 |
|
|
|
PlaceMatch™ lets you find places similar to any city or town you select, either using the default criteria or using criteria you specify.The criteria being used are show as column headings in the results table further below.
However, if you want to specify which factors to use in determining which places are similar to each other, you can select among dozens of other criteria. These include criteria related to crime and income, population demographics, education levels, and others; there are dozens of criteria you can select.
Please click on the [+/-] Advanced Controls link just below and try PlaceMatch using a variety of filtering criteria.
All Places > Virginia > Manassas
Click this [+/-] link to see or edit the similarity criteria used.
Cities and Towns Similar to Manassas, Virginia:
Sorted from most similar to least (using the default selection criteria).
Your specified criteria have resulted in 100 locations (a maximum of 100 are shown in the table below). Note that you can dictate for each each criterion (e.g., the percentage of people in poverty) whether it should match Manassas 'loosely' or 'strictly', using the Advanced Controls. This matching level, loose versus strict, is shown near the top of each column in the results table.
Click on a city or town name below to find places similar to it.
Or, to see details about a place, click its [details] link in the table below.
| City, State | Similarity | Go To City | 1 Person Houses | 65+ | College Grads | Commute Minutes | Family Income | Kids 0-4 | Non White | Pop. | Poverty | Seasonal Housing | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | loose | ||||
| MANASSAS, VIRGINIA | [details] | 21% | 5.4% | 28.1% | 35 | $70,141 | 8.6% | 27.9% | 35,135 | 6.3% | 0.2% | ||
| 1. Santa Clarita, California | 95 | [details] | 19.1% | 7.1% | 29.1% | 35 | $73,588 | 7.8% | 20.5% | 151,088 | 6.4% | 0.2% | |
| 2. Rancho Cucamonga, California | 94.3 | [details] | 16.8% | 6.1% | 23.3% | 33 | $66,446 | 7% | 33.5% | 127,743 | 7.1% | 0.1% | |
| 3. Morgan Hill, California | 93.5 | [details] | 15.8% | 7.5% | 33.5% | 37 | $90,134 | 8.1% | 27.6% | 33,556 | 4.7% | 0.3% | |
| 4. Aurora, Illinois | 93 | [details] | 20.8% | 6.3% | 29.9% | 30 | $61,113 | 10.6% | 31.9% | 142,990 | 8.5% | 0.2% | |
| 5. Antioch, California | 93 | [details] | 15.8% | 7.4% | 18.2% | 43 | $64,723 | 8.6% | 34.7% | 90,532 | 8.5% | 0.1% | |
| 6. Glendale Heights, Illinois | 92.8 | [details] | 22.4% | 5% | 26.7% | 29 | $64,115 | 8% | 36.2% | 31,765 | 6.1% | 0.1% | |
| 7. Germantown, Maryland | 92.8 | [details] | 23.4% | 3.1% | 43.2% | 35 | $67,204 | 9.2% | 37.8% | 55,419 | 4.6% | 0.1% | |
| 8. Carol Stream, Illinois | 92.4 | [details] | 21.4% | 5.7% | 32% | 31 | $74,984 | 8.2% | 21.5% | 40,438 | 3.4% | 0.1% | |
