 |
|
|
|
PlaceMatch™ lets you find places similar to any city or town you select, either using the default criteria or using criteria you specify.The criteria being used are show as column headings in the results table further below.
However, if you want to specify which factors to use in determining which places are similar to each other, you can select among dozens of other criteria. These include criteria related to crime and income, population demographics, education levels, and others; there are dozens of criteria you can select.
Please click on the [+/-] Advanced Controls link just below and try PlaceMatch using a variety of filtering criteria.
All Places > New Jersey > Voorhees
Click this [+/-] link to see or edit the similarity criteria used.
Cities and Towns Similar to Voorhees, New Jersey:
Sorted from most similar to least (using the default selection criteria).
Your specified criteria have resulted in 100 locations (a maximum of 100 are shown in the table below). Note that you can dictate for each each criterion (e.g., the percentage of people in poverty) whether it should match Voorhees 'loosely' or 'strictly', using the Advanced Controls. This matching level, loose versus strict, is shown near the top of each column in the results table.
Click on a city or town name below to find places similar to it.
Or, to see details about a place, click its [details] link in the table below.
| City, State | Similarity | Go To City | 1 Person Houses | 65+ | College Grads | Commute Minutes | Family Income | Kids 0-4 | Non White | Pop. | Poverty | Prop. Crime | Seasonal Housing | Viol. Crime | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | ||||
| VOORHEES, NEW JERSEY | [details] | 26.8% | 10.9% | 46.2% | 32 | $86,873 | 6.3% | 21.7% | 28,126 | 5.7% | 29.1 | 0.3% | 2.5 | ||
| 1. Roswell, Georgia | 92.8 | [details] | 22.8% | 7.5% | 52.6% | 32 | $85,946 | 6.9% | 18.5% | 79,334 | 5% | 27.5 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 2. North Brunswick, New Jersey | 92.7 | [details] | 24.4% | 10% | 37% | 32 | $70,812 | 6.7% | 37.3% | 36,287 | 4.7% | 25.2 | 0.1% | 2.2 | |
| 3. Edison, New Jersey | 92.6 | [details] | 21.2% | 11.9% | 42.3% | 34 | $77,976 | 6.4% | 40.5% | 97,687 | 4.8% | 25.1 | 0.2% | 2.2 | |
| 4. Kenmore, Washington | 91.8 | [details] | 24.2% | 10.3% | 41.5% | 30 | $72,139 | 5.7% | 13.3% | 18,678 | 5.7% | 29.1 | 0.5% | 1.7 | |
| 5. Benicia, California | 91.6 | [details] | 23.1% | 9.3% | 37.3% | 32 | $77,974 | 5.6% | 21.1% | 26,865 | 4.3% | 17.9 | 0.4% | 2.5 | |
| 6. Novato, California | 91.2 | [details] | 25.3% | 13% | 37% | 37 | $74,434 | 5.9% | 17.3% | 47,630 | 5.6% | 27.6 | 0.3% | 1.4 | |
