 |
|
|
|
PlaceMatch™ lets you find places similar to any city or town you select, either using the default criteria or using criteria you specify.The criteria being used are show as column headings in the results table further below.
However, if you want to specify which factors to use in determining which places are similar to each other, you can select among dozens of other criteria. These include criteria related to crime and income, population demographics, education levels, and others; there are dozens of criteria you can select.
Please click on the [+/-] Advanced Controls link just below and try PlaceMatch using a variety of filtering criteria.
All Places > New Jersey > Parsippany
Click this [+/-] link to see or edit the similarity criteria used.
Cities and Towns Similar to Parsippany, New Jersey:
Sorted from most similar to least (using the default selection criteria).
Your specified criteria have resulted in 67 locations (a maximum of 100 are shown in the table below). Note that you can dictate for each each criterion (e.g., the percentage of people in poverty) whether it should match Parsippany 'loosely' or 'strictly', using the Advanced Controls. This matching level, loose versus strict, is shown near the top of each column in the results table.
Click on a city or town name below to find places similar to it.
Or, to see details about a place, click its [details] link in the table below.
| City, State | Similarity | Go To City | 1 Person Houses | 65+ | College Grads | Commute Minutes | Family Income | Kids 0-4 | Non White | Pop. | Poverty | Prop. Crime | Seasonal Housing | Viol. Crime | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | ||||
| PARSIPPANY, NEW JERSEY | [details] | 27% | 11.2% | 43% | 27 | $81,041 | 6.1% | 25.7% | 50,649 | 3.9% | 16.4 | 0.3% | 0.7 | ||
| 1. Belmont, California | 94.2 | [details] | 27.2% | 13.2% | 51.7% | 29 | $95,722 | 6% | 24.8% | 25,123 | 4% | 22.8 | 0.2% | 0.8 | |
| 2. Matawan, New Jersey | 91.4 | [details] | 24.6% | 10.5% | 30.4% | 37 | $72,183 | 6.3% | 17.7% | 8,910 | 5.4% | 11.9 | 0.1% | 0.7 | |
| 3. Rutherford, New Jersey | 91 | [details] | 28.5% | 14.6% | 40.3% | 32 | $78,120 | 5.2% | 18% | 18,110 | 3.7% | 18.2 | 0.2% | 0.6 | |
| 4. Piscataway, New Jersey | 90.5 | [details] | 19.5% | 8.7% | 40.5% | 30 | $75,218 | 6.2% | 51.2% | 50,482 | 3.8% | 12 | 0.2% | 1.2 | |
| 5. Pacifica, California | 89.6 | [details] | 21.3% | 9.7% | 33.8% | 32 | $78,361 | 5.7% | 30.5% | 38,390 | 2.9% | 17.4 | 0.3% | 1.6 | |
| 6. Torrance, California | 89.5 | [details] | 27.5% | 14.1% | 36.4% | 27 | $67,098 | 5.7% | 40.8% | 137,946 | 6.4% | 26.4 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 7. Little Ferry, New Jersey | 89.5 | [details] | 31.4% | 12.4% | 24.1% | 27 | $59,176 | 6.4% | 31.2% | 10,800 | 6.3% | 9.9 | 0.2% | 0.9 | |
