 |
|
|
|
Please see the results table below.
PlaceMatch lets you find places similar to any city or town you select, either using the default criteria or using criteria you specify.The criteria being used are show as column headings in the results table further below.
However, if you want to specify which factors to use in determining which places are similar to each other, you can select among dozens of other criteria. These include criteria related to crime and income, population demographics, education levels, and others; there are dozens of criteria you can select.
Please click on the [+/-] Advanced Controls link just below and try PlaceMatch using a variety of filtering criteria.
All Places > New Jersey > Bogota
Click this [+/-] link to see or edit the similarity criteria used.
Cities and Towns Similar to Bogota, New Jersey:
Sorted from most similar to least (using the default selection criteria).
Your specified criteria have resulted in 99 locations (a maximum of 100 are shown in the table below). Note that you can dictate for each each criterion (e.g., the percentage of people in poverty) whether it should match Bogota 'loosely' or 'strictly', using the Advanced Controls. This matching level, loose versus strict, is shown near the top of each column in the results table.
Click on a city or town name below to find places similar to it.
Or, to see details about a place, click its [details] link in the table below.
| City, State | Similarity | Go To City | 1 Person Houses | 65+ | College Grads | Commute Minutes | Family Income | Kids 0-4 | Non White | Pop. | Poverty | Prop. Crime | Seasonal Housing | Viol. Crime | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | ||||
| BOGOTA, NEW JERSEY | [details] | 21.7% | 11.1% | 28.4% | 32 | $69,841 | 6.5% | 24.3% | 8,249 | 4% | 13.3 | 0.1% | 1.9 | ||
| 1. Bergenfield, New Jersey | 91.6 | [details] | 20.8% | 13.5% | 32.3% | 32 | $71,187 | 6.8% | 37.1% | 26,247 | 3.5% | 9.9 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 2. Pelham, New York | 91.5 | [details] | 21.2% | 12% | 54.9% | 37 | $95,929 | 7.3% | 16.8% | 6,400 | 3.3% | 20.9 | 0.2% | 2.2 | |
| 3. South River, New Jersey | 91.5 | [details] | 23.3% | 14.6% | 20.9% | 33 | $62,869 | 6.6% | 16.5% | 15,322 | 4.9% | 16.1 | 0.1% | 1.7 | |
| 4. Dunellen, New Jersey | 91.3 | [details] | 23.5% | 11.3% | 22.2% | 30 | $67,188 | 7.4% | 15.9% | 6,823 | 3.3% | 21.3 | 0.1% | 4 | |
| 5. Dumont, New Jersey | 91.1 | [details] | 22.3% | 15.4% | 27.4% | 32 | $73,880 | 6.7% | 16.2% | 17,503 | 2.6% | 9.8 | 0.1% | 0.9 | |
