 |
|
|
|
PlaceMatch™ lets you find places similar to any city or town you select, either using the default criteria or using criteria you specify.The criteria being used are show as column headings in the results table further below.
However, if you want to specify which factors to use in determining which places are similar to each other, you can select among dozens of other criteria. These include criteria related to crime and income, population demographics, education levels, and others; there are dozens of criteria you can select.
Please click on the [+/-] Advanced Controls link just below and try PlaceMatch using a variety of filtering criteria.
All Places > Texas > Carrollton
Click this [+/-] link to see or edit the similarity criteria used.
Cities and Towns Similar to Carrollton, Texas:
Sorted from most similar to least (using the default selection criteria).
Your specified criteria have resulted in 100 locations (a maximum of 100 are shown in the table below). Note that you can dictate for each each criterion (e.g., the percentage of people in poverty) whether it should match Carrollton 'loosely' or 'strictly', using the Advanced Controls. This matching level, loose versus strict, is shown near the top of each column in the results table.
Click on a city or town name below to find places similar to it.
Or, to see details about a place, click its [details] link in the table below.
| City, State | Similarity | Go To City | 1 Person Houses | 65+ | College Grads | Commute Minutes | Family Income | Kids 0-4 | Non White | Pop. | Poverty | Prop. Crime | Seasonal Housing | Viol. Crime | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | ||||
| CARROLLTON, TEXAS | [details] | 20% | 5.2% | 37% | 28 | $68,672 | 7.9% | 28.1% | 109,576 | 5.6% | 34.8 | 0.4% | 2.3 | ||
| 1. Plano, Texas | 93.9 | [details] | 20.2% | 4.9% | 53.3% | 29 | $91,162 | 8.3% | 21.7% | 222,030 | 4.3% | 38.8 | 0.3% | 2.9 | |
| 2. Round Rock, Texas | 92.5 | [details] | 18.5% | 4.5% | 32.9% | 28 | $65,471 | 9.7% | 23.2% | 61,136 | 4% | 27.4 | 0.3% | 1.5 | |
| 3. Roswell, Georgia | 91.3 | [details] | 22.8% | 7.5% | 52.6% | 32 | $85,946 | 6.9% | 18.5% | 79,334 | 5% | 27.5 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 4. Leesburg, Virginia | 91 | [details] | 23% | 6.1% | 41.3% | 30 | $78,111 | 9.8% | 16.7% | 28,311 | 3.6% | 30 | 0.5% | 2.2 | |
| 5. DeSoto, Texas | 91 | [details] | 21% | 9.3% | 30.2% | 32 | $66,986 | 7% | 51.2% | 37,646 | 5.5% | 46.1 | 0.2% | 4.1 | |
| 6. McKinney, Texas | 90.9 | [details] | 18.9% | 6.8% | 39.1% | 29 | $72,133 | 10.1% | 21.6% | 54,369 | 8.5% | 34.1 | 0.2% | 3.4 | |