| 8. Dobbs Ferry, New York | 89.3 | [details] | 27.2% | 15.2% | 50.6% | 34 | $93,127 | 5.3% | 19.3% | 10,622 | 5.6% | 10.9 | 0.2% | 0.9 | |
| 9. Old Bridge, New Jersey | 89.2 | [details] | 21% | 10.5% | 29.5% | 41 | $74,045 | 7% | 20.5% | 60,456 | 4.2% | 17.4 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 10. Lincoln Park, New Jersey | 88.8 | [details] | 26.7% | 14.8% | 32.9% | 28 | $77,307 | 5.8% | 9.9% | 10,930 | 2.8% | 8.7 | 0.2% | 0.4 | |
| 11. Roselle Park, New Jersey | 88.4 | [details] | 28.1% | 12.7% | 25.6% | 27 | $63,403 | 5.9% | 19.1% | 13,281 | 4.3% | 16.3 | 0.3% | 1.8 | |
| 12. Ridgefield Park, New Jersey | 88.4 | [details] | 29.5% | 12.9% | 26.1% | 29 | $62,414 | 5.9% | 21.8% | 12,873 | 6.7% | 12 | 0.2% | 0.9 | |
| 13. Cupertino, California | 88.2 | [details] | 19.4% | 11% | 65.4% | 27 | $109,455 | 6.1% | 49.9% | 50,546 | 4.8% | 19.5 | 0.4% | 1.2 | |
| 14. Delran, New Jersey | 88.1 | [details] | 21% | 10.8% | 27.3% | 28 | $67,895 | 6.2% | 17.1% | 15,536 | 4.1% | 17.1 | 0.1% | 1.4 | |
| 15. Sayreville, New Jersey | 88 | [details] | 22.3% | 12.4% | 25% | 36 | $66,266 | 6.7% | 23.5% | 40,377 | 4.7% | 18 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 16. Novato, California | 88 | [details] | 25.3% | 13% | 37% | 37 | $74,434 | 5.9% | 17.3% | 47,630 | 5.6% | 27.6 | 0.3% | 1.4 | |
| 17. Bothell, Washington | 87.5 | [details] | 25.8% | 9.5% | 38.6% | 29 | $68,580 | 6% | 12.7% | 30,150 | 5.1% | 31.4 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 18. San Carlos, California | 87.5 | [details] | 25.4% | 14.3% | 49.8% | 27 | $103,971 | 7% | 15.5% | 27,718 | 2.7% | 21.4 | 0.3% | 0.9 | |
| 19. Highland Park, New Jersey | 87.2 | [details] | 31.6% | 11.9% | 59.5% | 30 | $71,267 | 6% | 27.9% | 13,999 | 8.4% | 14.6 | 0.4% | 0.8 | |
| 20. Madison, New Jersey | 87 | [details] | 25.6% | 13% | 56.8% | 28 | $101,798 | 5.9% | 10.3% | 16,530 | 3.4% | 8.2 | 0.3% | 0.5 | |
| 21. Kenmore, Washington | 86.7 | [details] | 24.2% | 10.3% | 41.5% | 30 | $72,139 | 5.7% | 13.3% | 18,678 | 5.7% | 29.1 | 0.5% | 1.7 | |
| 22. Roswell, Georgia | 86.4 | [details] | 22.8% | 7.5% | 52.6% | 32 | $85,946 | 6.9% | 18.5% | 79,334 | 5% | 27.5 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 23. Bergenfield, New Jersey | 86.2 | [details] | 20.8% | 13.5% | 32.3% | 32 | $71,187 | 6.8% | 37.1% | 26,247 | 3.5% | 9.9 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 24. Hackettstown, New Jersey | 86.1 | [details] | 31.9% | 12.2% | 24.5% | 34 | $64,383 | 6.3% | 9.7% | 10,403 | 4.8% | 13.7 | 0.3% | 1.4 | |
| 25. Leonia, New Jersey | 86.1 | [details] | 22.1% | 13.7% | 49.9% | 36 | $84,591 | 5.8% | 34.3% | 8,914 | 6.5% | 10.3 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 26. Shaker Heights, Ohio | 86 | [details] | 30.3% | 15.6% | 61.7% | 24 | $85,893 | 6.2% | 40.1% | 29,405 | 6.9% | 23.3 | 0.4% | 1 | |
| 27. Laguna Hills, California | 86 | [details] | 21.7% | 12.2% | 39.3% | 29 | $81,334 | 6.1% | 23.2% | 31,178 | 5% | 24.4 | 0.4% | 1.9 | |
