PlaceMatch™ lets you find places similar to any city or town you select, either using the default criteria or using criteria you specify.The criteria being used are show as column headings in the results table further below.
However, if you want to specify which factors to use in determining which places are similar to each other, you can select among dozens of other criteria. These include criteria related to crime and income, population demographics, education levels, and others; there are dozens of criteria you can select.
Please click on the [+/-] Advanced Controls link just below and try PlaceMatch using a variety of filtering criteria.
All Places > Texas > Universal City
Click this [+/-] link to see or edit the similarity criteria used.
Cities and Towns Similar to Universal City, Texas:
Sorted from most similar to least (using the default selection criteria).
Your specified criteria have resulted in 80 locations (a maximum of 100 are shown in the table below). Note that you can dictate for each each criterion (e.g., the percentage of people in poverty) whether it should match Universal City 'loosely' or 'strictly', using the Advanced Controls. This matching level, loose versus strict, is shown near the top of each column in the results table.
Click on a city or town name below to find places similar to it.
Or, to see details about a place, click its [details] link in the table below.
| City, State | Similarity | Go To City | 1 Person Houses | 65+ | College Grads | Commute Minutes | Family Income | Kids 0-4 | Non White | Pop. | Poverty | Prop. Crime | Seasonal Housing | Viol. Crime | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | ||||
| UNIVERSAL CITY, TEXAS | [details] | 24.7% | 12% | 29.6% | 22 | $59,109 | 6.4% | 19.5% | 14,849 | 7.7% | 26.1 | 0.2% | 2.4 | ||
| 1. St. Charles, Missouri | 89.6 | [details] | 29.4% | 12.2% | 26.6% | 23 | $60,175 | 6.2% | 6.7% | 60,321 | 6.3% | 28.5 | 0.4% | 2.4 | |
| 2. Grand Terrace, California | 89.2 | [details] | 21.5% | 10.7% | 24.3% | 26 | $61,068 | 6.6% | 26.2% | 11,626 | 7.4% | 25.3 | 0.4% | 1.4 | |
| 3. Benbrook, Texas | 88.6 | [details] | 28.4% | 14.7% | 32.6% | 25 | $63,529 | 5.9% | 11.7% | 20,208 | 4.4% | 27.3 | 0.1% | 1.7 | |
| 4. Forest Park, Ohio | 88.5 | [details] | 24.8% | 9.1% | 26.2% | 25 | $55,618 | 6.6% | 63.3% | 19,463 | 6% | 28.5 | 0.1% | 2.5 | |
| 5. Reynoldsburg, Ohio | 88.4 | [details] | 25.2% | 10.1% | 27.1% | 24 | $60,183 | 7.1% | 15% | 32,069 | 5.5% | 41.8 | 0.3% | 2.8 | |
| 6. Fitchburg, Wisconsin | 88.2 | [details] | 27.8% | 5.1% | 42.1% | 20 | $64,106 | 7.1% | 17.8% | 20,501 | 6.4% | 27.6 | 0.2% | 3.3 | |