| 7. League City, Texas | 90.9 | [details] | 18.3% | 5.9% | 35.5% | 30 | $72,760 | 8.1% | 16% | 45,444 | 4.8% | 32.5 | 0.6% | 0.9 | |
| 8. Coral Springs, Florida | 90.8 | [details] | 15.3% | 6% | 33.9% | 29 | $64,193 | 6.9% | 18.5% | 117,549 | 8% | 26.7 | 0.7% | 2.7 | |
| 9. Grapevine, Texas | 90.5 | [details] | 22% | 4.8% | 43.2% | 26 | $84,940 | 7.4% | 11.8% | 42,059 | 4.8% | 37.6 | 0.3% | 2.1 | |
| 10. Rancho Cucamonga, California | 90.5 | [details] | 16.8% | 6.1% | 23.3% | 33 | $66,446 | 7% | 33.5% | 127,743 | 7.1% | 33.9 | 0.1% | 2.1 | |
| 11. Garland, Texas | 90.5 | [details] | 19.7% | 7.1% | 21.8% | 29 | $53,545 | 8.2% | 34.7% | 215,768 | 8.9% | 43 | 0.1% | 2.6 | |
| 12. Westminster, Colorado | 90.4 | [details] | 23.9% | 6.5% | 31.3% | 28 | $63,776 | 7.3% | 15.8% | 100,940 | 4.7% | 52 | 0.3% | 2.5 | |
| 13. Mesquite, Texas | 90.4 | [details] | 20.6% | 7.1% | 18.5% | 31 | $56,357 | 7.7% | 26.5% | 124,523 | 6.8% | 48.9 | 0.2% | 3.7 | |
| 14. Lumberton, New Jersey | 90.3 | [details] | 24.8% | 11.1% | 30.9% | 29 | $70,329 | 8.3% | 21.7% | 10,461 | 3.8% | 36.5 | 0.2% | 3.2 | |
| 15. Richardson, Texas | 90.3 | [details] | 22.9% | 10% | 47.7% | 25 | $72,876 | 6.7% | 24.6% | 91,802 | 6.3% | 38.3 | 0.2% | 2.8 | |
| 16. Fremont, California | 90.2 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.3% | 43.2% | 34 | $82,199 | 7.4% | 52.3% | 203,413 | 5.4% | 28.1 | 0.3% | 2.2 | |
| 17. Burnsville, Minnesota | 90 | [details] | 24.8% | 7.2% | 36.8% | 24 | $67,979 | 7.1% | 12.5% | 60,220 | 5.1% | 31.1 | 0.4% | 1.3 | |
| 18. Brooklyn Park, Minnesota | 90 | [details] | 22% | 5.6% | 27.3% | 25 | $64,297 | 8.1% | 28.6% | 67,388 | 5.1% | 42.5 | 0.2% | 4.1 | |
| 19. Rocklin, California | 89.9 | [details] | 18.6% | 8.6% | 36.1% | 28 | $72,245 | 7.9% | 11.7% | 36,330 | 4.5% | 34.4 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 20. Lewisville, Texas | 89.8 | [details] | 25.5% | 4.3% | 32.4% | 29 | $63,719 | 9.1% | 22.8% | 77,737 | 6% | 52.1 | 0.2% | 2.3 | |
| 21. Corona, California | 89.4 | [details] | 14.4% | 5.8% | 22% | 37 | $63,505 | 9.8% | 38% | 124,966 | 8.3% | 36.2 | 0.2% | 2.2 | |
| 22. Tustin, California | 89.3 | [details] | 23.8% | 7.1% | 33.4% | 25 | $60,092 | 8.6% | 41.3% | 67,504 | 8.5% | 30.3 | 0.4% | 3.2 | |
| 23. Broomfield, Colorado | 89 | [details] | 19.2% | 6.6% | 37.9% | 29 | $70,551 | 7.8% | 11.4% | 38,272 | 4.2% | 44.7 | 0.4% | 1.1 | |
| 24. Santa Clarita, California | 88.9 | [details] | 19.1% | 7.1% | 29.1% | 35 | $73,588 | 7.8% | 20.5% | 151,088 | 6.4% | 20.9 | 0.2% | 2.4 | |
| 25. Franklin, Tennessee | 88.9 | [details] | 25.5% | 7.4% | 42.3% | 24 | $69,431 | 8.5% | 15.5% | 41,842 | 6.7% | 22.2 | 0.3% | 2.2 | |
