 |
|
|
|
PlaceMatch™ lets you find places similar to any city or town you select, either using the default criteria or using criteria you specify.The criteria being used are show as column headings in the results table further below.
However, if you want to specify which factors to use in determining which places are similar to each other, you can select among dozens of other criteria. These include criteria related to crime and income, population demographics, education levels, and others; there are dozens of criteria you can select.
Please click on the [+/-] Advanced Controls link just below and try PlaceMatch using a variety of filtering criteria.
All Places > New Jersey > North Plainfield
Click this [+/-] link to see or edit the similarity criteria used.
Cities and Towns Similar to North Plainfield, New Jersey:
Sorted from most similar to least (using the default selection criteria).
Your specified criteria have resulted in 100 locations (a maximum of 100 are shown in the table below). Note that you can dictate for each each criterion (e.g., the percentage of people in poverty) whether it should match North Plainfield 'loosely' or 'strictly', using the Advanced Controls. This matching level, loose versus strict, is shown near the top of each column in the results table.
Click on a city or town name below to find places similar to it.
Or, to see details about a place, click its [details] link in the table below.
| City, State | Similarity | Go To City | 1 Person Houses | 65+ | College Grads | Commute Minutes | Family Income | Kids 0-4 | Non White | Pop. | Poverty | Prop. Crime | Seasonal Housing | Viol. Crime | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | ||||
| NORTH PLAINFIELD, NEW JERSEY | [details] | 23.1% | 9.5% | 26.5% | 31 | $62,875 | 7.8% | 36.9% | 21,103 | 6.4% | 22.9 | 0.1% | 2.9 | ||
| 1. Roselle, New Jersey | 91.1 | [details] | 25.4% | 12% | 17.3% | 31 | $58,841 | 6.6% | 64.4% | 21,274 | 7.5% | 24.1 | 0.1% | 3.2 | |
| 2. Whittier, California | 91 | [details] | 22.2% | 12.5% | 21.9% | 31 | $55,726 | 7.8% | 36.8% | 83,680 | 10.5% | 34.5 | 0.2% | 3.7 | |
| 3. Wharton, New Jersey | 90.1 | [details] | 26.4% | 11.3% | 22.7% | 30 | $64,957 | 7.4% | 17.9% | 6,298 | 8.3% | 23.2 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 4. North Brunswick, New Jersey | 89.6 | [details] | 24.4% | 10% | 37% | 32 | $70,812 | 6.7% | 37.3% | 36,287 | 4.7% | 25.2 | 0.1% | 2.2 | |
| 5. San Jose, California | 89.5 | [details] | 18.3% | 8.3% | 31.6% | 29 | $74,813 | 7.6% | 52.5% | 894,943 | 8.8% | 24.9 | 0.3% | 3.8 | |
| 6. Freeport, New York | 88.9 | [details] | 21.2% | 10.5% | 20.5% | 33 | $61,673 | 6.9% | 57.1% | 43,783 | 10.6% | 20 | 0.3% | 4.1 | |