| 7. Richardson, Texas | 88.1 | [details] | 22.9% | 10% | 47.7% | 25 | $72,876 | 6.7% | 24.6% | 91,802 | 6.3% | 38.3 | 0.2% | 2.8 | |
| 8. Leominster, Massachusetts | 88 | [details] | 27.8% | 13.6% | 21.9% | 26 | $54,660 | 7.1% | 12.9% | 41,303 | 9.5% | 26.7 | 0.2% | 1.4 | |
| 9. Steilacoom, Washington | 88 | [details] | 26.3% | 13.3% | 36.5% | 26 | $54,725 | 5.8% | 21.5% | 6,049 | 8.1% | 24.1 | 0.4% | 3.3 | |
| 10. Bellevue, Nebraska | 87.7 | [details] | 23.4% | 9.6% | 25.2% | 20 | $54,422 | 7.1% | 14.2% | 44,382 | 5.9% | 31.9 | 0.1% | 1.1 | |
| 11. Richland, Washington | 86.3 | [details] | 27.3% | 12.8% | 38.9% | 19 | $61,482 | 6.6% | 10.5% | 38,708 | 8.2% | 35.8 | 0.3% | 1.8 | |
| 12. West Paterson, New Jersey | 86.1 | [details] | 25.6% | 15.3% | 25.2% | 24 | $67,292 | 6.1% | 13.5% | 10,987 | 3.4% | 21.5 | 0.2% | 2.4 | |
| 13. Fridley, Minnesota | 86.1 | [details] | 26.9% | 12% | 24.4% | 23 | $55,381 | 6.7% | 11.3% | 27,449 | 7.3% | 46.3 | 0.2% | 3 | |
| 14. Sioux Falls, South Dakota | 86.1 | [details] | 29.9% | 11.1% | 27.8% | 16 | $51,516 | 7.3% | 8.1% | 123,975 | 8.4% | 35.3 | 0.2% | 3.4 | |
| 15. Redlands, California | 86 | [details] | 26.1% | 12.6% | 35.2% | 24 | $56,254 | 6.2% | 26.3% | 63,591 | 10.5% | 36.5 | 0.4% | 4.6 | |
| 16. Beaverton, Oregon | 86 | [details] | 30% | 9% | 39.1% | 24 | $60,289 | 7.2% | 21.7% | 76,129 | 7.8% | 39.2 | 0.3% | 2.5 | |
| 17. Burnsville, Minnesota | 85.9 | [details] | 24.8% | 7.2% | 36.8% | 24 | $67,979 | 7.1% | 12.5% | 60,220 | 5.1% | 31.1 | 0.4% | 1.3 | |
| 18. Walker, Michigan | 85.9 | [details] | 29.8% | 10.6% | 22% | 19 | $58,912 | 6.9% | 5.5% | 21,842 | 6.1% | 44.2 | 0.3% | 2.8 | |
| 19. Sherwood, Arkansas | 85.8 | [details] | 24.5% | 10.7% | 24.8% | 22 | $51,510 | 7.1% | 13.7% | 21,511 | 6.3% | 33.8 | 0.2% | 4.8 | |
| 20. Oak Creek, Wisconsin | 85.8 | [details] | 25.2% | 8.9% | 24.4% | 24 | $63,381 | 6.7% | 8% | 28,456 | 3.1% | 32.3 | 0.1% | 1 | |
| 21. Kenosha, Wisconsin | 85.5 | [details] | 28.3% | 12.2% | 18.2% | 24 | $51,016 | 7.5% | 16.4% | 90,352 | 9.5% | 31.7 | 0.3% | 2.4 | |
| 22. Edmond, Oklahoma | 85.2 | [details] | 20.6% | 8.8% | 47.8% | 23 | $65,230 | 7% | 13.4% | 68,315 | 7.2% | 24.4 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 23. Schertz, Texas | 85.1 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.8% | 27.5% | 25 | $59,745 | 7.5% | 18% | 18,694 | 5.2% | 24 | 0.2% | 2.3 | |
| 24. West Deptford, New Jersey | 85.1 | [details] | 27.3% | 12.2% | 21.7% | 25 | $64,477 | 5.9% | 7.7% | 19,368 | 5.3% | 22.7 | 0.2% | 1.6 | |