| 28. West Deptford, New Jersey | 85.9 | [details] | 27.3% | 12.2% | 21.7% | 25 | $64,477 | 5.9% | 7.7% | 19,368 | 5.3% | 22.7 | 0.2% | 1.6 | |
| 29. Chelmsford, Massachusetts | 85.9 | [details] | 23.1% | 13% | 44% | 29 | $82,676 | 6.7% | 6.9% | 33,858 | 2.8% | 16 | 0.3% | 1.2 | |
| 30. Mukilteo, Washington | 85.7 | [details] | 19.4% | 6.6% | 42.7% | 30 | $79,487 | 5.9% | 17.9% | 18,019 | 3.4% | 31 | 0.6% | 1.1 | |
| 31. Metuchen, New Jersey | 85.5 | [details] | 23.1% | 14.9% | 49.2% | 34 | $85,022 | 6.6% | 15.6% | 12,840 | 3.9% | 16 | 0.2% | 1.1 | |
| 32. Burnsville, Minnesota | 85.5 | [details] | 24.8% | 7.2% | 36.8% | 24 | $67,979 | 7.1% | 12.5% | 60,220 | 5.1% | 31.1 | 0.4% | 1.3 | |
| 33. Teaneck, New Jersey | 84.8 | [details] | 21.2% | 14.2% | 47.9% | 34 | $84,791 | 6.4% | 43.8% | 39,260 | 4.2% | 19 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 34. Mount Laurel, New Jersey | 84.6 | [details] | 28% | 14.7% | 42.1% | 30 | $76,288 | 6.1% | 12.9% | 40,221 | 3.1% | 19.5 | 0.4% | 1.1 | |
| 35. South San Francisco, California | 84.5 | [details] | 19.8% | 12.6% | 25.2% | 28 | $66,598 | 6.5% | 56% | 60,552 | 5.2% | 23.7 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 36. Schererville, Indiana | 84.5 | [details] | 24.2% | 10.4% | 29.5% | 31 | $70,474 | 6.4% | 8.6% | 24,851 | 3.1% | 25.4 | 0.5% | 0.9 | |
| 37. South River, New Jersey | 84.5 | [details] | 23.3% | 14.6% | 20.9% | 33 | $62,869 | 6.6% | 16.5% | 15,322 | 4.9% | 16.1 | 0.1% | 1.7 | |
| 38. Grand Terrace, California | 84 | [details] | 21.5% | 10.7% | 24.3% | 26 | $61,068 | 6.6% | 26.2% | 11,626 | 7.4% | 25.3 | 0.4% | 1.4 | |
| 39. Pleasantville, New York | 84 | [details] | 25.3% | 13.3% | 56.5% | 36 | $105,227 | 7% | 9.6% | 7,172 | 4.4% | 1 | 0.4% | 0.3 | |
| 40. Methuen, Massachusetts | 83.8 | [details] | 25.3% | 15.3% | 23% | 26 | $59,831 | 6.3% | 10.6% | 43,789 | 7.4% | 18.9 | 0.2% | 1.2 | |
| 41. Bogota, New Jersey | 83.8 | [details] | 21.7% | 11.1% | 28.4% | 32 | $69,841 | 6.5% | 24.3% | 8,249 | 4% | 13.3 | 0.1% | 1.9 | |
| 42. Dumont, New Jersey | 83.5 | [details] | 22.3% | 15.4% | 27.4% | 32 | $73,880 | 6.7% | 16.2% | 17,503 | 2.6% | 9.8 | 0.1% | 0.9 | |
| 43. Lake Forest Park, Washington | 83.5 | [details] | 19.4% | 13% | 51.1% | 28 | $84,316 | 4.7% | 14.7% | 13,142 | 3.8% | 25.4 | 0.4% | 1.2 | |
| 44. Pompton Lakes, New Jersey | 83.4 | [details] | 24.1% | 13.4% | 28.4% | 27 | $74,701 | 6.9% | 7% | 10,640 | 3.2% | 13 | 0.2% | 1.1 | |
| 45. Thousand Oaks, California | 83.1 | [details] | 19.6% | 11.1% | 42.2% | 27 | $86,041 | 6.7% | 14.9% | 117,005 | 5% | 15.6 | 0.5% | 1.4 | |
| 46. Palmyra, New Jersey | 83.1 | [details] | 31.9% | 13.5% | 21.8% | 28 | $57,192 | 5.8% | 19% | 7,091 | 4.2% | 22.7 | 0.3% | 1.6 | |
| 47. Lake Forest, California | 83 | [details] | 19.7% | 8.6% | 33.9% | 27 | $75,121 | 7.1% | 24% | 58,707 | 5.3% | 19.3 | 0.1% | 2 | |