| 7. Dublin, California | 90.8 | [details] | 21.1% | 4.6% | 32.9% | 32 | $83,123 | 5.9% | 30.6% | 29,973 | 2.9% | 26.9 | 0.4% | 2.8 | |
| 8. Bothell, Washington | 90.7 | [details] | 25.8% | 9.5% | 38.6% | 29 | $68,580 | 6% | 12.7% | 30,150 | 5.1% | 31.4 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 9. Petaluma, California | 90.5 | [details] | 22.8% | 11% | 30.1% | 34 | $71,158 | 6.6% | 15.8% | 54,548 | 6% | 24.3 | 0.3% | 2.6 | |
| 10. Brea, California | 90.1 | [details] | 23.2% | 11.4% | 33.5% | 30 | $68,423 | 6.1% | 22.7% | 35,410 | 5.3% | 46.1 | 0.3% | 2.5 | |
| 11. Martinez, California | 89.7 | [details] | 27.6% | 10.1% | 32.1% | 29 | $77,411 | 5.6% | 19% | 35,866 | 5.2% | 43.5 | 0.1% | 2.7 | |
| 12. Sayreville, New Jersey | 89.6 | [details] | 22.3% | 12.4% | 25% | 36 | $66,266 | 6.7% | 23.5% | 40,377 | 4.7% | 18 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 13. Huntington Beach, California | 89.5 | [details] | 24.5% | 10.4% | 36% | 30 | $74,378 | 6.2% | 20.8% | 189,594 | 6.6% | 23.6 | 0.7% | 2.2 | |
| 14. Laguna Hills, California | 89.5 | [details] | 21.7% | 12.2% | 39.3% | 29 | $81,334 | 6.1% | 23.2% | 31,178 | 5% | 24.4 | 0.4% | 1.9 | |
| 15. Rohnert Park, California | 89.5 | [details] | 24% | 8.1% | 24.7% | 29 | $61,420 | 6.3% | 19.7% | 42,236 | 8% | 30.1 | 0.4% | 4.2 | |
| 16. Mukilteo, Washington | 89.4 | [details] | 19.4% | 6.6% | 42.7% | 30 | $79,487 | 5.9% | 17.9% | 18,019 | 3.4% | 31 | 0.6% | 1.1 | |
| 17. Woodbridge, New Jersey | 89.2 | [details] | 21.7% | 13.4% | 26.8% | 31 | $68,492 | 6.3% | 29.2% | 97,203 | 4.8% | 29.4 | 0.2% | 3.3 | |
| 18. Montclair, New Jersey | 89.2 | [details] | 29.3% | 12% | 57.4% | 36 | $96,252 | 7% | 40.2% | 38,977 | 5.6% | 26.4 | 0.3% | 3.6 | |
| 19. University Place, Washington | 89 | [details] | 25.6% | 11.2% | 33.9% | 27 | $60,401 | 6.3% | 24.1% | 29,933 | 7.3% | 35.2 | 0.2% | 3.9 | |
| 20. Pleasanton, California | 89 | [details] | 19.3% | 7.6% | 47.3% | 35 | $102,796 | 6.8% | 19.6% | 63,654 | 2.6% | 29.6 | 0.7% | 1.4 | |
| 21. San Dimas, California | 88.8 | [details] | 21.2% | 11.9% | 28.4% | 32 | $72,124 | 5.9% | 25.3% | 34,980 | 6.3% | 24.9 | 0.4% | 2.6 | |
| 22. Framingham, Massachusetts | 88.7 | [details] | 28.7% | 13% | 42.3% | 29 | $67,420 | 6.5% | 20.2% | 66,910 | 8% | 24.1 | 0.5% | 2.4 | |
| 23. Shoreline, Washington | 88.6 | [details] | 26.6% | 14.5% | 37.3% | 28 | $61,450 | 5.2% | 23% | 53,025 | 6.9% | 42.2 | 0.3% | 2.9 | |
| 24. Folsom, California | 88.6 | [details] | 21.7% | 8.8% | 37.6% | 28 | $82,448 | 6.9% | 22.1% | 51,884 | 7.3% | 30.9 | 0.4% | 1.6 | |
| 25. Westborough, Massachusetts | 88.5 | [details] | 25.2% | 11.6% | 53.2% | 28 | $94,610 | 7.2% | 11.8% | 17,997 | 4.7% | 15 | 0.7% | 1.7 | |