| 25. Grapevine, Texas | 85.1 | [details] | 22% | 4.8% | 43.2% | 26 | $84,940 | 7.4% | 11.8% | 42,059 | 4.8% | 37.6 | 0.3% | 2.1 | |
| 26. Paso Robles, California | 84.9 | [details] | 23.4% | 13.4% | 17.4% | 21 | $44,322 | 7.2% | 24.3% | 24,297 | 13.6% | 27.5 | 0.3% | 4.9 | |
| 27. Enterprise, Alabama | 84.5 | [details] | 26.1% | 14.1% | 26.4% | 19 | $45,510 | 6.5% | 28.4% | 21,178 | 13.6% | 17.1 | 0.2% | 1.6 | |
| 28. Edgewater Park, New Jersey | 84.2 | [details] | 27.7% | 13% | 19.6% | 27 | $52,016 | 5.9% | 31.9% | 7,864 | 8.6% | 30 | 0.1% | 3.7 | |
| 29. Loveland, Colorado | 84 | [details] | 23.5% | 12.5% | 27.5% | 24 | $54,337 | 7% | 7.1% | 50,608 | 5.7% | 38.8 | 0.3% | 1.8 | |
| 30. Gladstone, Missouri | 83.7 | [details] | 30% | 15.9% | 25.1% | 23 | $55,128 | 5.4% | 6.8% | 26,365 | 4.7% | 34.2 | 0.2% | 2.6 | |
| 31. Methuen, Massachusetts | 83.5 | [details] | 25.3% | 15.3% | 23% | 26 | $59,831 | 6.3% | 10.6% | 43,789 | 7.4% | 18.9 | 0.2% | 1.2 | |
| 32. Canyon, Texas | 83.4 | [details] | 29.8% | 9.6% | 41.8% | 20 | $46,250 | 6.7% | 11.7% | 12,875 | 14.3% | 13.1 | 0.3% | 1.2 | |
| 33. Boise, Idaho | 83.3 | [details] | 28% | 10% | 33.6% | 19 | $52,014 | 7.1% | 7.8% | 185,787 | 8.4% | 39.3 | 0.5% | 4 | |
| 34. Orange, California | 83.3 | [details] | 19.4% | 9.6% | 28% | 26 | $64,573 | 7.4% | 29.5% | 128,821 | 10% | 27.4 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 35. Gibsonville, North Carolina | 83.3 | [details] | 23.5% | 9.9% | 23.8% | 23 | $51,164 | 7.1% | 19.8% | 4,372 | 8.9% | 18.8 | 0.1% | 1.6 | |
| 36. Monroe, Michigan | 83.2 | [details] | 30.1% | 15% | 16.7% | 22 | $51,442 | 7.5% | 9.1% | 22,076 | 12.6% | 29.3 | 0.2% | 3.7 | |
| 37. Rapid City, South Dakota | 83.2 | [details] | 29.7% | 13.2% | 26.7% | 16 | $44,818 | 7% | 15.7% | 59,607 | 12.7% | 44.7 | 0.4% | 4.2 | |
| 38. North St. Paul, Minnesota | 83 | [details] | 27% | 11.7% | 20% | 23 | $59,652 | 6.5% | 7.1% | 11,929 | 4.2% | 40.1 | 0.1% | 3.5 | |
| 39. Wake Village, Texas | 82.8 | [details] | 20.7% | 13% | 26.3% | 17 | $47,474 | 7% | 17.2% | 5,129 | 12.2% | 21.3 | 0.2% | 1 | |
| 40. North Augusta, South Carolina | 82.6 | [details] | 30.6% | 14.2% | 28.3% | 23 | $53,172 | 7.3% | 22.3% | 17,574 | 11% | 43.6 | 0.5% | 1.8 | |
| 41. Lodi, New Jersey | 82.5 | [details] | 30.1% | 14.9% | 18.7% | 26 | $51,959 | 6.4% | 21.8% | 23,971 | 8% | 19.4 | 0.2% | 1.8 | |
| 42. Appleton, Wisconsin | 82.4 | [details] | 27.7% | 11.3% | 29.7% | 17 | $57,097 | 6.9% | 8.5% | 70,087 | 5.5% | 31.2 | 0.3% | 2.3 | |
| 43. Bloomington, Minnesota | 82.4 | [details] | 29.6% | 15.7% | 35.4% | 21 | $67,135 | 5.3% | 11.9% | 85,172 | 4% | 37.9 | 0.4% | 2 | |