| 9. South Brunswick, New Jersey | 92.4 | [details] | 19.5% | 7.3% | 49% | 36 | $86,891 | 8.1% | 29.5% | 37,734 | 3.1% | 0.2% | |
| 10. Carrollton, Texas | 92.3 | [details] | 20% | 5.2% | 37% | 28 | $68,672 | 7.9% | 28.1% | 109,576 | 5.6% | 0.4% | |
| 11. Tracy, California | 92.2 | [details] | 14.4% | 6.4% | 18% | 42 | $67,464 | 9.4% | 34.8% | 56,929 | 7% | 0.2% | |
| 12. Broomfield, Colorado | 92.2 | [details] | 19.2% | 6.6% | 37.9% | 29 | $70,551 | 7.8% | 11.4% | 38,272 | 4.2% | 0.4% | |
| 13. Mundelein, Illinois | 92.2 | [details] | 17.1% | 6.2% | 39.9% | 30 | $75,083 | 9.2% | 21.3% | 30,935 | 4.6% | 0.2% | |
| 14. Westminster, Colorado | 91.9 | [details] | 23.9% | 6.5% | 31.3% | 28 | $63,776 | 7.3% | 15.8% | 100,940 | 4.7% | 0.3% | |
| 15. DeSoto, Texas | 91.9 | [details] | 21% | 9.3% | 30.2% | 32 | $66,986 | 7% | 51.2% | 37,646 | 5.5% | 0.2% | |
| 16. Livermore, California | 91.6 | [details] | 18.6% | 7.5% | 31.6% | 33 | $82,421 | 7.7% | 18.1% | 73,345 | 5.3% | 0.2% | |
| 17. Suisun City, California | 91.5 | [details] | 14.2% | 5.7% | 17.3% | 37 | $63,616 | 7.7% | 55.6% | 26,118 | 6.5% | 0.1% | |
| 18. Thornton, Colorado | 91.5 | [details] | 18.5% | 5.6% | 19.9% | 30 | $58,742 | 8.8% | 17.3% | 82,384 | 5.2% | 0.1% | |
| 19. McKinney, Texas | 91.4 | [details] | 18.9% | 6.8% | 39.1% | 29 | $72,133 | 10.1% | 21.6% | 54,369 | 8.5% | 0.2% | |
| 20. Cedar Hill, Texas | 91.3 | [details] | 14.7% | 4.6% | 28.3% | 34 | $63,416 | 8.5% | 43.3% | 32,093 | 5.5% | 0.1% | |
| 21. Newark, California | 91.1 | [details] | 14.1% | 7.8% | 24.2% | 32 | $71,351 | 7.2% | 47.8% | 42,471 | 5.5% | 0.2% | |
| 22. Garland, Texas | 91 | [details] | 19.7% | 7.1% | 21.8% | 29 | $53,545 | 8.2% | 34.7% | 215,768 | 8.9% | 0.1% | |
| 23. Union City, California | 91 | [details] | 11.2% | 8.1% | 29.5% | 34 | $74,910 | 7.3% | 69.8% | 66,869 | 6.5% | 0.1% | |
| 24. Lake Forest, California | 91 | [details] | 19.7% | 8.6% | 33.9% | 27 | $75,121 | 7.1% | 24% | 58,707 | 5.3% | 0.1% | |
| 25. Miramar, Florida | 90.9 | [details] | 14.1% | 6.3% | 20.7% | 34 | $52,952 | 8.7% | 56.4% | 72,739 | 8.2% | 0.4% | |
| 26. Dale City, Virginia | 90.9 | [details] | 13.6% | 3.8% | 22.7% | 42 | $69,278 | 8% | 43.2% | 55,971 | 4.4% | 0.1% | |
| 27. Plano, Texas | 90.8 | [details] | 20.2% | 4.9% | 53.3% | 29 | $91,162 | 8.3% | 21.7% | 222,030 | 4.3% | 0.3% | |
| 28. Leesburg, Virginia | 90.8 | [details] | 23% | 6.1% | 41.3% | 30 | $78,111 | 9.8% | 16.7% | 28,311 | 3.6% | 0.5% | |
| 29. Roswell, Georgia | 90.8 | [details] | 22.8% | 7.5% | 52.6% | 32 | $85,946 | 6.9% | 18.5% | 79,334 | 5% | 0.3% | |
| 30. Hoffman Estates, Illinois | 90.8 | [details] | 20.1% | 6.7% | 35.9% | 30 | $73,685 | 7.2% | 25.6% | 49,495 | 4.4% | 0.1% | |
| 31. Chino Hills, California | 90.7 | [details] | 10.8% | 4.2% | 37.6% | 41 | $81,794 | 8.7% | 43.6% | 66,787 | 5.1% | 0.1% | |