| 26. Hillsboro, Oregon | 88.8 | [details] | 23.5% | 6.3% | 29.5% | 25 | $57,379 | 9.3% | 22.5% | 70,186 | 9.2% | 55 | 0.6% | 2.4 | |
| 27. Folsom, California | 88.7 | [details] | 21.7% | 8.8% | 37.6% | 28 | $82,448 | 6.9% | 22.1% | 51,884 | 7.3% | 30.9 | 0.4% | 1.6 | |
| 28. San Jose, California | 88.4 | [details] | 18.3% | 8.3% | 31.6% | 29 | $74,813 | 7.6% | 52.5% | 894,943 | 8.8% | 24.9 | 0.3% | 3.8 | |
| 29. Marysville, Washington | 88.3 | [details] | 23.9% | 11.3% | 19% | 28 | $55,796 | 8.2% | 11.8% | 25,315 | 5.6% | 41.5 | 0.4% | 2.4 | |
| 30. Morgan Hill, California | 88.2 | [details] | 15.8% | 7.5% | 33.5% | 37 | $90,134 | 8.1% | 27.6% | 33,556 | 4.7% | 28.3 | 0.3% | 1.5 | |
| 31. Tualatin, Oregon | 88.1 | [details] | 24.8% | 5.8% | 37.5% | 23 | $68,165 | 7.6% | 13.1% | 22,791 | 5.5% | 46.9 | 0.5% | 2 | |
| 32. Eagan, Minnesota | 88 | [details] | 22.9% | 4.2% | 47.7% | 23 | $80,062 | 8.1% | 12% | 63,557 | 2.9% | 26.8 | 0.3% | 1.1 | |
| 33. Placentia, California | 88 | [details] | 16.1% | 9.1% | 31.3% | 28 | $68,976 | 7.4% | 32.2% | 46,488 | 8.7% | 19.2 | 0.2% | 2.8 | |
| 34. Federal Way, Washington | 88 | [details] | 24.6% | 7.6% | 26.2% | 32 | $55,833 | 7.8% | 31.2% | 83,259 | 9.3% | 61.7 | 0.2% | 3.4 | |
| 35. North Richland Hills, Texas | 87.8 | [details] | 20.6% | 8.8% | 26.1% | 28 | $64,718 | 7.1% | 11.5% | 55,635 | 4.8% | 47.8 | 0.2% | 2.6 | |
| 36. Livermore, California | 87.8 | [details] | 18.6% | 7.5% | 31.6% | 33 | $82,421 | 7.7% | 18.1% | 73,345 | 5.3% | 25.6 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 37. Lilburn, Georgia | 87.8 | [details] | 22.5% | 8.3% | 31.8% | 32 | $62,563 | 6.6% | 30.9% | 11,307 | 6.1% | 39.2 | 0.2% | 3.8 | |
| 38. Orange, California | 87.7 | [details] | 19.4% | 9.6% | 28% | 26 | $64,573 | 7.4% | 29.5% | 128,821 | 10% | 27.4 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 39. San Ramon, California | 87.6 | [details] | 21.1% | 6.1% | 52.7% | 33 | $106,321 | 7.4% | 23.2% | 44,722 | 2% | 27.4 | 0.7% | 1.1 | |
| 40. Vacaville, California | 87.5 | [details] | 19.3% | 8.3% | 19.4% | 30 | $63,950 | 6.6% | 27.9% | 88,625 | 6.1% | 26.8 | 0.2% | 3.7 | |
| 41. Schertz, Texas | 87.4 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.8% | 27.5% | 25 | $59,745 | 7.5% | 18% | 18,694 | 5.2% | 24 | 0.2% | 2.3 | |
| 42. Reynoldsburg, Ohio | 87.2 | [details] | 25.2% | 10.1% | 27.1% | 24 | $60,183 | 7.1% | 15% | 32,069 | 5.5% | 41.8 | 0.3% | 2.8 | |
| 43. Huntersville, North Carolina | 87 | [details] | 19.6% | 6.2% | 46.5% | 31 | $80,821 | 9.8% | 11.6% | 24,960 | 3.1% | 39 | 0.4% | 2.7 | |