| 26. Old Bridge, New Jersey | 88.5 | [details] | 21% | 10.5% | 29.5% | 41 | $74,045 | 7% | 20.5% | 60,456 | 4.2% | 17.4 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 27. Pacifica, California | 88.4 | [details] | 21.3% | 9.7% | 33.8% | 32 | $78,361 | 5.7% | 30.5% | 38,390 | 2.9% | 17.4 | 0.3% | 1.6 | |
| 28. Aberdeen, New Jersey | 88.2 | [details] | 20.8% | 10.4% | 34.4% | 37 | $76,648 | 6.9% | 21.2% | 17,454 | 4.7% | 14.3 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 29. Englewood, New Jersey | 87.5 | [details] | 24.7% | 13.3% | 36.7% | 34 | $67,194 | 6.9% | 57.5% | 26,203 | 8.9% | 20 | 0.4% | 2.1 | |
| 30. Marlborough, Massachusetts | 87.4 | [details] | 28.4% | 11.6% | 35.6% | 28 | $70,385 | 7% | 12.3% | 36,255 | 6.8% | 22.9 | 0.4% | 3.6 | |
| 31. San Rafael, California | 87.3 | [details] | 32.3% | 14.4% | 43.6% | 32 | $74,398 | 5.8% | 24.2% | 56,063 | 10.2% | 35.2 | 0.5% | 3.5 | |
| 32. Gloucester, New Jersey | 87.3 | [details] | 21.3% | 9.4% | 22% | 32 | $62,992 | 6.8% | 16.9% | 64,350 | 6.2% | 25.2 | 0.1% | 3.2 | |
| 33. Randolph, Massachusetts | 87.2 | [details] | 23.7% | 14.3% | 26.6% | 34 | $61,942 | 6% | 37.2% | 30,963 | 4.1% | 22.6 | 0.3% | 3.9 | |
| 34. San Bruno, California | 87 | [details] | 25.3% | 11.2% | 26.2% | 27 | $70,251 | 6.1% | 42.3% | 40,165 | 4.4% | 24.7 | 0.5% | 2.9 | |
| 35. Concord, California | 87 | [details] | 23% | 10.7% | 25.9% | 33 | $62,093 | 7.1% | 29.3% | 121,780 | 7.6% | 49.1 | 0.3% | 3.2 | |
| 36. Campbell, California | 87 | [details] | 30.3% | 9.7% | 39.7% | 27 | $78,663 | 6.5% | 27.2% | 38,138 | 4.8% | 32.8 | 0.6% | 1.7 | |
| 37. Teaneck, New Jersey | 86.8 | [details] | 21.2% | 14.2% | 47.9% | 34 | $84,791 | 6.4% | 43.8% | 39,260 | 4.2% | 19 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 38. Delran, New Jersey | 86.7 | [details] | 21% | 10.8% | 27.3% | 28 | $67,895 | 6.2% | 17.1% | 15,536 | 4.1% | 17.1 | 0.1% | 1.4 | |
| 39. Evesham, New Jersey | 86.6 | [details] | 22.9% | 8.9% | 39.7% | 31 | $77,245 | 7.3% | 8.7% | 42,275 | 2.8% | 16.7 | 0.2% | 1.2 | |
| 40. La Verne, California | 86.5 | [details] | 18.9% | 13.1% | 31.6% | 32 | $70,344 | 5.8% | 22.9% | 31,638 | 4.7% | 28 | 0.2% | 3 | |
| 41. Cupertino, California | 86.5 | [details] | 19.4% | 11% | 65.4% | 27 | $109,455 | 6.1% | 49.9% | 50,546 | 4.8% | 19.5 | 0.4% | 1.2 | |
| 42. Roselle Park, New Jersey | 86.4 | [details] | 28.1% | 12.7% | 25.6% | 27 | $63,403 | 5.9% | 19.1% | 13,281 | 4.3% | 16.3 | 0.3% | 1.8 | |
| 43. Albany, California | 86.4 | [details] | 29.1% | 11.1% | 64% | 31 | $64,269 | 6% | 38.7% | 16,444 | 7.9% | 43.7 | 0.2% | 2.6 | |
| 44. San Anselmo, California | 86.3 | [details] | 28.2% | 11.3% | 59% | 33 | $86,528 | 5.9% | 8.4% | 12,378 | 5.1% | 21.1 | 0.6% | 1.4 | |