| 32. Hillsborough, New Jersey | 90.7 | [details] | 17.2% | 6.8% | 46.6% | 33 | $93,933 | 7.9% | 14% | 36,634 | 3.1% | 0.2% | |
| 33. Temecula, California | 90.7 | [details] | 12.8% | 7.1% | 25% | 35 | $62,270 | 8.9% | 21.1% | 57,716 | 6.7% | 0.4% | |
| 34. Bolingbrook, Illinois | 90.7 | [details] | 14.2% | 4.3% | 29.2% | 34 | $71,527 | 9.5% | 35.5% | 56,321 | 4.1% | 0.1% | |
| 35. Katy, Texas | 90.6 | [details] | 17.8% | 8.1% | 23.5% | 34 | $57,741 | 7.5% | 16% | 11,775 | 8.4% | 0.4% | |
| 36. Lake Dallas, Texas | 90.5 | [details] | 19.2% | 6.2% | 19.6% | 31 | $58,370 | 8.8% | 10.5% | 6,166 | 6.6% | 0% | |
| 37. Round Rock, Texas | 90.5 | [details] | 18.5% | 4.5% | 32.9% | 28 | $65,471 | 9.7% | 23.2% | 61,136 | 4% | 0.3% | |
| 38. Rancho Santa Margarita, California | 90.4 | [details] | 17.4% | 3.4% | 43.8% | 33 | $88,216 | 10.2% | 18.4% | 47,214 | 2.9% | 0.2% | |
| 39. Corona, California | 90.3 | [details] | 14.4% | 5.8% | 22% | 37 | $63,505 | 9.8% | 38% | 124,966 | 8.3% | 0.2% | |
| 40. Rocklin, California | 90.3 | [details] | 18.6% | 8.6% | 36.1% | 28 | $72,245 | 7.9% | 11.7% | 36,330 | 4.5% | 0.3% | |
| 41. Placentia, California | 90.3 | [details] | 16.1% | 9.1% | 31.3% | 28 | $68,976 | 7.4% | 32.2% | 46,488 | 8.7% | 0.2% | |
| 42. Lancaster, Texas | 90.3 | [details] | 21.3% | 9% | 18.9% | 32 | $48,498 | 8.2% | 62.4% | 25,894 | 8.1% | 0.2% | |
| 43. Mesquite, Texas | 90.3 | [details] | 20.6% | 7.1% | 18.5% | 31 | $56,357 | 7.7% | 26.5% | 124,523 | 6.8% | 0.2% | |
| 44. Brentwood, California | 90.2 | [details] | 14.7% | 9.6% | 20.9% | 45 | $75,753 | 9.7% | 26.2% | 23,302 | 5.8% | 0.4% | |
| 45. Fairfield, California | 90.2 | [details] | 17.2% | 9% | 20.4% | 30 | $55,503 | 8.5% | 43.8% | 96,178 | 9.3% | 0.2% | |
| 46. Lafayette, Colorado | 90.1 | [details] | 22.7% | 5.8% | 45.6% | 26 | $64,088 | 8% | 14.5% | 23,197 | 7% | 0.2% | |
| 47. Makakilo City, Hawaii | 90.1 | [details] | 11.3% | 6.1% | 26.3% | 37 | $67,267 | 8.6% | 75.8% | 13,156 | 5.1% | 0.2% | |
| 48. Pearland, Texas | 90.1 | [details] | 15.4% | 8.4% | 29.1% | 32 | $70,748 | 8% | 17.4% | 37,640 | 4.7% | 0.1% | |
| 49. Simi Valley, California | 90 | [details] | 14.7% | 7.6% | 24.9% | 30 | $75,140 | 7.3% | 18.7% | 111,351 | 5.8% | 0.1% | |
| 50. Fremont, California | 89.9 | [details] | 16.5% | 8.3% | 43.2% | 34 | $82,199 | 7.4% | 52.3% | 203,413 | 5.4% | 0.3% | |
| 51. Woodridge, Illinois | 89.9 | [details] | 23.2% | 5.3% | 39% | 32 | $71,546 | 7.6% | 24.7% | 30,934 | 3.8% | 0.2% | |
| 52. Streamwood, Illinois | 89.8 | [details] | 18.4% | 6.1% | 26.5% | 33 | $68,771 | 8.7% | 22.5% | 36,407 | 3% | 0.1% | |
| 53. Moorpark, California | 89.8 | [details] | 10% | 4.5% | 34.2% | 30 | $78,909 | 8.1% | 25.6% | 31,415 | 7% | 0.1% | |
| 54. Federal Way, Washington | 89.7 | [details] | 24.6% | 7.6% | 26.2% | 32 | $55,833 | 7.8% | 31.2% | 83,259 | 9.3% | 0.2% | |