| 7. Hayward, California | 88.6 | [details] | 21% | 10.2% | 19.9% | 33 | $54,712 | 7.9% | 57% | 140,030 | 10% | 36 | 0.2% | 4.2 | |
| 8. Duarte, California | 88.6 | [details] | 21.7% | 11.9% | 23.6% | 31 | $56,556 | 7.5% | 48% | 21,486 | 11.3% | 27.7 | 0.2% | 4.3 | |
| 9. Downey, California | 88.4 | [details] | 19.1% | 11% | 17.3% | 29 | $50,017 | 8% | 46.5% | 107,323 | 11.1% | 35.1 | 0.2% | 4.2 | |
| 10. Beacon, New York | 88.3 | [details] | 28.4% | 12.2% | 18.8% | 33 | $53,811 | 7% | 31.6% | 13,808 | 11% | 20.9 | 0.3% | 3.8 | |
| 11. Montclair, New Jersey | 88.3 | [details] | 29.3% | 12% | 57.4% | 36 | $96,252 | 7% | 40.2% | 38,977 | 5.6% | 26.4 | 0.3% | 3.6 | |
| 12. Dunellen, New Jersey | 88.2 | [details] | 23.5% | 11.3% | 22.2% | 30 | $67,188 | 7.4% | 15.9% | 6,823 | 3.3% | 21.3 | 0.1% | 4 | |
| 13. Sayreville, New Jersey | 88 | [details] | 22.3% | 12.4% | 25% | 36 | $66,266 | 6.7% | 23.5% | 40,377 | 4.7% | 18 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 14. Fremont, California | 88 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.3% | 43.2% | 34 | $82,199 | 7.4% | 52.3% | 203,413 | 5.4% | 28.1 | 0.3% | 2.2 | |
| 15. Fullerton, California | 87.9 | [details] | 23.4% | 11.3% | 31.3% | 29 | $57,345 | 7% | 38.1% | 126,003 | 11.4% | 36.3 | 0.2% | 3.1 | |
| 16. Bound Brook, New Jersey | 87.5 | [details] | 23.6% | 12.5% | 23.9% | 26 | $51,346 | 6.9% | 17.4% | 10,155 | 10.9% | 21.3 | 0.2% | 1.3 | |
| 17. Orange, California | 87.5 | [details] | 19.4% | 9.6% | 28% | 26 | $64,573 | 7.4% | 29.5% | 128,821 | 10% | 27.4 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 18. Buena Park, California | 87.5 | [details] | 15% | 9.3% | 19.7% | 30 | $52,327 | 8.1% | 47% | 78,282 | 11.3% | 27.4 | 0.1% | 4.1 | |
| 19. West Covina, California | 87.4 | [details] | 14.7% | 10.4% | 21.9% | 35 | $57,614 | 7.6% | 56.1% | 105,080 | 9% | 40 | 0.1% | 3.6 | |
| 20. Cheverly, Maryland | 87 | [details] | 20% | 8% | 39.5% | 35 | $67,540 | 8.2% | 66.1% | 6,433 | 6.8% | 40.4 | 0.1% | 6.2 | |
| 21. Aberdeen, New Jersey | 86.8 | [details] | 20.8% | 10.4% | 34.4% | 37 | $76,648 | 6.9% | 21.2% | 17,454 | 4.7% | 14.3 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 22. Pelham, New York | 86.7 | [details] | 21.2% | 12% | 54.9% | 37 | $95,929 | 7.3% | 16.8% | 6,400 | 3.3% | 20.9 | 0.2% | 2.2 | |
| 23. Lumberton, New Jersey | 86.6 | [details] | 24.8% | 11.1% | 30.9% | 29 | $70,329 | 8.3% | 21.7% | 10,461 | 3.8% | 36.5 | 0.2% | 3.2 | |
| 24. Forest Park, Ohio | 86.5 | [details] | 24.8% | 9.1% | 26.2% | 25 | $55,618 | 6.6% | 63.3% | 19,463 | 6% | 28.5 | 0.1% | 2.5 | |
| 25. Placentia, California | 86.4 | [details] | 16.1% | 9.1% | 31.3% | 28 | $68,976 | 7.4% | 32.2% | 46,488 | 8.7% | 19.2 | 0.2% | 2.8 | |