| 44. Chula Vista, California | 86.9 | [details] | 19.2% | 11% | 22.2% | 27 | $50,136 | 7.8% | 44.9% | 173,556 | 10.6% | 41.6 | 0.4% | 4.8 | |
| 45. Temecula, California | 86.7 | [details] | 12.8% | 7.1% | 25% | 35 | $62,270 | 8.9% | 21.1% | 57,716 | 6.7% | 42 | 0.4% | 3.6 | |
| 46. Suwanee, Georgia | 86.7 | [details] | 15% | 4.3% | 45.6% | 33 | $91,519 | 8.6% | 15.5% | 8,725 | 2.2% | 42.9 | 0.4% | 2.5 | |
| 47. Troutdale, Oregon | 86.5 | [details] | 13.3% | 4.4% | 20.4% | 27 | $62,203 | 8.6% | 12.5% | 13,777 | 4.8% | 44.4 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 48. Wake Forest, North Carolina | 86.4 | [details] | 20.8% | 7.9% | 43% | 32 | $60,408 | 9.8% | 20.4% | 12,588 | 8.8% | 36.9 | 0.6% | 2.7 | |
| 49. Tigard, Oregon | 86.3 | [details] | 27% | 10% | 36.5% | 24 | $61,656 | 7.7% | 14.6% | 41,223 | 6.6% | 65 | 0.3% | 2.8 | |
| 50. Pleasanton, California | 86.3 | [details] | 19.3% | 7.6% | 47.3% | 35 | $102,796 | 6.8% | 19.6% | 63,654 | 2.6% | 29.6 | 0.7% | 1.4 | |
| 51. Farmers Branch, Texas | 86.2 | [details] | 23% | 12.1% | 27.2% | 23 | $57,531 | 7.3% | 21.6% | 27,508 | 6.3% | 50.5 | 0.3% | 2.7 | |
| 52. Cary, North Carolina | 86.1 | [details] | 21.1% | 5.4% | 60.7% | 24 | $88,074 | 8.1% | 17.8% | 94,536 | 3.4% | 21.5 | 0.6% | 1 | |
| 53. Summerville, South Carolina | 86 | [details] | 23.3% | 10.6% | 26.7% | 29 | $51,469 | 7% | 22.8% | 27,752 | 9.2% | 45.4 | 0.4% | 4.1 | |
| 54. Grand Prairie, Texas | 86 | [details] | 20.5% | 6.4% | 19.3% | 29 | $51,449 | 8.9% | 38% | 127,427 | 11.1% | 55.3 | 0.6% | 3.5 | |
| 55. Windsor, California | 86 | [details] | 18.1% | 11.1% | 24.7% | 27 | $67,992 | 8% | 21% | 22,744 | 5.1% | 19.8 | 0.3% | 2.9 | |
| 56. Lawrence, Indiana | 86 | [details] | 24.6% | 8.2% | 26.8% | 26 | $56,609 | 9.1% | 21.4% | 38,915 | 6.7% | 28.8 | 0.3% | 4.4 | |
| 57. Brentwood, California | 86 | [details] | 14.7% | 9.6% | 20.9% | 45 | $75,753 | 9.7% | 26.2% | 23,302 | 5.8% | 48.5 | 0.4% | 3.7 | |
| 58. Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota | 86 | [details] | 21.6% | 7.8% | 29.6% | 23 | $68,629 | 7.2% | 8.2% | 29,751 | 4.2% | 35.4 | 0.2% | 1.7 | |
| 59. Newark, California | 85.9 | [details] | 14.1% | 7.8% | 24.2% | 32 | $71,351 | 7.2% | 47.8% | 42,471 | 5.5% | 48.2 | 0.2% | 3.3 | |
| 60. Mooresville, North Carolina | 85.9 | [details] | 23.8% | 11.2% | 22.8% | 28 | $51,011 | 8.1% | 18.5% | 18,823 | 7.2% | 33.6 | 0.4% | 2.3 | |
| 61. Layton, Utah | 85.9 | [details] | 14.9% | 5.7% | 27.1% | 25 | $57,193 | 10.3% | 10.1% | 58,474 | 5.6% | 31 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 62. Harker Heights, Texas | 85.8 | [details] | 18.6% | 6.2% | 29.8% | 24 | $49,607 | 9.4% | 29.1% | 17,308 | 10% | 39.5 | 0.2% | 2.4 | |
