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 71. Wharton, New Jersey | 81.2 | [details] | 26.4% | 11.3% | 22.7% | 30 | $64,957 | 7.4% | 17.9% | 6,298 | 8.3% | 23.2 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 72. Loveland, Colorado | 81.2 | [details] | 23.5% | 12.5% | 27.5% | 24 | $54,337 | 7% | 7.1% | 50,608 | 5.7% | 38.8 | 0.3% | 1.8 | |
| 73. Richardson, Texas | 81.1 | [details] | 22.9% | 10% | 47.7% | 25 | $72,876 | 6.7% | 24.6% | 91,802 | 6.3% | 38.3 | 0.2% | 2.8 | |
| 74. Hackettstown, New Jersey | 81 | [details] | 31.9% | 12.2% | 24.5% | 34 | $64,383 | 6.3% | 9.7% | 10,403 | 4.8% | 13.7 | 0.3% | 1.4 | |
| 75. Edmond, Oklahoma | 80.9 | [details] | 20.6% | 8.8% | 47.8% | 23 | $65,230 | 7% | 13.4% | 68,315 | 7.2% | 24.4 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 76. Shoreline, Washington | 80.9 | [details] | 26.6% | 14.5% | 37.3% | 28 | $61,450 | 5.2% | 23% | 53,025 | 6.9% | 42.2 | 0.3% | 2.9 | |
| 77. Grand Terrace, California | 80.9 | [details] | 21.5% | 10.7% | 24.3% | 26 | $61,068 | 6.6% | 26.2% | 11,626 | 7.4% | 25.3 | 0.4% | 1.4 | |
| 78. Matawan, New Jersey | 80.8 | [details] | 24.6% | 10.5% | 30.4% | 37 | $72,183 | 6.3% | 17.7% | 8,910 | 5.4% | 11.9 | 0.1% | 0.7 | |
| 79. San Dimas, California | 80.8 | [details] | 21.2% | 11.9% | 28.4% | 32 | $72,124 | 5.9% | 25.3% | 34,980 | 6.3% | 24.9 | 0.4% | 2.6 | |
| 80. Romeo, Michigan | 80.7 | [details] | 31.5% | 14.2% | 23.3% | 27 | $60,179 | 6.6% | 7.3% | 3,721 | 3.9% | 20.2 | 0.5% | 1.1 | |
| 81. Blue Springs, Missouri | 80.6 | [details] | 18% | 7.1% | 27.4% | 27 | $61,008 | 7.4% | 6.8% | 48,080 | 4.8% | 42.1 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 82. Brandon, Mississippi | 80.6 | [details] | 24% | 11.5% | 34.4% | 25 | $63,098 | 6.7% | 13.4% | 16,436 | 6% | 19.3 | 0.1% | 0.7 | |
| 83. Gorham, Maine | 80.5 | [details] | 20.5% | 10% | 31.5% | 24 | $55,434 | 6% | 2.4% | 14,141 | 7.4% | 14.9 | 0.5% | 1.1 | |
| 84. St. Peters, Missouri | 80.4 | [details] | 20.5% | 7.8% | 27.2% | 27 | $65,123 | 7.4% | 5.7% | 51,381 | 2.7% | 27.4 | 0.2% | 2 | |
| 85. Framingham, Massachusetts | 80.3 | [details] | 28.7% | 13% | 42.3% | 29 | $67,420 | 6.5% | 20.2% | 66,910 | 8% | 24.1 | 0.5% | 2.4 | |
| 86. Ridgefield Park, New Jersey | 80.1 | [details] | 29.5% | 12.9% | 26.1% | 29 | $62,414 | 5.9% | 21.8% | 12,873 | 6.7% | 12 | 0.2% | 0.9 | |
| 87. Old Bridge, New Jersey | 80 | [details] | 21% | 10.5% | 29.5% | 41 | $74,045 | 7% | 20.5% | 60,456 | 4.2% | 17.4 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 88. Granby, Massachusetts | 80 | [details] | 19.8% | 11.7% | 23% | 22 | $57,632 | 5.6% | 3.2% | 6,132 | 2.2% | 13.2 | 0.3% | 2.4 | |
| 89. St. Charles, Missouri | 79.9 | [details] | 29.4% | 12.2% | 26.6% | 23 | $60,175 | 6.2% | 6.7% | 60,321 | 6.3% | 28.5 | 0.4% | 2.4 | |
| 90. Highland Park, New Jersey | 79.9 | [details] | 31.6% | 11.9% | 59.5% | 30 | $71,267 | 6% | 27.9% | 13,999 | 8.4% | 14.6 | 0.4% | 0.8 | |
| 91. Crystal, Minnesota | 79.8 | [details] | 27.6% | 14.1% | 22.4% | 23 | $54,738 | 6.6% | 11.7% | 22,698 | 4.4% | 31.6 | 0.1% | 2.4 | |
| 92. Lake Forest, California | 79.8 | [details] | 19.7% | 8.6% | 33.9% | 27 | $75,121 | 7.1% | 24% | 58,707 | 5.3% | 19.3 | 0.1% | 2 | |
| 93. Campbell, California | 79.7 | [details] | 30.3% | 9.7% | 39.7% | 27 | $78,663 | 6.5% | 27.2% | 38,138 | 4.8% | 32.8 | 0.6% | 1.7 | |
| 94. Brea, California | 79.6 | [details] | 23.2% | 11.4% | 33.5% | 30 | $68,423 | 6.1% | 22.7% | 35,410 | 5.3% | 46.1 | 0.3% | 2.5 | |
| 95. Northbridge, Massachusetts | 79.6 | [details] | 22.4% | 13.8% | 23.7% | 30 | $62,095 | 7.4% | 3.7% | 13,182 | 5.3% | 11.8 | 0.2% | 2.4 | |
| 96. Grapevine, Texas | 79.5 | [details] | 22% | 4.8% | 43.2% | 26 | $84,940 | 7.4% | 11.8% | 42,059 | 4.8% | 37.6 | 0.3% | 2.1 | |
| 97. Martinez, California | 79.4 | [details] | 27.6% | 10.1% | 32.1% | 29 | $77,411 | 5.6% | 19% | 35,866 | 5.2% | 43.5 | 0.1% | 2.7 | |
| 98. Eastampton, New Jersey | 78.8 | [details] | 21.4% | 7.2% | 29.6% | 30 | $71,765 | 7.1% | 21.8% | 6,202 | 2.9% | 15.5 | 0.5% | 1.8 | |
| 99. Sayreville, New Jersey | 78.8 | [details] | 22.3% | 12.4% | 25% | 36 | $66,266 | 6.7% | 23.5% | 40,377 | 4.7% | 18 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 100. Dover, New Hampshire | 78.7 | [details] | 31.1% | 13.7% | 32.4% | 23 | $57,050 | 5.7% | 5.5% | 26,884 | 8.4% | 23.4 | 0.6% | 0.8 |