| 26. Santa Clarita, California | 86.2 | [details] | 19.1% | 7.1% | 29.1% | 35 | $73,588 | 7.8% | 20.5% | 151,088 | 6.4% | 20.9 | 0.2% | 2.4 | |
| 27. Maplewood, New Jersey | 86.1 | [details] | 20.4% | 12.1% | 50.8% | 37 | $92,724 | 7.9% | 41.2% | 23,868 | 4.4% | 27.2 | 0.1% | 3.4 | |
| 28. Union City, California | 85.8 | [details] | 11.2% | 8.1% | 29.5% | 34 | $74,910 | 7.3% | 69.8% | 66,869 | 6.5% | 40.2 | 0.1% | 5.2 | |
| 29. Lake Forest, California | 85.6 | [details] | 19.7% | 8.6% | 33.9% | 27 | $75,121 | 7.1% | 24% | 58,707 | 5.3% | 19.3 | 0.1% | 2 | |
| 30. Gloucester, New Jersey | 85.6 | [details] | 21.3% | 9.4% | 22% | 32 | $62,992 | 6.8% | 16.9% | 64,350 | 6.2% | 25.2 | 0.1% | 3.2 | |
| 31. Gilroy, California | 85.2 | [details] | 14.4% | 6.8% | 19.1% | 32 | $65,330 | 9.4% | 41.1% | 41,464 | 10.4% | 37.7 | 0.1% | 4.4 | |
| 32. Haverhill, Massachusetts | 85.2 | [details] | 28.7% | 12.8% | 23.4% | 28 | $59,772 | 7.4% | 10.3% | 58,969 | 9.1% | 25.4 | 0.3% | 5 | |
| 33. Richardson, Texas | 85.2 | [details] | 22.9% | 10% | 47.7% | 25 | $72,876 | 6.7% | 24.6% | 91,802 | 6.3% | 38.3 | 0.2% | 2.8 | |
| 34. Lakewood, California | 85.2 | [details] | 18.3% | 11.9% | 20.7% | 29 | $63,342 | 7.1% | 37.3% | 79,345 | 7.4% | 38.2 | 0.1% | 4.8 | |
| 35. Jamesburg, New Jersey | 85.1 | [details] | 22.5% | 10.7% | 20.2% | 30 | $67,887 | 7.6% | 17.2% | 6,025 | 3.5% | 11 | 0% | 1.5 | |
| 36. Livermore, California | 84.5 | [details] | 18.6% | 7.5% | 31.6% | 33 | $82,421 | 7.7% | 18.1% | 73,345 | 5.3% | 25.6 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 37. Petaluma, California | 84.4 | [details] | 22.8% | 11% | 30.1% | 34 | $71,158 | 6.6% | 15.8% | 54,548 | 6% | 24.3 | 0.3% | 2.6 | |
| 38. Milpitas, California | 84.3 | [details] | 11.5% | 7% | 36.5% | 25 | $84,827 | 7.2% | 69.1% | 62,698 | 5% | 35.8 | 0.1% | 3.1 | |
| 39. Rancho Cucamonga, California | 84.2 | [details] | 16.8% | 6.1% | 23.3% | 33 | $66,446 | 7% | 33.5% | 127,743 | 7.1% | 33.9 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 40. Vacaville, California | 84.2 | [details] | 19.3% | 8.3% | 19.4% | 30 | $63,950 | 6.6% | 27.9% | 88,625 | 6.1% | 26.8 | 0.2% | 3.7 | |
| 41. Corona, California | 83.9 | [details] | 14.4% | 5.8% | 22% | 37 | $63,505 | 9.8% | 38% | 124,966 | 8.3% | 36.2 | 0.2% | 2.2 | |
| 42. Morgan Hill, California | 83.8 | [details] | 15.8% | 7.5% | 33.5% | 37 | $90,134 | 8.1% | 27.6% | 33,556 | 4.7% | 28.3 | 0.3% | 1.5 | |
| 43. Mount Holly, New Jersey | 83.7 | [details] | 27.7% | 12.4% | 18.6% | 25 | $52,000 | 6.6% | 31.3% | 10,728 | 9.9% | 37.8 | 0.2% | 4.8 | |