| 55. Elgin, Illinois | 89.6 | [details] | 23.4% | 8.6% | 20.5% | 27 | $58,404 | 9.2% | 29.5% | 94,487 | 8.1% | 0.2% | |
| 56. Winslow, New Jersey | 89.6 | [details] | 18.7% | 8.5% | 18.6% | 35 | $62,045 | 8.2% | 34.5% | 34,611 | 6% | 0.1% | |
| 57. Hanover Park, Illinois | 89.6 | [details] | 14% | 4.1% | 20.2% | 31 | $63,990 | 8.8% | 31.9% | 38,278 | 6.1% | 0% | |
| 58. Duluth, Georgia | 89.5 | [details] | 26.2% | 4.9% | 45.7% | 32 | $69,437 | 7.6% | 31.4% | 22,122 | 4.4% | 0.2% | |
| 59. Gurnee, Illinois | 89.5 | [details] | 23.3% | 7.2% | 47.8% | 32 | $88,932 | 9.6% | 17.9% | 28,834 | 3% | 0.4% | |
| 60. Lawrence, Indiana | 89.4 | [details] | 24.6% | 8.2% | 26.8% | 26 | $56,609 | 9.1% | 21.4% | 38,915 | 6.7% | 0.3% | |
| 61. Lumberton, New Jersey | 89.4 | [details] | 24.8% | 11.1% | 30.9% | 29 | $70,329 | 8.3% | 21.7% | 10,461 | 3.8% | 0.2% | |
| 62. Old Bridge, New Jersey | 89.4 | [details] | 21% | 10.5% | 29.5% | 41 | $74,045 | 7% | 20.5% | 60,456 | 4.2% | 0.2% | |
| 63. Troutdale, Oregon | 89.3 | [details] | 13.3% | 4.4% | 20.4% | 27 | $62,203 | 8.6% | 12.5% | 13,777 | 4.8% | 0.3% | |
| 64. Douglasville, Georgia | 89.2 | [details] | 22.9% | 6.6% | 26.3% | 34 | $52,340 | 8.2% | 36.2% | 20,065 | 12.2% | 0.4% | |
| 65. Evesham, New Jersey | 89.1 | [details] | 22.9% | 8.9% | 39.7% | 31 | $77,245 | 7.3% | 8.7% | 42,275 | 2.8% | 0.2% | |
| 66. Rowlett, Texas | 89.1 | [details] | 10.6% | 5.2% | 32.5% | 34 | $73,417 | 8.7% | 18.2% | 44,503 | 3% | 0.1% | |
| 67. Duarte, California | 89.1 | [details] | 21.7% | 11.9% | 23.6% | 31 | $56,556 | 7.5% | 48% | 21,486 | 11.3% | 0.2% | |
| 68. Upland, California | 89 | [details] | 21% | 10.8% | 26.7% | 31 | $57,471 | 7% | 32.8% | 68,393 | 12% | 0.2% | |
| 69. Logan, New Jersey | 88.9 | [details] | 15.6% | 6.2% | 25% | 30 | $70,771 | 8.5% | 18% | 6,032 | 4.3% | 0.3% | |
| 70. East Windsor, New Jersey | 88.9 | [details] | 24.4% | 8.3% | 42% | 35 | $73,461 | 7.7% | 25.6% | 24,919 | 5.3% | 0.2% | |
| 71. Suwanee, Georgia | 88.9 | [details] | 15% | 4.3% | 45.6% | 33 | $91,519 | 8.6% | 15.5% | 8,725 | 2.2% | 0.4% | |
| 72. Kennesaw, Georgia | 88.8 | [details] | 22% | 5.8% | 34.5% | 38 | $67,778 | 9.9% | 18% | 21,675 | 4.5% | 0.2% | |
| 73. Elk Grove, California | 88.7 | [details] | 12.8% | 6.8% | 24.1% | 28 | $64,069 | 7.9% | 40.9% | 59,984 | 5.2% | 0.1% | |
| 74. Huntersville, North Carolina | 88.7 | [details] | 19.6% | 6.2% | 46.5% | 31 | $80,821 | 9.8% | 11.6% | 24,960 | 3.1% | 0.4% | |
| 75. Howell, New Jersey | 88.6 | [details] | 15.3% | 8.8% | 29% | 39 | $74,623 | 8% | 10% | 48,903 | 4.2% | 0.3% | |
| 76. Folsom, California | 88.5 | [details] | 21.7% | 8.8% | 37.6% | 28 | $82,448 | 6.9% | 22.1% | 51,884 | 7.3% | 0.4% | |
| 77. San Jose, California | 88.5 | [details] | 18.3% | 8.3% | 31.6% | 29 | $74,813 | 7.6% | 52.5% | 894,943 | 8.8% | 0.3% | |