| 6. Leonia, New Jersey | 90.3 | [details] | 22.1% | 13.7% | 49.9% | 36 | $84,591 | 5.8% | 34.3% | 8,914 | 6.5% | 10.3 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 7. Roselle Park, New Jersey | 89.8 | [details] | 28.1% | 12.7% | 25.6% | 27 | $63,403 | 5.9% | 19.1% | 13,281 | 4.3% | 16.3 | 0.3% | 1.8 | |
| 8. Sayreville, New Jersey | 89.5 | [details] | 22.3% | 12.4% | 25% | 36 | $66,266 | 6.7% | 23.5% | 40,377 | 4.7% | 18 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 9. Aberdeen, New Jersey | 89.2 | [details] | 20.8% | 10.4% | 34.4% | 37 | $76,648 | 6.9% | 21.2% | 17,454 | 4.7% | 14.3 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 10. Jamesburg, New Jersey | 88.9 | [details] | 22.5% | 10.7% | 20.2% | 30 | $67,887 | 7.6% | 17.2% | 6,025 | 3.5% | 11 | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 11. Old Bridge, New Jersey | 88.9 | [details] | 21% | 10.5% | 29.5% | 41 | $74,045 | 7% | 20.5% | 60,456 | 4.2% | 17.4 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 12. Wharton, New Jersey | 88.7 | [details] | 26.4% | 11.3% | 22.7% | 30 | $64,957 | 7.4% | 17.9% | 6,298 | 8.3% | 23.2 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 13. Teaneck, New Jersey | 88.6 | [details] | 21.2% | 14.2% | 47.9% | 34 | $84,791 | 6.4% | 43.8% | 39,260 | 4.2% | 19 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 14. Middlesex, New Jersey | 88.6 | [details] | 21.7% | 14.2% | 23.4% | 26 | $70,343 | 6.7% | 12.7% | 13,717 | 3.6% | 9.4 | 0.1% | 1.2 | |
| 15. Matawan, New Jersey | 88.2 | [details] | 24.6% | 10.5% | 30.4% | 37 | $72,183 | 6.3% | 17.7% | 8,910 | 5.4% | 11.9 | 0.1% | 0.7 | |
| 16. Roselle, New Jersey | 88 | [details] | 25.4% | 12% | 17.3% | 31 | $58,841 | 6.6% | 64.4% | 21,274 | 7.5% | 24.1 | 0.1% | 3.2 | |
| 17. South San Francisco, California | 88 | [details] | 19.8% | 12.6% | 25.2% | 28 | $66,598 | 6.5% | 56% | 60,552 | 5.2% | 23.7 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 18. Piscataway, New Jersey | 87.8 | [details] | 19.5% | 8.7% | 40.5% | 30 | $75,218 | 6.2% | 51.2% | 50,482 | 3.8% | 12 | 0.2% | 1.2 | |
| 19. Kearny, New Jersey | 87.7 | [details] | 21.8% | 10.9% | 17.4% | 32 | $54,596 | 5.7% | 24.3% | 40,513 | 8.6% | 27.3 | 0.2% | 2.7 | |
| 20. Pacifica, California | 87.6 | [details] | 21.3% | 9.7% | 33.8% | 32 | $78,361 | 5.7% | 30.5% | 38,390 | 2.9% | 17.4 | 0.3% | 1.6 | |
| 21. Edison, New Jersey | 87.1 | [details] | 21.2% | 11.9% | 42.3% | 34 | $77,976 | 6.4% | 40.5% | 97,687 | 4.8% | 25.1 | 0.2% | 2.2 | |
| 22. Rahway, New Jersey | 87 | [details] | 28.1% | 14.5% | 18.6% | 29 | $61,931 | 6.3% | 39.8% | 26,500 | 7.1% | 25.4 | 0.1% | 3.5 | |
| 23. Delran, New Jersey | 86.8 | [details] | 21% | 10.8% | 27.3% | 28 | $67,895 | 6.2% | 17.1% | 15,536 | 4.1% | 17.1 | 0.1% | 1.4 | |
| 24. North Brunswick, New Jersey | 86.8 | [details] | 24.4% | 10% | 37% | 32 | $70,812 | 6.7% | 37.3% | 36,287 | 4.7% | 25.2 | 0.1% | 2.2 | |