| 45. Lake Forest, California | 86.3 | [details] | 19.7% | 8.6% | 33.9% | 27 | $75,121 | 7.1% | 24% | 58,707 | 5.3% | 19.3 | 0.1% | 2 | |
| 46. Grapevine, Texas | 86.3 | [details] | 22% | 4.8% | 43.2% | 26 | $84,940 | 7.4% | 11.8% | 42,059 | 4.8% | 37.6 | 0.3% | 2.1 | |
| 47. DeSoto, Texas | 86.3 | [details] | 21% | 9.3% | 30.2% | 32 | $66,986 | 7% | 51.2% | 37,646 | 5.5% | 46.1 | 0.2% | 4.1 | |
| 48. Torrance, California | 86.1 | [details] | 27.5% | 14.1% | 36.4% | 27 | $67,098 | 5.7% | 40.8% | 137,946 | 6.4% | 26.4 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 49. Bedford, Texas | 86 | [details] | 31.5% | 8.7% | 35.2% | 26 | $71,017 | 5.9% | 12.4% | 47,152 | 3.7% | 40.6 | 0.2% | 4.2 | |
| 50. Novi, Michigan | 86 | [details] | 28% | 8.1% | 49.1% | 28 | $91,369 | 7.4% | 12.7% | 47,386 | 2.2% | 30.1 | 0.5% | 1.2 | |
| 51. Lafayette, California | 85.9 | [details] | 19.3% | 14.4% | 68% | 32 | $120,364 | 5.5% | 13.2% | 23,908 | 2.9% | 35.2 | 0.3% | 1.4 | |
| 52. Forest Park, Ohio | 85.9 | [details] | 24.8% | 9.1% | 26.2% | 25 | $55,618 | 6.6% | 63.3% | 19,463 | 6% | 28.5 | 0.1% | 2.5 | |
| 53. La Plata, Maryland | 85.8 | [details] | 19.3% | 12.6% | 21.9% | 38 | $66,288 | 6.2% | 27.3% | 6,551 | 10.1% | 24 | 0.3% | 2.1 | |
| 54. Grand Terrace, California | 85.7 | [details] | 21.5% | 10.7% | 24.3% | 26 | $61,068 | 6.6% | 26.2% | 11,626 | 7.4% | 25.3 | 0.4% | 1.4 | |
| 55. Natick, Massachusetts | 85.6 | [details] | 28.2% | 14.3% | 52.5% | 31 | $85,715 | 7.4% | 8% | 32,170 | 2.8% | 22.4 | 0.2% | 1.2 | |
| 56. Eastampton, New Jersey | 85.5 | [details] | 21.4% | 7.2% | 29.6% | 30 | $71,765 | 7.1% | 21.8% | 6,202 | 2.9% | 15.5 | 0.5% | 1.8 | |
| 57. Bloomfield, New Jersey | 85.5 | [details] | 30.5% | 14.3% | 31.8% | 31 | $64,945 | 5.9% | 29.9% | 47,683 | 5.9% | 40.1 | 0.2% | 3.9 | |
| 58. Mount Laurel, New Jersey | 85.4 | [details] | 28% | 14.7% | 42.1% | 30 | $76,288 | 6.1% | 12.9% | 40,221 | 3.1% | 19.5 | 0.4% | 1.1 | |
| 59. Freeport, New York | 85.4 | [details] | 21.2% | 10.5% | 20.5% | 33 | $61,673 | 6.9% | 57.1% | 43,783 | 10.6% | 20 | 0.3% | 4.1 | |
| 60. Thousand Oaks, California | 85.4 | [details] | 19.6% | 11.1% | 42.2% | 27 | $86,041 | 6.7% | 14.9% | 117,005 | 5% | 15.6 | 0.5% | 1.4 | |
| 61. Des Moines, Washington | 85.4 | [details] | 28% | 14.9% | 22.9% | 28 | $57,003 | 6.6% | 25.8% | 29,267 | 7.6% | 43.7 | 0.5% | 3.9 | |
| 62. Pelham, New York | 85.3 | [details] | 21.2% | 12% | 54.9% | 37 | $95,929 | 7.3% | 16.8% | 6,400 | 3.3% | 20.9 | 0.2% | 2.2 | |
| 63. Alameda, California | 85.2 | [details] | 32.2% | 13.3% | 42.2% | 31 | $68,625 | 5.6% | 43.1% | 72,259 | 8.2% | 30.9 | 0.5% | 4.7 | |