| 44. Duluth, Georgia | 83.7 | [details] | 26.2% | 4.9% | 45.7% | 32 | $69,437 | 7.6% | 31.4% | 22,122 | 4.4% | 18.2 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 45. Artesia, California | 83.5 | [details] | 14.9% | 12.4% | 18.8% | 27 | $47,017 | 7.3% | 55.8% | 16,380 | 11.5% | 22.4 | 0.2% | 6.8 | |
| 46. Simi Valley, California | 83.3 | [details] | 14.7% | 7.6% | 24.9% | 30 | $75,140 | 7.3% | 18.7% | 111,351 | 5.8% | 19.7 | 0.1% | 1.6 | |
| 47. San Marcos, California | 83.3 | [details] | 20.2% | 11.9% | 20% | 28 | $51,292 | 8.8% | 32.6% | 54,977 | 12% | 27.2 | 0.3% | 4.6 | |
| 48. Antioch, California | 83.1 | [details] | 15.8% | 7.4% | 18.2% | 43 | $64,723 | 8.6% | 34.7% | 90,532 | 8.5% | 34.3 | 0.1% | 5.8 | |
| 49. Kenosha, Wisconsin | 82.8 | [details] | 28.3% | 12.2% | 18.2% | 24 | $51,016 | 7.5% | 16.4% | 90,352 | 9.5% | 31.7 | 0.3% | 2.4 | |
| 50. Plano, Texas | 82.5 | [details] | 20.2% | 4.9% | 53.3% | 29 | $91,162 | 8.3% | 21.7% | 222,030 | 4.3% | 38.8 | 0.3% | 2.9 | |
| 51. Lilburn, Georgia | 82.4 | [details] | 22.5% | 8.3% | 31.8% | 32 | $62,563 | 6.6% | 30.9% | 11,307 | 6.1% | 39.2 | 0.2% | 3.8 | |
| 52. Oak Park, Michigan | 82.4 | [details] | 26.6% | 12.2% | 27.2% | 25 | $54,786 | 6.8% | 53% | 29,793 | 9.4% | 34.9 | 0.2% | 5.9 | |
| 53. Leominster, Massachusetts | 82.4 | [details] | 27.8% | 13.6% | 21.9% | 26 | $54,660 | 7.1% | 12.9% | 41,303 | 9.5% | 26.7 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 54. Roswell, Georgia | 82.2 | [details] | 22.8% | 7.5% | 52.6% | 32 | $85,946 | 6.9% | 18.5% | 79,334 | 5% | 27.5 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 55. McKinney, Texas | 82.1 | [details] | 18.9% | 6.8% | 39.1% | 29 | $72,133 | 10.1% | 21.6% | 54,369 | 8.5% | 34.1 | 0.2% | 3.4 | |
| 56. Lafayette, Colorado | 82.1 | [details] | 22.7% | 5.8% | 45.6% | 26 | $64,088 | 8% | 14.5% | 23,197 | 7% | 22.8 | 0.2% | 2.6 | |
| 57. Suisun City, California | 82 | [details] | 14.2% | 5.7% | 17.3% | 37 | $63,616 | 7.7% | 55.6% | 26,118 | 6.5% | 24 | 0.1% | 3.9 | |
| 58. Round Rock, Texas | 81.9 | [details] | 18.5% | 4.5% | 32.9% | 28 | $65,471 | 9.7% | 23.2% | 61,136 | 4% | 27.4 | 0.3% | 1.5 | |
| 59. Winslow, New Jersey | 81.9 | [details] | 18.7% | 8.5% | 18.6% | 35 | $62,045 | 8.2% | 34.5% | 34,611 | 6% | 19.8 | 0.1% | 4.4 | |
| 60. Richmond Hill, Georgia | 81.6 | [details] | 19% | 6.8% | 21.7% | 28 | $54,457 | 9.4% | 18.7% | 6,959 | 10.3% | 22.8 | 0.1% | 3.3 | |
| 61. Schertz, Texas | 81.3 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.8% | 27.5% | 25 | $59,745 | 7.5% | 18% | 18,694 | 5.2% | 24 | 0.2% | 2.3 | |
| 62. Wanaque, New Jersey | 81.2 | [details] | 16.7% | 12% | 22.3% | 30 | $71,127 | 6.7% | 9.3% | 10,266 | 3.3% | 13.2 | 0.1% | 1.3 | |