| 25. Pompton Lakes, New Jersey | 86.7 | [details] | 24.1% | 13.4% | 28.4% | 27 | $74,701 | 6.9% | 7% | 10,640 | 3.2% | 13 | 0.2% | 1.1 | |
| 26. Wanaque, New Jersey | 86.5 | [details] | 16.7% | 12% | 22.3% | 30 | $71,127 | 6.7% | 9.3% | 10,266 | 3.3% | 13.2 | 0.1% | 1.3 | |
| 27. Petaluma, California | 86.5 | [details] | 22.8% | 11% | 30.1% | 34 | $71,158 | 6.6% | 15.8% | 54,548 | 6% | 24.3 | 0.3% | 2.6 | |
| 28. Glendora, California | 85.5 | [details] | 19.1% | 12.5% | 25.7% | 31 | $66,674 | 6.3% | 19.7% | 49,415 | 5.9% | 26.4 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 29. Bridgewater, Massachusetts | 85.3 | [details] | 19.6% | 8.6% | 29.6% | 32 | $73,953 | 6.2% | 12.7% | 25,185 | 3.5% | 10.9 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 30. East Windsor, New Jersey | 85.2 | [details] | 24.4% | 8.3% | 42% | 35 | $73,461 | 7.7% | 25.6% | 24,919 | 5.3% | 16.3 | 0.2% | 0.9 | |
| 31. Metuchen, New Jersey | 85.1 | [details] | 23.1% | 14.9% | 49.2% | 34 | $85,022 | 6.6% | 15.6% | 12,840 | 3.9% | 16 | 0.2% | 1.1 | |
| 32. Lake Forest, California | 84.9 | [details] | 19.7% | 8.6% | 33.9% | 27 | $75,121 | 7.1% | 24% | 58,707 | 5.3% | 19.3 | 0.1% | 2 | |
| 33. Livermore, California | 84.7 | [details] | 18.6% | 7.5% | 31.6% | 33 | $82,421 | 7.7% | 18.1% | 73,345 | 5.3% | 25.6 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 34. Randolph, Massachusetts | 84.6 | [details] | 23.7% | 14.3% | 26.6% | 34 | $61,942 | 6% | 37.2% | 30,963 | 4.1% | 22.6 | 0.3% | 3.9 | |
| 35. Scotch Plains, New Jersey | 84.5 | [details] | 20.9% | 14.1% | 49.7% | 35 | $96,238 | 7.8% | 21.1% | 22,732 | 3% | 11.2 | 0.2% | 0.9 | |
| 36. Meadows Place, Texas | 84.1 | [details] | 12.1% | 9.2% | 47.5% | 27 | $75,708 | 6.5% | 28.2% | 4,912 | 4.5% | 21 | 0.1% | 1.2 | |
| 37. Daly City, California | 84.1 | [details] | 18.2% | 12% | 29.1% | 32 | $68,365 | 6% | 74.1% | 103,621 | 7.1% | 22.5 | 0.3% | 3.1 | |
| 38. Placentia, California | 84 | [details] | 16.1% | 9.1% | 31.3% | 28 | $68,976 | 7.4% | 32.2% | 46,488 | 8.7% | 19.2 | 0.2% | 2.8 | |
| 39. Belleville, New Jersey | 84 | [details] | 27.9% | 13.4% | 21.7% | 29 | $55,212 | 5.9% | 30.6% | 35,928 | 8.2% | 23.5 | 0.2% | 2.8 | |
| 40. Florence, New Jersey | 84 | [details] | 24.8% | 11.9% | 19.9% | 28 | $67,412 | 6.1% | 14.5% | 10,746 | 6.1% | 13.1 | 0.3% | 2.3 | |
| 41. La Mirada, California | 83.8 | [details] | 17.4% | 13.8% | 25.2% | 30 | $66,598 | 6.3% | 35.5% | 46,783 | 5.6% | 26.1 | 0.2% | 3.2 | |
| 42. Parsippany, New Jersey | 83.8 | [details] | 27% | 11.2% | 43% | 27 | $81,041 | 6.1% | 25.7% | 50,649 | 3.9% | 16.4 | 0.3% | 0.7 | |