| 64. South San Francisco, California | 85.1 | [details] | 19.8% | 12.6% | 25.2% | 28 | $66,598 | 6.5% | 56% | 60,552 | 5.2% | 23.7 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 65. Glendora, California | 85.1 | [details] | 19.1% | 12.5% | 25.7% | 31 | $66,674 | 6.3% | 19.7% | 49,415 | 5.9% | 26.4 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 66. Stoughton, Massachusetts | 85 | [details] | 24.4% | 15.1% | 28.4% | 32 | $69,942 | 5.6% | 11.5% | 27,149 | 4.6% | 16 | 0.6% | 4.3 | |
| 67. Belleville, New Jersey | 84.9 | [details] | 27.9% | 13.4% | 21.7% | 29 | $55,212 | 5.9% | 30.6% | 35,928 | 8.2% | 23.5 | 0.2% | 2.8 | |
| 68. Steilacoom, Washington | 84.9 | [details] | 26.3% | 13.3% | 36.5% | 26 | $54,725 | 5.8% | 21.5% | 6,049 | 8.1% | 24.1 | 0.4% | 3.3 | |
| 69. Arvada, Colorado | 84.8 | [details] | 22.9% | 10.7% | 29% | 27 | $63,273 | 6.4% | 9% | 102,153 | 5.2% | 35.8 | 0.1% | 1.8 | |
| 70. San Mateo, California | 84.8 | [details] | 31.6% | 15.1% | 38.6% | 27 | $76,223 | 6.1% | 33.8% | 92,482 | 6.1% | 36.2 | 0.6% | 4.5 | |
| 71. Fullerton, California | 84.8 | [details] | 23.4% | 11.3% | 31.3% | 29 | $57,345 | 7% | 38.1% | 126,003 | 11.4% | 36.3 | 0.2% | 3.1 | |
| 72. Merrillville, Indiana | 84.7 | [details] | 26.2% | 15.1% | 20.2% | 30 | $56,355 | 6.6% | 30.3% | 30,560 | 4.3% | 35.4 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 73. Metuchen, New Jersey | 84.7 | [details] | 23.1% | 14.9% | 49.2% | 34 | $85,022 | 6.6% | 15.6% | 12,840 | 3.9% | 16 | 0.2% | 1.1 | |
| 74. Orange, California | 84.7 | [details] | 19.4% | 9.6% | 28% | 26 | $64,573 | 7.4% | 29.5% | 128,821 | 10% | 27.4 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 75. Wharton, New Jersey | 84.7 | [details] | 26.4% | 11.3% | 22.7% | 30 | $64,957 | 7.4% | 17.9% | 6,298 | 8.3% | 23.2 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 76. Lilburn, Georgia | 84.2 | [details] | 22.5% | 8.3% | 31.8% | 32 | $62,563 | 6.6% | 30.9% | 11,307 | 6.1% | 39.2 | 0.2% | 3.8 | |
| 77. Attleboro, Massachusetts | 84 | [details] | 25.7% | 12.9% | 23.5% | 28 | $59,112 | 7% | 8.7% | 42,068 | 6.2% | 22.6 | 0.2% | 3.5 | |
| 78. Chelmsford, Massachusetts | 83.5 | [details] | 23.1% | 13% | 44% | 29 | $82,676 | 6.7% | 6.9% | 33,858 | 2.8% | 16 | 0.3% | 1.2 | |
| 79. Los Alamitos, California | 83.4 | [details] | 21.8% | 14.8% | 29.8% | 27 | $60,767 | 5% | 23% | 11,536 | 5.2% | 35.6 | 0.2% | 2.3 | |
| 80. Vienna, Virginia | 83.4 | [details] | 19.2% | 13.6% | 56.4% | 30 | $93,043 | 6.5% | 18.9% | 14,453 | 2.5% | 16.3 | 0.4% | 1.2 | |
| 81. Dunellen, New Jersey | 83.3 | [details] | 23.5% | 11.3% | 22.2% | 30 | $67,188 | 7.4% | 15.9% | 6,823 | 3.3% | 21.3 | 0.1% | 4 | |
| 82. Summerville, South Carolina | 83.2 | [details] | 23.3% | 10.6% | 26.7% | 29 | $51,469 | 7% | 22.8% | 27,752 | 9.2% | 45.4 | 0.4% | 4.1 | |