| 63. Concord, California | 85.6 | [details] | 23% | 10.7% | 25.9% | 33 | $62,093 | 7.1% | 29.3% | 121,780 | 7.6% | 49.1 | 0.3% | 3.2 | |
| 64. Draper, Utah | 85.5 | [details] | 10.7% | 3.7% | 33.5% | 26 | $76,858 | 10.5% | 8.8% | 25,220 | 2.7% | 40 | 0.4% | 1.3 | |
| 65. Lafayette, Colorado | 85.5 | [details] | 22.7% | 5.8% | 45.6% | 26 | $64,088 | 8% | 14.5% | 23,197 | 7% | 22.8 | 0.2% | 2.6 | |
| 66. Mansfield, Texas | 85.4 | [details] | 10.8% | 5.7% | 32.8% | 28 | $71,700 | 8.4% | 13.6% | 28,031 | 4% | 36.8 | 0.2% | 2.3 | |
| 67. Collierville, Tennessee | 85.3 | [details] | 12% | 6% | 41.2% | 28 | $84,830 | 7.6% | 10.1% | 31,872 | 2.4% | 18.6 | 0.6% | 2.4 | |
| 68. Concord, North Carolina | 85.2 | [details] | 23.1% | 11.1% | 22.8% | 27 | $53,571 | 7.9% | 21.2% | 55,977 | 8.2% | 52.5 | 0.3% | 3 | |
| 69. Monroe, Washington | 85.2 | [details] | 20.9% | 8% | 19.1% | 33 | $55,793 | 9.7% | 13.9% | 13,795 | 8.9% | 33.8 | 0.3% | 1.9 | |
| 70. Petaluma, California | 84.9 | [details] | 22.8% | 11% | 30.1% | 34 | $71,158 | 6.6% | 15.8% | 54,548 | 6% | 24.3 | 0.3% | 2.6 | |
| 71. Plymouth, Minnesota | 84.9 | [details] | 21.7% | 7.6% | 51% | 24 | $90,134 | 7% | 8.6% | 65,894 | 2.6% | 24.4 | 0.5% | 0.9 | |
| 72. Murrieta, California | 84.9 | [details] | 14.3% | 11.4% | 23% | 36 | $65,904 | 7.5% | 18.4% | 44,282 | 4.3% | 31.4 | 0.7% | 2 | |
| 73. Apple Valley, Minnesota | 84.8 | [details] | 19.2% | 5.5% | 41% | 25 | $79,335 | 7.2% | 8.2% | 45,527 | 2.1% | 32.8 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 74. Oak Creek, Wisconsin | 84.6 | [details] | 25.2% | 8.9% | 24.4% | 24 | $63,381 | 6.7% | 8% | 28,456 | 3.1% | 32.3 | 0.1% | 1 | |
| 75. Rio Rancho, New Mexico | 84.4 | [details] | 20.8% | 11.7% | 24.8% | 29 | $52,233 | 7.5% | 21.6% | 51,765 | 5.1% | 25.6 | 0.5% | 3.2 | |
| 76. Shakopee, Minnesota | 84.4 | [details] | 21.4% | 7.4% | 25.8% | 23 | $66,885 | 8.9% | 8.4% | 20,568 | 3.5% | 40.2 | 0.1% | 2.2 | |
| 77. Northglenn, Colorado | 84.3 | [details] | 23.1% | 10.2% | 19.4% | 30 | $52,888 | 7.3% | 17% | 31,575 | 5.4% | 63.1 | 0.2% | 3.6 | |
| 78. Sachse, Texas | 84.3 | [details] | 10.3% | 4% | 30.6% | 31 | $71,918 | 9.2% | 12.7% | 9,751 | 4.6% | 19.9 | 0.3% | 1.5 | |
| 79. Apex, North Carolina | 84.3 | [details] | 19.3% | 4% | 58.8% | 26 | $78,689 | 10.4% | 14.9% | 20,212 | 1.9% | 21.7 | 0.2% | 3.5 | |
| 80. Keizer, Oregon | 84.2 | [details] | 21.6% | 12.2% | 20.4% | 24 | $49,977 | 8.1% | 14.5% | 32,203 | 9.3% | 36.1 | 0.2% | 2.5 | |