| 43. Hillsdale, New Jersey | 83.6 | [details] | 15.8% | 14.8% | 45.9% | 32 | $90,861 | 7.3% | 7.6% | 10,087 | 3.3% | 5.8 | 0.1% | 0.9 | |
| 44. East Brunswick, New Jersey | 83.2 | [details] | 17.2% | 11.6% | 47.1% | 38 | $86,863 | 5.9% | 22.4% | 46,756 | 2.8% | 17.8 | 0.1% | 0.8 | |
| 45. Brier, Washington | 82.9 | [details] | 11.3% | 5.8% | 32.2% | 31 | $77,226 | 6.1% | 13.6% | 6,383 | 1.8% | 14.7 | 0.1% | 0.6 | |
| 46. La Verne, California | 82.8 | [details] | 18.9% | 13.1% | 31.6% | 32 | $70,344 | 5.8% | 22.9% | 31,638 | 4.7% | 28 | 0.2% | 3 | |
| 47. Novato, California | 82.8 | [details] | 25.3% | 13% | 37% | 37 | $74,434 | 5.9% | 17.3% | 47,630 | 5.6% | 27.6 | 0.3% | 1.4 | |
| 48. Gloucester, New Jersey | 82.7 | [details] | 21.3% | 9.4% | 22% | 32 | $62,992 | 6.8% | 16.9% | 64,350 | 6.2% | 25.2 | 0.1% | 3.2 | |
| 49. South Plainfield, New Jersey | 82.6 | [details] | 15.3% | 14.1% | 24% | 27 | $72,745 | 6.2% | 22.3% | 21,810 | 3.4% | 19.4 | 0.2% | 2.2 | |
| 50. Belmont, California | 82.3 | [details] | 27.2% | 13.2% | 51.7% | 29 | $95,722 | 6% | 24.8% | 25,123 | 4% | 22.8 | 0.2% | 0.8 | |
| 51. Boxborough, Massachusetts | 82.1 | [details] | 26% | 4.7% | 72.1% | 34 | $110,572 | 7.4% | 11.2% | 4,868 | 2.8% | 9.5 | 0.3% | 2.1 | |
| 52. La Palma, California | 82 | [details] | 11.1% | 10.2% | 38.1% | 31 | $74,524 | 5.6% | 57% | 15,408 | 4.9% | 23 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 53. Fountain Valley, California | 81.8 | [details] | 16.2% | 11.3% | 34.4% | 28 | $74,502 | 6% | 36% | 54,978 | 4.3% | 26 | 0.3% | 1.3 | |
| 54. Natick, Massachusetts | 81.7 | [details] | 28.2% | 14.3% | 52.5% | 31 | $85,715 | 7.4% | 8% | 32,170 | 2.8% | 22.4 | 0.2% | 1.2 | |
| 55. San Carlos, California | 81.7 | [details] | 25.4% | 14.3% | 49.8% | 27 | $103,971 | 7% | 15.5% | 27,718 | 2.7% | 21.4 | 0.3% | 0.9 | |
| 56. Forest Park, Ohio | 81.7 | [details] | 24.8% | 9.1% | 26.2% | 25 | $55,618 | 6.6% | 63.3% | 19,463 | 6% | 28.5 | 0.1% | 2.5 | |
| 57. Friendswood, Texas | 81.5 | [details] | 17.2% | 8.6% | 38.6% | 30 | $77,293 | 6.6% | 9.9% | 29,037 | 3.3% | 15.6 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 58. Vacaville, California | 81.5 | [details] | 19.3% | 8.3% | 19.4% | 30 | $63,950 | 6.6% | 27.9% | 88,625 | 6.1% | 26.8 | 0.2% | 3.7 | |
| 59. Simi Valley, California | 81.3 | [details] | 14.7% | 7.6% | 24.9% | 30 | $75,140 | 7.3% | 18.7% | 111,351 | 5.8% | 19.7 | 0.1% | 1.6 | |
| 60. Attleboro, Massachusetts | 81.1 | [details] | 25.7% | 12.9% | 23.5% | 28 | $59,112 | 7% | 8.7% | 42,068 | 6.2% | 22.6 | 0.2% | 3.5 | |
| 61. West Deptford, New Jersey | 81 | [details] | 27.3% | 12.2% | 21.7% | 25 | $64,477 | 5.9% | 7.7% | 19,368 | 5.3% | 22.7 | 0.2% | 1.6 | |