| 44. New Holland, Pennsylvania | 82.3 | [details] | 26% | 16.1% | 18.9% | 19 | $50,758 | 5.5% | 9.7% | 5,092 | 5.2% | 24.4 | 0.2% | 1.6 | |
| 45. Parkville, Missouri | 82.2 | [details] | 25.2% | 6.1% | 45.3% | 22 | $86,820 | 7.1% | 9.6% | 4,059 | 6.5% | 29.1 | 0.3% | 3.5 | |
| 46. Fort Collins, Colorado | 82.2 | [details] | 26.2% | 7.9% | 48.4% | 19 | $59,332 | 5.9% | 10.4% | 118,652 | 14% | 39.5 | 0.4% | 3 | |
| 47. Yukon, Oklahoma | 82.1 | [details] | 20.1% | 10.7% | 23.2% | 22 | $52,646 | 6.5% | 9.1% | 21,043 | 6.6% | 29.1 | 0.3% | 2.1 | |
| 48. Christiansburg, Virginia | 82.1 | [details] | 26.5% | 12.1% | 25.1% | 21 | $47,428 | 7.4% | 6.9% | 16,947 | 8.5% | 38.8 | 0.2% | 1.6 | |
| 49. Chesapeake, Virginia | 82 | [details] | 18% | 9% | 24.7% | 26 | $56,302 | 7.2% | 33.1% | 199,184 | 7.3% | 38.5 | 0.3% | 5.5 | |
| 50. Huber Heights, Ohio | 81.8 | [details] | 20.5% | 9.3% | 18.9% | 23 | $53,579 | 7.3% | 15.1% | 38,212 | 5.9% | 41 | 0.2% | 1.8 | |
| 51. Westerville, Ohio | 81.5 | [details] | 21.2% | 10.4% | 44.6% | 23 | $82,163 | 6.1% | 6.5% | 35,318 | 3.5% | 31.8 | 0.3% | 1.3 | |
| 52. Golden, Colorado | 81.5 | [details] | 30.6% | 8% | 46.3% | 25 | $67,414 | 5.7% | 9.3% | 17,159 | 11.3% | 34.1 | 0.4% | 1.3 | |
| 53. Costa Mesa, California | 81.5 | [details] | 28% | 8.4% | 29.1% | 24 | $55,456 | 7.1% | 30.5% | 108,724 | 12.6% | 33.9 | 0.3% | 2.6 | |
| 54. Inver Grove Heights, Minnesota | 81.5 | [details] | 21.6% | 7.8% | 29.6% | 23 | $68,629 | 7.2% | 8.2% | 29,751 | 4.2% | 35.4 | 0.2% | 1.7 | |
| 55. Sand Springs, Oklahoma | 81.3 | [details] | 22.5% | 12.2% | 17.5% | 21 | $47,258 | 6.8% | 14.2% | 17,451 | 9.1% | 39.1 | 0.2% | 2.5 | |
| 56. Crystal, Minnesota | 81.3 | [details] | 27.6% | 14.1% | 22.4% | 23 | $54,738 | 6.6% | 11.7% | 22,698 | 4.4% | 31.6 | 0.1% | 2.4 | |
| 57. Cupertino, California | 81.3 | [details] | 19.4% | 11% | 65.4% | 27 | $109,455 | 6.1% | 49.9% | 50,546 | 4.8% | 19.5 | 0.4% | 1.2 | |
| 58. Vestavia Hills, Alabama | 81 | [details] | 27.8% | 16.2% | 60.8% | 20 | $89,746 | 6.1% | 5.5% | 24,476 | 3.1% | 12.1 | 0.3% | 1.6 | |
| 59. Carlstadt, New Jersey | 80.8 | [details] | 26.5% | 15.3% | 21% | 26 | $62,040 | 5.1% | 11.1% | 5,917 | 6.1% | 43.8 | 0.3% | 2 | |
| 60. Mount Holly, New Jersey | 80.4 | [details] | 27.7% | 12.4% | 18.6% | 25 | $52,000 | 6.6% | 31.3% | 10,728 | 9.9% | 37.8 | 0.2% | 4.8 | |
| 61. Jenks, Oklahoma | 80.4 | [details] | 18.6% | 9.1% | 31.9% | 21 | $61,050 | 7.3% | 12.6% | 9,557 | 4.6% | 21.5 | 0.3% | 1.2 | |