| 78. Randolph, New Jersey | 88.5 | [details] | 18% | 7.3% | 59.4% | 32 | $115,722 | 7.6% | 14.3% | 24,847 | 1.4% | 0.2% | |
| 79. Sachse, Texas | 88.5 | [details] | 10.3% | 4% | 30.6% | 31 | $71,918 | 9.2% | 12.7% | 9,751 | 4.6% | 0.3% | |
| 80. Wheaton-Glenmont, Maryland | 88.5 | [details] | 22% | 11.8% | 34.2% | 36 | $62,295 | 7.2% | 50.1% | 57,694 | 8.5% | 0.2% | |
| 81. San Marcos, California | 88.5 | [details] | 20.2% | 11.9% | 20% | 28 | $51,292 | 8.8% | 32.6% | 54,977 | 12% | 0.3% | |
| 82. Round Lake Beach, Illinois | 88.5 | [details] | 14% | 4.6% | 16.1% | 37 | $61,637 | 11.3% | 25.6% | 25,859 | 5.1% | 0.3% | |
| 83. Vernon Hills, Illinois | 88.4 | [details] | 25.1% | 6.1% | 54.3% | 31 | $83,806 | 8.1% | 18.1% | 20,120 | 2.9% | 0.2% | |
| 84. Aurora, Colorado | 88.4 | [details] | 27.4% | 7.4% | 24.6% | 28 | $52,551 | 8.1% | 31.1% | 276,393 | 8.9% | 0.2% | |
| 85. West Covina, California | 88.4 | [details] | 14.7% | 10.4% | 21.9% | 35 | $57,614 | 7.6% | 56.1% | 105,080 | 9% | 0.1% | |
| 86. Missouri City, Texas | 88.3 | [details] | 12% | 5.4% | 44.5% | 34 | $77,762 | 7.3% | 55.7% | 52,913 | 3.3% | 0.1% | |
| 87. Manassas Park, Virginia | 88.3 | [details] | 14.4% | 4.3% | 20.3% | 37 | $61,075 | 10% | 27.2% | 10,290 | 5.2% | 0.1% | |
| 88. Huntington Station, New York | 88.2 | [details] | 19.1% | 10.6% | 27.9% | 30 | $67,115 | 7.8% | 28.4% | 29,910 | 11.2% | 0.2% | |
| 89. Cheverly, Maryland | 88.1 | [details] | 20% | 8% | 39.5% | 35 | $67,540 | 8.2% | 66.1% | 6,433 | 6.8% | 0.1% | |
| 90. Matthews, North Carolina | 88.1 | [details] | 17.5% | 9.2% | 42.3% | 29 | $75,791 | 7% | 9.7% | 22,127 | 4% | 0.1% | |
| 91. Mission Viejo, California | 88 | [details] | 17% | 10.9% | 41.2% | 29 | $86,902 | 6.9% | 16.8% | 93,102 | 3.8% | 0.3% | |
| 92. Windsor, California | 88 | [details] | 18.1% | 11.1% | 24.7% | 27 | $67,992 | 8% | 21% | 22,744 | 5.1% | 0.3% | |
| 93. Gilroy, California | 88 | [details] | 14.4% | 6.8% | 19.1% | 32 | $65,330 | 9.4% | 41.1% | 41,464 | 10.4% | 0.1% | |
| 94. Newcastle, Washington | 88 | [details] | 20.2% | 6.6% | 54.4% | 27 | $91,381 | 7.8% | 24.9% | 7,737 | 2% | 0.2% | |
| 95. Acworth, Georgia | 88 | [details] | 23.3% | 7.2% | 29.2% | 39 | $55,163 | 10% | 20.3% | 13,422 | 8.3% | 0.2% | |
| 96. Aberdeen, New Jersey | 87.9 | [details] | 20.8% | 10.4% | 34.4% | 37 | $76,648 | 6.9% | 21.2% | 17,454 | 4.7% | 0.1% | |
| 97. Lake Stevens, Washington | 87.9 | [details] | 16.5% | 5.7% | 20.3% | 32 | $68,250 | 8.2% | 7.7% | 6,361 | 4.4% | 0.1% | |
| 98. Concord, California | 87.9 | [details] | 23% | 10.7% | 25.9% | 33 | $62,093 | 7.1% | 29.3% | 121,780 | 7.6% | 0.3% | |
| 99. Orange, California | 87.9 | [details] | 19.4% | 9.6% | 28% | 26 | $64,573 | 7.4% | 29.5% | 128,821 | 10% | 0.2% | |
| 100. Coppell, Texas | 87.8 | [details] | 15.8% | 2.6% | 62.6% | 27 | $106,630 | 9.5% | 16.8% | 35,958 | 1.9% | 0.3% |