| 62. Grosse Pointe Park, Michigan | 80.9 | [details] | 26.2% | 10.8% | 59.5% | 27 | $104,267 | 6.4% | 7.5% | 12,443 | 4% | 26.5 | 0.3% | 1.3 | |
| 63. Roswell, Georgia | 80.8 | [details] | 22.8% | 7.5% | 52.6% | 32 | $85,946 | 6.9% | 18.5% | 79,334 | 5% | 27.5 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 64. Livingston, New Jersey | 80.6 | [details] | 13% | 15.4% | 57.7% | 32 | $108,049 | 7% | 17.4% | 27,391 | 1.8% | 18.6 | 0.3% | 1.2 | |
| 65. Naugatuck, Connecticut | 80.3 | [details] | 24.9% | 11.7% | 19% | 27 | $59,216 | 6.9% | 8.2% | 30,989 | 6.4% | 17.7 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 66. Evesham, New Jersey | 79.9 | [details] | 22.9% | 8.9% | 39.7% | 31 | $77,245 | 7.3% | 8.7% | 42,275 | 2.8% | 16.7 | 0.2% | 1.2 | |
| 67. Poway, California | 79.9 | [details] | 12.8% | 8.6% | 39.3% | 27 | $77,875 | 6% | 17.1% | 48,044 | 4.3% | 17.7 | 0.2% | 1.6 | |
| 68. Westampton, New Jersey | 79.7 | [details] | 17.2% | 9.1% | 26.2% | 29 | $69,656 | 7.3% | 29.2% | 7,217 | 2.5% | 27.4 | 0.2% | 2.9 | |
| 69. Milford, Massachusetts | 79.5 | [details] | 25.7% | 12.9% | 26.7% | 28 | $61,029 | 7.2% | 7.1% | 26,799 | 7.2% | 9.3 | 0.3% | 2.4 | |
| 70. Duluth, Georgia | 79.5 | [details] | 26.2% | 4.9% | 45.7% | 32 | $69,437 | 7.6% | 31.4% | 22,122 | 4.4% | 18.2 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 71. Mission Viejo, California | 79.3 | [details] | 17% | 10.9% | 41.2% | 29 | $86,902 | 6.9% | 16.8% | 93,102 | 3.8% | 14.1 | 0.3% | 1.3 | |
| 72. Missouri City, Texas | 79.1 | [details] | 12% | 5.4% | 44.5% | 34 | $77,762 | 7.3% | 55.7% | 52,913 | 3.3% | 23.9 | 0.1% | 2.5 | |
| 73. Methuen, Massachusetts | 78.9 | [details] | 25.3% | 15.3% | 23% | 26 | $59,831 | 6.3% | 10.6% | 43,789 | 7.4% | 18.9 | 0.2% | 1.2 | |
| 74. Willingboro, New Jersey | 78.8 | [details] | 15% | 12.9% | 18.9% | 33 | $64,338 | 6.1% | 75.3% | 33,008 | 5.9% | 21.8 | 0.2% | 3.5 | |
| 75. East Hanover, New Jersey | 78.7 | [details] | 13.5% | 14.6% | 33.4% | 26 | $88,348 | 6.3% | 12.9% | 11,393 | 1.7% | 17.9 | 0.2% | 0.7 | |
| 76. Lathrup Village, Michigan | 78.4 | [details] | 21.5% | 12.2% | 51.5% | 26 | $98,213 | 5.6% | 53% | 4,236 | 2.7% | 17.9 | 0.2% | 1.7 | |
| 77. Agoura Hills, California | 78.4 | [details] | 13.9% | 6.2% | 48.4% | 32 | $95,765 | 6% | 13% | 20,537 | 3.5% | 16.8 | 0.2% | 2.1 | |
| 78. Schertz, Texas | 78.3 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.8% | 27.5% | 25 | $59,745 | 7.5% | 18% | 18,694 | 5.2% | 24 | 0.2% | 2.3 | |
| 79. Holmdel, New Jersey | 78.2 | [details] | 11% | 12.2% | 54.8% | 37 | $122,785 | 5.8% | 19.8% | 15,781 | 3.4% | 14.2 | 0.3% | 0.8 | |
| 80. Bartlett, Tennessee | 78 | [details] | 12% | 8.6% | 28.2% | 25 | $69,962 | 6.6% | 7.6% | 40,543 | 2.7% | 28.4 | 0.1% | 1 | |