| 63. Pearland, Texas | 81.1 | [details] | 15.4% | 8.4% | 29.1% | 32 | $70,748 | 8% | 17.4% | 37,640 | 4.7% | 32 | 0.1% | 2.7 | |
| 64. Rocklin, California | 80.8 | [details] | 18.6% | 8.6% | 36.1% | 28 | $72,245 | 7.9% | 11.7% | 36,330 | 4.5% | 34.4 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 65. Missouri City, Texas | 80.5 | [details] | 12% | 5.4% | 44.5% | 34 | $77,762 | 7.3% | 55.7% | 52,913 | 3.3% | 23.9 | 0.1% | 2.5 | |
| 66. Carson, California | 80.5 | [details] | 14.3% | 10.7% | 18.1% | 28 | $54,886 | 6.9% | 74.3% | 89,730 | 9.3% | 29.6 | 0.2% | 6.9 | |
| 67. Newcastle, Washington | 80.5 | [details] | 20.2% | 6.6% | 54.4% | 27 | $91,381 | 7.8% | 24.9% | 7,737 | 2% | 36.2 | 0.2% | 2.5 | |
| 68. Santee, California | 80.4 | [details] | 18% | 8.9% | 17% | 28 | $57,874 | 6.7% | 13.3% | 52,975 | 5.4% | 23.3 | 0.2% | 3.1 | |
| 69. Monroe, Washington | 80.4 | [details] | 20.9% | 8% | 19.1% | 33 | $55,793 | 9.7% | 13.9% | 13,795 | 8.9% | 33.8 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 70. Grandview, Missouri | 80.1 | [details] | 27.1% | 9.7% | 19.3% | 25 | $47,889 | 7.2% | 40.2% | 24,881 | 8.4% | 30.4 | 0.2% | 6.3 | |
| 71. Grapevine, Texas | 80.1 | [details] | 22% | 4.8% | 43.2% | 26 | $84,940 | 7.4% | 11.8% | 42,059 | 4.8% | 37.6 | 0.3% | 2.1 | |
| 72. Lake Dallas, Texas | 79.9 | [details] | 19.2% | 6.2% | 19.6% | 31 | $58,370 | 8.8% | 10.5% | 6,166 | 6.6% | 29.4 | 0% | 1.8 | |
| 73. Westampton, New Jersey | 79.8 | [details] | 17.2% | 9.1% | 26.2% | 29 | $69,656 | 7.3% | 29.2% | 7,217 | 2.5% | 27.4 | 0.2% | 2.9 | |
| 74. Moorpark, California | 79.6 | [details] | 10% | 4.5% | 34.2% | 30 | $78,909 | 8.1% | 25.6% | 31,415 | 7% | 11.7 | 0.1% | 1.3 | |
| 75. Glen Ridge, New Jersey | 79 | [details] | 16.6% | 10.4% | 65.8% | 40 | $120,650 | 9.3% | 10.8% | 7,271 | 3% | 35.9 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 76. Boxborough, Massachusetts | 79 | [details] | 26% | 4.7% | 72.1% | 34 | $110,572 | 7.4% | 11.2% | 4,868 | 2.8% | 9.5 | 0.3% | 2.1 | |
| 77. Logan, New Jersey | 78.6 | [details] | 15.6% | 6.2% | 25% | 30 | $70,771 | 8.5% | 18% | 6,032 | 4.3% | 20.6 | 0.3% | 2.3 | |
| 78. Lawrence, Indiana | 78.5 | [details] | 24.6% | 8.2% | 26.8% | 26 | $56,609 | 9.1% | 21.4% | 38,915 | 6.7% | 28.8 | 0.3% | 4.4 | |
| 79. Ripon, California | 78.2 | [details] | 16.2% | 10.1% | 20.6% | 29 | $62,592 | 7% | 15.5% | 10,146 | 6.2% | 37.1 | 0.1% | 2.8 | |
| 80. Friendswood, Texas | 77.9 | [details] | 17.2% | 8.6% | 38.6% | 30 | $77,293 | 6.6% | 9.9% | 29,037 | 3.3% | 15.6 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 81. Chesapeake, Virginia | 77.9 | [details] | 18% | 9% | 24.7% | 26 | $56,302 | 7.2% | 33.1% | 199,184 | 7.3% | 38.5 | 0.3% | 5.5 | |