| 48. Plymouth, Minnesota | 83 | [details] | 21.7% | 7.6% | 51% | 24 | $90,134 | 7% | 8.6% | 65,894 | 2.6% | 24.4 | 0.5% | 0.9 | |
| 49. Grosse Pointe Park, Michigan | 83 | [details] | 26.2% | 10.8% | 59.5% | 27 | $104,267 | 6.4% | 7.5% | 12,443 | 4% | 26.5 | 0.3% | 1.3 | |
| 50. Bridgewater, Massachusetts | 82.6 | [details] | 19.6% | 8.6% | 29.6% | 32 | $73,953 | 6.2% | 12.7% | 25,185 | 3.5% | 10.9 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 51. San Anselmo, California | 82.5 | [details] | 28.2% | 11.3% | 59% | 33 | $86,528 | 5.9% | 8.4% | 12,378 | 5.1% | 21.1 | 0.6% | 1.4 | |
| 52. South Euclid, Ohio | 82.5 | [details] | 28.2% | 15.3% | 36.5% | 25 | $58,958 | 6.5% | 24.8% | 23,537 | 4.5% | 19.8 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 53. Middlesex, New Jersey | 82.4 | [details] | 21.7% | 14.2% | 23.4% | 26 | $70,343 | 6.7% | 12.7% | 13,717 | 3.6% | 9.4 | 0.1% | 1.2 | |
| 54. Hanover, New Jersey | 82.2 | [details] | 19.5% | 14.9% | 41.5% | 24 | $93,937 | 6.4% | 11.2% | 12,898 | 1.2% | 13.5 | 0.2% | 1.2 | |
| 55. Shoreview, Minnesota | 82 | [details] | 24.1% | 9.7% | 46.9% | 23 | $82,500 | 5.5% | 6.7% | 25,924 | 2.1% | 13.5 | 0.4% | 0.6 | |
| 56. Lansdale, Pennsylvania | 81.9 | [details] | 32.6% | 15.6% | 24.6% | 23 | $54,891 | 6.3% | 14.6% | 16,071 | 5.6% | 21.9 | 0.2% | 1.7 | |
| 57. Folsom, California | 81.6 | [details] | 21.7% | 8.8% | 37.6% | 28 | $82,448 | 6.9% | 22.1% | 51,884 | 7.3% | 30.9 | 0.4% | 1.6 | |
| 58. Benbrook, Texas | 81.5 | [details] | 28.4% | 14.7% | 32.6% | 25 | $63,529 | 5.9% | 11.7% | 20,208 | 4.4% | 27.3 | 0.1% | 1.7 | |
| 59. Louisville, Colorado | 81 | [details] | 22.7% | 6.1% | 59.9% | 23 | $81,512 | 6.3% | 8.8% | 18,937 | 3% | 22.3 | 0.4% | 1.2 | |
| 60. Easton, Massachusetts | 80.4 | [details] | 20.7% | 9.4% | 39.6% | 30 | $82,190 | 6.5% | 8.1% | 22,299 | 2% | 7.2 | 0.5% | 0.4 | |
| 61. Sterling Heights, Michigan | 80.2 | [details] | 24.1% | 11.8% | 23% | 27 | $70,140 | 6.2% | 9.3% | 124,471 | 5.2% | 23 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 62. Brandon, Mississippi | 80 | [details] | 24% | 11.5% | 34.4% | 25 | $63,098 | 6.7% | 13.4% | 16,436 | 6% | 19.3 | 0.1% | 0.7 | |
| 63. Vadnais Heights, Minnesota | 79.5 | [details] | 24.7% | 7.8% | 37% | 24 | $74,178 | 6.9% | 8.3% | 13,069 | 3.2% | 20.6 | 0.4% | 0.4 | |
| 64. Berea, Ohio | 79.1 | [details] | 32.4% | 14.3% | 29.3% | 23 | $59,194 | 5% | 8.5% | 18,970 | 5.5% | 19.3 | 0.3% | 1.8 | |
| 65. West Boylston, Massachusetts | 78.7 | [details] | 23.5% | 14.7% | 29.6% | 24 | $69,100 | 4.3% | 8.4% | 7,481 | 3.2% | 18.2 | 0.2% | 0.8 | |
| 66. Manchester, Missouri | 78.7 | [details] | 20.5% | 9% | 52.9% | 25 | $71,329 | 7% | 8.4% | 19,161 | 3% | 13.1 | 0.1% | 0.6 | |
| 67. Edmond, Oklahoma | 77.3 | [details] | 20.6% | 8.8% | 47.8% | 23 | $65,230 | 7% | 13.4% | 68,315 | 7.2% | 24.4 | 0.2% | 1.5 |