| 81. Hamburg, New Jersey | 77.8 | [details] | 23.3% | 8.1% | 19.8% | 39 | $64,773 | 7.4% | 6.9% | 3,105 | 4.6% | 10 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 82. South Euclid, Ohio | 77.6 | [details] | 28.2% | 15.3% | 36.5% | 25 | $58,958 | 6.5% | 24.8% | 23,537 | 4.5% | 19.8 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 83. Brandon, Mississippi | 77.6 | [details] | 24% | 11.5% | 34.4% | 25 | $63,098 | 6.7% | 13.4% | 16,436 | 6% | 19.3 | 0.1% | 0.7 | |
| 84. West Linn, Oregon | 77.5 | [details] | 17.9% | 7.8% | 49.2% | 25 | $83,252 | 6.6% | 6.7% | 22,261 | 3.9% | 19.2 | 0.3% | 1.1 | |
| 85. Santee, California | 77.5 | [details] | 18% | 8.9% | 17% | 28 | $57,874 | 6.7% | 13.3% | 52,975 | 5.4% | 23.3 | 0.2% | 3.1 | |
| 86. Danville, California | 77 | [details] | 15.9% | 10.3% | 59.4% | 33 | $125,867 | 7.1% | 13.7% | 41,715 | 2.2% | 18.1 | 0.3% | 1.2 | |
| 87. Diamond Bar, California | 76.9 | [details] | 12.7% | 7.5% | 42.3% | 36 | $71,911 | 5.7% | 59% | 56,287 | 6% | 16 | 0.2% | 1.3 | |
| 88. Yorba Linda, California | 76.5 | [details] | 12.6% | 7.7% | 41.5% | 32 | $96,132 | 6% | 18.5% | 58,918 | 3% | 13.6 | 0.2% | 0.9 | |
| 89. Sugar Land, Texas | 76.4 | [details] | 12.3% | 6.7% | 53.7% | 31 | $88,639 | 6.1% | 34% | 63,328 | 3.8% | 27 | 0.3% | 2.4 | |
| 90. Nolensville, Tennessee | 75.9 | [details] | 9.4% | 6.4% | 41% | 31 | $72,426 | 7.6% | 7.6% | 3,099 | 2.9% | 2.3 | 0.2% | 0.7 | |
| 91. Converse, Texas | 75.8 | [details] | 16.2% | 6.4% | 19% | 25 | $49,396 | 7.8% | 30.6% | 11,508 | 6.5% | 21.3 | 0.1% | 1 | |
| 92. Suisun City, California | 75.6 | [details] | 14.2% | 5.7% | 17.3% | 37 | $63,616 | 7.7% | 55.6% | 26,118 | 6.5% | 24 | 0.1% | 3.9 | |
| 93. Sterling Heights, Michigan | 75.4 | [details] | 24.1% | 11.8% | 23% | 27 | $70,140 | 6.2% | 9.3% | 124,471 | 5.2% | 23 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 94. Benbrook, Texas | 75.4 | [details] | 28.4% | 14.7% | 32.6% | 25 | $63,529 | 5.9% | 11.7% | 20,208 | 4.4% | 27.3 | 0.1% | 1.7 | |
| 95. Helotes, Texas | 75 | [details] | 9.7% | 10.8% | 43.2% | 28 | $80,090 | 6.5% | 13% | 4,285 | 2% | 26.8 | 0.1% | 1.9 | |
| 96. Hendersonville, Tennessee | 74.4 | [details] | 22.5% | 10.2% | 26.4% | 29 | $57,625 | 6.6% | 7.1% | 40,620 | 6.2% | 22.9 | 0.3% | 3.1 | |
| 97. Choctaw, Oklahoma | 72.1 | [details] | 16.1% | 10.6% | 19% | 27 | $55,437 | 5.8% | 11.2% | 9,377 | 5.9% | 23.4 | 0.3% | 1.7 | |
| 98. Zachary, Louisiana | 72 | [details] | 16.9% | 10.8% | 20.8% | 28 | $57,389 | 6.9% | 30.2% | 11,275 | 9.1% | 27.4 | 0.1% | 1.6 | |
| 99. Piedmont, Oklahoma | 71.5 | [details] | 7.6% | 6.4% | 29.9% | 28 | $57,121 | 7.2% | 6.7% | 3,650 | 3.9% | 13.7 | 0.3% | 1.1 |