| 82. Allen, Texas | 77.8 | [details] | 11.9% | 2.8% | 47.5% | 31 | $82,747 | 10.7% | 12.9% | 43,554 | 3% | 33.9 | 0.1% | 1.4 | |
| 83. Acworth, Georgia | 77.8 | [details] | 23.3% | 7.2% | 29.2% | 39 | $55,163 | 10% | 20.3% | 13,422 | 8.3% | 38.2 | 0.2% | 3.8 | |
| 84. Winters, California | 77.7 | [details] | 15% | 7.8% | 18.1% | 26 | $55,183 | 7.8% | 30.2% | 6,125 | 5% | 31 | 0.2% | 2.8 | |
| 85. Rowlett, Texas | 77.5 | [details] | 10.6% | 5.2% | 32.5% | 34 | $73,417 | 8.7% | 18.2% | 44,503 | 3% | 26.1 | 0.1% | 1.6 | |
| 86. Mission Viejo, California | 77.4 | [details] | 17% | 10.9% | 41.2% | 29 | $86,902 | 6.9% | 16.8% | 93,102 | 3.8% | 14.1 | 0.3% | 1.3 | |
| 87. Angleton, Texas | 77.2 | [details] | 21.4% | 10.8% | 17.2% | 25 | $50,019 | 7.7% | 24.8% | 18,130 | 11.1% | 28.9 | 0.3% | 6.2 | |
| 88. Layton, Utah | 77 | [details] | 14.9% | 5.7% | 27.1% | 25 | $57,193 | 10.3% | 10.1% | 58,474 | 5.6% | 31 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 89. Cedar Park, Texas | 76.9 | [details] | 13.1% | 4.3% | 36.6% | 32 | $70,587 | 11% | 13.6% | 26,049 | 4.1% | 22.5 | 0.1% | 2 | |
| 90. Powder Springs, Georgia | 76.6 | [details] | 13.7% | 6.3% | 28.7% | 39 | $59,392 | 8% | 42.1% | 12,481 | 8.5% | 24 | 0.1% | 1.4 | |
| 91. Spring Hill, Tennessee | 76.4 | [details] | 12.3% | 3.6% | 29.7% | 31 | $62,643 | 11% | 11.7% | 7,715 | 4% | 20.9 | 0.1% | 2.7 | |
| 92. Sachse, Texas | 76.2 | [details] | 10.3% | 4% | 30.6% | 31 | $71,918 | 9.2% | 12.7% | 9,751 | 4.6% | 19.9 | 0.3% | 1.5 | |
| 93. Apex, North Carolina | 75.8 | [details] | 19.3% | 4% | 58.8% | 26 | $78,689 | 10.4% | 14.9% | 20,212 | 1.9% | 21.7 | 0.2% | 3.5 | |
| 94. Pflugerville, Texas | 75.5 | [details] | 11.5% | 3.7% | 38.3% | 27 | $73,629 | 9.3% | 22.8% | 16,335 | 1.7% | 31 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 95. Oviedo, Florida | 75.4 | [details] | 9.7% | 5.8% | 41.3% | 31 | $66,288 | 8.4% | 16.5% | 26,316 | 4.6% | 18.9 | 0.3% | 4 | |
| 96. Holly Springs, North Carolina | 75.4 | [details] | 16.4% | 2.8% | 50.7% | 34 | $74,010 | 11.5% | 22.9% | 9,192 | 4.8% | 20.1 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 97. Mansfield, Texas | 75.4 | [details] | 10.8% | 5.7% | 32.8% | 28 | $71,700 | 8.4% | 13.6% | 28,031 | 4% | 36.8 | 0.2% | 2.3 | |
| 98. Maple Valley, Washington | 74.5 | [details] | 12.8% | 4.5% | 31.7% | 38 | $70,008 | 9.2% | 9.4% | 14,209 | 2.6% | 32 | 0.3% | 1.8 | |
| 99. Leander, Texas | 74.3 | [details] | 14.3% | 4.6% | 22.4% | 37 | $55,051 | 10.1% | 13.8% | 7,596 | 4.2% | 30 | 0% | 5.1 | |
| 100. Wylie, Texas | 74.2 | [details] | 15.4% | 5.9% | 21.4% | 34 | $62,903 | 9.4% | 9.5% | 15,132 | 3.4% | 32.7 | 0.2% | 2.5 |