| 81. Bixby, Oklahoma | 84.1 | [details] | 18.1% | 9.8% | 26.6% | 23 | $58,104 | 7.7% | 13.1% | 13,336 | 5.4% | 22.3 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 82. Duarte, California | 84 | [details] | 21.7% | 11.9% | 23.6% | 31 | $56,556 | 7.5% | 48% | 21,486 | 11.3% | 27.7 | 0.2% | 4.3 | |
| 83. Kennesaw, Georgia | 83.9 | [details] | 22% | 5.8% | 34.5% | 38 | $67,778 | 9.9% | 18% | 21,675 | 4.5% | 25.5 | 0.2% | 1.1 | |
| 84. Gilbert, Arizona | 83.7 | [details] | 12.7% | 3.8% | 36.1% | 30 | $70,994 | 10.3% | 14.3% | 109,697 | 3.2% | 48.7 | 0.7% | 1.5 | |
| 85. Maple Valley, Washington | 83.6 | [details] | 12.8% | 4.5% | 31.7% | 38 | $70,008 | 9.2% | 9.4% | 14,209 | 2.6% | 32 | 0.3% | 1.8 | |
| 86. Acworth, Georgia | 83.6 | [details] | 23.3% | 7.2% | 29.2% | 39 | $55,163 | 10% | 20.3% | 13,422 | 8.3% | 38.2 | 0.2% | 3.8 | |
| 87. Ripon, California | 83.5 | [details] | 16.2% | 10.1% | 20.6% | 29 | $62,592 | 7% | 15.5% | 10,146 | 6.2% | 37.1 | 0.1% | 2.8 | |
| 88. Oakdale, Minnesota | 83.5 | [details] | 25.3% | 8.4% | 24.3% | 23 | $66,680 | 7.7% | 7.8% | 26,653 | 3.6% | 40.5 | 0.2% | 2 | |
| 89. Oregon City, Oregon | 83.2 | [details] | 22.6% | 9.8% | 18.4% | 27 | $51,597 | 8.4% | 7.6% | 25,754 | 8.9% | 52.4 | 0.2% | 2.5 | |
| 90. Redwood City, California | 83.1 | [details] | 27.1% | 10.2% | 35.7% | 26 | $73,798 | 7.5% | 31% | 75,402 | 6% | 32.8 | 0.8% | 4.2 | |
| 91. Winslow, New Jersey | 83.1 | [details] | 18.7% | 8.5% | 18.6% | 35 | $62,045 | 8.2% | 34.5% | 34,611 | 6% | 19.8 | 0.1% | 4.4 | |
| 92. Lexington, South Carolina | 82.9 | [details] | 26.4% | 7.5% | 34.9% | 24 | $65,694 | 8.9% | 16.1% | 9,793 | 7.2% | 59.2 | 0.2% | 2.6 | |
| 93. Woodstock, Georgia | 82.7 | [details] | 26.6% | 8% | 33.7% | 34 | $65,740 | 9% | 10.6% | 10,050 | 4.2% | 58.5 | 0.1% | 2.4 | |
| 94. Huber Heights, Ohio | 82.6 | [details] | 20.5% | 9.3% | 18.9% | 23 | $53,579 | 7.3% | 15.1% | 38,212 | 5.9% | 41 | 0.2% | 1.8 | |
| 95. Hayward, California | 82.5 | [details] | 21% | 10.2% | 19.9% | 33 | $54,712 | 7.9% | 57% | 140,030 | 10% | 36 | 0.2% | 4.2 | |
| 96. Oviedo, Florida | 82.4 | [details] | 9.7% | 5.8% | 41.3% | 31 | $66,288 | 8.4% | 16.5% | 26,316 | 4.6% | 18.9 | 0.3% | 4 | |
| 97. Newberg, Oregon | 82.3 | [details] | 22.7% | 10.6% | 20.8% | 25 | $51,084 | 8% | 9.5% | 18,064 | 6.6% | 46.6 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 98. Lebanon, Ohio | 81.9 | [details] | 23.8% | 8.9% | 25% | 24 | $52,578 | 8.5% | 9% | 16,962 | 6.4% | 34.5 | 0.2% | 1.3 | |
| 99. Mounds View, Minnesota | 81.9 | [details] | 24.3% | 8.9% | 24% | 24 | $60,685 | 7.6% | 9.4% | 12,738 | 5.9% | 45.4 | 0.2% | 1.7 | |
| 100. Covington, Washington | 81.8 | [details] | 11.8% | 3.7% | 24.8% | 36 | $65,173 | 7.9% | 12.1% | 13,783 | 3.6% | 43.4 | 0.2% | 2.8 |