| 62. Bound Brook, New Jersey | 80.3 | [details] | 23.6% | 12.5% | 23.9% | 26 | $51,346 | 6.9% | 17.4% | 10,155 | 10.9% | 21.3 | 0.2% | 1.3 | |
| 63. Port Chester, New York | 80.1 | [details] | 26.7% | 12.9% | 20.6% | 22 | $51,025 | 7% | 39.3% | 27,867 | 13% | 22.5 | 0.2% | 1.9 | |
| 64. Eau Claire, Wisconsin | 80 | [details] | 29.8% | 11.9% | 28.9% | 16 | $49,320 | 5.8% | 6.6% | 61,704 | 13.6% | 37.1 | 0.3% | 2.9 | |
| 65. South Euclid, Ohio | 80 | [details] | 28.2% | 15.3% | 36.5% | 25 | $58,958 | 6.5% | 24.8% | 23,537 | 4.5% | 19.8 | 0.2% | 1.5 | |
| 66. Haledon, New Jersey | 79.5 | [details] | 23.5% | 14.1% | 18.5% | 23 | $49,014 | 7% | 26.4% | 8,252 | 10.6% | 13.7 | 0.2% | 1.1 | |
| 67. Quakertown, Pennsylvania | 79.5 | [details] | 28.4% | 15.3% | 17% | 26 | $51,194 | 6.6% | 5.5% | 8,931 | 5.9% | 39.5 | 0.2% | 3.4 | |
| 68. Shaker Heights, Ohio | 78.9 | [details] | 30.3% | 15.6% | 61.7% | 24 | $85,893 | 6.2% | 40.1% | 29,405 | 6.9% | 23.3 | 0.4% | 1 | |
| 69. Louisville, Colorado | 78.6 | [details] | 22.7% | 6.1% | 59.9% | 23 | $81,512 | 6.3% | 8.8% | 18,937 | 3% | 22.3 | 0.4% | 1.2 | |
| 70. University Heights, Ohio | 78.6 | [details] | 29.9% | 13.4% | 55.3% | 23 | $75,424 | 7.3% | 24.6% | 14,146 | 5.8% | 17.7 | 0.4% | 2.3 | |
| 71. North Olmsted, Ohio | 78.4 | [details] | 26.4% | 15% | 27.1% | 25 | $62,422 | 5.5% | 6% | 34,113 | 4.1% | 14.7 | 0.4% | 0.9 | |
| 72. White Oak, Texas | 78.2 | [details] | 18.1% | 9.6% | 21.1% | 20 | $50,781 | 6.7% | 5.4% | 5,624 | 11.4% | 22.4 | 0.1% | 3.2 | |
| 73. West Linn, Oregon | 78.1 | [details] | 17.9% | 7.8% | 49.2% | 25 | $83,252 | 6.6% | 6.7% | 22,261 | 3.9% | 19.2 | 0.3% | 1.1 | |
| 74. Irmo, South Carolina | 76.9 | [details] | 14.3% | 4.8% | 39.2% | 26 | $62,005 | 7.4% | 23.2% | 11,039 | 4.3% | 29.9 | 0% | 4.9 | |
| 75. Mustang, Oklahoma | 76.3 | [details] | 15.7% | 8.6% | 17.8% | 24 | $53,018 | 7.2% | 8.4% | 13,156 | 5.6% | 35.4 | 0.2% | 4.3 | |
| 76. South Plainfield, New Jersey | 75.5 | [details] | 15.3% | 14.1% | 24% | 27 | $72,745 | 6.2% | 22.3% | 21,810 | 3.4% | 19.4 | 0.2% | 2.2 | |
| 77. Lathrup Village, Michigan | 74 | [details] | 21.5% | 12.2% | 51.5% | 26 | $98,213 | 5.6% | 53% | 4,236 | 2.7% | 17.9 | 0.2% | 1.7 | |
| 78. Pleasant Grove, Alabama | 73.7 | [details] | 16.6% | 15.8% | 17.3% | 26 | $59,132 | 5.4% | 15.3% | 9,983 | 3.8% | 20.5 | 0.1% | 2 | |
| 79. La Canada Flintridge, California | 73.7 | [details] | 13.8% | 14% | 63.5% | 26 | $122,779 | 5.2% | 25.5% | 20,318 | 4.3% | 17.5 | 0.4% | 1.9 | |
| 80. Newcastle, Oklahoma | 72.5 | [details] | 14.8% | 8.8% | 22.5% | 26 | $59,509 | 5.5% | 10.4% | 5,434 | 4.8% | 27.8 | 0.4% | 1.1 |