| 83. Temple City, California | 83 | [details] | 20.2% | 14% | 28.5% | 32 | $54,455 | 5.7% | 51.3% | 33,377 | 9.3% | 15.9 | 0.4% | 1.8 | |
| 84. Benbrook, Texas | 83 | [details] | 28.4% | 14.7% | 32.6% | 25 | $63,529 | 5.9% | 11.7% | 20,208 | 4.4% | 27.3 | 0.1% | 1.7 | |
| 85. Takoma Park, Maryland | 82.9 | [details] | 32.4% | 8.8% | 49.6% | 34 | $63,434 | 7.2% | 51.2% | 17,299 | 10.3% | 40.3 | 0.3% | 5.1 | |
| 86. San Juan Capistrano, California | 82.8 | [details] | 20.3% | 13.1% | 30.7% | 26 | $69,481 | 7.2% | 21.5% | 33,826 | 10.7% | 14.6 | 0.6% | 1.8 | |
| 87. North Richland Hills, Texas | 82.7 | [details] | 20.6% | 8.8% | 26.1% | 28 | $64,718 | 7.1% | 11.5% | 55,635 | 4.8% | 47.8 | 0.2% | 2.6 | |
| 88. Euless, Texas | 82.5 | [details] | 31% | 5.8% | 29.5% | 26 | $54,697 | 7.4% | 24.5% | 46,005 | 7% | 38.7 | 0.3% | 2.1 | |
| 89. Hendersonville, Tennessee | 82.3 | [details] | 22.5% | 10.2% | 26.4% | 29 | $57,625 | 6.6% | 7.1% | 40,620 | 6.2% | 22.9 | 0.3% | 3.1 | |
| 90. Sterling Heights, Michigan | 82.1 | [details] | 24.1% | 11.8% | 23% | 27 | $70,140 | 6.2% | 9.3% | 124,471 | 5.2% | 23 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 91. Bound Brook, New Jersey | 82 | [details] | 23.6% | 12.5% | 23.9% | 26 | $51,346 | 6.9% | 17.4% | 10,155 | 10.9% | 21.3 | 0.2% | 1.3 | |
| 92. Leominster, Massachusetts | 82 | [details] | 27.8% | 13.6% | 21.9% | 26 | $54,660 | 7.1% | 12.9% | 41,303 | 9.5% | 26.7 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 93. Grosse Pointe Park, Michigan | 81.9 | [details] | 26.2% | 10.8% | 59.5% | 27 | $104,267 | 6.4% | 7.5% | 12,443 | 4% | 26.5 | 0.3% | 1.3 | |
| 94. Woodhaven, Michigan | 81.5 | [details] | 22.6% | 7% | 20.1% | 25 | $75,813 | 6.3% | 6.8% | 12,530 | 3.3% | 31.8 | 0.6% | 3.8 | |
| 95. Methuen, Massachusetts | 81.4 | [details] | 25.3% | 15.3% | 23% | 26 | $59,831 | 6.3% | 10.6% | 43,789 | 7.4% | 18.9 | 0.2% | 1.2 | |
| 96. Burlington, Massachusetts | 81.3 | [details] | 19% | 13.9% | 42.6% | 26 | $82,072 | 6.9% | 13.3% | 22,876 | 1.9% | 28.1 | 0.6% | 1.1 | |
| 97. Palmyra, New Jersey | 81.3 | [details] | 31.9% | 13.5% | 21.8% | 28 | $57,192 | 5.8% | 19% | 7,091 | 4.2% | 22.7 | 0.3% | 1.6 | |
| 98. Carlstadt, New Jersey | 81.1 | [details] | 26.5% | 15.3% | 21% | 26 | $62,040 | 5.1% | 11.1% | 5,917 | 6.1% | 43.8 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 99. Haverhill, Massachusetts | 80.7 | [details] | 28.7% | 12.8% | 23.4% | 28 | $59,772 | 7.4% | 10.3% | 58,969 | 9.1% | 25.4 | 0.3% | 5 | |
| 100. Apple Valley, Minnesota | 80.4 | [details] | 19.2% | 5.5% | 41% | 25 | $79,335 | 7.2% | 8.2% | 45,527 | 2.1% | 32.8 | 0.2% | 1.4 |